Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
The worst enemy of the free world & its puppet, the muslim born* bowing moron, Mr X “president” of the United Media
MR X, FACE IT, YOU LOST ALL CREDIBILITY IN THE FREE WORLD & MOREOVER, PAINTED YOURSELF IN A CORNER WITHOUT RETURN! As long as the U.S. Constitution defends freedom of/from religion, freedom of girls/women etc. USA is at war with islam & will always be! Klevius quiz: How come that Mr X (Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro - or whatever) who was "assisted" into Harvard law school by Abdullah's legal advisor (a NOI racist) & specialized in constitutional issues, seemingly doesn't understand the basics of the basis of democracy & human rights (i.e. negative human rights)? If he did he would never be able to "respect" islam. Or is he already so convinced that he can turn the US constitution upside down by the help of his powerful islamofascist pals & the United Media?! He certainly already sidestepped the constitution when he became "president" without even proving his own identity!
* To our knowledge Obama hasn't committed open apostasy as yet. As a muslim he can't be a president (yes, there are those other reasons as well) because islam (in any logical meaning of the word) doesn't permit the freedom entitled by the U.S. constitution, e.g. freedom of/from religion. Compare this to islamofascist Saudi Arabia & its evil dictator (the most important representative/caliph of islam) he bowed for! This is why apostasy (leaving islam) is considered the worst crime against islam**. On the other hand, if he did leave islam at some point (after being in Pakistan as a 20 year old & changing his name from Barry to Arabic Barack?!) he violates the most central tenet in islam which fact also proves that a true muslim can never be in accordance with the US constitution or Negative Human Rights!
** Why don't you get it MR X? Didn't you read history or were the books already changed in favor of islam?! The "faith" you "respect" is based on enslavement, the number of victims by far exceeds any other ideology on the planet, it's totalitarian, & once in (via birth) you are stuck. Add to this all the other one-way tricks of islam, e.g. sexist abuse of women as sex slaves & ideological reproducers under the threat of Sharia & apostasy ban, a muslim man can marry whoever & the kids become muslims while a muslim woman can only marry muslims etc etc. The basic formula of islam consists of everything opposite to the idea of freedom of the individual as described in the US constitution & the UN Declaration of 1948!
The Saudi "king", the "islamic world's caliph", is the main representative of islamic hate mongering all over the world through mosques, schools, universities etc. He is also behind the Cairo declaration of islamic "human rights" (which is the very opposite to the original Human Rights Declaration of 1948), which denies girls & women freedom (to make this evil islamic declaration look more positive it's embedded in a retorics of "accepting cultural traditions". This is also the guy behind OIC's (57 islamofascist countries who have hijacked UN's Human Rights Council) UN resolution to criminalize criticism of islam. Nothing of this info can be found on Wikipedia which instead praises this man's "philanthropy". Apart from the fact that it's easy to be philanthropic when you sit on a mountain of money given to you without you doing anything, the Saudis are famous for "islamic philanthropy", i.e. to use donations for the purpose of spreading islamofascism (compare, for example, Klevius post on how the Saudi house acted in the Tsunami catastrophe!). And, as described elsewhere on this blog, the "House of Saud" was founded on plantation slavery outside Riyadh & the whole of the country was stolen by the help of a few jihadists. But Mr X Obama (or whatever) is by no means Abdullah's only friend. "Obama" has to share him with e.g. Sudan's Omar al-Bashir (indicted by the International Criminal Court for what has been described as the Darfur genocide).
Rakesh Maria (Mumbai): “My boys have ferreted out the real conspiracy behind the attack. The danger we have exposed is not only to India, but to the whole world. The sooner the world realizes that, the better.”
Klevius comment: And the sooner the world realizes that it's islam per se, the better. Contrary to the proposed picture of islam prevalent in mainstream media, islam is not less but more related to crimes/terrorism than generally thought. This is because most islamic atrocities are under reported no matter how intensely the committed crimes/terror acts are linked to islam. And as you know, islam is an evil political ideology outlined for the purpose of offering moral comfort for what otherwise would be classified as pure evilness. A robber's moral.
Get rid of your cowardice fear & dangerous ignorance:
Origin of islamWhat is rapetivism?
Origin of religion