Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Rick Santorum: Three muslim students at Harvard University, one man and two women, who wore Western-style clothes and spoke English with little or no accent, disputed my description of Islam as it's practiced in the Middle East, maintaining that al-Qaeda's version of islam in no way reflects the islam that is practiced around the world. So I asked: Should apostates - muslims who convert to another religion - be subject to execution?
One of the women quickly said no. She insisted that she was free to leave islam if she wanted to, and that she knew other people who had done so without a problem - in the United States.
I said: What if they lived in a muslim-majority country?
Silence. Eventually, the young man blurted out, "That's different because in Muslim countries, islam and the government are one, and converting from islam is the equivalent of treason against the government, punishable by death." The two women agreed.
Klevius comment: This is why muslims can't participate in democracy without abandoning islam! This is also why muslim born (without committing open apostasy as yet - in islam you can pretend to be a Christian for the sake of islam) Mr X "president" is unconstitutional, as are all truly muslim politicians.
Again, if you don't understand the mechanism behind islam's initial success 1400 yrs ago, you end up in exactly these situations. Without knowing exactly these persons the statistical scenario is that the women represented ignorance while the man represented the evilness of Mohammed/islam.
When women share this evilness it's usually due to family, marriage etc. Of course you know that in islam women are forced to sexually satisfy muslim men while forbidden from having relations with non-muslim men. However, muslim men can have sex with both muslim & non-muslim women, four wives & an unlimited amount of concubines. Moreover, the kids are always his & muslim from birth, & it's the women's duty to foster them to obeying muslims who despise non-muslims (what Klevius call muslim racism) under the threat of Sharia/apostasy ban.
Btw, why is it that so many ask if apostasy is punishable by death? The question ought to be: Is apostasy punishable (legally or socially)? I guess this is one of a variety of islamic tactics to keep as much as possible of evil original islam alive. Islam is built on sex & threats. Sex for men & threats for women & other infidels!
To really understand the perversity of not only islam but also our own submission to its evilness, read how Jewish slave trade evolved into islamic totalitarianism in Origin of Vikings.