Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Friday, October 26, 2012

Despite Klevius islam tutorial Mediamatters still seems completely lost, or...!

Also read Klevius Sharia tutorial for Mediamatters (published a couple of years ago)!

Mediamatters Bizarre Obsession With Hiding Evil Sharia 

The problem with Mr X "president" is that he is a muslim born apostate according to Sharia (i.e. considered the worst crime in islam) - and that he, despite this proof of evilness in islam, says he "respects" islam!








Islam is Obama's real father

Mediamatters wants you to believe that the main point for Obama critics is to question the identity of his father. But almost no one cares about it. So why? The answer is that Mediamatters (and other Sharia supporters) want to distract you from the real issue namely that the person officially named his father was a muslim according to Sharia, no matter if active or not!

What’s the Harm With a Little Sharia? 

Brooke Storrs: Malaysia is considered to be a “moderate” Muslim nation giving religious freedom to its citizen population of Chinese and Indian minorities.  The country has a dual justice system, civil and Sharia.  Civil laws apply to everyone, whereas Sharia laws apply only to Muslims – in theory.  Sharia Courts in Malaysia have jurisdiction over Muslims in civil matters of marriage, inheritance, and apostasy.  The complications of Sharia Courts ruling on the law in recent years have come when someone has converted to Islam, or when someone wishes to leave Islam.  In the last several years in Malaysia, the following story has played out a few times.  A man married to a non-Muslim converts to Islam, then dies.  Upon his death, the governing Sharia Court gets into a tussle with his wife over what will happen with his body, since Muslims have different burial rites than other faiths. In a different situation that made international headlines, a man of Indian descent divorced his wife, later converted to Islam, and then tried to take custody of their children.  Sharia holds that children of Muslims are also Muslims and must not be left in the custody of a non-Muslim.  While the father did not ultimately win custody of the children, the mother is still fighting over their officially registered religion.  The courts have ruled their children are Muslims.  “Once a Muslim, always a Muslim,” is a tenet they very rarely overturn. Arguably one of the most agregious cases involved Siti Fatimah Abdul Karim, or Revathi, as she wants to be called.  She is of Indian descent, born to parents who converted to Islam, but whose Hindu grandmother raised her.  She practiced Hinduism all her life and married a Hindu.  After the birth of their little girl, Revathi went to the Sharia court to have her name changed and her official religious status changed from Muslim to Hindu.  The court detained her in a “religious rehabilitation camp” for six months while at the same time taking custody of her little girl.  After she was released, the court ordered her and her child to live with her Muslim parents.  They would not allow her to leave Islam.  Because Sharia does not allow a Muslim woman to marry outside the faith, she could not live with her husband.   The Lina Joy case also made international headlines.  Born into a Muslim family, she petitioned the civil court to have her official religious status changed from Muslim to Christian.  The courts fought her for years, ruling that she must have her hearing in a Sharia Court.  Her reasoning was in effect, “You say I must have my case heard in a Sharia Court, because I am a Muslim.  I’m telling you, I’m not a Muslim.  I’m a Christian.  The Civil Court should hear my case.”  The case reached the Civil Supreme Court in 2006 and the justices agreed to hear her case, but they eventually ruled against her.  Lina Joy’s official religion was recognized as Muslim in Malaysia which prohibited her from marrying her Christian fiancé or have children with him.  She and her fiancé have since fled the country. It is clear that even when Sharia is intended for Muslims only, it can greatly affect those outside of Islam.  So, when the tolerant among us say, “What’s the harm?  Let them govern themselves with Sharia,” let’s tell them about what has happened in the “moderate” Muslim nation of Malaysia.

Why do people continue supporting fascism and its lackeys?!

 When islamofascism/Sharia supporting Obama says he is on Israel's side, what he really means is that he is on Saudi's side against Iran!

Muslims have always fought against each other and continue to do so as you can see on the news!

And due to the efforts by Saudi based OIC combined with treacherous politicians the world is now facing a situation where it will be legal to violate Human Rights except for when Human Rights are used to boost islamofascism and its efforts to erase them and to criminalize criticism against islam, the by far worst racist/sexist ideological crime ever against humanity! 

OIC has now taken over UN and by UN forcing/luring member states to accept OIC's islamofascist Sharia declaration as "foreign law" these member states have to consider Sharia in domestic courts! This trend has to be stopped immediately.

It was through politics German voters Hitler got his power. And it's undeniable that at least one third of the Germans were racist fascists! But no one was allowed to say so. It was considered the worst of crimes.

Wake up world! The new Hitler is called Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu!


No comments: