Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Islamic OIC "human rights" (Sharia) for muslim women: You have the right to be fucked whenever your husband feels for it!
see Origin of islam
However, according to the Enlightened* Western (i.e. global/universal) Negative Human Rights a woman has the right not to be fucked! If you have difficulties understanding this difference between night & day, pls don't hesitate to comment/ask below!
* "Enlightenment" was the period during which it became obvious that a true human moral can only be built on the logic of ALL humans as equals regardless of sex etc. without any loopholes such as the islamic "duties", "responsibilities" etc in the sexist Cairo declaration on "human rights"!
Abdulaziz Othman Altwaijri at The Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ISESCO) established by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC):” The Islamic concept of enlightenment is based on a solid foundation of belief and science.”
Klevius comment: The Western (global/universal) concept of enlightenment is based on an even far more “solid foundation” of logic! Foundations built on belief ARE NO FOUNDATIONS AT ALL! Ask a builder! The bigger the mosque or church, the smaller the individual’s rights! This is also why socialists & islamic "believers" share a common interest to deny Negative Human Rights (the basic freedom space surrounding the individual through which sexist or racist islamic Sharia intrusions shouldn't be allowed).
Instead of protecting the collective we need to protect the rights of the weakest in the society, the individual. Sharia doesn't protect the freedom of women, it locks them up! See also Klevius article Social democracy & the rights of the individual (1994 in Swedish) & Angels of Antichrist - the social state vs kinship (1996).
Not only has the islamofascist OIC (57 islamist nations led by the Saudi Caliph, you know, Mr X “president’s” first call) stolen the name ‘human rights’ and applied it to it’s extreme opposite, Sharia, but they have also tried the same with Enlightenment! When do you really gonna get it? These islamists are racists/sexist fascists using UN for trying to deny women and girls equal freedom rights!
Because of Islam's inborn evil inconsistancy islam is doomed forever to burn in the fire of Enlightenment! And the longer it takes for people to realize it, the longer the suffering of islam's victims!
The desperate white washing of not only islam's dirty origin, but also islam's very essence, sexist sex segregation (rapetivism), ought to be put under sharp light, not the least because of the widespread ignorance, naivity & deliberate political confusion of the issue.
Klevius question: Isn't it kind of embarrassing that Klevius is still your best & only reliable source on sex segregation?
Just look at the total 'gender' confusion out there! The real disaster seems to be Wikipedia. Just look at their gender page & due discussion forum. The only thing that stands definitely clear is a messed up naive & confused but extremely tendentious agenda against "Western gender views". It's very laughable in its would-be-wise attitude with talk abt "original research" etc while heavily pushing for "original bias" instead.
Just google 'gender klevius' & you get the best on the net abt it! So far Klevius has no competitors whatsoever when it comes to the understanding of sex segregation, the basic element in "monotheist" "religions" culminating in islamic rapetivism.