To understand the pics see Origin of islamAlso consider The Jewish/islamic Origin of the Vikings
A modern Arab woman on Arab men - a wormhole to the islamic myth abt pre-islamic Arabia
Hajar Benlahmar (slightly edited by Klevius): If i have to choose between marrying an Arab and non Arab, I'd pick the non Arab even though I’m an Arab, for one simple reason, I can't bear the mentality of Arabic men, which is dogmatic, racist, sexist - just name it (Klevius: Islam?). An Arabic man cant accept a woman as partner in life, he wants her to be under his control (Klevius: Sharia?) following his wills and denying her existence. Most Arabic men are not looking for a wife to share life with, but they are looking for a domestic servant.
Klevius comment: "A domestic servant" whose services include sex & the reproduction of dogmatic, racist, sexist boys & submissive girls.
You've heard it many times. The evil pre-islamic society was improved by Mohammed & islam. However, the opposite holds true. Because of a scandalous ignorance abt pre-islamic Arabia, sanctioned by islam (includes ibn-Khaldun & others), islamic vulgo caricatures of the pre-islamic Arabs are taken as facts by stupid "islamologs" & others even today.
The non-islamic world is at war with islam
Islam has, from scratch, been an attacking jihadist "faith", & if you are under attack & defend yourself it's called war, isn't it! Most of islam's basic tenets are opposite those of U.S. & the free democratic world. In fact, there's an enourmous & desperate effort to "reformulate"/"reinterpret" islam/Koran while simultaneously belittling the products of Enlightenment (which, btw, was caused by an attacking islam). Islam started & built its tenets as a parasitic slave finance combined with sex slavery & rapetivism confined in Sharia & apostasy ban & sealed with monotheism. That's why sex jihadism made it initially so successful, that's why O.I.C. (Organization of Islamic Countries) have their own "human rights" (Cairo declaration, which denies girls/women freedom under the cover of "responsibilities & "dignity" etc) & now wants to (via UN) criminalize criticism of islam.
Like your supposed notion of 'FREEDUMB' which is nothing but the modern day opium of the masses. Those of you who subjugate and oppress women under the disguise of 'freedom of choice' of what she wants to wear or not are perverts who use freedom as a tool to exploit women as sex objects and objects of so-called beauty. You are devoid of concepts such as honor and chastity. You are imprisoned with your lusts and desires and depend on your whims to lead your meaningless life devoid of a Creator.
ReplyDeletePoor "anonymou"! Did you have a hard time with math? Try again: The main reason why OIC (muslim's world organization) abandoned Human Rights was that islam wants to keep sex slaves (sex apartheid). So if sexist inequality, slavery, racism against "infidels", and apostasy ban is "honor and chastity", well then you're right, but only then. And what "creator"?! In islam "god" is buried even deeper than Mohammad's meticulously "hidden" (hint: there was none) "grave" in the islamofascist wahhabi homeland of islam, Saudi Arabia! That's why Mohammad and not "god" is the idol for muslims to follow. And if the historical and logical traces of early islam are at serious odds with islamic teachings then what is the only solution to prolong the dying Leviathan's terminal and inevitable ending? Right, to criminalize criticism of islam as OIC is doing in the UN in an extremely disingenuous way that few have really fully understood! OIC (and its many accomplices) is hence responsible for the final rupture of this growing abscess that has already caused, and right now causes, so much suffering and loss of human dignity!
ReplyDelete