If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!
* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBS's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, October 25, 2005
In honour of Rosa Park, Martin Luther King & Linda, brave white victim of senseless racism/sexism (boosted by oil-fueled Arabic Islam?)!
IS ISLAM THE WORST CRIME EVER AGAINST HUMANITY? (Also see klevius.info & postings/links below)
Robert Spencer: "...anyone who leaves Islam should be killed (which is based, of course, on a statement of Muhammad himself: see Bukhari, vol. 9, bk. 84, no. 57)"
Dangerous blinkers: Just focusing/searhing for "good" parts in Islam is like focusing on Hitler's moustache! "Moderate" "Muslims" have to position themselves. Latest example was when Islam spat Kurdish Nalin Pekgul, leader of Sweden's socialdemocratic women, publicly straight in her face, accusing her for "racism" against Islamists.
The pan-Arabic Islam formula: Confine (sex segregate) females as institutionalised reproducers (physical or cultural) of Arabic Islam. I.e. a sort of sex segregated language imperialism, which also can be used by non-Arabic fascists - as long, of course, as Koran is read in Arabic
(see the pan-Arabic veil trap)
For well over a millennium, across three continents - Asia, Africa,and Europe - non-Muslims have experienced jihad war ideology, and its ugly corollary institution, dhimmitude. Today, the debate among Muslim scholars regarding the theological "correctness" of "lesser" versus "greater" jihad are meaningless to the millions of non-Muslim victims". Ibn Khaldun (the most recognized Arabic historian: "In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. ..The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense. ..Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations."
Ultimate sexist Tariq Ramadan - also see From Freud to bin Laden): "Islam is not the problem. The problem is with Muslims. But Islam "accounts for the rise of fanatical imams whose medieval mind-set contorts the Koran for their own ends and who remain wilfully ignorant of western life."
Peter Klevius: Arabic Islam is the problem, not the "Muslims".
A cynical and hypocritical, political vote-fishing: Leftist/liberal "bourgeois" well-off white politicians sacrify "ghetto-whites" (who, in reality, are much less racist than themselves), because they know they probably get the votes anyway. But to really ensure it, every criticism is called "right-wing", "racist", or even worse! And while racism against whites (created by this political propaganda/agitation) may in fact be the most common, and sometimes spills over from the ghetto-people to the well-offs, it's just blinked away. In this political process these naive and/or selfish, greedy politicians sell their souls to cooperation with Arabic Islam, a good candidate for the title worst fascism ever! Most western countries (incl Sweden's disastrous Malmö - the city where Mohammed is by far the most common forename among newborn) seem now to have their own "Galloways". However, if you really want to get rid of racism/sexism globally, this road to hell should be changed to something more in line with KLEVUX!
SWEDISH MEDIA HYPOCEISY. Sweden's former Pol Pot supporting (now eager supporter of Arabic Islam) state radio tells us that Muslims are the most common reporters of racism. Really! So?! An absolute majority of Sweden's immigrants call themselves "Muslims", and according to the law its impossible for a white non-Muslim Swede to report Islamic etc atrocities, namings, and racist behavior, no matter how racist they are!
Saturday, October 15, 2005
Islamic brotherhood built on racism and raped and veil trapped sisters! Is Arabic* Islam the worst of crimes?
Klevius definition of the holy negative human rights
Klevius definition of religion
What is sex segregation
From Freud to bin Laden
From Klevius without love
KLEVUX - the only site on the net addressing sex segregation as a key issue in this context!
*Update for those wondering abt "Arabic" (also see previous posting abt Arabic linguistic oil-imperialism and Arabic/Islamic slave racism/sexism): See e.g. B. J. Stock: "It is interesting that those Islamics committing these heinous acts believe absolutely that the Quran orders them to do these things to achieve Mohammed’s plan of Islam dominating the world. Yet, all the world hears is the plea from Muslims to understand that Islam is a religion of peace and love. If that is so, does this mean that Islamics who are terrorists use a Quran that is different from the “peaceful” Muslim’s Quran?"
Some historical hints due to received questions/feedbacks: We all ought to face the fact that Arabic/Islamic slavery is the longest, cruelest and most widespread in time and size (even more so proportionally if we consider lower global population figures during the almost thousand years of its existence BEFORE the Atlantic slave trade!). But that's not all. Rapes/slaves/infidels trinity is the very heart of successful Islam. Although Mohammed’s followers were mainly young males (usually sons of the richest), when he "exiled" in African Abyssinia to "gather strength", he in fact, followed a racist "colorist" trail that was long since established. Research is still scant on this topic but P. Klevius' hypothesis, in line with later development, suggests that a combination of "recruitment" and forced/raped slavery, centering around the Islamic "infidel" concept, is the very key to Islam's success as a "religion" (We alredy know that the tradition of orphan child-soldiers/slaves constituted a main part of later Muslim armies - compare young Islamists today terrorizing streets globally! Interestingly there's a rumour abt an "African" as the first killed in battle!). This view also explains Mohammed's military victory over the other Quraysh. In conclusion one might say that Islam as a whole is like e.g. Hamas etc! A combination of cheap "bribes" to the "weaks", "infidel" rhetorics and compulsion(submission)/violencen etc. The indisputable truth is that it was his miltary successes that eventually rendered Mohammed his autocratic power!
"Islam has never known any brotherhood or equality even within its 'millat'"
Also note the hypocritical, racist (against non-Muslim immigrants and natives) and deceitful Islamic tradition (compare above) of using the term "immigrants" as synonymous with "Muslims" by Islamists and their supporters.
ISLAMIC MISSIONARY SEX: Arabs "married" & confined helpless girls/women after their menfolk had been killed/enslaved. Sharia made it possible to marry/divorce several times a day, and to keep unlimited number of concubines - hence strongly supporting the spread of Arabic Islam! And it's still on!
also see: Klevius on the veil trap!
Testimony of Claude Moniquet, Director General of European Strategic Intelligence and Security Center: "Now at least half of the female Muslim population wear the veil. In some municipalities in France, the figure is about 80%. From field investigation we know that in most cases those girls and women didn’t really choose to wear the veil but were “forced” to do so by family or community pressure. In some European cities, a Muslim girl who refuses to wear the veil leaves herself open to insults, physical aggression, sexual harassment and even collective rape. In France, those aggressions happen regularly."
Shocking update from Sudan: In Islamic Sudan a 16-year old (Christian) girl is forced to flee from Darfur and then gets sentenced by Islamic Sharia to severe flogging for becoming preganant. This happens simultaneously as the Islamist government sets up a "Potemkin front" of a "special Attorney Office for Crimes against Humanity"! This kind of creeping Islam is far more dangerous than whoever bin Laden or his wanna bees!
True democracy needs to challenge Islam! By Lee Jay Walker
The Caliphate of Jihadistan!
Western leaders keep saying after every terrorist attack, "This is not about Islam." Sorry, but this is all about Islam
Bolton: The Arab Muslims continue to attack their black Muslim neighbors. The government-backed Janjaweed militia has been raping the women, burning everything in sight and killing anyone who gets in their way.
Somalian alleged al-Qaeda terrorist: "The Western world should respect our own ideas (Islam) in choosing the way we want to govern our country, the way (Islam) we want to go about our own business. That is our right," he said. He said he plans to have an important role in the country’s future. "I can influence all of my people with the faith (Islam) and our religion (Islam)," Aweys said. "The existing government is not an Islamic one and we will be having our own Islamic faith and we will be very strong in influencing our people."
Klevius comment: Read Ugly iceberg of bigotry - a revealing example of how leftist/feminist "research" (in fact pure propaganda wrapped in an academic label) is made and used to support abusing/beating/raping/killing Islam!
And again - KLEVUX is the only site yet on the net addressing sex segregation as the core issue in this context. Some people may be hurt/surprised, though, to know that real feminism is, in fact, chauvinism just like Islam, and that real emancipation is what many people just call feminism (see Klevius definition of feminism).
Also see: Indonesian Islamic-Muslim crypto-creationism hinders science abt the Flores "Hobbit"
Friday, October 14, 2005
Monday, October 10, 2005
Arabic "Negro slaves" and slave armies underlying the senseless & hypocritical myth of the "good" Islam in medieval Spain.
A shallow "undergraduate" introductory presentation of Arab-Islam's horrendous crimes against Africans and others (Muslims were especially attracted by blond Europeans - that's how Christians learned to catch "infidels" - the Arabic/Islamic "infidel"* concept in Koran*** etc is one of the most evil tools for expansionism among "religions"-/political/militaristic totalitarian ideologies - such as Finns, Slavs etc from the North and trade them to Muslims). Not to teach these and similar facts (and the totalitarian, violent sexist and racist anti-democratic and anti-human rights texts in Koran) for innocent school children, is an additional crime. Every nation, state, school etc. who teaches about Islam while witholding this kind of info, ought to be legally scrutinized and sued. Who files the first application for a summon?.
* The Arabic/Islamic "infidel" concept in Koran etc has to be understood together with the proposition that individuals who do not submit to the "Allah" described in the Arabic/Islamic Koran, are no real humans, and hence could (and even should) be humiliated, raped, killed, enslaved etc. Jews, and sometimes even Christians, where placed somewhere in between as "people of the book" due to the forced connection originally made on the basis of what Mohammad learnt from the Jews in Medina who were then killed/expelled for not submitting to the new Arabic "religion" (see What's true Islam/Arab?).
*** The Arabs, who didn't know how to make paper, captured some Chinese paper makers, hence making the spread of Koran possible
Morocco and Spanish Andalucia were two of Islam's main evil medieval centers prospering on the enormous trading and work of especially African but also other slaves. These not only constitute the much worse backbone and base for what later evolved into the Atlantic slave trade", but also are revealing examples of how politically correct history inbterpretations may, in fact, cover up the worst of evilness. Many nations and -isms have already reconsiled and apologized for their historical atrocities. Arabic Islam has not!
"With Negroes brought from West Africa and Slavs from Russia, the Spanish Muslim capital of Cordoba became one of the greatest slave-markets in the world. With the decline of Muslim Spain, this bulk of this trade shifted to East Africa**. By this time, some peoples of Africa had come to depend upon the slave trade, and Zanzibar had become the great slave emporium. Wars between African tribes were not fought to kill, but to take prisoners who could be exchanged with Arab slave-traders for imported goods. It has been estimated that 25% of the slaves taken out of Africa ended up in Muslim lands. Even more important, this centuries-old trade had rooted the institution in the African economy and had established the general pattern of that trade."
** see The Arab Slave Trade is the longest yet least discussed
Without their wealth created by slavery and the help of maps and ships made and given by Visigothic traitors, Arab-Islam would never have been capable of entering Iberia!
Without slaves or oil no Islam!
Peter Klevius sites and blogs grow faster than oil-fueled Arabic Islam and al-Jazeera!
Klevius (sually) top-rated on MSN:
Definition of religion
Definition of feminism
Definition of human rights
Out of Africa (as "Pygmies" and back as global "Mongoloids").
and many others. Peter Klevius' politically not correct (yet rudimentary and unsponsored) AIQ net Klevux is (because of its transparency, global contributions, logical flexibility and reliance on the "Holy" negative human rights) developing into an irresistable critical net of logic targeting evil, totalitarian, sexist or racist -isms.
Friday, October 07, 2005
Thanks to Bush, Condi & Blair, Turkey ready for EU negotiations. Western free, secular pluralism softly killing Arabic Koran-Islam!
Pluralism vs. monolitheism. While terror-Islam now seems successful in blowing most of its own head off, the free world is still threatened by "radical moderates" with similar racist/sexist totalitarian reading habits!
Islamophobia (Koranophobia) based on anti-sexism/anti-racism/anti-totalitarianism is sound anti-fascism and perhaps the most important grassroot movement ever. It targets inhumane sexist/racist, totalitarian texts, and due political/militaristic/linguistic pan-Arabic "capitoilislamic" totalitarian racist/sexist attitudes, deeds, laws, customs etc. encouraged by them. It has two strong enemies, though: Political Islam, i.e. powerful state propaganda/politicians (assisted with liberal/leftist media) on the one hand, and people who confuse their "Muslim" ethnicity with racist/sexist totalitarian pan-Arabic Koran-Islam, on the other!
A lot of completely different people call themselves "Muslims", but there's only one totalitarian Koran text, full of racism/sexism, and, according to a recent study, more violent to its content than any other main religious text! This book is then said to be the heart of an ideology that no one takes responsibility for (see e.g. Roger Scruton).
Furthermore, European "Muslims" (study made in England) seem to be alarmingly hypocritical and immoral in picking/using/supporting different suspicious aspects of Islam (i.e. aspects in clear opposition to negative human rights!
So what's Islam? Well, see the postings below, follow the links, and think, dude!
Sunday, October 02, 2005
Is an Islamic non-proliferation treaty needed? And can Koran be read selectively? Anti-fascism called Islamophobia!?
Also see: Does the Pope want to castrate Islam?
Modern Islam (i.e. basically forced/exported oil-fueled pan-Arabism) has to, and indeed, is, actively trying to distance itself from essential but un-democratic and incredibly inhuman parts of Koran, while leaving “good” parts untouched for ritual usage (which in fact is only a superficial connection to Political Islam - see posting below).
But not any Muslim (and few non-Muslims) dare to say this openly because Koran is the heart of pan-Arabic Islam and the tie between terror fundamentalists and "moderate" fundamentalists! Here exactly goes the line that makes Islam completely impossible as a worldview, and all of its followers, radicals and moderates, inseparably lumped together. And if a “moderate” Islamist/Muslim does abandon Koran (and survive), is s/he then a Muslim anymore - see third posting below? And who is the right representative of Islam to decide who is a real "Muslim"? As you may already know Islam has the most violent and aggressive texts of all main religions, and Islam also completely lacks internal responsibility. Doesn't sound like a good combination for an ideology that talks abt "infidels" and expressly wants to rule the world!
(see Klevius' Definition of religion!
Adonis' veil trap: a confined sexist/racist insult against others, simultaneously strangling its wearer with sex segregation!
Also see Klevius Definition of feminism (most visited on MSN)!
Adonis’ naive view on veils as just fluttering in the wind of interpretations is, in fact, the blindness of a misogynist, deeply embedded in an Islamic/Arabic tradition of sex segregation, the extent of which he himself really seems to be unaware of.
Who’s an Arab?
Well, who’s an English speaker? Arab is a very late branch of Hebrew/Aramaic, and its first main texts are those compailed during 23 years following Mohammad's death, in what is now called Koran (which actually means 'to read'). Mohammed can be compared to Cædmon who at approximately the same time created deeply religious texts in England (also based on the Judeo/Christian tradition). However, Cædmon doesn't have the same amount of violent and militaristic records.
According to Koran "Islam does not mean peace"!
"An examination of the history of Islam and of the relationship of the West to it shows that there are always those in the West who will make common cause with Islam. Without their aid, Islam would have long ago collapsed"
May I finally quote "Helen": "As long as its a Muslim country trying to make an Islamic/Arab bomb, El Baradei will always claim that it's too soon to tell ... until the bomb goes off"
Klevius comment: Really?!