Pages

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" loves mosque mice and excuses mosque rats and islam (the worst ideological crime ever)!


The Muslim Brotherhood, who strongly oppose democracy other than as a means for destroying democracy, was voted on by Egyptians who didn't know the diference between Sharia and Human Rights.




While Egypt is bleeding because of islam


Why don't media and politicians dare to tell Egyptian muslims about the racist/sexist difference between Sharia and Human Rights? Because that would be "islamophobia" wouldn't it! And the Turkish muslims, PM Erdogan and OIC Fuhrer Ihsanoglu, think doing that is the worst form of terrorism...




Listen to these confused voices about islam's bloodshed in Egypt

Not a hint about the "elephant in the room", i.e. islam and Sharia



Romesh Ratnesar (deputy editor of Bloomberg Businessweek): Although numerous observers have called for the U.S. to suspend that (military) aid until the army turns power over to a legitimate civilian government, Obama didn’t go anywhere near that far. Nor did he call for the release of the imprisoned former President Mohammed Morsi, or for the prosecution of individuals involved in carrying out abuses during yesterday’s massacre, or indicate that the U.S. would seek any kind of action in the United Nations Security Council.

That’s because the administration is boxed in by its insistence in recent weeks that the military’s overthrow of the freely elected Morsi was actually a step toward restoring democracy. Obama again tried to make that case today, arguing that Morsi’s government “was not inclusive” and suggesting that after his ouster, “there remained a chance for reconciliation and an opportunity to pursue a democratic path.” But yesterday’s events make abundantly clear that democracy and military rule are irreconcilable. Sooner rather than later, President Obama will have to choose to support one or the other.


Alexia Underwood (also in Bloomberg Business Week): At a nearby sandwich shop, Mohammed Hassan had just returned from the protests. “I saw four people killed with my own eyes by the police,” he said. He had been at the new sit-in for hours, and his ears were still ringing from the live ammunition exchanged between protesters and security forces. “Where are my human rights?”

Hesham Sallam, co-editor of the Arab Studies Institute’s publication Jadaliyya, called the crackdown yesterday a calculated move by the army to consolidate power and an obvious attempt to ride the wave of popular discontent against Morsi to its own benefit. “The army and domestic security sector have long been trying to construct a political system in which their own privileges and institutions could be shielded from the uncertainties of electoral politics,” he wrote in an e-mailed statement. He added that the crackdown was an attempt to justify the resurgence of the security state of the Mubarak era.

The burning of several Christian churches by supporters of President Morsi further gives the armed forces the upper hand


Klevius comment: Clearly many muslims don't have a clue that their beloved "faith" is precisely the opposite to Human Rights. Why? Because "West's behavior for most muslims seems to approve of islam (while simultaneously giving muslims a lot of ammo against Human Rights). The extreme "sensitivities" in the West when it comes to islam and muslims is not only at the cost of all others (incl. the majority of the world's population who are atheists - btw, have you noticed that atheist nations like China and Japan are usually excluded from "Asians" by islam supporters) but also responsible for the prolonging of the bloodshed and other* terror caused by this schizophrenic patient's (islam's) free and even applauded roaming around among civilized people.

* The muslim birthrate is the highest and the muslim apostasy ban and Sharia effectively keeps most of them as muslims, hence increasing the threat against Human Rights in the future. Due to "special religious needs" muslims fill the hospitals and graveyards while non-muslims are left to die prematurely and are burned. Mulsims also get extreme special service in matters ranging from taxpayers' money directed to "religious" (read islamofascist) "teachers" etc. to a never ending variety of support that is out of reach for most non-muslim people. But they all fade compared to muslims violation (via Sharia) of non-muslims Human Rights.

If anything has contributed to division and unrest in society, it's the strange fact that muslims are protected by the very Human Rights they deny others while non-muslims have to conform to Sharia, in other words, being denied their Human Rights.



Who is a Western national?


A muslim who is born there and talks fluently the local language but who also supports islamofascist Sharia which stands for the very opposite values?!


This fanatic* muslim and his muslim world organization (OIC) is the most dangerous threat to Human Rights - but is sitting silent as mosque mice while Egypt is suffering


 * who dreams about a Turk led muslim world empire under Sharia, just as Hitler dreamed about a Grossdeutschland. And who blinks the miserable failures of the Turk led Ottoman slave empire which fell in the deepest decay after West had abolished slavery for good.









No comments:

Post a Comment