People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights. Brexit was meant to protect UK from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel. Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal) isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the European Court of Justice.

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

Do Americans and Pompeo share the Saudi hate against Shia muslims?

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis

In the 8 October 2016 Sana'a (Yemen) funeral bombing by Saudi Arabia 155 people were killed and at least 525 more wounded when two airstrikes, about three to eight minutes apart, hit the packed Al Kubra hall. US and UK happy with the Saudis investigating it.

This Swedish muslim MP wants to criminalize Peter Klevius islamophobia. Really!

West's indulgence of islamofascism (sharia) has made its boasting against China about "democratic values" empty. The risk of you being stabbed, raped etc. by a hateful jihadi is created by your political leaders, BBC etc. - who also have arranged so it's not even called a hate crime.

BBC squeezes in Eng-land cricket in every news report - while UK-land plays borderless Brexit - and football is divided in four UK-lands, Welsh, English, Irish and Scottish players, and two top leagues with whatever players!? Confusing? Not even close to the "British" measuring decaphobia. English isn't "British", it belongs to the world. British stands for imperialism, colonialism, slavery and cooperation with islamofascists.

Peter Klevius stands for these "stops" and due huge implications - all shame on him if you can prove him wrong (click links if you need to educate yourself before saying something stupid): Stop using the misleading 'gender' instead of sex (sociology)! Stop islam's abuse of Human Rights (jurisprudence)! Stop saying humans came "out of Africa" (anthropology)! Stop talking about "consciousness" when you don't know what you're talking about (philosophy/ai).

Islam is the problem - China is the solution.

If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!

* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.

Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

UK's islamic and Sinophobic Parliament

UK's islamic and Sinophobic Parliament

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Why didn't islam go to the Moon?!

Why didn't islam go to the Moon?!

Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.

Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.

Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!

Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!

Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?


UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?

In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?

What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.

Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.

BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!

Stop US global bullying! What moral right does US have trying to dominate Earth and space? "God"?! Or the Saudi murderer and mass murderer "prince"?! Hasn't US sucked out enough already from the rest of the world? A global dollar manipulation favoring US and paid by the rest. A US marked global license and patent imperialism - and Android. Is Internet next?

26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.

25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.

BBC  News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.

Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.

Your choice: China high tech or US/UK bombs?

Your choice: China high tech or US/UK bombs?

US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US

US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism


Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?


Read this: The "out of Africa" hoax is worse than the Piltdown hoax - and much bigger and more worrisome.

Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).


A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.

"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.


In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".

The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.

As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.

Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.

Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!


And if you respect your Earthly home – don’t support a hate ideology that encourages over-population and sex apartheid. We don’t need more workers because the most profitable sectors have the least jobs – a trend that AI accelerates.

No true muslim can be fully human.

Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.

So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.

A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".

Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?

Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?

Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.

Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!

The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.

However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.

The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).

However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!

BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.

The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.

Top emitters

Top emitters

Peter Klevius evolution formula

Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer! Ask yourself: How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China; that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.

Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Existence-centrism (Peter Klevius 1986)

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad.
However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.
UK/BBC's extreme double standard re. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and China. Klevius: How come that islamofascist tech poor Saudi property-, media-, infra structure- etc. 'vulnerable' investments and supremacist hate spreading mosques, is considered no threat to UK but instead an 'important ally' while China, which doesn't tick any danger boxes, is deliberately painted by BBC propaganda as the worst threat? And how come that China's peaceful Belt and Road spreading of wealth and high tech is considered worse than UK's continuing militaristic and (un)security meddling within an EU that UK decided to leave for the purpose of EU not meddling within UK?!
UK continues even after Brexit to use EU citizens as bargaining chips by placing their rights in an unsafe statutory instrument instead of in the law.

Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.

Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!

Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!

You muslim should be ashamed of calling Human Rights defenders "islamophobes"

- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.

Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?

* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.

Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".

Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.

CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".

A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.

Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.


If you don't like Klevius (very few do) you may check if it's him or the anti-racist, anti-sexist and anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration you can't digest - but which Klevius stubbornly keeps feeding you.

Iran, Corbyn, bin Laden's son etc. - it's more about protecting BBC's poster boy, war criminal and state terrorist Mohammad Salman, than protecting people on the streets from Saudi exported racist islamic hate terror.

Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?

The world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media BBC, 20190221 gave the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but managed to squeeze in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to bring back samples to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese sond already 2010 brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one else has managed to do this except the Japanese. This is in line with BBC's usual racist attitude against Japan and China.

Klevius wonders whether BBC/UK government count Islamic State muslims who can't be directly tied to atrocities, as "peaceful muslims"?

Klevius wonders why semitic attacks on Jews are called "antisemitism"?

WARNING about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi dictator family!
If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC, which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC "the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.

Theresa May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and their leaders and parliamentarians.

Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.

Do you support Human Rights or sharia?
Klevius islam logic: If I is SI and SI is not HR then I is not HR. For those who don't understand formal logic: If islam is sharia islam and sharia islam violates Human Rights, then islam violates Human Rights.

Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.

Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.


Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay.

UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused.

UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Listen to this Viking about the danger of religion
Martina Big (aka Malaika Kubwa) wanted to be "black". We don't know exactly why. However, fair skinned politicians and media people who support black supremacism, Nation of Islam etc. might consider following her example.

Are "whites" the new Jews - and in need of a burqa or skin color change?

Are "whites" the new Jews - and in need of a burqa or skin color change?

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Is UK/Saudi cooperation a security threat to EU - and people in UK

Is UK/Saudi cooperation a security threat to EU - and people in UK

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Politicians against the people

Politicians against the people

Rule Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.

Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.

Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:

1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.

2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.

3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

UK PM escapes muslim terror induced by her "close ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


Saudi terror, war crimes, sharia - and "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

True Brits for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and against Human Rights

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

The network that reignited evil Human Rightsphobic sharia islam via al-Saud

Human Rightsphobe Jacob Rees-Mogg and BBC News crack jokes about Germans lacking humour

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

What is "islamophobia"?

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Saturday, June 28, 2014

Muslims started World War I - but no one seems to talk much about it. Why?!

 

Servants of Sharia behind World War I


No matter how much you try to blink/whitewash history, the fact remains that islam is the most evil ideology the planet has seen so far




Apart from its basic racist approval of slavery (islam's main source of finance before oil) the evil ideology called islam stands on two basic legs:

1 Rapetivism - sex for jihadist thugs and Sharia reproduction of as many new muslims as possible aided by a one way muslim male muslimhood determination.

2 Parasitism - jihad pillaging/booty and a mafia like system of extortion etc. Pay islam to protect yourself from islam!

In the civilized world we still call such an ideology a violation of Human Rights!

Erdogan (1994): 'I am a servant of sharia'!

Islamofascism supporting BBC pushed forward an islam supporting "researcher" who blames Erdogan's islamofascism on EU's criticism of Turkey's Human Rights violations. But the fact remains that Erdogan has always been an islamofascist, no matter how much willful thinkers try to "moderate" him. And the fact remains that islam/Sharia will always not only blame but also criminalize Human Rights.




BBC's servant of Sharia


Here some other servants of Sharia. The one in the middle (Mishal Husain) employed by BBC and the two others were quite possibly employed by MI5 or MI6.



Muhamed Mehmedbasic would have been the one that started World War I had he not miserably failed


Muhamed Mehmedbasic, an Ottoman muslim, was first in line to murder Franz Ferdinand 1914. However, when he failed then Gavrilo Princip finished the Archduke.

All in all they were at least six terrorists who lined the route.

The islamofascist Ottoman Slave Empire (IOSE) entered World War I on the side of the Central Powers (mainly Germans) and was ultimately defeated. During the war, the empire's Armenians were deported and ultimately an estimated 1,500,000 were exterminated during the Armenian Genocide
Large-scale massacres committed by muslims were also committed against the empire's other minority groups such as the Greeks and Assyrians.
The muslims mass slaughtered the Assyrian population of the Islamofascist Ottoman Slave Empire (IOSI) during the 1890s and the First World War, in conjunction with the Armenian and Greek genocides.

The Assyrian civilian population of upper Mesopotamia (the Tur Abdin region, the Hakkâri, Van, and Siirt provinces of present-day southeastern Turkey, and the Urmia region of northwestern Iran) was forcibly relocated and massacred by the Muslim Ottoman (Turkish) army, together with other armed and allied Muslim peoples, including Kurds, Chechens and Circassians, between 1914 and 1920, with further attacks on unarmed fleeing civilians conducted by local Arab militias.

Estimates on the overall death toll have varied. Providing detailed statistics of the various estimates of the Churches' population after the genocide, David Gaunt accepts the figure of 275,000 deaths as reported at the Treaty of Lausanne and ventures that the death toll would be around 300,000 because of uncounted Assyrian-inhabited areas, leading to the elimination of half of the Assyrian nation.

The Assyrian genocide took place in the same context as the Armenian and Pontic Greek genocides. In these events, close to three million Christians of Syriac, Armenian, or Greek Orthodox denomination were murdered by the Young Turks regime.

In 2007, the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) reached a consensus that "the Ottoman campaign against Christian minorities of the Empire between 1914 and 1923 constituted a genocide against Armenians, Assyrians, and Pontian and Anatolian Greeks. The IAGS referred to the work of Gaunt and Travis in passing this resolution. Gregory Stanton, the President of the IAGS in 2007–2008 and the founder of Genocide Watch, endorsed the "repudiation by the world's leading genocide scholars of the Turkish government's ninety-year denial of the Ottoman Empire's genocides against its Christian populations, including Assyrians, Greeks, and Armenians."

The Ottoman Empire began massacring Assyrians alredy long before WWI in the nineteenth century, a time of friendly relations between the Ottomans and the British, who were defending the Ottomans from the Russian Empire's efforts to include under its protection the communities of Ottoman Orthodox Christians.

However, always remember what Klevius has always emphasized, that the WWI was the result of the islamic slave imperium decaying due to the West's abolishment of slavery in the early 19th century.



















.

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Islam's evil history repeats itself exactly according to its evil original formula


Every true muslim is a Human Rights violator




ISIS is Ansar al Islam tuned to Saudi Wahhabism which, in turn, is tuned to the origin of islam - NOT TO ANY "WESTERN INTERVENTION"!


The only "Western intervention" is islam's incompatibility with Human Rights - the very same incompatibility that made OIC officially abandon Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia in UN. I.e. in the very world institution that was  created to defend Human Rights. In practice it means that the most basic of Human Rights are criminalized - just as in the world's most intolerant country, Saudi Arabia. It also means that every true muslim, due to whatever form of Sharia, is a Human Rights violator.

In Iraq Mullah  Krekar founded in 1999 Ansar al Islam organization with Abu Musab al Zarqawi, with whom he had contact since 1994. Through the cell of Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Amman Jordan. Their so called Jordanian millennium attack was scheduled to the 2000 new years eve. Ansar al Islam then developed to a copy of the original Caliphate including the Levant.


The Saudi dictator family plus its allies are the main contributors, both ideologically and financially, to the slaughtering, raping, torturing etc terror now going on. And of course they don't distribute the money with a tag marked the state of Saudi Arabia.

Günter Meyer, Director of the Center for Research into the Arabic World at the University of Mainz. Meyer, has no doubt about where ISIS gets its funding. 'The most important source of ISIS financing to date has been support coming out of the Gulf states, primarily Saudi Arabia but also Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.'

However, just like original islam, ISIS utilizes financial possibilities in the wake of their slaughtering conquest. Sex slaves, pillaging and booty are the main incentives for jihadists. Piracy blessed by the Koran and Allah.

Charles Lister at the Brookings Doha Center: 'ISIS has made an effort to establish networks in society that generate a continuing flow of money. One example is the systematic extortion conducted by ISIS in the recently conquered city of Mosul. The exortion affects small businesses and big companies, construction firms, and if the rumors are true, even local government representatives. In addition, it's suspected that the organization levies taxes in the areas that it completely controls - for example Raqqa in northeastern Syria.'

According to Günter Meyer at the University of Mainz, there is no chance that money is flowing to ISIS from Sunni circles connected to the former dictator of Iraq, Saddam Hussein. The goals of ISIS are too different from those of people in Hussein's network. Both groups want to topple the Shiite government of Iraq, but ISIS wants to establish an islamic theocracy, whereas the Sunnis from Hussein's Baath Party want to establish a secular democracy.'


ISIS' looting of the central bank in Mosul, brought them some hakf a Billion $ in cash. Other banks in Mosul and other areas under ISIS control were also plundered.

Eliot Higgins, writing under the pseudonym Moses Brown: 'ISIS can now buy a lot of jihad. With $429 million, ISIS could pay 60,000 fighters $600 a month for a whole year.'


Klevius question to BBC and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Do you see the pattern that exactly resembles how Klevius for more than a decade on the web has described the origin of islam? And if you really need additional support, why not critically read Hugh Kennedy's and others similar (although less articulated) descriptions.




And always remember Hugh Kennedy's words: 

'Before Abdul Malik, Mohammed is never mentioned on any official document
whatsoever, nor any form of religious pronouncement
'!

This is why the Saudis have put meters of concrete on non-existing tombs, early mosques etc. Islam is later modelling of a parasitic Arabic piracy formula "justified" via references to Judaic/Christian writings.


 This is what Klevius wrote after 9/11 on the web:

 The root formula of Islam
Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban. On behalf of today's and historical victims of Islam (in Darfur and globally), and on behalf of all humans who feel offended by the tenets/acts of Islam. Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very human rights it opposes?!* i.e. 1400 years of slavery/rapetivism/genocides
Without these evil racist/sexist/fascist extremist pillars and violent terror threats from so called "unislamic"* and confused morons Islam is dead!

AND ALL OF THEM ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN A DEMOCRACY BASED ON UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS! ISN'T THIS EXTREMISM IF ANYTHING?! FREEDOM OF RELIGION CAN'T MEAN PROMOTING DEATH OF FREEDOM!
.
Slavery (forbidden all over the world except in Koran/Islam) - It's well known that Islam allows slavery, although perhaps less well known that Islam emerged out of the very idea of sponging on institutionalized slavery. This is why Saudi islamofascist dictators, imams etc. terrorists and terrorist supporters don't admit that the Koran is completely wrong in a non-totalitarian world, not only because it allows slavery but especially in claiming to be some "god's" unchangeable word hence excluding even the possibility of reformation!
.
"Infidel" racism (forbidden according to the UN declaration on every humans equal value, but a basic tenet of Koran/Islam) - The moral cornerstone needed for taking slaves and abusing others. Today this alluring but evil racism is utilized in a variety of topics from the people of Darfur to the West in particular or general.
.
Rapetivism (globally forbidden because it's not in accordance with the principle that a person's sex shouldn't be used as a regulator of that person's freedom, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Rigid sex segregation for the purpose of abusing Islam confined girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of Islam, i.e. as many new Muslims as possible.Sharia (forbidden in a democracy simply because it violates democracy and, like the other Islamic pillars, a bunch of human rights that democracy rests on) - Islam's jurisprudence for sex segregated rapetivism, apostasy ban etc. Ehsan Jami (Dutch ex-muslim): "We have an enormous problem with apostasy in Islam. We see a lot of problems where people want to leave Islam but they can't,"
.
Apostasy ban (forbidden because it limits a person's freedom of or from religion, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Children (commonly from birth) and adults (commonly via marriage/rape) are forced to become and stay Muslims.
.
These cannot be erased by mere "interpretations" but needs deep reformist castration! And in this sense "majority Muslims" are tightly connected to Islamic extremism, i.e. to Islam itself. And if that's just because of plain ignorance abt Islam they better educate themselves, e.g. in a Koran school true to the Koran and Islam! When coming out they then have two choices: Becoming an "extremist" (open or stealthy) or abandoning the message alltogether!

That Islam (Koran) allows and even encourages psychological and physical wife beating is just one of an abundance of "minor" ripples of the main pillars above. The naivity of Muslim feminism may be exemplified by Asghar Ali: "
...shari'ah also clearly lays down that if a man hides his impotency from his bride at the time of marriage and she discovers it after marriage, she is fully entitled to divorce on that ground. This itself clearly shows that she is entitled to sexual pleasure along with raising family." Rising what family?! The only reason for this rule is to safeguard that no woman fails to reproduce as many Muslims as possible!

The victims of Islam often reveal the same loyalty conflict as allegedly do victims of child abuse. However, some don't.
So why isn't the human rightsphobia we call Islam globally criminalized and indicted, and how come that many a "democracy" seem to care more abt islamofascist terrorists than supporting the war on islamofascist terror?! And why are we supposed to ask islamist imams, professors etc for advice?! It's like asking Goring how to deal with Hitler and his terrorist youth! The likely answer: "Don't question, criticize or mess with us but support us!"




.

Sunday, June 15, 2014

Sensibel people out there - here's the ultimate proof of how BBC (and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain) deliberately misinforms you right now in the service of Saudi Arabian islamofascism!

This is how BBC doesn't inform you about the world's most dangerous man - and an ongoing evil repetition of the origin of islam, the worst ideological crime ever against humanity!

'Iyad Madani', the Fuhrer of the world's biggest muslim organization, OIC, gets 216 hits on Google News today. However,


'Iyad Madani BBC' gives no result at all.




And this is while Saudi backed ISIS spread jihad terror over the Levant!


While islam and the Saudis mass murder Shia muslims in Iraq. Will we see "king" Abdullah in the International Criminal Court soon?!

Were most German Nazis moderate Nazis? Like allegedly most muslims are moderate muslims - despite Erdogan's claim that there is no moderate islam?!

How does being a muslim without taking responsibility for one's ideology differ from being a German without taking responsibility for National-socialism (Nazism)? Even an extremely cautious estimate reveals that muslims have murdered, tortured, enslaved, raped and terrorized multiple times that of the Germans. And still ticking...




The Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani is the Fuhrer of the world's most powerful muslim Sharia organization (Saudi based OIC which via a scumbag muslim voting bloc in UN has made EVERY muslim a Sharia-muslim and made the most basic Human Rights a criminal offense wherever Sharia rules). Saudi Arabia is behind the racist sectarian slaughtering and sexist Sharia oppression of people not only in the Mideast but all over the world. And BBC and Mishal Husain are accomplices to this. There was a time when naive muslims and Westerners thought one could be a muslim without Human Rights violating Sharia. Not so anymore. So what they now do is to propose "moderate Sharia". However, the violation of the most basic of Human Rights can never be moderate!




The naive urban PC myth that Bush's Iraq war caused islamic terror in Iraq seems  to have at least a 4-10 year deficit - and the real culprits and their disgusting ideology are still at large




Saudi-backed infiltration has been going on since the early 1990s, from the Balkans to the borders of China


ISIS is former Ansar al-Islam.

Mouaz Moustafa, executive director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a Syrian-American organization that supports the opposition: '[The extremist groups] are the most well-resourced on the ground…'.



Klevius comment: How come that evil always gets most of the funds?

2008 Klevius wrote:

The root man of Saudi islamofascism was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab who, during his studies in Basra in the 18th C, got seriously dazzled by glimpses of the European Enlightenment twinkling through the temporary crack to the West called the "Tulip period". He then retreated back into his medieval islamic darkness & as a result, came to position himself as the very opposite to the British "Glorious revolution" which fought against Catholic papacy, & which ended up in Lancashire's coal fueled textile industries as the beginning of the modern industrialized* world based on technology & rationality rather than on religious superstition & fundamentalism (also compare Shinto vs islam). A major outcome of industrialization was universal suffrage & the idea about negative human rights.
* isn't it an irony then that Britain, who started the series of modern revolutions as well as industrialization, came to deeply embed itself with the most intolerant, racist & sexist constitution, i.e. the Saudi islamofascist state which was incapable of producing anything by itself except hatred & more fanatic muslims!

Together with the criminal "house of Saud" Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab then confined the Arabs in islamic backwardness &, in addition, the Arab women in an islamic burka of extreme Sharia sex segregation/apartheid.

After having robbed Mecca & Medina, the Sauds/Wahhabis run the stolen country by the help of what they fleeced from visiting pilgrims. This was the main source of income until Westerners found/drilled oil & made the lazy islamist looters even wealthier.


From the beginning of the Iraq liberation, the Kurds expressed fear of Saudi Wahhabi jihadist penetration. They reported Saudi Wahhabi desecration of cemeteries--always an early sign of the Saudi-backed infiltration that has been going on since the early 1990s, from the Balkans to the borders of China.

An individual calling himself Mullah Krekar (aka Najmuddin Faraj Ahmad, born 07/07/1955 in Iraqi Kurdistan), religious mentor of the terrorist group Ansar al-Islam, which first operated in Kurdistan and then moved to the Sunni Triangle, has declared that he was proud to be described as a disciple of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, founder of Saudi islamofascism.

Mullah Krekar was the original leader of the islamist armed group Ansar al-Islam, which was set up and commenced operations in Kurdistan while he had refugee status in Norway.

In 1991, after the first Gulf War, when Saddam Hussein oppressed, gassed and pursued the Kurds in Northern Iraq, Mullah  Krekar fled to Norway. From there he continued his relations with islamic militants in the Middle East and especially in Jordan and Iraq.

In Iraq Mullah  Krekar founded in 1999 Ansar al Islam organization with Abu Musab al Zarqawi, with whom he had contact since 1994. Through the cell of Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Amman Jordan, Jordanian intelligence found evidence to his involvement in the Jordanian millennium plot scheduled to the 2000 new years eve.

In 2002 Mullah  Krekar visited the Kurdish autonomy in Northern Iraq.

After the arrest of Jamal Zougam, one of the main offenders that carried out the Madrid Trains Bombing on 3/11/2004, Jamal Zougam revealed in his investigation that between 1999 – 2001, he traveled several times to Oslo, Norway, to meet Mullah  Krekar for “spiritual guidance”.

The name of Mullah  Krekar emerged so many times in the activities of Ansar al Islam, the most dangerous islamic network in Europe, and in connection with so many muslim terrorist cells in Europe and the Middle East, that it is impossible to assume that Mullah  Krekar is innocent from harboring terror.

Mullah Krekar is an example of shrewd manipulation of the judicial system by islam supporters.

The US had Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi in custody at a detention facility in Iraq, but muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barack Barakeh Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) freed him. Al Baghdadi was among the prisoners released in 2009 from the U.S.'s now-closed Camp Bucca near Umm Qasr in Iraq.

But now five years later he is leading the army of ruthless extremists bearing down on Baghdad who want to turn the country into an Islamist state by blazing a bloody trail through towns and cities, executing Iraqi soldiers, beheading police officers and gunning down innocent civilians.

al Baghadadi, aka Abu Duaa, was an islamic fundamentalist long before the U.S. invaded Iraq and he became a leader in al Qaeda's network before he was arrested and detained by American forces in 2005.

'Abu Duaa was connected to the intimidation, torture and murder of local civilians in Qaim,' according to a 2005 U.S. intelligence report.

'He would kidnap individuals or entire families, accuse them, pronounce sentence and then publicly execute them.'

The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), act in coordination with Saddam Hussein's former Baathists.

Western and Arab countries have happily supported ISIS and other muslim terrorist groups.

The muslim terrorists have now become owners of a territory.

However, terrorists such as ISIS cannot control large territories on their own but need others supporting them.


ISIS is attempting to take over Sunni-populated regions with the help of local forces so that it can control activities on the border of Syria and Iraq hence facilitating attacks against Iraq and weaken the Shiite-dominated government in Baghdad.

ISIS will probably negotiate similarly as the Taliban have done.

Muslim Wahhabi clerics/muftis in Saudi Arabia have heavily inspired the bloodshed produced by muslim jihadi groups in Iraq and Syria. ISIS islam interpretation is hence a Wahhabi one spiced with the usual inevitable takfirism, i.e. sectarian racism. Islam rests on racism on multiple levels due to its original formula that has nothing to do with good governance but everything to do with being an ideological AK-47 for parasitism.

Islam is therefore all about racist hate and sexism (sex slaves and reproduction of as many muslim males as possible). Except for the default islamic state of eternal hate and contempt of the "infidel" and the takfirs (wrong muslims), Saudi Sunni muslims especially hate Shia muslims, and teach others to hate them as well. This hatred is inherited from the very origin of islam and has to do with islamic (Arabic)language imperialism. So it's not at all just Saudi Arabia vs. Iran but a purely religious feature of islam. In fact, as Klevius has said since 9/11, the very origin and core of islam is tailored for parasitism, greed, looting and rapetivism. After the islamic conquest of the Sassanid Empire, during the reign of the Ummayad dynasty, the Arab muslim attackers/looters tried to impose Arabic as the primary language of the subject peoples throughout their empire.

In 2006, al-Qaeda blew up the al-Askari mosque, sparking a new civil war between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq.

The only way to stop the spread of islamic terrorism is to stop Saudi Arabia. However, Mr X "president" will never do that. Even now he wants to help the Saudis while talking about giving military aid to the Iraqis.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family hides its dirty game behind "private donors" etc.

Pictures of Saddam Hussein and his commander Essat al-Douri have been posted in the streets by ISIS.

Khamenei blames Saudi Arabia, Qatar for Iraq insurgents

Armed groups like the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) are leading to a debate on Salafism in Saudi Arabia because although they do Saudi business they also may constitute a threat to the dictatir family itself.

Saudi Salafism shares with ISIS the islamic fanatism of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn al-Qaim and Mohammad ibn Abdel Wahhab.


Does the islamic Sharia rule include all people or is it limited to influential muslim figures and muslim dictators (Ahl al-Hal wal Aqad)?

However, political Salafism cannot establish a system of rule that can be held accountable, as it bans and criminalizes all forms of opposition, criticism and protest against authority. Despite the differences among Salafist movements from jihadist Salafism to Saudi government loyalists Jamia Salafism, they all refuse and criminalize opposition to authority.

Salafist political theory is a mess of contradictory sayings of Sharia fanatics from the Middle Ages. Some sayings forbid resistance and protests, while others consider criticizing power a religious duty. What makes either of both opinions prevalent and dominant during a certain era is the power and influence of those who believe in it.

Issues of Sharia rule and democracy and their relation to islam in the Arab Spring countries worries Saudi Arabia. The Syrian jihad terror and the chance it gave to jihadist Salafism has prompted many questions regarding theories of authority in islam.

Saudi "king" Abdullah, with his policy of delivering blows against Iran by orchestrating the overthrow of Assad in Syria and Malik in Iraq, shows no pity for the bloodshed he causes. Nor do his supporters, including such apart figures as Mr X "president" muslim born (apostate?!) Barry Barakeh Hussein Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) and BBC's muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain etc.

Militarily Saudi Arabia's first public display of Chinese missiles capable of hitting Tehran has to be added to Obama's and UK's selling of huge amounts of expensive sophisticated military equipment and weapon systems to this (except for oil/gas) extremely backward and evil nation that in no way could have produced this technology by the hackward islam they embrace for the sake of doing evil and violating Human Rights.

However, ISIS is the ruthless muslim killing machine, that takes Sunni hate of Shiites to its logical, and bloody, extreme.

Saudi "king" Abdullah's main goal is, using his own words, "cutting off the head of the snake" in Tehran.

The Sunni/Shiite divide coincides approximately with the division between Arabs and Persians, now and historically.

Saudi Arabia's dilemma is rooting for muslim ISIS terrorism while avoiding its advances at home.

Already in the 1920s, Muslim Brotherhood fighters were helping Ibn Saud to conquer Arabia for the Saud family (which had come to wealth by using African slaves on their dade plantations in truly islamic tradition). Ibn Saud, the father of Saudi "king" Abdullah, asked the British to use their air force to weaken the the Muslim Brotherhood jihadists who had also attacked the Brits. Ibn Saud then used his own muslim jihadists to massacre them at Sabilla in 1929.


Btw, where are all the world's 1.5 Billion muslims who should need to follow Klevius' blog? What keeps them away?! If they need collected info digested via an unbiased Atheist (not chained by prejudicial "god" thoughts) top brain and interpreted against what we historically know about islam - there seems to be few options.
Stop being a coward muslim! Become a brave ex-muslim! You too Mishal Husain - if your muslim husband allows you to.


Dear reader, sorry for not editing this (and most other) posting properly - but as long as you don't contribute with anything Klevius cannot employ an editor. And you know, Klevius doesn't want to waste his life on editing this - isn't it more than enough that he produces this info for you! And why does Klevius bother doing even this? Well, simply because his Atheist moral is entirely resting on basic Human Rights and equality. And as he continuously sees how stupidity paves the way for evil immoral (Human Rights violation) by racist/sexist elements, he feels morally obliged to do at least this. If not for anything else than his own peace of mind.




.



Thursday, June 12, 2014

How many lives has the muslim Saudi terrorist "king" destroyed - at home and abroad?




Saudi muslim "king" Abdullah is the world's most evil muslim terrorist - yet BBC and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain seem to have completely missed this obvious fact - as has muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president"! Why?


RT video: Deprived of their basic needs, the four Saudi royal princesses kept in 13-year isolation by their father, King Abdullah, have surpassed 60 days without food.

The monarch’s daughters fell out of their father’s favor for speaking out against the ill treatment of women in the Gulf kingdom. It is also believed that the king was angry at the girls' mother for not giving him a son.

Two of the princesses, Sahar and Jawaher, say they are being kept against their will in two mansions inside a royal compound in the city of Jeddah, along with their other two sisters – Maha and Hala. They say they have been deprived of food for over 60 days and have very little access to water.

“It’s a horrible situation, it’s a forced famine basically. They are confining us, depriving us of food and water, freedom and rights. We are struggling, we are surviving, we are resisting, we are trying our best to stay alive,” the two sisters told RT via Skype.

“How can we continue living like this? We have to take the risk of [speaking out]."

Having spent so much time deprived of freedom, they struggle to understand why they have been locked up.

“The king and his sons need to answer these questions: What are we charged with? What exactly is our crime?”

“What is the crime of 99 percent of women in this country, who are basically suffering under male guardianship? A male guardian can do whatever he wants; he can cut off everything and she is left with nothing,” they said on behalf of the female citizens of the ultraconservative kingdom.

“We are making these statements right now [in order to] gain our rights, our freedoms.”

Their health is slowly deteriorating. Past appeals by their mother, Alanoud Al-Fayez, for outside assistance - including from Western leaders like US President Barack Obama - have not come to fruition. The administration is turning a blind eye, according to some critics. But the situation cannot be helped by appealing to the Saudi government either, as it maintains that the princesses are in fact perfectly free to move around the city of Jeddah, provided they are accompanied by bodyguards.

The four sisters are between the ages of 38 and 42, with at least one said to be suffering from psychological problems.

Earlier, in rare interviews with foreign media, the sisters said they don’t have any passports or IDs and the king has also forbidden any man to seek his daughters’ hands in marriage. The entire time they have been kept in isolation, both electricity and water have been shut off at random, often for days – even weeks.

The 89-year-old monarch and father of 38 children, given to him by multiple wives, is listed among Forbes magazine's most wealthy and influential men, with a fortune estimated at around US$17 billion.

The princesses' mother, Al-Fayez, divorced King Abdullah in 1980, consequently leaving for London in 2001. The sisters' ordeal then began around 2002. Less than one year after their mother escaped, Abdullah began tormenting his daughters. The sisters told their mother that he drugged their food and water to keep them docile when they openly spoke against women being illegally detained and placed in mental wards.

The director of the Institute for Gulf Affairs, Ali Al-Ahmed, believes the grave human rights situation in the kingdom is compounded by a political strategy from the outside, whose purpose is to keep any negative press at bay, and is a force to either change things for the better or keep them as they are.

“This is the nature of the Saudi monarchy, who are oppressing the people in their country. But now it’s very clear that they’re oppressing their own female members. The king who is portrayed in the international media – in the Western media - as a reformer, is oppressing his own daughters; healthy adult women, who have been held for 13 years…they’re being starved deliberately,” Al-Ahmed told RT.

“People outside the country definitely can speak and hold those people who are responsible for this crime accountable; namely the Saudi king and his sons…who are deliberately doing this.”


The Saudi islamic terror tentacles


Although Qatar and other islamofascist countries try to shed as much blood as possible, Saudi Arabia's dicator family is by far the world's most dangerous terrorist organization. ISIS and Boko Haram are just two names in the islamic Saudi killing and raping machinery.


How many versions are there of islam? And how many versions were there of Nationalsocialism (Nazism)?! And how come that "benign islam" always represents islam while evil Nazism always represents Nationalsocialism? Klevius doesn't approve of any state socialism* but cannot see the logic in this.

* State socialism ia when the state and state officials rather than the citizens benefit from taxes.

According to people who use the oxymoron "islamophobia", Saudi Arabia is both the islamic paradise and not islamic at all.

If we have to believe PC people (fascists) there is actually not any muslim country with "real islam". Their islam is "perverted" by the "infidel colonialists". In short, if you think you can criticize islam then think again because it's not islam's fault but yours! So Klevius has taken these advices seriously and therefore headed to the origin of islam, long before any "Western imperialism". However, what Klevius found there when islam started its own grim 1400 year colonialism campaign turned out to be exactly the very same picture as we see today.

Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Husein Mohammad Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) and other leaders in France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the UK, should all be held accountable for the destabilization of Iraq, Libya and Syria. Indeed, Egypt, Lebanon, Mali, Tunisia, Nigeria, Malaysia, Thailand, Brunei, etc etc. Islamofascist Gulf and Western powers alongside Turkey have unleashed forces that, guided by islamic original evil, shoot, bomb, behead, slaughter and rape in a stream of terrorist attacks, destroy cultural monuments and commit other barbaric acts.

According to a jihadi source, Baghdadi received 'encouraging signals from a regional agency in a friendly Sunni Muslim country to enter Syria, and promises of financial support toward this goal.' When asked whether it was Saudi Arabia or Qatar, he replied, 'It is one of these two.'

Zaid Alisa: Iraq should name and shame the countries supporting Al-Qaeda and lodge complaints at the United Nations against those countries if it wants to fight Al-Qaeda

Klevius comment: How could you possibly complain to UN when islam and Saudi Arabia have taken over UN?!













.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Fascism in our time




Ayaan Hirsi Ali: 'Remember apartheid -- we stopped it through writing books, writing, through songs, through trade boycotts, through diplomacy. We were united as a -- just not America but the West and all moral countries to say it is unacceptable to divide humanity to blacks and whites and what are we seeing with Sharia? We’re seeing it in Brunei. We’re seeing it in Sudan. We know it in our lives, Saudi Arabia and others. On grounds of, you know … we are not taking the positions, the moral positions that we need to and we're not fighting that moral positions with the tools we have.'

Baroness Cox (a British "islamophobic" "islam hateing" cross-bench peer leading a Parliamentary campaign to protect girls/women from Sharia): 'It's deeply disturbing. This violates everything that we stand for. It would make the Suffragettes turn in their graves.'

Klevius question: Who are 'we' in 'everything that we stand for'? Does it include BBC's crypto-islamofascist Sharia supporting* presenter Mishal Husain, who grew up in Saudi Arabia and other islamofascist countries - and all other similar muslim women in power position (compare e.g. Sayeeda Warsi) who pretend to be civilized on the surface but support uncivilized racist/sexist Sharia? Do note that EVERY form of Sharia is against the most basic of Human Rights. This is why OIC (all the world's muslims Saudi based and led world Umma organization) replaced Human Rights with Sharia in UN by the help of UN's largest voting bloc consisting of some of the world's worst Human Rights violators - yes, including the homelands of Mishail Husain and Sayeeda Warsi etc.

* If she doesn't support Sharia (in whatever form) she is no muslim and therefor an apostate.

 

All muslims world organization, Saudi based OIC and its Human Rights violating Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.






Just one example of barbaric islamofascism thriving in the Western civilization

An African giant that makes every prophet laughable and pathetic



Brandeis University cancelled plans to award American Enterprise Institute fellow Ayaan Hirsi Ali an honorary degree after students raised "concerns" about statements she’s made that are critical of Islam.

Some quotes by Martin J. Gross (a Member of the Board of Trustees of Brandeis University): 'I must now confess to having serious concerns about the spirit of free inquiry at my alma mater when it rescinds an honorary degree to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a woman who champions women's rights in the Muslim world.

And I thought it regrettable that upon learning that Hirsi Ali was offered an honorary degree 87 Brandeis faculty members were so “filled with shame” that they presented President Lawrence with a letter urging him to “rescind immediately the invitation to Ms. Ayaan Hirsi Ali for an honorary doctorate” based on her "virulently anti-Muslim public statements."
What is worthy of note is that Hirsi Ali's views do not come from an ivory tower but from the concrete reality of her personal experiences as a woman.

She was genitally mutilated as a child, fled a forced marriage at age 12 and lives under constant threat of death by the very people who proudly wear the ideology she condemns.

And how preposterous is their issue with her Western triumphalism, especially when she fled to the West from the very ideology that is trying to kill her.
I am profoundly perplexed that there is no counter letter submitted by any faculty member to President Lawrence. Is there not a single woman faculty member in the Women and Gender Studies Program who can find the compassion to defend her? Is the majority of the faculty too intimidated to speak out against this new tyranny for fear of being ostracized?

It now appears that Brandeis’ motto of "truth unto its innermost parts" has been replaced by the eleventh commandment of political correctness: “Thou shalt not offend.”'

Klevius: And here is an other example of what this African heroine has to fight



Example of Saudi islam in Europe (UK) 2014 - it's not getting better, it's getting worse!


At Oldknow academy which has 600 pupils on its roll, inspectors found that school governors had used the primary school's budget to subsidise a trip to Saudi Arabia "for only muslim staff and pupils". Extremely intolerant racist and sexist Saudi Atabia (the "guardian of islam" and home of OIC) does not allow non-muslims to even visit Mecca and Medina (the muslim slave markets were muslims now throw stones against a pillar symbolizing us non-muslims.

Staff at the academy, which has links with a school in Saudi Arabia, could not tell inspectors whether certain teaching materials had been properly vetted and said that the content in the newly introduced second Islamic assembly was not properly monitored.

The academy had also cancelled a special Christmas assembly and inspectors were told that the school had established and paid for a madrassa out of its budget.

According to the report, a group of governors is making significant changes to the ethos and culture of the academy without full consultation. They are endeavoring to promote a Sharia-based ideology in what is a maintained and non-faith academy.



.

Sunday, June 08, 2014

How come that muslims (islamofascists) are allowed to desecrate Human Rights while Human Rights defense (islam critcism) is not accepted?!



Has there ever been a time in world history when islam (the most disgusting ideological crime throughout 1400 years) has been so protected from criticism as it is now?


What have a) the reproduction of as many muslim jihadists as possible; b) the implying that too few Jews have been murdered by muslim jihadists; C the halal slaughtering of a British soldier, in common?








Islam has, since its origin, left a rich track of islam criticism in its horrifying historical path of enslavement, looting, murdering, genocides, rapetivism etc.




 
John of Damascus (c. 676–749) noted that an Arian monk (Bahira) influenced the alleged Muhammad and viewed the islamic doctrines as a hodgepodge of Bible stuff. According to John, the Arabs were called "Saracens" (Greek Σαρακενοί, Sarakenoi) because they were "empty" (κενός, kenos, in Greek) "of Sarah", i.e. illegitimate children.

Muhammad al Warraq, a 9th-century scholar and critic of islam.

Maimonides, the foremost Jewish philosopher in Andalus refers to Mohammad, as "hameshuga" – "that madman".

Ibn Kammuna (Examination of the Three Faiths, 1280): Sharia is incompatible with the principles of justice. There is no proof that Muhammad attained perfection and the ability to perfect others as claimed. To this day we never see anyone converting to islam unless in terror, or in quest of power, or to avoid heavy taxation, or to escape humiliation, or if taken prisoner, or because of infatuation with a muslim woman, or for some similar reason. Nor do we see a respected, wealthy, and pious non-muslim well versed in both his faith and that of islam, going over to the islamic faith without some of the aforementioned or similar motives.

Ibn al-Rawandi (827–911) an Atheist, repudiated islam and religion in general.

 
 Although both Nationalsocialism and islam both contain evil, the former is forbidden but the latter, which has a much deeper, longer and bigger record of evil, is protected. Why?





.

Friday, June 06, 2014

Why isn't this deeply informative picture of BBC's muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain more popular on Google?


Is someone manipulating or are people just stupid?!


 It should preferably be viewed in the context of this picture


 and Saudi based OIC's Human Rights desecrating Sharia and its Fuhrer Iyad Madani, the Saudi leader of all the world's muslims via its (scumbag) voting bloc in UN.



 These pictures together best describe the problem with islam in the world of today. Offending? Not at all compared to the offense islam today constitutes against Human Rights. If you don't believe me please do read Saudi Arabia's (the "guardian of islam") criminal legislation which criminalizes Human Rights. And not only Saudi Arabia. OIC's world Sharia openly crimnalizes the most basic of Human Rights.

Take that and again contemplate the depth of these pics! And see them for what they really are - a defense for every human beings right to equality.














.

Thursday, June 05, 2014

Why isn't BBC's Saudi rooted anti-semitic* muslim Sharia presenter talking about islamic "radicalism"?


* Here Klevius ironically uses 'anti-semitism' in partly the same way as when BBC and other islamofascism supporting media try to  hide the fact that most hate attacks against Jews are committed by muslims. However, Klevius doesn't hide it but deliberately uses the concept precisely to emphasize this disgusting bigotry and hypocrisy. 'Semits' used to mean Semitic language family speakers, and became synonymous with European Ashkenazi Jews supposed to be rooted in Biblical Mideast, but whose only connection to Mideast was the Jewish slave traders in the Jewish Khazar slave empire in the southern part of European Russia; the Jewish slave traders who served the disgusting Andalus with white sex slaves (mainly from Slavic and Finnish parts of Europe); and the same repeated by Jewish slave traders and the Turkish Ottoman muslims up until Europe abolished slavery entirely in the early 19th century (abolishment of slavery had been made in several more or less successful attempts against the muslim and Jewish slave raiders/traders since the origin of islam). European Ashkenazi Jews were produced by Jewish slave traders having sex (usually constitutional rape) with European sex slaves or their descendants. This has been known for long but only during the last decades finally confirmed via genetic research. This may be compared with the gruesome genetic history of Arabian Mideast which confirms that almost only women (sex slaves) from Africa have left their genetic mark in Arabs because African male slaves were usually castrated before sold to muslim Arabs. And the numbers and suffering were huge - nothing like the belittling of islam's crimes against humanity so commonly (mis)taught today.



Mishal Husain's and BBC's extreme and radical bigoted hypocrisy


While BBC News today talked about the threat from "radical" muslims in British schools and, later on, the muslim Taliban problem, Mishal Husain, a muslim Sharia supporter (or apostate?!) was assigned to talk about payment protection insurance, frogs turning into princes etc. Why? Is it islamophobia, i.e. the fear of exposing a "Euro-muslim" to real islam?



Mishal Husain, apostasy, Iyad Madani, OIC, Sharia,




In much the same way as BBC has failed to inform its compulsory license fee paying audience about islamofascist OIC, its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani, and the Human Rights violating islamofascism they impose via the biggest voting bloc in UN (consisting of mainly the worst Human Rights violating nations).











 .