How come that we continue blinking/excusing the worst of evil fascisms now represented by the Saudi Caliph & Co?!

Saudi islamofascists are called "guardian of islam" - and rightly so. True islam is true islamofascism! And you moron continue swallowing the poison the Saudi dictator family spreads over the world by the help of their invention OIC and Turkey's  islamofascist Ottoman* ambitions!

* For you ignorant, Ottoman was a slave imperium based on Koranic teaching that miserably fell apart when slavery was forbidden!


The bleeding obvious


The evilness in islam is its incompatibility with the core idea of Human Rights, namely that every individual has the same negative rights (freedom from impositions) no matter of sex, beliefs etc. This means, for example, that whereas Human Rights let women decide by themselves, Sharia-islam denies them this right by imposing sex-connected “duties”, “responsibilities” “dignity” etc creepy euphemisms for sexism. Just like when Muslim Brotherhood started calling truthsayers about islam “islamophobes”.

In fact the whole of islam is evil. What people might consider less evil or even good doesn’t belong to islam in any meaningful sense. What made islam “successful” wasn’t any personal reflections about how to be nice towards your neighbor but just the very opposite. Islam is, and has always been, a racist/sexist parasite on the “un-islamic”. However, that hasn’t hindered islam supporters from Caliphs to journalists and poiticians etc to include islam’s booty in islam itself. It’s like calling a criminal thug a police just because he sits in a police car.


OIC (islam) against Human Rights

Alyssa A. Lappen: The OIC Cairo declaration proposed to contribute to global assertion of “human rights, to protect man from exploitation and persecution, and to affirm his freedom and right to a dignified life,” but only in accordance with sharia. Briefly, it supports the opposite of “human rights” in the West: unequal rights.

The OIC, then, functions chiefly as a rising barricade---dangerously invisible to Western leaders, journalists and educators---to cow and herd free-thinking Western democracies on every continent into ever-tightening iron-clad boundaries to guard Islam against free speech, which the authors understand, despite their seemingly wishful thinking.

In Jun. 1992, days after al-Azhar University clerics listed free thinker Farag Foda first among “helpers of evil,” two al-Jama'at al-Islamiyya members shot him dead. Foda sought to separate mosque and state. He exposed Islamic atrocities from first caliph Abu Bakr to the end of Abbasid Arab caliphate. And at Cairo's Jan. 1992 book fair, he debated orthodox clerics whose fatwas he had mocked (including that against Salman Rushdie). At their trial, Muslim Brotherhood cleric Mohammed al-Ghazali defended Foda's killers, noting that any Muslim could kill an apostate (p. 74).

Egregious violations of basic human rights, heretofore, have stemmed directly from Islamic texts---the Koran, hadith and sira---not only “human interpretation” thereof. In the Koran itself (3:110) originated the claim that Muslims are the best of peoples, notes Australian writer Geoff Dickson. [4] Muslim jurist Ibn Kathir (1301–1373) in his tafsir (exegesis) explains the verse to mean:

“You are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma`ruf (all that Islam has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (all that Islam has forbidden), and you believe in Allah. And had the People of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Fasiqun (rebellious).”

Theoretically anything is possible. So, theoretically, is Islamic reform. But the rest of humanity meanwhile deserves and needs the truth about Islamic expansionism and irredentism, including where and how those beliefs and practices originated.

Klevius comment: No, not even in theory is it possible to reform islam without completely emptying it from its islamic content!


The mystery (unless you understand the deep nature of sex segregation)

Apart from Western oil money and Oriental inferiority complex boosted racism, the main lubrication for continuing islamofascism is sex segregation. The simple truth is that our cultural sex segregation is lagging far behind the equality potential offered by Human Rights. And the main culprit in prolonging it is, as already Otto Weinger pointed out more than a century ago, the "Woman".  Sigmund Freud, who was one of the worst advocates for continuing cultural sex segregation, probably caused Otto Weininger's premature death (age 23) by mocking the young genius thesis. Later on Ludwig Wittgenstein hailed Weininger as one of very few intellectual heroes of him. Wittgenstein never considered Freud as a hero but rather amused himself with Freud's "intellectual" house of cards.

...says Klevius, your foremost expert on sex segregation in a time when no one else seems to be interested in the most vibrant of issues ever...
.
.