Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
And prove me wrong, but this is the worst of terrorists with his (& his pals) fingers deeply involved in the Taliban movement as well as radical islamist elements in Pakistan, Philippines & abt everywhere where there's a Saudi funded/supported school, mosque , university etc! The evil islamist hate mongerer & hypocrite Saudi "king" Abdullah (& Co) who, on the one hand admits that "islam cannot compete with science/technology", but on the other hand, wants to benefit from islam's inborn evilness. As a criminologist I understand that unreported & in police reports unconnected islamic hate crimes (boosted by Koran verses etc deliberately distributed by Saudi oil Billionaires) may be hard to see as an entity but when you do the numbers get huge, not the least because these crimes are also largely blinked, hence paving the way for further intimidation/submission. And now the old evil chap wants to wash (with Western oil money) his reputation as one of the world's most intolerant dictators (in the most intolerant of nations, with no freedom for other faiths or faithlessness), guilty of an unknown (but apparantly enormous) number of murder/rape/robbery/assault etc victims due to islamic street jihad agitated for from madrassas, mosques, schools, universities etc that he has sponsored/sanctioned. Not to forget the Millions in Darfur etc whose blood is on his & his good pal's (Sudan's "president" Bashir, who is wanted for arrest by the Haague) hands.
When you know the real forces (i.e. islam's ideological soul) behind the Origin of islam you have only two choices left:
1 Puke & commit apostasy, or
2 Continue as nothing has happened, i.e. being a bigot/hypocrite muslim. Or maybe you're an extremist who really likes true original islam?!
The third alternative, i.e. reforming islam, is hypothetical & impossible, precisely because the very backbone of the original islam (i.e. Koran's infidel racism+slavery+rapetivism+apostasy ban jihad) of course, contradicts everything a normal* & decent world citizen would agree on today.
Saudi "king" Abdullah has long since given up any dream of reconciling islam with the inevitable power of Western civilization based on technology & negative human rights (after having read it you hopefully understand why "responsibilities" aren't & cannot be connected to Negative Human Rights, only to democratic laws which don't violate NHR)! Abdullah understands that he has eventually to submit to "Western" civilization, although he wants to squeeze out as much as possible of his evil medieval Leviathan. Runs in the family.
However, although Abdullah's KAUST (the new Saudi university paid by Western tech money the "House of Sand, um, Saud" has stolen from others) is presented by "king" Abdullah as a "scientific center that embraces all peoples" & that it's "the first line of defense against extremism", it still preserves extremely outdated sex segregation. So for example, aren't women allowed to swim in the same pool as men**, etc etc. So no matter how "radical" (from an islamic point of view) KAUST will still stick to sexist customs we in the West haven't seen for >100 yrs!
According to "king" Abdullah "faith and science cannot compete except in unhealthy souls". I agree, letting a totalitarian monogod into your soul will inevitably make it filthy - see Klevius definition of religion). This means that he has given up islam's validity in one of the most essential parts of modern life.
And always remember that Klevius blogs/sites are the only ones***, so far, addressing the very root cause, i.e. sex segregation! A burqa or veil is almost always remote controlled by a Mohammed copy! Except, of course, when it's not just feeble minded fashion.
Read Islam doesn't deserve Human Rights
* As has been repeatedly stated on this & other KLEVUX/Klevius blogs/sites, Klevius is an extremely normal world citizen. Why/how? Because instead of resting his morality via a "god" he takes it from his fellow world citizens. As everyone (except many monogod people) already knows, building one's moral on a private "god" (i.e. a moral black hole) or on a totalitarian "god", both reduces the responsibilities of the individual (see Klevius Definition of religion)!
** As you know, in islam it's believed that (muslim) men cannot see a woman without risking getting mad!
*** Yes, it's a heavy burden, but I have to admit it's a lot of fun as well. Why? Because it has grown so big, yet is still so simple. When Wollstonecraft in the 1790s wrote abt sex segregation most women had no access to her writings or possibility to really evaluate their segregated position. However, while sex segregation has become utterly visible in modernity, its defense has grown at an equal rate starting with Victorian time psychoanalysis etc (see e.g. Rapetivism from Freud to bin Laden) & feminism/chauvinism (to understand this you may read From Klevius without love), & of course, the ultimate sex segregation, islam. This defense has now become such a big bubble that nothing could be easier than picking its monstrous contradictions. If you just want/dare to do it!