People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.
Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis
If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!
* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Saturday, March 28, 2009
The final defamation of U.N., while an illegitimate & anti-constitutional "president" islamizes U.S.
A lesson on Human Rights vs. sex apartheid & fascism for Mr. “President” X & his islamofascist pals/supporters.
Should UK deny Visa for Mr X "president"?
Gary Kreep (United States Justice Foundation): "Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? It has been publicly reported that Mr. Obama as far back as 2006 had a relationship to a law firm that was coincidentally researching ways to get around the Article 2 requirements of the U.S. Constitution for service as president.
This appears to be an ongoing attempt by Mr. Obama to obtain the presidency while avoiding and evading all questions on his eligibility".
This is Ayaan Hirsi Ali, one of the greatest heroes & freedom fighters of our time - our enlightenment against fundamentalism. The others represent the worst enemy of freedom.
Should UK allow this mysterious Kenyan/Indonesian man with a Paki background & with suspicious terrorist connections, to enter its territory?
This is a muslim couple who started a TV station in US for the purpose of "showing the right picture of islam". He has now decapitated her
This is muslim born, illegitimate & unconstitutional "president" Barry Barack Hussein Obama/Osama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) with some of his islamofascist pals:
Can you tell who is a moderate muslim eager to broadcast a positive picture of islam's peacefulness, & who recently stabbed his divorcing wife at least 9 times & then chopped her head off while she was still alive? OK, I agree, they all look capable of it. Correct answer is the guy to the left who's rewarded by top islamofascists from the muslim terror organization CAIR (The Council on American Islamic Relations - these guys are right now busy accusing FBI for offending muslims because FBI has monitored a California mosque that hosts islamic terrorists planning blow up jobs in California). Btw, the British lord Ahmed (who threatened Britain with 10000 street jihadists if Wilders was allowed entrance to Britain) to the right is also accused of murder & causing death (this dangerous islamofascist recently got away with only 3 months in jail because the biased British court "thought" he had just stopped his 20 minute constant SMS session while driving, just seconds before he killed a person!? Btw, Mr X "president's" first call was to the islamofascist Saudi leader whose legal adviser is the Nation of Islam guy at his right ear while Ingrid Mattson at his left ear is a wahhabist islamofascist who wants to make islam & Sharia the new constitution of USA!
This deeply immoral Mr X "president" Obama (or whatever) has now sanctioned rape of Afghan girls & women, both within family as well as outside it. Afghanistan's president Karzai & the parliament has right now signed a bill that is a copy of Obama's closest foreign friend Saudi Arabia!
Klevius obituary on islam
As an intro to this philosophical termination of islam, the most pathetic excuse for islam may here be exemplified by Robert Rabil, at the political science department at Florida Atlantic University where he teaches the school's "muslim studies" courses: "Islam is a monotheist religion embraced by 1.4 billion people. You don't lump all these people with the islamic fundamentalists".
Klevius comment: So the more muslims the less evil is islam?! And when it comes to the pompous use of the funny word "monotheism" (see e.g. Klevius Origin of religion) this form of rapetivism was not civilized but its very opposite. It started with circumcision & the deliberate aim to breed itself to power by the help of girls/women's bodies (see Are women humans?). If we assume as progress the development of female rights to be on pair with those of male rights (without silly excuses for heterosexual attraction - see also Gametes have no sex -, less physical size, muscles or whatever etc) then "monotheisms" clearly represent a more primitive stage, don't they (it's no coincidence that the first new civilization in Mideast, on this side of Medieval darkness, was Westernized "Jews"). And in fact a much more primitive stage than for instance hunter/gatherers (see Klevius Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor (1992).
The simple but fanatically hidden truth abt islam
Some say that radicals have hijacked islam and that peaceful co-existence is possible with muslims, i.e. islamist, i.e. those who adhere to islam. This is a deep double lie. Firstly, it's the "moderate interpretations" that have hijacked islam. Original islam was not only based on slavery & rapetivism but its apostasy ban & infidel racism was also the very essence for an ideology that could defend these atrocities. And to make it worse islam was created to never change or question this order of matter. Secondly, by re-defining Koran/islam, either you kill islam or you are no longer a muslim!
You must always consider the "mysterious" original "success" of islam in an uncivilized & brutal rape fixated militant chauvinist society. Only Klevius Origin of islam satisfies historical findings! And only Klevius offers the most pressing issue of our time as the key to the understanding of islam, namely sex segregation.
An other example of schizophrenic thinking: "It is generally accepted that today, among the five religious and cultural blocs which predominate in the world -namely Christianity, Confucianism, Buddhism, Judaism and Islam- it is the Muslim societies which have been furthest from democracy." Klevius comment: How could less than 10 Million Jewas "predominate in the world"?!
UFOs & "gods"
Whereas UFOs are at least possible (even though probably all “observations” so far are fake - the extremely small time/space cracks possible for such encounters make them equally extremely unlikely – islam’s “god” is not.
For children & others who question “who then created the aliens”, pls visit Klevius definition of religion? Islam is NOT a “god-faith” because “god” has been thoroughly eliminated from it. Only “god’s” words are left, & these cannot be trusted on because (according to three main schools): 1) either Mohammed distorted them or 2) we have to guess (interpret) or 3 only those familiar to old Arabic can understand them!
The death of UN
When 56 deeply intolerant and undemocratic islamofascist nations attack the former human rights bastion UN from inside, with a proposal to ban criticism on islamofascism, what we see then is nothing less than the desperate death struggle of the worst remaining evil Leviathan from the past. This is not to say that when islam is dead we enter the paradise but to say that the last major ideologically based evil is gone forever. Why? Whereas evil communism (incl. French revolution if you like) sucked its ideological stimulant from the technological/industrial revolution, islamofascism has sponged on sex segregation, the last of obstacles for a clarified view on global negative human rights, the very foundation, meaning and fulfillment of human life (the very essence of 'life' btw, is uncertainty - not fundamentalism, as described in Klevius definition of religion).
The biggest obstacle is the fanatic (so called "moderate") strive to utilize new ideas and policies while maintaining islamofascism*. The Western world must therefore treat muslim masses as democratically incapacitated in the struggle against human rights abuses, while helping to empower reformist voices and civil society through mass apostasy.
* ‘Islamofascism’ is here to be understood as the modern form of a system of racist/sexist beliefs even remotely connected to islam’s original formula: infidel slavery+rapetivism (google it!)+apostasy ban.
Klevius lesson in political philosophy
The slippery sloop
is to not react to islamists’ aims “to defeat the entire Western civilization, which they regard as the enemy. As a consequence so called muslims ought to commit apostasy against islam! This is best done by adhering fully to theb holy Negative Human Rights & a democracy that excludes islamic anti-democratic ideology.
A muslim in a global society faces a very simple question: Should I continue my racist/sexist despise for “infidels” (which, of course, is the worst treason you can do against democracy and negative human rights) and they, as a logical consequence, continuing to be suspicious about my relation to true (i.e. radical) islam?
And a very simple answer is: Leaving true islam (which, of course, is the worst treason you can commit against islam).
Women & girls without HUMAN rights in the islamic Umma
The very foundation of democracy is negative human rights. A negative right is empty, i.e. non-prescriptive, and, as a consequence, hence immunized against possible restrictions in freedom, whereas a positive right may be connected to “obligations and responsibilities” that may violate freedom.
The main difference between the islamofascist OIC nation's Cairo declaration and the REAL Human rights is that while the latter includes girls & women the former excludes them. How? Simply because the islamofascist "rights" distinctively emphasize "duties" & "responsibilities" as excuses for a continuing sex apartheid.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali: "European society is about to be hijacked by a rapidly growing population of muslims who are supported by islamic nations in their efforts to undermine their host countries. Islamic thought and practice is incompatible with that of the West, because in Islamic societies, religious law is supreme. "All aspects of the life of a person in public and private, down to the most intimate details, are regulated," she said. "In liberal democracies, laws are not made by God".
Terry Miller, Director of the Center for International Trade and Economics at The Heritage Foundation in "Who Leads the United Nations?": The OIC's strength comes not so much from its numbers as from its focus and the strength of its belief in its own rightness. It is not clear whether the West has, collectively, the courage of its own convic¬tions to match the OIC. This is one of the great ideo¬logical, cultural, and political issues of our time. Its resolution will influence lives and events far beyond the United Nations.
Becket Fund’s Graham Bennett: "We are no longer talking about rights at the Human Rights Council, we are talking about politics. It's a disgrace”.
Klevius humble proposal: Eventually, the problem isn't islam, simply because islam's evilness is so obvious, but rather Christianity in general, and Catholicism in particular. This problem is spelled "INTER FAITH". Christians try, in vain, to use islam as their "faith insurance". In this process islamofascism is the only winner. So all you "monotheists", rise your gaze & face the fate of your "faith": What you really long for can only be delivered through the original idea of negative human rights. It's spelled love of FREEDOM together with other freedom lovers.
The most regrettable are those poor souls who take imams & islam "scholars" seriously. I.e. those who can't stand the book of history. Ayaan Hirsi Ali: "Islam is not a religion of peace, it's a political theory of conquest that seeks domination by any means it can."
Btw, from Klevius so far unpublished A Roots Guide you'd also learn that Tibetan lamaist slavery was inspired by islam. So why not donate something so you could read this extremely important book!
Monday, March 23, 2009
Here's just one extremely "puzzling" example presented in the context of the "Golden calf" story in Exodus:
"The Quranic Version of the episode is similar in most respects..." (sic)!
Klevius comment: "Koranic versions"!? Exodus came about some 2,000 years before any Koran was even thought about! This extremely illogical double-millennium jump to a late lousy & confused copy (in fact many differing copies) of the Jewish Bible seems outright pathetic.
EDUCATE YOURSELF ABT TODAY'S FASCISM. IT'S CALLED ISLAM!
Monday, March 16, 2009
Muslim born & unconstitutional "president" Barry Barack Hussein Obama/Osama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) hands over Paki/Afgan girls/women to al-Qaeda
1 Muslim born & unconstitutional "president" Barry Barack Hussein Obama/Osama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) applauds when, in practice, Mulla Omar & al-Qaeda take over Afganistan & Pakistan!
2 Muslim born & unconstitutional "president" Barry Barack Hussein Obama/Osama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) applauds the reinstallation of the islamofascist Chief Justice of Pakistan Supreme Court, Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudry. This puppet lawyer is backed up by Pakistan's main islamofascist party Jamaat-e-Islami whose terrorist wings* (with tight connections to ISI, Pakistan's CIA**) Hizbul Mujahideen, Kashmiri Jamaat-i-Islami, Talibans, & in extension Mulla Omar & al-Qaeda. Pakistan's Interior Minister Makhdoom Faisel Saleh Hayat: "All of the activists and terrorists who have been apprehended in recent months have had links to the Jamaat-e-Islami, whether we have arrested them in Lahore or here or Karachi, they have been harboring them".
* This is a common islamofascist strategy nowadays. One side is shown up as "moderate" & "social" whereas the other truly islamic side is kept hidden. The moderate/extremist divide that doesn't exist.
** Yes, the Paki disaster originates from Medieval time when islam attacked & enslaved the territory & committed an unbelievable terror & genocide. In fact, it's a true disgrace that the Pakis are still licking their slave master islam! Like in Africa it's the centuries/millennium old islamic oppression, imperialism & colonialism that's behind most of the never-ending shortcomings. And with West supporting this islamic cancer & muslim born & unconstitutional US "president" Barry Barack Hussein Obama/Osama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) applauding it the spread of metastases & due suffering continues. And girls & women are left in the mouth of the islamic Leviathan (see Origin of islam).
The empty hole of idiocy in Washington Post
Salman Ahmed (The Washington Post): "Terrorists who use Islam as an excuse to launch their attacks on innocents need to be countered by Islamic scholars who represent the U.N. member states".
Klevius comment: What could be more stupid than this double self contradiction?! Firstly, how could those who learn Koran by hearth possibly use (to a point where they even sacrifice themselves for its content) "Islam as an excuse"?! Secondly, the 57 islamofascist countries in UN, which expertise Salman Ahmed wants to utilize, have for long been busy gravely abusing UN for the purpose of silencing the crimes of that very same Koran islam!
Salman Ahmed continues: "Islamic scholars from Muslim majority nations, America and the West need a global platform like the U.N. to send messages condemning the killing of innocents and labeling such actions un-Islamic".
Klevius comment: Isn't that statement, by any measure, in itself the most un-islamic you can imagine! And a perfect fit in the Koranic instruction of how to cheat & lie in front of the execrable infidels before islam gets its totalitarian the hegemony it & most of its followers so extremely fanatically strive for?!
Harold A. Gould: "The forces of moderation and modernity are currently beleaguered; steadily losing ground to the fanatics whose declared goal is to return civil society to seventh century conditions where mullahs, ayatollahs and ideological radicals rule the roost behind the facade of a distorted, stereotyped conceptualization of Sharia law that would reduce everyone to automatons chanting the ideological cliches of ultra-orthodox Islam. For several years, the world has witnessed the gradual crystallization of FATA and its tribal environs into a quasi-state dominated by the Taliban and Al Qaeda. So much so that Mullah Umar and Osama Bin Laden have in essence severed this region from Pakistani sovereignty, established a de facto emirate there, imbued it with rudimentary state institutions, and are employing its infrastructural resources to broaden their political and ideological writ to encompass more mainstream portions of Pakistan.
The recent conquest of Swat, the ‘Switzerland of Pakistan’, by Maulana Fazlullah, leader of the outlawed Tehreek-e-Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi (TNSM), on behalf of the Taliban is a case in point. This has markedly altered the balance of power in the border regions and points a political dagger directly at the heart both of Pakistani and Afghani political society unless a way is found to reverse it. The enemy is literally at the gates! The danger to both countries’ future as secular states has dramatically increased even further with the news that the Government of Pakistan has now in effect capitulated to the Taliban in Swat. They have allowed the extremists to win by default. With their willingness to accept the Talibani version of Shariah Law for Malakand, the Pakistan government has in effect consigned women’s rights, modern education, art, music, science and democracy itself there to the medieval dustbin. Swat, and Malakand generally, now have been annexed to the ‘Jihadistan Emirate’; they have become reluctant minions of a theocratic state which all the objective evidence indicates is contrary to what ordinary, workaday Pakistanis and Afghanis would really prefer if left to their own devices."
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Some farts: Google's Mr X humbug "president" Barry Barack Hussein Obama/Osama** Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) commits high level financial fraud!
Islamofascist media farts like Google & Al-Jazeera - & the super fart in the White House who is now committing the worst swindle so far! (For more info abt his islamofascist murderers etc friends on the pic see previous postings - the one awarded by islamofascist CAIR used to stab his divorcing wife some 9x before beheading her while still alive! Not islam? Oh yeah - see below***)
For many days Google's standing pic of the heroic Dutch freedom fighter Geert Wilders was the one to the left! Same with the racist Arabic terror Al-Jazeera's islamofascist "feert" journalism seen at the top.
However, the islamic feert "civilization" (see Origin of islam) is rapidly vanishing in the wind of the inevitable logic of the holy negative human rights! However, the smell during this transitional stage from real islam to a castrated eunuch islam is disgusting!
No wonder that 57 islamofascist countries led by Saudi Abdullah are so eager to cover up islam's crimes & the real true nature of Koran/islam!
A stimulus package for racist/sexist islamofascism
Klevius economy lesson: This muslim born* & unconstitutional (he is, for example, lacking a "natural born" birth certificate which is necessary for a US president - & no one dares to ask for it because they are afraid of being called "racist". Moreover, as a born muslim who hasn't committed islam's worst crime apostasy, he is under islamic submission & hence against democracy & the US constitution. Democracy means individual freedom which is complete anatema for islam!) Mr X humbug "president" Barry Barack Hussein Obama/Osama** Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) who never would have been voted president had it not been for Google's (& similar) extremely misleading, onesided & biased propaganda campaign, is now spending borrowed money while planning to simultaneously not paying it back in full! How? Because when you print more money (like e.g. Zimbabwe) without actually being able to back it up, he (US) now inflates money borrowed from abroad so that when the lender wants it back he gets only a part of it! Every new printed dollar lessens the proportional value of US bonds! And in the case of Saudi Abdullah & Co they at least get their islamofascist Sharia spread in the US via financial arrangements. Also consider the massive flow of borrowed money via the "stimulus" package" to sexist/racist islamofascist organizations & individuals.
* So why does Klevius always underline the fact that Barry Barack Hussein Obama/Osama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) is a muslim because his alleged father was a born muslim? Well, simply because it reveals the true nature of evil islam (e.g. apostasy ban) & the hypocrisy/bigotry of islam's supporters!
** Obama is the Swahili form of Arabic Osama & Swahili is islam's slavery language in the East African interface between Arabic Koran-islam & the African slave traders who assisted in committing the worst crime ever against humanity! Educate yourself on KLEVUX!
*** Juan Cole thinks islam is a "cultural tradition" & hence isn't primarily responsible for "making young boys angry". However, islam is, quite contrary, a totalitarian fascist ideology based on inciting infidel racism/hatred & rapetivist sexism, which is easy for anyone to see if you just open your eyes in front of history (see Origin of islam)!
Jewish worry abt muslim born US "president"
Martin Raffel (senior associate director of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs): “If there is a move on the part of our allies to engage with terrorist organizations while they remain terrorist organizations, that will raise concerns within our community”.
Klevius acknowledgement: As my beloved readers already know I have for many years (since 2003 on Internet) rallied for a black US president. So pls, you morons who abuse the race card, just shut up!
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
What’s the difference between “moderate Talibans” & “anti-islamist muslims”, & why “respect” those who despise you?!
Klevius intro: Never forget that the essence of islam is racism, i.e. racist disrespect against the “infidel”! This racist lure, together with islam’s deep rooted sexist sex segregation (rapetivism) is what makes islam going! And by always connecting muslims with islam, while simultaneously always referring to an imaginary “difference between moderate muslims & islamists” this evilness is effectively upheld. Moreover, this is combined with the islamofascists' (Saudi Abdullah & Co) efforts to exploit & incite racist hatred between the "non-white" developing world & the technologically advanced “white West” (what abt Japan`, it,s neither “West” nor “white”! And what abt all non-whites who for long have been “Westerners”)?!
Mr. unconstitutional muslim born “president” X, Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Soetoro Obama/Osama (or whatever - see postings below) says he "respects islam" & now wants to talk with "moderate Talibans"! However, these words aren't just like his ordinary empty platitudes but contain a deep paradox. Apart from the obvious fact that the line between an "islamist Taliban" & a "moderate muslim" seems to become more problematic, the connection to islam itself suffers a logical meltdown. For example:
M. Zuhdi Jasser, is an American who calls himself “a devout anti-islamist American muslim who rejects all of political islam & the Islamic Umma”.
Klevius comment: And the leader of ALL American muslims, incl. M. Zuhdi Jasser, is the islamofascist, Wahhabi inspired & Saudi funded extremely political Sharia supporting Ingrid Mattson, a close ally to Mr. “president” X (e.g. invited by him as a main speaker on the Democrats convent last year & as a preacher on his “inauguration” this year).
M. Zuhdi Jasser wanted to hear Mr. “president” X, Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Soetoro Obama/Osama (or whatever - see postings below) speak to muslim dissidents. “He (Mr “president” X) did not, save an oblique reference in his inaugural. By making no distinctions between support for autocrats and dissidents, he spoke to maintaining the status quo--the despots in control.”
Klevius comment: Pls, Mr M. Zuhdi Jasser, but every support for islam, incl. your own, is “maintaining the status quo - the despots in control” (islam is the very definition of a despot, i.e. “a ruler with absolute power & authority”!).
M. Zuhdi Jasser: The 'Muslim world' is not monolithic.
Klevius comment: But islam is! Why? Well, because you just made it by calling yourself a muslim! Unless, of course, you abandone islam.
M. Zuhdi Jasser: Islam as a singular political entity based in a faith practice directly feeds into the language of the theocrats -- the Islamists. Islamism is the politico-religious collectivist belief in the primacy of the Islamic state grounded in a dominating legal system based in shar'ia law (Islamic jurisprudence). It is a system which can feign democracy vis-à-vis elections but operates in a supremacist position of Islamic law over all other faith systems and empowers oligarchs (clerics) to write and interpret law. While some Islamists may believe in more peaceful means of ascendancy, whether they are violent or peaceful, the Islamic state is their common goal. At the crux of the 'contest of ideas' between the West and the "Muslim world" lie the competing roles of liberty and Islamism.
Klevius comment: I rest my case! The very same same islam that is now, via UN, trying to veil its ugly face by having 57 islamofascist nations (OIC) criminalizing criticism of itself, is the original islam that succeeded precisely because it utilized racism (enslavement &/or dhimmitude for "infidels") & sexist sex segregation (rapetivism) & mob etc. violence/intimidation!
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
The truth abt muslim born & unconstitutional Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama/Osama Soetoro (or whatever)* Wikipized from the ignorant mob
* Mr "president" X, changed his first name from American Barry to Arabic Barack after visiting Pakistan at age 20. Mr X was born a muslim Hussein Obama (a Swahili** form of Osama), & "adopted"/"married" to a muslim Soetoro stepfather,
** Swahili was created through Arab-islam's extensive & persisting slave trading of slave girls, eunuchs & plantation slaves in East Africa for more than thousand years.
What is Wikipization?
Klevius answer: Wikipization means the process of creating false/biased information by filtering a mass of public opinions/references (compare Klevius chapter Science & references in Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor, 1992).
Aaron Klein: A WND article reporting yesterday that Wikipedia had been scrubbing President Obama's biography of criticism has resulted in an "edit war" on the website in which a large number of users were barred from posting on key issues, including any mention of challenges to Obama's eligibility.
Ultimately, administrators at Wikipedia, the online "free encyclopedia" mega-site written and edited by its users, entirely locked Obama's page so that only top editors could make changes to the entry – and only if a change is supported by a consensus of editors.
A perusal through Obama's Wikipedia entry yesterday found a heavily guarded, mostly glowing biography about the U.S. president. Some of Obama's most controversial past affiliations, including with Rev. Jeremiah Wright and former Weathermen terrorist Bill Ayers, were not once mentioned, even though the associations received significant media attention and became themes during the presidential elections last year.
Also completely lacking is any mention of the concerns surrounding Obama's eligibility to serve as commander-in-chief.
Following WND's report on Obama's Wikipedia page, the news outlet monitored the page as scores of users attempted to add entries about eligibility concerns, and the president's past associations with Ayers and Wright. All attempts to post on Ayers or Obama's birth certificate were removed within minutes by the site's volunteer administrators.
One mention of Wright was finally allowed. Obama's page currently states, "Obama resigned from Trinity [United Church of Christ] during the Presidential campaign after controversial statements made by Rev. Jeremiah Wright became public."
The Wikipedia entry does not currently outline some of Wright's remarks, such as exclaiming "God damn America," claiming the 9-11 attacks signified "America's chickens" were "coming home to roost" or telling congregants the U.S. government invented the HIV virus as a means of "genocide" against black people.
Following a large volume of attempted postings on controversial issues, administrators yesterday placed a "protection" lock on Obama's page, informing non-administrators that new postings would not be allowed until "disputes have been resolved."
Meanwhile, WND was inundated with e-mails from Wikipedia users yesterday stating their recent attempts to edit Obama's page were blocked. Some said they believed the site to be "biased" in favor of Obama. A sampling of e-mails included:
* "As soon as Wikipedia found out I was conservative leaning and on the national lists of the righties, they banned me," wrote author Mark Paul Seber
* "Thought you might be interested to know that Wikipedia's 'Family of Barack Obama' page contains inaccuracies about his paternal family relations and that when I tried to add the correct info it, too, was removed/changed," wrote an anonymous WND reader.
* "Before the election I was banned from Wikipedia multiple times for trying to post a picture of Obama and Odinga in Kenya on Odinga's Wikipedia site," commented WND reader "Don."
* "Back in January, I posted to Obama's 'talk page' – not the main entry, just the talk page. My post pointed out that FactCheck is lying about the 10/31 statement from the Hawaii Dep't of Health. I didn't go into speculation. As a result, my username was permanently blocked, what I posted was deleted, and a "conflict of interest" notice was placed on my old user page," wrote another anonymous reader.
* "What you are looking at regarding the Barrack (sic) Obama article on Wikipedia is a 'liberalization' of not just that, but the entire website," wrote Brian Macdonald of Murfreesboro, Tennessee. "The people who control and edit in Wikipedia will present what they think should be the article on Obama; they will not post anything about his socialism, his Bill Ayers connections, former Marxist "New Party" which he was involved in, or anything else that would portray him in a negative light, despite the official Wikipedia policy that everything is to be neutral."
While Wright finally made it onto Obama's Wikipedia page – if only in one sentence – multiple times the past month, Wikipedia users who wrote about the eligibility issues had their entries deleted almost immediately and were banned from re-posting any material on the website for three days.
In one example, one Wikipedia user added the following to Obama's page:
"There have been some doubts about whether Obama was born in the U.S. after the politician refused to release to the public a carbon copy of his birth certificate and amid claims from his relatives he may have been born in Kenya. Numerous lawsuits have been filed petitioning Obama to release his birth certificate, but most suits have been thrown out by the courts."
As is required on the online encyclopedia, the entry was backed up by third-party media articles, citing the Chicago Tribune and WorldNetDaily.com
The entry was posted Feb. 24, at 6:16 p.m. Eastern Time. Just three minutes later, the entry was removed by a Wikipedia administrator, claiming the posting violated the website's rules against "fringe" material.
According to Wikipedia rules, however, a "fringe theory can be considered notable if it has been referenced extensively, and in a serious manner, in at least one major publication, or by a notable group or individual that is independent of the theory."
The Obama eligibility issue has indeed been reported extensively by multiple news media outlets. WorldNetDaily has led the coverage. Other news outlets, such as Britain's Daily Mail and the Chicago Tribune have published articles critical of claims Obama may not be eligible. The Los Angeles Times quoted statements by former presidential candidate Alan Keys doubting Obama is eligible to serve as president. Just last week, the Internet giant America Online featured a top news article about the eligibility subject, referencing WND's coverage.
When the user tried to repost the entry about Obama's eligibility a second time, another administrator removed the material within two minutes and then banned the Wikipedia user from posting anything on the website for three days.
Wikipedia administrators have the ability to kick off users if the administrator believes the user violated the website's rules.
Over the last month, WND has monitored several other attempts to add eligibility issues to Obama's Wikipedia page. In every attempt monitored, the information was deleted within minutes and the user who posted the material was barred from the website for three days.
The Wikipedia entry about former President George W. Bush, by contrast, is highly critical. One typical entry reads, "Prior to his marriage, Bush had multiple accounts of alcohol abuse. ... After his re-election, Bush received increasingly heated criticism. In 2005, the Bush administration dealt with widespread criticism over its handling of Hurricane Katrina. In December 2007, the United States entered the second-longest post-World War II recession."
The entry on Bush also cites claims that he was "favorably treated due to his father's political standing" during his National Guard service. It says Bush served on the board of directors for Harken and that questions of possible insider trading involving Harken arose even though a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation concluded the information Bush had at the time of his stock sale was not sufficient to constitute insider trading.
Angela Beesley Starling, a spokeswoman for Wikipedia, explained to WND that all the website's encyclopedia content is monitored by users. She said the administrators who deleted the entries are volunteers.
"Administrators," Starling said, "are simply people who are trusted by the other community members to have access to some extra tools that allow them to delete pages and perform other tasks that help the encyclopedia."
According to Alexa.com, Wikipedia is the seventh most trafficked website on the Internet. A Google search for the words "Barack Obama" brings up the president's Wikipedia page in the top four choices, following two links to Obama's official websites