If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!
* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBS's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Two pathetic but potentially dangerous islamofascist converts: A mother who doesn't know her daughter, and a par-anormal "professor"* in occult** Arabic fairy telling
** The word occult comes from the Latin word occultus (clandestine, hidden, secret), referring to "knowledge of the hidden".
Update: The muslim born traitor "president" demands "a more civil debate" (in his propaganda abuse of a tragedy caused by an insane left-wing murderer who apparently also symphatized with muslim terrorists). Klevius comment: Did Mr X "president" allude to OIC's sharia based blasphemy/defamation legislation in UN, which would effectively hinder ANY speach, writing, art etc considered not islam friendly enough?!
Via Paki voices BBC defends racist muslim sexism (see prev. post) against non-muslims by accusing the poor 12-14 year old foster children for "too revealing clothes" and "ease of sex". BBC also notes that muslim women (sic) weren't targeted!? In conclusion BBC blames BNP and EDL for muslim Koran triggered pedophilia. Moreover, BBC says the Koran should be followed when it says girls should be educated (in islam?!) but not when it says that non-muslim girls are allowed to be raped by muslim men. Please, do participate with more News about BBC's biased and dangerous cherry picking. Klevius comment: Is BBC more fundamentalist islamic than the Taliban?!
Don't trust this Finnish/Swedish muslim leader when it comes to islamic terrorists, she doesn't have a clue!
Helena Benaouda is chair woman of the Muslim Council of Sweden. Her daughter has a child together with Munir Awad, the Swedish terrorist who has been assisted/freed/supported etc by the Swedish state time after time, when arrested around the world for different islamic terrorist activities and preparations etc. I had no idea, Helena said. She has also said: All forms of extremism are unacceptable and I just like everyone else, must take the threat of extremism - including islamic extremism - seriously.
Klevius comment: Really! Isn't she the most cute example of perverted islamophilia (compare the papthetic Swedish convert islamofascist and former leader of Swedish muslims, Leif Carlsson aka abd al Haqq Kielan - see my 2005 posting)? An uprooted Finn in Sweden trapped by a muslim representative of evil islam! But sadly she isn't alone. The whole media and political world is full of her kinds! Let me guess, when the Saudi Arabs murdered thousands of innocent people in 9/11 she probably applauded it as did the muslm world, while her teenage daughter sucked it all up!
Don't buy a Koran translated by Sahib Bleher, he really believes in angels and other occultism, as well as in 9/11 conspiracy theories!
How many islamic jihad murders, rapes etc has this islamofascist contributed to. Is he just simple minded or deliberate?! And how on earth has any university let him and his alikes in, in the first place?! This ship wreck of distorted mind is of course boosted by BBC.
Sahib Mustaqim Bleher: "You cannot translate the Koran itself but just its meaning. We have this different concept that is the verbal revelation, direct word of god, and of course, that is not accessible for man to paraphrase, or put in his own words, but the meaning must be understood, and for those who don’t have access to the Arabic language, they need to turn to a translation."
Klevius comment: !? Ever heard such crap?! This guy is a real islamist fundamentalist "truther". He really shows he won't even in theory contribute to any attempt of reforming islam! Or perhaps he just happens to share Klevius' and the Pope's view that such an attempt is miserably doomed to fail.
Moreover, this islamofascist not only believes in an invisible and non-existing* "Allah", on top of that he also claims that he really believes in "angels", i.e. not only in a metaforical sense! For this crackpot an angel really transported him(?)self to Mohammed, at a time when Mohammed didn't even exist (first historical appearance of any Mohammed is more than half a century after his alleged death, and then only as a recarnation of Jesus on an inscription in Jerusalem and on some suspicious Malikian coins). The simple fact is that everything about Mohammed is made up of almost nothing in retrospective! "Almost"?! Well, except, of course, islam's main pillar, sex and booty jihadism resting on the immoral and racist infidel/non-believer/idolator/pagan (or whatever) excuse!
And, btw, why should only one angel spread "god's" message to only one ordinary Aramaic Arabic man when there were allegedly myriads of linguistically skilled angels (messengers) waiting for the job?! Or was this evil "god" still equally mad and revengeful as in Babel?! A religion of the Arabic language must have come handy for the Arabic speaking slave raiders/traders as well as oil billionaires!
Sahib Bleher: "The weirdest conspiracy theory out there is that a few bearded and turban-clad individuals somewhere in an unknown Afghan cave could have duped American air traffic control and penetrated the defences of the Pentagon with such apparent ease. Sure, bin Laden is still out there somewhere and Elvis lives, let's not question those truths!"
Klevius comment: Indeed! You really are a crack pot, aren't you. What's wrong with you!"Gods", angels, messengers, secret meanings only understood in Aramaic (Jesus language) Arabic, Bush bombing NY with planes etc etc.! Ever thought about seeing a doctor?
In my already diminutive book Demand for Resources (1992) I used a whole chapter (Science and References) to address the problem with peer reviews and the politicization of social scie nces. Applied to islamology it would mean that all you have left of the origin of islam is an empty bucket full of strange dynamics asking for answers. So Klevius methodology is to pick out the few bits there are, clean them from islamic "faith" dirt and propaganda, and then put these pieces together in accordance with what we know about the Medieval Mideastern keril surrounding this evil phenomenon (we do know it was evil because of its violence tracable via other sources and connections. Turns out there was no other phenomenon than a Jewish "civil war" (I know, a "civil war" without an empire or state sounds strange, doesn't it, but consider that it's still going on - see e.g. the Jewish Defence League's struggle against islam suporting Jews today) between the "Jews believing in Jesus" and other Jews, in the shadow and aftermath of the general "Sassanian wars".
We now pay the price for ever letting the theologicans stay in what was aimed to become scientific universities in the aftermath of the Enlightenment (understood as the realization and confirmation of the universal human - a renaissance thought product that had evolved as a reaction against islamic Jewish/Ottoman slave trading/raiding economy - when Shakespeare wrote about the Jew in Venice he was much better informed than Google or BBC readers in general - you reader of this are, of course, an exception).
Women's deep ignorance* about sex and religion (yet also deep involvement in) is a main contributor to the fact that this disastrous medieval Leviathan called islam is still around! This ignorance is partially inevitable because it's a physiological fact (heterosexual attraction - see below) not possible to be experienced by women, only by most men. But sex segregation is clearly visible for everyone who opens her/his eyes! And the only key is de-sex segregation. This is where Klevius happens to be in the forefront of he world right no. Unlike many other fighters against islamofascism (e.g. Pamela Geller springs to mind - she might not realize how close she is to that very islam she criticizes) Klevius isn't confined in unnecessary (usually "monotheist" induced) sex segregation. In fact, Klevius has always argued that unnecessary cultural sex segregation not only limits the potentials of girls/women, but also indirectly paves the way for islamofascism.
* Women's ignorance about sex is twofold. Firstly, they don't understand heterosexual attraction (HSA), no matter how much we talk about flowers and bees, hence ending up with a skewed and completely misleading "equal sexuality" paradigm (remember that HSA comes on top of other expressions/experience of sexuality, esthetics etc). Secondly, because sex segregation inevitably in general limits girls' potentials (not to be confused with by heart study usuccess - compare the discussion about "electrical girls and mechanical boys" in Angels of Antichrist) compared to boys, this creates an inferiority complex (not Penis envy, as Freud erroneously thought, but a general physical and cultural "skill complex") wich is then covered (i.e. explained away) by female beauty (HSA) as something culturally (not physical) feminine, which it is. In other words, the dog sex attraction (HSA) of a female behind etc physical features affecting the male brain stem, is confused (often deliberately) with the woman's personality, which has absolutely nothing to do with it. Applied to Klevius definition of the Negative Human Rights, girls/women are now (since Enlightenment) for the firsta time ever intellectually and legally freed from the reproductive "curse" of their bodies (curse only when combined with sex segregation and rapetivism - Klevius says nothing about individuals sexual activities when they aren't pushed via distorting sex segregation). However, due to its nature as a gold reservoire for excuses and hiding place for incompetency, sex segregation is often furiously defended by, yes women (what in sociology is called the "female patriarchy") not the least in muslim societies. As you dear reader know, Klevius has, since 2004 tried to tell the world via the web, that true feminism shares the sex segregated ideology of islam, hence making muslim feminism quite logical (see From Klevius without love). Although Buddha and others had their share of the "woman"problem, it's in the semitic language sphere were "monotheist" sex segregation has had its fertile ground. This is quite ineresting because only the semitic language sphere (together with later indo-European) has separate pronouns for women and men. Moreover, the first civilization in Mideast was the non-semitic and non-sexist (compared to the surrounding semitic people) Sumerian people. From this perspective it's quite disastrous that the Buddha statues in Afghanistan remain destroyed by muslims, isn't it!
For a starter to understand sex segregation in modernity, do visit Klevius Psychosocial Freud timeline, and From Freud to bin Laden. They might open some novel landscapes for you.
Klevius question to you islamophobic muslims (i.e. muslims against sharia): Are you blind and deaf?! If not
Look at this map!
Read this: The map shows OIC, dedicated to the violation of Human Rights and the introduction of worldwide sharia (its Cairo declaration), and now the largest voting bloc in UN. OIC wants to criminalize criticism of islam or anything that doesn't fit the muslim dogma about the origin of islam and the cover up/distortion of its 1400 yrs of slave finance! What this map doesn't show are all the nations were islamists are already on the verge to succeed in their often violent islamization strive (look at, for example, muslim born Mr X. "president's" Kenyan islamist "cousine"/friend - you know the guy behind the election atrocities against non'muslims and the hunt on LGBT people)! And all of this because of insane and dangerous political correctness.
Listen to this extremely low estimate on 140+ Million African victims of islamic atrocities!
Realize that the only non-occult explanation of the emergence of what we now call islam tightly follows "the extreme polemics" of Klevius! Without occultism and conspiracy theories etc.
Consider the evil impact of this muslim born (apsostate or traitor?) Mr X (all his records, incl "long form" birth certificate etc, are hidden!) "president" (supporting, or even "respecting", sharia is against the US Constitution) with all his support for the worst kind of islamofascistst, home and abroad! This traitor has been heavily backed up, not so much by the people as by the media. BBC has for a week now been busy filling every news report with this moron sponging on the Tucson tragedy. The bias is almost unbelievable! No wonder people don't trust news agencies anymore. The naked speculation in boosting Obama's crumbling support while simultaneously demonizing his opponents (the subtler the worse), is almost a copy of how he was elected by the media as the media "president". Klevius guess is that this must be one of the most disgusting exploitations ever of dead or injured people. And the murderer, mentally ill Jared Loughner, happened to be a “left-wing” like Obama himself, but also "quite lberal".
An Arizona politician seeks sharia advice from an slamic terror organization
Obama's creepy CAIR (founded by an al-Qaeda affiliate) friends have now succeeded in over talking ignorant Indiana state Rep. Bruce Borders who now, after meeting CAIR/al-Qaeda, says he won't introduce legislation that would deny recognition of the Islamic Sharia in the state!
Klevius comment: Why didn't he ask bin Laden or Mulla Omar etc, or some of his local already racist/sexist sharia practising imams?!
Muslim born Mr X "president's" first call was to the worst of islamic hate mongerers, the Saudi wahhabi caliph!
Muslim born Mr X "president" has proved to be a professional stand up orator (although his educators' advices are embarrassingly obvious).
Muslim born Mr X "president" (or his advisors) has utilized the inferiority complex (i.e. racism) that darker skin seems to cause among many of its bearers.
Do we really need to boost human reproduction on this planet by the help of islamic sharia rapetivism? Over population is the main threat today, especially for the poor ones. Islam is based on rapetivism, i.e. the reproduction of as many new muslims as physically possible. Economically islamic ideology is based on parasitism, i.e. the enslavement of others. Islam itself therefore has no capability to feed itself. Quite the opposite to, e.g. China, which has allowed only one child per family, is non-theist, and a powerful producer of the only real asset, technology.
The only possible reform of islam is its eradication. And the faster the better if we want to minimize the suffering. And here your best terminator is called Negative Human Rights, i.e. the basis for the freedom part of the Universal Human Rights Declaration from 1948. Negative rights for a positive future without islam. Criminalize islam, not those who point to the historical fact that islam is the worst crime ever against humanity!
If you'd like to participate in this extremely important and humanitarian intellectual charity work against the exploitation of humans, please start commenting on Klevius BBC News blog, aimed to point out media bias favoring evil racist/sexist islam.
Klevius, your extremely normal* intellectual butler at your service.
* Klevius is so normal so he is despised by most left and right wingers. And his defense of LGBT people, and especially his criticism of sex segregation, wipes off most of the rest. But again, so extremely normal so he's positioned just right in the middle between those who support islamAND LGBT, and those who oppose islam AND LGBT, as well as those who support feminism AND islam, and those who oppose de-sex segregation AND islam (to understand this latter you're adviced to read Klevius Definition of feminism). However, apart from being extremely normal, Klevius is also extremely intelligent, which fact you shouldn't waste on problematicing Klevius but rather islam. :)