Does it really help Jews to cooperate with the ideology that started with the genocidal slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina?
Ed Miliband is the son of Polish immigrant parents. His mother, Marion Kozak, is a Polish Jew who survived the Holocaust thanks to being protected by Poles. His father, Ralph Miliband, was a Belgian-born Polish Jewish Marxist academic who fled with his father to England during World War II.
Rochdale is notorious for its muslim sex predators abusing white British girls taken into "care" by the social state.
Rochdale Labour councillor Shakil Ahmed is the dad of now freed(?!) terrorist suspect Waheed Ahmed who was arrested and accused of trying to go to Syria with eight of his relatives.
Greater Manchester Police confirmed that six people - a 21-year-old man arrested at Birmingham Airport, two women and two men aged between 22 and 47 held at Manchester Airport, plus a 30-year-old man arrested in the Rochdale area, have been released without charge.
University student Waheed, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, and eight of his relatives - including four children ranging from a one-year-old baby to an 11-year-old - were stopped on the Turkish border with Syria and arrested by Turkish police within walking distance of the border in the town of Reyhanli.
Labour councillor dad Shakil Ahmed refused to comment on his son's arrest
Police said the six people arrested on suspicion of commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism have been released without charge. A force statement read: 'No evidence was uncovered to suggest any imminent threat to the communities of Rochdale or the UK.'
Waheed's father Shakil Ahmed, a bakery delivery driver who has been pictured with party leader Ed Miliband, is a councillor in Rochdale.
Mr Ahmed said he believed his son had been on holiday with other relatives when they were stopped.
In a statement Councillor Shakil Ahmed said: 'My son is a good muslim and his loyalties belong to Britain, so I don't understand what he's doing there.
'If I thought for a second that he was in danger of being radicalised, I would have reported him to the authorities.
'He's studying a degree in politics and sociology at Manchester University and has a good future ahead of him.'
The territory on the Syrian side of the stretch of border that they were attempting to cross is controlled by the Nusra Front, the Syrian branch of Al Qaeda.
Five houses, including that of Ahmed’s father, were searched as part of attempts to establish why the group apparently tried to enter Syria.
Klevius wrote:
Muslim ethnicity - not geographical location - behind "Asian" or "Pakistan" sex abuse/murder of white girls!
The disgusting face of the social state
Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for
letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from
your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending
islam while not defending of children.
However, she seems not very visible on Google News despite the biggest
sex slave shock ever in Britain happened under her watch!?
To get a theoretical background to this please read what Klevius wrote some 20 years ago (
Angels of Antichrist in the social state - the most important sociological paper written in the last century) and a decade ago (
Pathological symbiosis in the social service).
Also consider
The Swedish girl problem.
However, what you really should give a serious thought is why Joyce Thacker is defended?
The now reported over 1400 child (young girls "rescued" from their
families by the social state) sex slaves taken and abused lately by
British muslims is just a tiny glare from the tip of the iceberg. And
although it's common and accepted all over the muslim world, in Western
countries it's protected under the "islamophobia" slogan.
It's not islam! Really? So muslim jihadists, and muslim sex offenders
just happen to follow the text in the Koran and the historical origin of
islam in this respect?!
And some other disgusting females supporting muslim sex slavery
Is the Darfur genocide a "random muslim scare story", Nesrine Malik? As a
Sudanese you should know, shouldn't you. Or the global muslim sex abuse
and trafficking of underage girls?
Nesrine Malik: In 2012, nine men were convicted of child
exploitation and grooming of
vulnerable young girls in Rochdale. Similar grooming gangs were
identified in Derby, Rotherham and Oxford..The fact that these grooming
gangs were Asian and Muslim ('muslims' were almost never mentioned -
it's entirely Malik's own spice to ther story), and their
victims white, became central to their offences in public discourse and
media coverage. How was this done? Newspaper articles, radio shows and
TV panel discussions adopted, discussed and repeated the claim of Muslim
grooming and abuse. By popularising a notion that their crimes were
somehow mandated by a sharia law that condoned sexual exploitation of
non-Muslims. That is, not only is their religion relevant, it is
blessing their crimes, or at least informing their culture. This was
simply not true but it was repeated and sublimated into fact. "Muslim
grooming gangs", a description about as unhelpful as the
"Christian paedophile Jimmy Savile". It was a scenario in which a
factually erroneous religious justification was used to explain an
anomalous episode.
Max Dunbar: “I used to get outraged about people like Nesrine Malik.
Here we have an independent woman working in finance in secular London,
telling women in the developing world that theocracy really isn’t so bad
as they make out. Isn’t this an imperialist attitude? But in the end,
the appropriate response isn’t outrage: it’s a dark and riotous laughter
at the arrant stupidity of it all.”
It was because they were muslims they were so leniently handled with by
social workers, police, courts, etc. - not because they were from Asia!
Non-muslim Russians from Asia would hardly have been equally leniently
handled!
Who else than Klevius can tell all these abused or about to become
abused girls about sex apartheid and the true origin of islam?
When a girl trapped in a limiting sex segregated upbringing suddenly
realizes the heterosexual attraction of her ass she might easily get
lost - especially if her attachment to her parents is cut off by the
state power of senseless social authorities. Combine this to the Koran
that tells you that infidel girls your right arm possesses are
legitimate. And add to this that, according to islamic logic, the West
(more or less by its very existence) is attacking islam and therefore
war booty is legal.
And who else than Klevius can tell all of you others that your tax money
to the social state is of no use - but contributes to abuse! Yes,
Klevius has seen all the evidence through academic studies as well as on
the actual field as a solicitor in cases were the state wants to abduct
children for no real reason other than placing them in commercial
foster or care homes they themselves often have commercial interest in.
Moreover, the social state has itself developed into a self serving
commercial interest spiced by political interest.
Again, read Angels of Antichrist and Pathological symbiosis before you even open your big mouth in these matters.
Here's what Klevius wrote
is by far the most important sociological paper written in the last
Century. In summary it shows that there is no connection at all between
tax money invested in the
welfare social state and the
quality of its outcome. And how could there ever be when it's a defacto
overgrown commercial company except fot that it:
doesn't have to show results (or the results can be arbitrarily manipulated by itself)
its parts work as authorities
it has monopoly
it writes, more or less, its own laws via its extensive bureaucracy
and lobbying (for a horror example from Sweden of how democracy is
sidestepped by bureaucracy see
Pathological Synbiosis)
its main interest is to feed itself
it started as a dump for the spill over (women) of sex segregation
(in the post-industrial automation), i.e. women (who couldn't go to the
private sector) were paid to get away from their children (often to take
care of children of others). As Klevius has shown in his thesis
groundbreaking (but largely neglected)
Pathological Symbiosis
(with all the references you may ask for to really see how bad the
social state is in taking care of children) this process also includes
an element of feel of guilt boosted by "motherhood" psychology, i.e.
that women who couldn't take care of their children because they were
working started pathologizing women who did take care of their children.
Although the welfare state was born in the 1940s the social state
emerged on a powerful new tax platform in Sweden in the 1970s with some
roots in much earlier practices.
In
Angels of Antichrist (which, so far, is the world's only serious/informed attempt to an overall interdisciplinary approach on the social state) and
Pathological Symbiosis
it's shown beyond reasonable doubt that there's absolutely no evidence
(see e.g. Vinnerjung's comprehensive study on foster children) that the
social state has contributed any good social work on the whole despite
the enormous amount of money invested in it. And this is no rocket
science to understand. How could a young sex segregated woman without
children of her own and brainwashed for many years in courses based on
all the time changing and heavily biased flimsy but fashionable non
sense psychology ans sociology, possibly know anything else than khow to
get the most out of it for herself?
So when
Jim Taylor, chief executive of
Rochdale Borough
Council, refuses to answer whether he'll get rid of those social workers
who called sexually abused/raped (by muslims from Pakistan) white girls
(whom the social state already had taken "care" of) and who were in
their early teens, "prostitutes" "life choice" and didn't in any way
react to the cries for help, then this is a pattern that has been around
for long also in Swedish schools etc as Klevius has written for a
decade on his sites and blogs.
* To understand what a social state is please read the most important sociological paper from the last century.
'Extreme islam' and 'extremist muslims' vs. ?
No, there is nothing to counter evil islam. Extreme islam has no
alternative simply because islam is extreme in itself. Islam can never
comply with the basic universal equality principle of Human Rights.
That's because islam is based on racism and sexism, i.e. supremacy!
Klevius therefore fully agrees with Erdogan's statement that there are
no moderate muslims because there is no moderate islam.
And they are all around us ready to squeeze in more of islam whenever
opportunities arise - and always ready to excuse islam from whatever
that can be seen as unfavorable to islam.
Chief Crown Prosecutor for the north-west of England, Nazir Afzal was "removed" due to 'on-going drive for efficiency' after being investigated for allegation he sent a text message to a (muslim?) defendant in a court case.
Nazir Afzal to BBC's (deliberately?) toothless (and therefore useless)
presenter Edward Stourton: It has nothing to do with islam. I know that
the vast majority of offenders are British white male.
However, although white British men (because most Brits are "white" -
"colored" muslims constitute below 3-5% and Pakistani/Bangladesh
muslims even less) are the majority of abusers in the British population
as a whole, the specific type of grooming offence and especially the
very highly organised sex abuse such as we’ve seen in Rotherham and
elsewhere, is dominated by muslims and follows Koranic principles from
the origin of islam.
This should be a warning to British voters!
David Milliband (Red Ed's pink brother): "It's one thing to take on islam, the other is to take on the muslims abusing islam."
Klevius: Again, the evil ideology is excused while its evilness is
called "abuse" of the ideology. An AK47 isn't a peaceful tool. It's
meant to kill or injure humans no matter how you interpret the manual.
And most users say it's for defense. Same with islam. Islam can't
survive without being "attacked by "infidels" or "islamophobes". It's
against this background you have to consider the muslim statement that
Allah made all muslims but some, the "infidels", committed apostasy and
therefore constitute "attack on islam".
Andrew Gilligan: Mr Niamatullah, also known as Abu Eesa, from
Manchester, is a full-time preacher and an instructor for the Al-Maghrib
Institute, whose dean of academic affairs, Yasir Qadhi, will appear at
the same Mend events. Mr Qadhi has previously claimed the Holocaust was a
hoax, although he now says he believes it did happen and has repudiated
his views.
On April 3 in Manchester, one of the speakers booked to appear alongside
Mr Niamatullah is Baroness Warsi, the former Tory chairman and the
first Muslim woman to sit in Cabinet. Let us hope she has not read his
views on women in the workplace from the “Prophetic Guidance” website.
“I am an absolute extremist in this issue in that I don’t have any time
for the opposing arguments,” he wrote.
“Women should not be in the workplace whatsoever. Full stop. I simply
can’t imagine how we will safeguard our Islamic identity in the future
and build strong Muslim communities in the West with women wanting to go
out and becoming employed in the hell that it is out there.” There is
no suggestion that Baroness Warsi endorses such extremist views.
Even carrying money in your pocket is “entirely unacceptable from a
fiqhi [Islamic law] point of view”, according to Mr Niamatullah since
there are “pictures of a non-mahram [forbidden] woman” – the Queen – on
the banknotes, though he has “regretfully” conceded that this particular
rule must be broken if daily life is to remain possible.
Baroness Warsi claimed last night that she was not appearing with
anybody else at the Manchester event, although Mend’s own website lists
her and Mr Niamatullah as speakers. Flyers for the event naming the pair
have been circulating online for weeks. Other avowed Mend democrats
include Azad Ali, the group’s head of community development and
engagement, who has written of his “love” for Anwar al-Awlaki, the
al-Qaeda recruiter; said that the Mumbai attacks were “not terrorism”;
justified the killing of British troops and stated that “democracy, if
it means at the expense of not implementing the Sharia, of course nobody
agrees with that”.
Mend itself is a rebranding of a group called Engage, or iEngage, which
was removed as secretariat to the All-Party Parliamentary Group on
Islamophobia in 2011 after The Sunday Telegraph revealed its links with
extremism. The name change appears to have been enough to fool many MPs
and official bodies.
Mend also appears dramatically better funded than in its Engage days,
doubling its claimed number of staff and hiring regional co-ordinators
across England.
Much of Mend’s money may come from the proceeds of tax avoidance. Sufyan
Ismail, its chief executive, is a Lancashire businessman with reported
assets of £65 million who earned his fortune by creating one of the
country’s biggest tax avoidance consultancies, OneE Group, described as a
“specialist advisory unit for high net worth entrepreneurs, footballers
and celebrities”. OneE specialises in what its website called “income
sheltering solutions” and “profit extraction” techniques, often through
its offshore subsidiary in Cyprus. In an adaptation of the HMRC slogan
“tax doesn’t have to be taxing”, OneE’s tag-line was that for its
clients “tax doesn’t have to be”. Mend is based in OneE’s London office.
Mr Ismail, who lives in a leafy lane near Bolton, has been able to kill
two birds with one stone, depriving the infidel British state of tens of
millions in revenue while making himself extremely rich. As well as
advising others how to avoid tax, OneE’s accounts show that it paid more
than £26 million in two years into an “employer-financed retirement
benefit scheme” and millions of pounds in “loans” to Mr Ismail. The
£26 million could, of course, represent generous pensions for OneE’s 45
staff, averaging almost £600,000 each, nearly 10 times their average
salaries. Or it could be a scheme to save Mr Ismail and his fellow
directors paying almost any income tax. HMRC bluntly describes schemes
of this type, which are legal, as “tax avoidance.”
'Jews and Christians are the 'enemies of Allah' who wil 'all go to hellfire,' said Haithsm al-Haddad
Another of Mr Ismail’s companies, the now-liquidated 1st Ethical Tax
Planning, was subject to an HMRC investigation, according to documents
at Companies House. The directors were reported by the liquidator under
the Company Directors’ Disqualification Act, though Mr Ismail has not
been disqualified. The auditors of OneE Group resigned in 2013 and the
accounts of a related company, OneE Tax, have been revised and
resubmitted – twice.
The outcome of the HMRC investigation is unknown. OneE did not return
calls seeking comment, though the company has previously said that the
pensions wheeze was merely “responsible tax planning” with nothing
“aggressive or abusive” about it. Mr Ismail said last night that he had
resigned as a director of OneE three months ago, but declined to respond
to questions about the company or 1st Ethical Tax Planning. He said
that he had “never engaged in tax avoidance of any description”.
Mend’s own accounts are not yet available, but in the last two years Mr
Ismail and a fellow director of OneE have donated hundreds of thousands
of pounds to their personal charity, 1st Ethical Charitable Trust, which
has spent large sums on UK community projects, almost certainly
including Mend.
So why are Mend and YouElect urging Muslims to participate in a system
which many of the two organisations’ key figures fundamentally reject?
One clue may come in Mr Niamatullah’s speech, in which he said that
Muslims should act as an “underground movement … to affect and influence
people”.
Mr Ali’s day job is as a community affairs co-ordinator for the Islamic
Forum of Europe (IFE), an extremist group based at the East London
Mosque, which wants to create a Sharia state in Europe.
According to a training session for recruits, the IFE’s goal is “not
simply to give da’wah [call to the faith]. Our goal is to create the
True Believer, to then mobilise those believers into an organised force
for change who will carry out da’wah, hisbah [enforcement of Islamic
law] and jihad. This will lead to social change and iqamatud-Deen [an
Islamic social, economic and political order]”. IFE’s “entryism” helped
to install Lutfur Rahman as the Labour leader of Tower Hamlets council.
He then gave them millions of pounds in grants. Mend also appears to
have been funded by Tower Hamlets. Mr Rahman was expelled from the
Labour Party, but re-elected as an independent, with IFE help. He
represents Islamism’s closest ally in UK political office.
Mend and the IFE cannot, of course, hope to replicate their success in
heavily Muslim Tower Hamlets across the UK. But by building links with
an unsuspecting political establishment, they can further the Islamist
agenda.
Mend’s “Muslim manifesto” attacks the way that the government has
treated Islamists as “beyond the pale” and demands they be brought into
“partnership” with Whitehall. Mend wants to return to the position under
the previous administration where non-violent extremists were treated
as legitimate representatives of their community. Mr Ali, for instance,
was the chairman of the main liaison group between the Muslim community
and the Metropolitan Police.
Mend has enjoyed some success in this field, building links with some
police and crime commissioners, including Greater Manchester’s Tony
Lloyd and West Yorkshire’s Mark Burns-Williamson.
'We are all Cage, abd we stand with them in all their endeavours,' said Jamil Rashid
The manifesto claims that the Government’s promotion of British values
“provides a fertile environment for the festering of far-Right ideas”
and says that “integration narratives” are “concerning”. It claims,
falsely, that “government policy continues to conflate religion with
extremism”.
It makes valid points about discrimination against Muslims in employment
and anti-Muslim attacks, which are on the rise, albeit from a low base.
But it uses selective evidence, often choosing the gloomiest opinion
polls and the most damning studies to paint a picture of a community
under siege. (Mend’s Facebook page is far more inflammatory, hosting,
for instance, an article which says that Muslims may face a holocaust.)
It also claims that far-Right extremism is a “growing problem”. But,
according to the anti-fascist group Hope not Hate, the British far-Right
is “shrinking” and “in its worst state for almost 20 years”. The
manifesto claims that a “surge in Islamophobic hate crime” after the
killing of the soldier Lee Rigby included the murder of Mohammed Saleem,
a Muslim. Mr Saleem was killed three weeks before Drummer Rigby’s
death, by a Ukrainian racist who had been in Britain for five days.
Mend and YouElect, along with the IFE, the Muslim Council of Britain,
the Unite union and the TUC, on Saturday organised a “march against
Islamophobia”, assembling outside that well-known media hotbed of hate,
the BBC.
“Islamophobia”, one of Mend’s favourite charges, is a standard
accusation made by Muslim wrongdoers to smear critics and deter
scrutiny. No doubt this article will attract a similar response. But
every time the charge is abused by the likes of Mend, it loses a bit
more credibility and further damages the genuine victims of anti-Muslim
prejudice.
*
By declaring herself a muslim she inevitably has to support sharia in
some form. And every form of sharia is against the most basic of Human
Rights and the principle of universal equality.
Jews, not Romans, ordered the execution of Jesus*. 600 years later Muhammad ordered the first genocide of Jews in Medina.
* When Mr X "president"Barry Barakeh
Hussain Muhammad Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) in his presidential
campaign was asked whether he believes in Jesus he said yes. However,
like all muslims he doesn't believe in Christ.
First the Jews murdered Jesus and then the muslims murdered the Jews -
no wonder religion seems to be the problem. Or do you really think that
without Judaic religions there would still be the same amount of victims
on top of other victims?! In other words, do you, for example, really
think the Germans had murdered equally many without Nationalsocialism
(aka Nazism)?
BBC presenter Mishal Husain has called on British Muslim scholars to use social media to combat extremism
Mishal Husain: “I don’t think my way of life is under any kind of threat."
BBC-s sharia presenter Mishal Husain with her islamofascist muslim pals
who share almost identical values with the Islamic State.
British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo
OIC Secretary-General Iyad Amin Madani stressed that the "Saudi
governing system is based on Islam, which fosters values of justice,
compassion, equality, and tolerance."
Klevius: These words from this human scumbag must be some of the most
hypocritical ever uttered. According to historical facts islam has been
the by far worst crime against humanity throughout 1400 years. And today
islam's "guardian" Saudi Arabia is the most intolerant of the world's
countries and has even criminalized Human Rights.Moreover. the Saudi
regime is the hate mongering mastermind behind islamic terror around the
world. And while most people point to islamic "scholars" (aka clerics,
imams, etc) as the driving force, Mishal Husain asks these muslim
"scholars" to contribute even more.
Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports Saudi based OIC and its Sharia against Human Rights!
If s/he doesn't then s/he is an apostate (i.e. committing the worst
"crime" known to islam) and ought to be welcomed by every non-muslim.
Saudi based OIC - and its
islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today,
and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!
Catherine Brennan, Reclaim Australia spokeswoman: "We
are pro-Australian values and anti-extreme islam, but we're not
anti-muslim".
Klevius: Meaning what?! Who are then the followers of "extreme islam" if they aren't muslims?
Islam was born out of backwardness and hate - that's why islam is still backward today!
Economic activity in Muslim countries remains scant, low tech and strictly oriented towards local consumption.
Sayyid al-Qimny: It seems that the reason, in the end, for our
backwardness is the men of religion themselves and their opportunistic
allies throughout history. When compared with the language of modernity,
does not their discourse today appear somewhat redolent of the Middle
Ages?
Our shaykhs tell us – God grant them mercy – that what the likes of
people like me are aiming for is that we live as westerners, with all
their ‘moral degeneracy’, so that our Nation and its traditions should
collapse; as if we had made enough progress in the first place to fear a
collapse, and as if the life of westerners has led to backwardness and
collapse in them!
Given this perception of modernity as a deliberate cultural raid
targeting our nation via its religion, (now that imperialism has
‘reconfigured itself to use new methods’), that is, that the Crusader
West is waging a Crusade campaign, one thing remains difficult to
decide: is the West a right-wing, religious, Crusader West extremist in
its religiosity, or a place of debauchery, degeneracy and atheism?
So there is no connection between on the one hand religion or faith, and
on the other hand progress or backwardness. Rather, behind every crime
there is someone who benefits from it. This crime is the one committed
by the professional clerics throughout history against the rights of the
nation in toto. They are the ones who were responsible all this time
for Islam and the Muslims; for ten centuries its ‘defenders’ have turned
out to be its thieves.
Klevius: Atheism is the very precondition for Human Rights. Even for people "believing" in a "god".
Here's a Frontpage view on islam and muslims
Why Muslim Cultures Lag Behind
In the past fifty years, many countries have caught up with the rich
and developed Western World. Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore,
with virtually no natural resources, have created advanced, urbanized
and prosperous societies, complete with world-class technology that
often exceed that which is found in the West. India, Brazil and China,
although not yet fully developed, now all possess large and affluent
middle classes that did not exist just a few decades ago. There is no
reason to believe why their economic and social progress of all of these
countries will not continue for the foreseeable future.
The Muslim world, on the other hand, has struggled during this era
of unprecedented global wealth creation. These countries have profited
almost solely, by happy geological accident, from oil and gas
extraction. Beyond these activities, trillions of dollars in oil
revenue over the past sixty years, Muslim progress in many other areas,
such as scientific research, social issues and education, lags badly
behind the rest of the world.
How could this be the case? The answer, which the major media dares
not touch, lies in the very culture of Muslim countries themselves.
Consider the following cultural traits which are all typically found in
majority Muslim countries:
Belief in magic
State-owned Malaysian newspapers and television stations routinely run
breathless stories about witch doctors (‘bomoh’), evil spirits and other
forms of the supernatural. Visitors to Malaysia get a good laugh out of
such quaint cultural practices, until they realize with a shock that
Malaysian belief in such superstition is absolutely sincere. But it’s
not just here in Malaysia where this happens. In Saudi Arabia,
witchcraft is considered very real and a capital offence. In Iran, laws
are on the books that make ‘sorcery’ a crime. And in Iraq, many of the
locals are absolutely convinced that American soldiers wear sunglasses
that can see through clothing and have bases protected by force fields. A
culture that is eager to embrace the supernatural takes a giant step
away from rationality and deceives itself fundamentally. Self-deception
is always, sooner or later, the path to failure.
Belief in conspiracies
Muslims take it as an Article of Faith that various groups of so-called
infidels or other outsiders are engaged in various conspiracies to keep
Muslims down, make Islam look bad, or are otherwise up to No Good. The
lack of evidence means little to a society where ‘skepticism’ is already
an unusual and foreign concept. For instance, even well-educated
Muslims will tell you, with total earnestness, that the 9-11 terror
attacks were actually perpetrated by Zionists, or the CIA, or the U.S.
Government, or some other nefarious group. Never mind the vast amount of
evidence to the contrary. When presented with rebuttals from
non-Muslims, Muslims will usually just shrug it off and carry on with
their nonsensical conspiracy theories.
Lack of innovation
Here in Malaysia, it is telling that the word in the Malay language for
innovation (“inovasi”) did not exist until it came from English, quite
recently, as a loan word. Innovation, meaning to create something
without precedent, is a risky and therefore dangerous business in the
Islamic world. The reason for this is because Islam already has a word
for innovation, “bid’ah”. In Islam, this word is essentially the same in
meaning as ‘heresy’, which is yet another capital crime under Islamic
law. Hence creativity and individuality are utterly stifled in a
totalitarian fashion, even in Muslim countries where Islamic law has not
yet been fully implemented. Improvisation is also discouraged for
similar reasons. This is a major reason why Islamic countries are
usually characterized by a near-total lack of scientific research and
reluctance to embrace technology in general.
Lack of devotion to non-family/non tribal/non-clan organizations
In most Muslim societies, loyalty often runs no farther than one’s tribe
or sect. People from the far-off central government, or those from the
next valley over for that matter, are foreigners to be met with
suspicion or hostility. Afghanistan is a perfect example of this sort of
chaos. Even if these differences are eventually papered over, so to
speak, by the force and coercion of a dictatorship, the lack of cohesion
and distrust remain. Muslim leaders usually come into and stay in power
by exploiting this very characteristic, by playing one tribe or group
off another. Patriotism amongst the general public is another foreign
concept, taken for granted in the West. Muslims may remain loyal to
Islam in general, but more importantly, to the tribe in particular.
Lack of empowerment of women
The future, no matter what form it may take, is almost certainly going
to involve more technology, not less. How well equipped is a society for
this future if half of its members are only (at best) grudgingly given
their rights? In many Islamic countries, women are often illiterate and
have no rights in essential critical life decisions, such as those
involving child-rearing, marriage or education. And why should they?
Various Quranic verses, age-old Islamic traditions, and core Islamic
teachings render women as nothing more than chattel and the property of
their male relatives—never the equal of men. And no one can ‘reform’
these teachings to something more enlightened—see the penalty for
“bid’ah” above.
Lack of personal responsibility
Muslim leaders often lie to or deceive their own people, to
subordinates, or to allies in order to advance their own personal
agendas. Remember that most Muslim countries are a patchwork of tribes
who barely tolerate one another in the best of times. Loyalty to one’s
country as a whole is next to non-existent. So, the main objective of
these leaders, whether at the top, middle or bottom, is to steal as much
as they can, while they can, in order to enrich themselves and their
families, clans or tribes—’national interest’ be damned. If you’re one
of the rare incorruptible types, or are otherwise too stupid to steal
when presented with the opportunity, then more the fool you are. Other
tribes or groups are useful as scapegoats when the need arises or when
blame must be deflected.
Lack of skilled labour
Rich, developed and successful countries like Germany, Japan and others
do not just spring into existence. It takes the efforts of millions,
skilled specialists toiling endlessly in dangerous and/or monotonous
drudgery for decades, to build and also maintain the ever-growing
complex web of systems that modern nations depend on to function. But
Muslim countries, even the ones with trillions from oil revenue, have
consistently failed to create large enough castes of technical
specialists that modern nations must have. As there are never enough
people willing or able to work within their own borders, Muslim nations
are forced to outsource their labour needs. In Saudi Arabia and most
Arab states, for instance, cleaners and maids come from India or the
Philippines, while engineers and others in the technical trades come
from America, Europe and increasingly east Asia. This trend is
accelerating, paradoxically enough, at a time when the governments of
the burgeoning Arab world are having an increasing problem just feeding
their exploding populations.
Lack of meritocracy
The West has thrived not only because they have learned to hold people
responsible for their actions, but also they have learned to give out
rewards based on individual achievement. Hence higher–performing
individuals tend to be eventually in charge and reap the most rewards
(in prestige, rank, money, etc.). Westerners do not always manage to
live up to these ideals, but the concepts themselves are not questioned.
In the Islamic world, however, what counts is personal loyalty,
personal connections, and tribal/sect membership. Incompetent leaders
are preferable to competent ones, so long as they are properly loyal.
Such a state of affairs makes for incredible inefficiency on a normal
day and catastrophic consequences when any sort of crisis arises.
Muslims are fond of saying “it’s God’s will” at difficult times, which
for Muslims seems like most of the time. Actually, it’s not so much
“God’s will” but more like the inevitable consequences of their
dysfunctional culture.
If you’ve read up to this point, no doubt that you could add a few
more things to this list. But remember, political correctness dictates
that all cultures are somehow “equal,” and Muslims are convinced their
cultures are somehow superior, never mind the reams of evidence to the
contrary. So while I want to be optimistic, the smart money is not
riding on the would-be reformers of the under-performing societies of
the Muslim world. At least not yet.
Does the problem lie in the way islam is utilized?
Sayyid al-Qimny: The problem lies not in the religion, nor in any
religion. It lies in the way this religion is utilized. Some make use of
it to achieve progress, others to maintain backwardness. Some respect
religion and distance it from political games and the intrigues of
shaykhs and sultans, but there are others who continue to exploit it to
maintain a single way of thinking and a single vision, so as to stay
master of the castle in every sphere and every issue. To these, issues
concerning the nation, the people or the religion do not pre-occupy him
so much as maintaining domination and authority over the mind of the
Muslim, and retaining this all-embracing authoritarian control by
effectively enslaving the people.
It is a stand taken by everyone who is engaged in Islam as a profession
and as a source of income, by those who have the power to mould the
consciousness of the people according to imperious, authoritarian
priorities. It is a consciousness of the single view to the exclusion of
all others. They claim that this is the true Islam and that all else
constitutes sinful disbelief. This leaves no room at any time for any
alternative view to emerge. Accordingly no opposition has ever appeared
over the entire history of the Muslims. If anything of this nature did
appear its ideological instrument was invariably some alternative
reading of this same Islam. But in general, over the entire length of
Islamic history, their efforts petered out to leave in place a type of
society that only knew of one, uniquely saved, denomination.
So we have therefore uncovered a first reason that we may connect with Islam:
That is, the absence of any other point of view which could foster a
rich discussion concerning religion and life and come up with something
new, as occurred when the earliest Christians differed on their
interpretations of the Gospel, of God and the Holy Spirit. Those who
differed held councils which relied on the strength of the arguments of
the protagonists, so that the matter ended with a settlement that the
majority conceded to. When new differences surfaced, new councils were
convened. Such were the Councils of Nicaea, Chalcedon and Ephesus, and
the like. This attitude was the afterglow of Greco-Roman culture. But on
the Islamic side the first and the last ‘council’ was that of the
Saqīfat Banī Sā‘ida [1] in which was decided the formula for Islamic
rule, politically and religiously, all other things being deemed
outright error.
Rhazes' Book of Medicine - a medieval preeminence
This formula went from crisis to crisis until some resolution emerged,
but only after a series of crushing civil wars beginning with the
Apostasy Wars and carrying on and beyond Karbalā. During this time this
isolated, oppressed region continued to give off the appearance of
power, but it did not take long before it was suppressed and its leaders
wiped out, whether by the Zanj rebellion or the Assassins or the
Qarmatians or by others. All that remained operative was the primordial,
tribal, Caliphal principle that cannot accept rivals, due to its claim
that this is the true Islam that God demands – as if they had somehow
ascended into the heavens and taken down all the miraculous details in
their writings on fiqh: all their interpretations, sanctions,
commentaries and fatwās, straight from the mouth of God Himself, who
privileged them above all others with this insight.
Christianity since its very inception spoke to the people of the time in
their language and their way of thinking. It gave to Caesar what was
Caesar’s and to God what was God’s, separating the two domains, and by
doing so stood in the Greek tradition where democratic principles were
still operating.
The Islamic caliphate system, complete with its religious dressing and
the close alliance of its professional clerics, was an example of the
total amalgamation of religious and worldly powers, taking the example
of the Prophet, who held all the powers in himself in his fledgling
state, as a template for rule under an absolute ruler in terms of his
powers, influence, and absolutely dominant, single religious conception.
By so doing they failed to make a distinction between the Prophet as
the unique prophet and the Seal of the Prophets, and themselves as heirs
to the Prophethood – an office which is not in fact a hereditary one.
Klevius: However, this analysis completely misses the very origin and
soul of true islam namely its evilness that was and still is its main
attraction. It's islam's violations of Human Rights that constitutes its
main allure. Without it islam wouldn't be popular anymore. OIC realized
it when it declared islamic sharia as superior to Human Rights.
'The reason for muslim backwardness is the "men of religion" themselves and their opportunistic allies throughout history'
Sayyid al-Qimny: It seems that the reason, in the end, for our
backwardness is the men of religion themselves and their opportunistic
allies throughout history. When compared with the language of modernity,
does not their discourse today appear somewhat redolent of the Middle
Ages?
Our shaykhs tell us – God grant them mercy – that what the likes of
people like me are aiming for is that we live as westerners, with all
their ‘moral degeneracy’, so that our Nation and its traditions should
collapse; as if we had made enough progress in the first place to fear a
collapse, and as if the life of westerners has led to backwardness and
collapse in them!
Given this perception of modernity as a deliberate cultural raid
targeting our nation via its religion, (now that imperialism has
‘reconfigured itself to use new methods’), that is, that the Crusader
West is waging a Crusade campaign, one thing remains difficult to
decide: is the West a right-wing, religious, Crusader West extremist in
its religiosity, or a place of debauchery, degeneracy and atheism?
So there is no connection between on the one hand religion or faith, and
on the other hand progress or backwardness. Rather, behind every crime
there is someone who benefits from it. This crime is the one committed
by the professional clerics throughout history against the rights of the
nation in toto. They are the ones who were responsible all this time
for Islam and the Muslims; for ten centuries its ‘defenders’ have turned
out to be its thieves.
Klevius: This nonsense rhetorics resembles someone sitting on a branch
while cutting it! Islam is always excluded from its consequences and
placed in an "islamophobia" bubble outside the reach of "islamophobic"
criticism.
.
