Islam, not Israel, is the root problem - and BBC is confused* - again

* A mature BBC reporter said he was stunned by the fact that Saudi women support the Sharia oppression against women that he found appalling. Well, let Klevius help you just a little. For decades Klevius has pointed to this self evident fact, namely that feminism and sexist chauvinism are the same, i.e. based on cultural sex segregation covered by subtle references to non-founded purported biological reasons! This is also why feminism is often confused with its antonyme. But a true feminist can never work for women's liberation. So why are they true feminists anyway? Individual reasons may vary but the overall problem is the inferiority complex women thinkthey would face if not being able to hide behind the "femininit" veil. That, and the fact that the imbalance heterosexual attraction (especially strong when women are young) causes, and with due possibilities to culturally exploit it, creates an additional source of veiled misunderstanding that is completely unnecessary. If the Western world has done anything, except for stumbling over the self evident idea of Universal Human Rights (e.g. freedom from impositions because of one's sex), it has certainly revealed that mentally healthy men do not have to rape women because of their clothes, behavior etc. (Written by Peter Klevius who,sadly, still seems to be the world's foremost analyst on sex segregation)


Islam/OIC* and Saudi Arabia, not Israel, is the root problem




*  OIC is an islamofascist organization based on islamist Sharia law that openly violates Human Rights

The Saudi caliph "king" Abdullah al Saud and his rape accused and Western oil money spreading nephew Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud together with other members of the Saudi dictator family constitute the very heart of the M (Mideast/muslim)  problem

R. Upadhyay: The objective behind the foundation of Caliphate was to bind the Ummah (Entire Muslim community) in some form. Recognised by the Sunni Muslims as the spiritual heir as well as subordinate successor of the Prophet and the central authority for the followers of Islam, the Caliph was supposed to follow the tradition (‘Sunnat’) of Prophet Mohammad strictly and was the only authorised guide for Jihad against non-Muslim world for the purpose of subjugating it and to establish the sovereignty of Allah in entire world. He was not only the spiritual and temporal head of the Ummah but was also the protector of the holiest shines in Mecca and Medina. Due to its permanent link and control over Haramain (the holiest territories of Mecca and Medina) the Caliphate remained a dominant force in the public life of the Muslim world. All those who followed the tradition of the Prophet as per guidance of the Caliph were known as Sunnis.

Klevius addition: All these "prophet" talks came long after the alleged but, in fact, non-existing Mohammad. The islamic "prophet" was a late compilation of fairy tales based on deeds by Jewish-Christian Arab robbers in the wake of the Byzantine-Sassanid wars.

The Sunni Muslims believe that the first four Caliphs were “righteous and well inspired” who followed the tradition of the Prophet strictly and still want the community to return to the era of the Prophet and his first four successors. However, the history of the appointment of Caliph suggests that out of these four Caliphs three were assassinated. The violent struggle for the leadership of Ummah therefore suggests that sword played a crucial role in the appointment of Caliphs. The bloody streets of Baghdad, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other Muslim countries since the eighties of last century still echo the history of civil war for the leadership in the name of Islam.

Klevius comment: The Saudi flag is the bloody sword of islamofascism!

Alwaleed bin Tala al Saud - accused for rape etc while spending Saudi oil billions for hate mongering under his hypocritical bigot cover of pretending being modern while promoiting Saudi islamofascism

Ryan Mauro: The mayor was offended at Alwaleed’s response to the disaster. He said, “At times like this one, we must address some of the issues that led to such a criminal attack. I believe the government of the United States of America should re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance toward the Palestinian cause… Our Palestinian brethren continue to be slaughtered at the hands of Israelis while the world turns the other cheek,” he said.
In other words, the “root cause” of the attacks was America’s alliance with Israel, and if future attacks are to be avoided, that relationship must be downgraded. After Giuliani turned Alwaleed away, the Saudi prince said the mayor had caved to “Jewish pressure.” Alwaleed apparently believes that the U.S. government is held hostage to the “Zionist lobby.”
In 2002, Alwaleed donated $27 million to a telethon on Saudi television for the families of Palestinian “martyrs.” The entire event brought in $155 million. This has led to reasonable allegations that Alwaleed was giving money to the families of suicide bombers, which is very possible. The Saudi government says this isn’t so, and that the “martyrs” were “Palestinians victimized by Israeli terror and violence.” He is also a co-owner of ART TV, a station that aired a fundraiser called, “Jihad in Palestine” that advocated violence.
Alwaleed has spent tens of millions of dollars to spread Saudi influence around the world, especially in the U.S. In many cases, this has benefited the Muslim Brotherhood. In 2002, for example, he donated $500,000 to the Council on American-Islamic Relations for a media campaign to defend Islam. The Islamic Society of North America got $1.5 million for a scholarship program. John Esposito, probably the Muslim Brotherhood’s top non-Muslim advocate, founded Georgetown University’s Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding with his support. Alwaleed’s foundation is run by the daughter of Dr. Abdul-Hamid Abu-Sulayman, called “one of the most important figures in the history of the global Muslim Brotherhood.”
Alwaleed does not disguise the fact that his donations are meant to change minds. He says that Arabs who boycott the U.S. are mistaken because “economic interests” bring more influence. “We have to be logical and understand that the U.S. administration is subject to U.S. public opinion…to bring the decision-maker on your side, you not only have to be active inside the U.S. Congress or the administration but also inside U.S. society,” he said.
In keeping with this strategy, Alwaleed is the second largest shareholder of News Corp., the parent company of Fox News Channel. He has boasted that when he saw Fox describing Muslim riots in France as, well, Muslim riots, he called Rupert Murdoch and had the terminology changed within 30 minutes. News Corp. owns14.5% of Alwaleed’s Rotana media group.





.

.