Peter Klevius started as an empty
origo/singularity whose existencecentrism (mind) now is the sum of his
experience with his surroundings and due synaptic adaptations, while
also constituting part of the surroundings of others. A canvas which
doesn't have a soul/self of its own but does reflect what it has
experienced and adapted to. However, the false impression of having a
"self", "free will" etc. rests on language, i.e. the use of the word 'I'
which animals and humans without language lack. As a human with
language you are in the same position as Peter Klevius, and together we
all (incl. non-language humans) make up the total existencecentrism of
humankind - and the key to a universal human with (negative) Human
Rights without irrational exceptions and impositions. So when Peter
Klevius talks/writes/acts, he does so against a background that includes
the latest synapses combinations in his brain as well as what his other
nerve signals bring to his thalamus from his body and other
surroundings.
Why trust an individual like Peter Klevius more than academic peer constellations?
Because Klevius is a free individual - and because he (unlike islamists,
socialists etc) accepts full Human Rights equality (so called 'negative
rights') hence making him immune against bias common among many
scientists! And it certainly doesn't hurt that Klevius happens to have
an IQ far beyond most professional academics - while also featuring a
rock stable mentality combined with no political, religious or academic
hindering ties.
Peter Klevius biological father, Olof Kinnmark, was one of Sweden's best
chess players (he managed to win the Gothenburg championship over a
span of some four decades), and Klevius half-sister (same mother but
less intelligent father) managed to top IBM's European IQ test (IQ 167)
in their brain hunt in the early days of computing. Klevius mother's two
brothers both had engineer as well as economy degrees and had leading
occupations in some of Finland's biggest companies.
So..., as Klevius was told after having done the military IQ test (they
never gave the actual numbers though): 'If you ever have any
difficulties - don't blame your brain for it!' However, that's precisely
what Klevius has kept doing ever since by calling himself mentally
impaired - meaning it's not always easy to communicate with people of
average IQ - not the least because first you have to lower the bar so
you can communicate, and when doing so your partner starts easily
disrespecting/belittling what you say, and when you explain it a little
deeper then they usually get hurt. But to those who really know Klevius
he defends himself by pointing to the fact that they have all the time
they need to check him out afterwards and possibly correct and embarrass
him -, if they can (compare Klevius writings). As a close friend of
Klevius used to say: 'I hate when you give up so quickly when you're
wrong. That leaves me with too little space to really enjoy my victory.
And when I'm proven wrong I can't give up equally quick'.
The photo below was taken after Finland, as the first country in the
world, got full* suffrage for women - but long before the US, UK, and
most other countries got the same right.
* Meaning they could also be elected.
Now we have the unbelievable situation that the US not only lacks full
equality for women in the Constitution (due to religious prejudices -
see the tragic history of the Equal Rights Amendment) but also that US
women let themselves be cheated by a sharia supporting crooked money
puppet who just happens to have a Vagina. So Trump's alleged kisses and
hugs and statements to some women mean more than EVERY woman's right to
equality?! Good job done by Saudi sponsored politicians and media - and
easily duped US women.
These four Finnish/Finland-Swedish mothers in Klevius maternal line have just buried a fifth.
US women fighting in vain for equality some 70 years after Finnish women got full equality.
Perpetua (203 AD):
'I saw a ladder of tremendous height made of bronze, reaching all the
way to the heavens, but it was so narrow that only one person could
climb up at a time. To the sides of the ladder were attached all sorts
of metal weapons: there were swords, spears, hooks, daggers, and spikes;
so that if anyone tried to climb up carelessly or without paying
attention, he would be mangled and his flesh would adhere to the
weapons.' Perpetua realized she would have to do battle not merely with
wild beasts, but with the Devil himself. Perpetua writes: They stripped
me, and I became a man'.
Peter Klevius: They stripped Perpetua of her femininity and she became a human!
The
whole LGBTQ+ carousel is completely insane when considering that the
1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) art. 2 gives everyone,
no matter of sex, the right to live as they want without having to
"change their sex". So the only reason for the madness is the stupidly
stubborn cultural sex segregation which, like religious dictatorship,
stipulates what behavior and appearance are "right" for a biological
sex. And in the West, it is very much about licking islam, which refuses
to conform to the basic (negative) rights in the UDHR, and instead
created its own sharia declaration (CDHRI) in 1990 ("reformed" 2020 with
blurring wording - but with the same basic Human Rights violating
sharia issues still remaining). The UDHR allows women to voluntarily
live according to sharia but sharia does not allow muslim women to live
freely according to the UDHR. And culturally ending sex segregation does
not mean that biological sex needs to be "changed." Learn more under
'Peter Klevius sex tutorials' which should be compulsory sex education
for everyone - incl. people with ambiguous biological sex! The LGBTQ+
movement is a desperate effort to uphold outdated sex segregation. And
while some old-fashioned trans people use it for this purpose, many
youngsters (especially girls) follow it because they feel trapped in
limiting sex segregation.
Only stupid or emotionally unstable people need to boast - Klevius is
neither. So why does he "boast"? Well, he doesn't, he only boosts info
about himself as a service for his readers.
Self-citing is self-advertising, but necessary if important knowledge is
kept hidden from the people. However, the real problem is deliberately
biased out of focus "research".
The quality of research is determined by how well it keeps its alleged
focus. However, scientific "doping" happens within peer constellations
and filtered citation lists used to alter the focus while "sharpening"
it with misleading academic semantics resulting in more or less nonsense
"research" where the "red line" is that very bias it aimed to achive
for political, religious or whatever purpose other than science.
Drawing by Peter Klevius
Forgive Klevius for self-citing his book which, btw, warns about
citations even in general* (see chapter Science and citations). However,
self-citation is neccessary for the people serving under-dog who is
declared pariah because of being "islamophobic" (i.e. defending basic
Human Rights against sharia islamofascism) and/or not scientifically PC
despite more IQ and less bias than main stream science - and most
importantly, offering scientific insights that could straighten up many
costly research paths. However, as with everything, even science is
heavily influenced by personal, religious and/or political bias.
Therefore, acknowledging this fact, Klevius main scientific methodology
is sniffing bias - even within himself.
* Klevius warned 1992 (pp. 40-44) for
automated scientific papers where the coherence lies in deliberate bias
based on citation filters rather than scientific research focus (compare
drawing above). Unlike nonsense papers produced by SCIgen type
programs, citation steered (i.e. academic "cherry picking" for
political, religious etc reason)
Please, fact-check Klevius - if you can! Your IQ may be too low for the
task, and the originality of Klevius insights (i.e. insights better in
line with known facts than main stream academic ones) may seem confusing
precisely because of an inevitable lack of other scientists saying the
same.
Klevius isn't boasting - just boosting. What some might think is Klevius
boasting about himself is in fact the very opposite, namely Klevius
criticizing dumb/biased "scientists" sitting in an ivoy tower guarded by
prestigious academic dogma, greed and conceit - not to mention peer and
citation cartels etc.
1988 Met with a deserting South African soldier and other people with knowledge about Bushmen (who possess mongoloid features).
1992 Published Demand for Resources (ISBN 9173288411) in which Klevius
pointed to Northern Eurasia and mongoloid cold adaptation (incl. the
remarcable 280,000 bp Jinniushan in northern China) as the possible
source of the evolution of the truly modern humans (meaning the one that
clearly differed from its predecessors when it comes to intelligence,
i.e. what started that very cultural change we still experience).
2002 Spencer Wells points to Central Asia as the genetic node for M45 (however, Wells continued to propose out of Africa).
2003 Klevius theory of a better packed brain shaped by climatological
changes (e.g. up and down through Central Asian channels to the cold but
protein/fat rich Siberia - see Klevius old and since 2006 unchanged Out of Africa as pygmies and back as global mongoloids).
UPDATE: Dear reader, do realize that Peter Klevius as an intellectual coward didn't dare to challenge Well's 2003 genetic analysis (before Denisova DNA 2012) which we now know is worth nothing. So Peter Klevius didn't spell out what he already 1992 in his book hinted at, i.e. the mongoloid (cold adaptation) connection between Jinniushan in northern China and Khoisan in southern Africa.
2004 Homo floresiensis was announced and gave Klevius a better glimpse
of how the packaging actually might had taken place - while other
scientists declared it "a sick human" and having a "too small brain" for
doing what it did.
2010 Klevius art track map connected the Denisova bracelet (the oldest
and most sophisticated known truly modern human achievement) with other
Eurasian paleo-art and noted a band from Baycal to the Pyrenees with a
new level of sophistication not seen anywhere else in the world, and
fitting well into a picture where the truly modern human spread out from
northern Eurasia - now with a better packed brain in a bigger skull.
UPDATE: 2024 Liujiang was redated by a Chinese researcher as contemporary with Cro-Magnon. This, if true, doesn't alter Peter Klevius out of SE Asia (and mongolization in the north) theory (or rather self-evident conclusion) a single bit but interestingly emphasizes modern "mongoloid" form together with an archaic bun.
2012 The announcement of the archaic looking Red Deer Cave people
(11,500-14,500 bp) existing in Southern China just like the extremely
modern looking but much older (70,000-155,000bp) Liujiang skull, long
after the birth of the truly modern human (45-50,000 bp?).
2014 The announcement of the hitherto oldest genome (45,000 bp) of a
modern human, the Ust-Ishim man in North-western Russia didn't add
anything to Klevius understanding. Nor did the announcement of an other
Russian find, the 37,000 year old Kostenki 14 found on a place with
truly modern human habitation at least 45,000 years ago.
What is called 'anatomically modern human' in biased PC language is in
fact nothing more humanlike than what we call Neanderthals when it comes
to tool technologies and behavior. In fact, Klevius thinks we have to
question the whole early homo/Neanderthal picture and rather see tool
technologies and varying grades of "archaic" feature in the light of
hybridization from the north instead of from the south. It's actually
quite embarrassing how serious looking anthropologists keep telling you
that there was a one way grid between Africa and EurAsia that worked
100% for tens of thousands of years - even though the alternative view
presented here ticks all the boxes.
Klevius wrote:
Skulls and genetics out of east Asia/Siberia and into Europe, Mideast and Africa
Skull development, tools, art, genes, all go in the very opposite
direction of what main stream PC science tries to propose in its
eagerness to please its own invention*, Afrocentrism.
* An ashamed Klevius admits that he
also used to be an Afro-centrist until he realized the awful
crypto-racism it contained - back in the 1980s.
And when data don't fit the wanted picture it's called "mysteries".
However, the biggest mystery seems to be the axiomatic "Adam" haplogroup
A00 which was not created by a god but by biased OOA people.
Most "mysteries" in genetics disappear
by abandoning OOA and changing direction of HSS evolution. Only South
East Asia offered a combination of tropical island/mainland fluctuations
needed to put pressure on size reduction paired with evolutionary
isolation in an environment where only those survived who managed to
shrink their heads while keeping the same intelligence as their mainland
kins with some double the sized brain. Homo floresiensis is evidence
that such has happened there.
Early modern human settlement of Europe north of the Alps occurred
43,500 years ago in a cold steppe-type environment long before similarly
skilled humans appeared in Mideast.
Kostenki on the Don river in the European part of Russia has layers
associated with culturally modern humans underneath the ~40,000 bp
Campanian eruption.
The clearly modern human (we have even his DNA) called Ust-Ishim man is
~45,000 bp and found at the Irtysh River near Ural mountains.
Early Ahmarian culture and the Protoaurignacian culture, living in south
and west Europe and west Asia around 40,000 years ago used small stone
points as tips for hunting weapons like throwing spears, and they
appeared in Europe 3,500 years earlier than in the Levant. This is
logical if those humans came from the Altai area in Siberia and followed
the Mammoth steppe which went all the way to central Europe and never
came even close to Mideast.
The oldest HSS skull ever found is from east Asia.
Liujiang HSS, 1567cc, est. 70,000 bp
to more than 150,000 bp. Even the lowest possible estimate is far
earlier than anything similar in Africa, Mideast or Europe.
Do consider the multitude of techniques in use to blur the physical HSS
definition. However, this skull can't be confused with anything from
Africa before 70,000 bp.
The Liujiang skull most probably came from sediment dating to 111,000 to
139,000 bp but there is a small chance that it came either from a
deposit dating from around 68 000 bp or from one dating to more than 153
000 bp. However, even the loweat est. combined with its very modern
shape and size would even then make it the first of its kind.
Early modern human settlement of Europe north of the Alps occurred
43,500 years ago in a cold steppe climate - and 3,500 years earlier than
in Mideast.
Some 37,000-42,000 bp Neanderthals in Romania/Europe are supposed to
have disappeared. Oase 1 is within the Aurignacian cultural tradition,
which was the first wave of modern humans in Europe est. 45,000-35,000
bp. Compare this to the 45,000 bp modern HSS at Ust-ishim in western
Siberia, of whom we have a full DNA.
For comparison, Mladeč 1, an early
Upper
Paleolithic skull from the Czech Republic, dating to around 36,000 bp
compared to Manot 1 from Mideast 55,000 bp cranial capacity 1100 cc.
John Hawks: The morphology of the skull is very comparable to those that
come from the early Upper Paleolithic of Europe. Its parietal bones
bulge outward and upward into distinct bosses, which place its maximum
breadth relatively high on the parietal bones, not at the midpoint of
the skull as in Neandertals. But like many early Upper Paleolithic
crania, it has Neandertal-like features. In the case of Manot 1, the
occipital bone projects backward into a bun-like structure and there is a
slight erosion of the surface of bone at the cranial rear called a
suprainiac fossa.
Oase 2 Romania, 40,000 bp.
Oase 1 from the same site and time as Oase 2, was clearly human but had
some 5 to 11 percent of his genome originated from Neanderthals. This
individual's Neanderthal ancestry was more recent than that of any
modern human tested previously. Some half of its chromosome 12 sequence
coincided with Neanderthals rather than modern humans and it had a
Neanderthal ancestor within the past four to six generations, pointing
to later than anticipated admixture between Neanderthals and the modern
human population to which Oase 1 belonged.
Tampa Ling (Laos) skull (TPL1) and jaw (TPL2) est. 46,000-63,000 bp.
Recent discoveries in Laos, a modern human cranium (TPL1) from Tam Pa
Ling‘s cave, provided the first evidence for the presence of early
modern humans in mainland Southeast Asia by 63-46 ka. In the current
study, a complete human mandible representing a second individual, TPL
2, is described using discrete traits and geometric morphometrics with
an emphasis on determining its population affinity. The TPL2 mandible
has a chin and other discrete traits consistent with early modern
humans, but it retains a robust lateral corpus and internal corporal
morphology typical of archaic humans across the Old World. The mosaic
morphology of TPL2 and the fully modern human morphology of TPL1 suggest
that a large range of morphological variation was present in early
modern human populations residing in the eastern Eurasia by MIS 3.
TPL1
TPL2 has a significantly smaller dental arcade breadth than all modern
and archaic samples, including the closely contemporaneous mandible from
Tianyuan cave (64.5 mm) or any other East Asian early modern humans
(66.4 ± 2.2, n = 5) [29]. The only other Homo fossils that are similarly
small in bigonial breadth and dental arcade breadth at the M2 are LB1
(83.0 mm (estimated) and 55.0 mm, respectively) and LB6 (71.0 mm and
53.0 mm, respectively) from Liang Bua, Flores (Homo floresiensis).
Jaw from Tam Pa
Ling in the Annamite Mountains, Laos, dating to between 46,000 and
63,000 ybp. Missing teeth mirrored by Klevius.
Niah skull, Sarawak (Malaysia) est. 39,000-45,000 bp.
.
