The wealthy communist and intellectual dwarf, spy prince Guillou, fights a few vulnerable and hated - intellectual dwarfs!

Jan Guillou, with a mouth the size of Scandinavia's biggest newspaper, takes on crumbs on islam's road to hegemony! But will he win?And what about OIC and its Human Rights violating Sharia?!

The Swedish "prince" Jan Guillou (author of cheap and stupid but popular story books who used to be suspected as a spy for Communist Soviet) heightens his intellectual sword as high he can in his defense of the vulnerable 1.5 billion plus oil steered muslim world Umma (Saudi based OIC and its Human Rights violating Sharia). And it's just high enough to hit - a few other intellectual dwarfs who aren't supported by anyone and who constitute the easiest of targets. Job well done, Jan, or! And to really point out the depth of their character and the danger they pose he informs us that these lonely individuals have problems writing simple text.

Have fun playing with the retards Jan but why continue betraying your country?!

 It says: Guillou challenges the web haters

So what about muslim street haters?

A peaceful muslim demonstration in Sweden while Guillou swings his Sharia sword. Can you recognize the peaceful muslim kicker who later seems to talk to his people?

Aeneas: The OIC is not shy in demanding that the fear of God be put into any and all who dare to question Islamic dogma.  Indeed the prime purpose of an international sharia criminal court would be to punish critics of Islamic doctrine.  Such an institution has been unknown in Europe since the days of the Inquisition.  The OICs aim is not to allow Muslims to peacefully practice their faith, but to impose that faith on those who do not want to have anything to do with it!  In any case, Mr Esfanani’s comments come on the eve of the OICs 12th Summit that takes place in Cairo this week (2).

The OIC has already indicated that it will be intensifying its efforts to curb Western freedoms which might be an indication of its intention to create an international sharia court:

    “According to the OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the leaders of Islamic nations need to have a new approach for dealing with the threats of Islamophobia.”

In his call for an observer office to combat religious intolerance, İhsanoğlu made no mention of the religious intolerance and persecution that takes place in OIC countries.  The OIC’s approach is all about imposing sharia rather than actually confronting real religious intolerance.

Muslim Saudi Arabia is the most disgusting of states. And OIC is based and steered from there! Any comments Mr Guillou. Or don't you dare to debate with people over your intellectual level?

OIC's islamofascist Fuhrer of all muslims, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, talking in Saudi Arabia 2012:     …the most important point here is that we have succeeded in the period since 2005 (the publishing of the Danish cartoons) succeeded internationally in that we issued reports from the Human Rights Council of the UN on how to deal with islamophobia… and these reports we have adopted in agreement with the US and European countries that were objecting to these reports.

    …At this moment we have the resolution 16/18 which was issued last year at the UN which forms a legal groundwork for criminalising actions that could lead to (muslim) violence… there is in the international agreement for civil and political rights (year 1966 paragraph 18) A provision that would allow us to put limits on the misuse of freedom of speech including misuse of freedom of the press, freedom of thought, the misuse of these freedoms towards others, in a sense that it would encourage to violence and to hatred based on religious belief. We have these legal bases… bases that existed for some time and new bases that we developed and the international community accepts; all we are now missing is some steps that would allow enforcement of these laws.

 I have no reason to believe that this man to the left, who was attacked by the muslim demonstrators, was an intellectual dwarf. However, it seems clear he was quite vulnerable though were he stood there alone. And when he turned to the police he was told that they weren't interested because they "didn't want any problems". The victim was then counter-reported (by the muslim kicker?) to the police for "racial agitation", apparently for him not approving of message of the muslim demonstration.

.






 .