The Germanwings A320 didn't crash in a "remote section of the French Alps" but in the nuclear heartland of France
Route D107, Alpes de Haute Provence
In the case of the pilot flying the aircraft being incapacitated, the door will automatically open after a set period of time if the correct code is entered. However, in the event a pilot flying the aircraft does not want the other pilot to enter the flight deck, the one in the cockpit has the ability to block entry if he reacts before the door would be opened automatically. If the person on the other side of the door says ‘no’, you can’t get in. The doors are bolted and heavily protected and it would likely be impossible to break it down within minutes, even if passengers or flight attendants assisted. If a crew member locks down the flight deck with the manual doors, nothing will open it.
Klevius comment: No matter what turns out to have been the cause it again seems that muslims are more protected from suspicions than non-muslims. Had it been a mosque fire media would have been filled with "right wing terrorist susoects".
See for example the Swedish "arson mosque attack" that later turned out to be completely the result of the muslims themselves (insurance fraud while simultaneously blaming "right wing racists"?).
Klevius wrote:
Saturday, December 27, 2014
Naive Swedes "love-bomb" terrorist labeled mosque
Islam means sharia and sharia is ALWAYS and in whatever form, against the most basic of Human Rights
"Moderate" imam: "The Islamic State. It is like an invisible arm, coming to poison the wells where our children drink. We are losing something precious. We are losing our young people."
Klevius: It's not the Islamic State - it's the ideology of islam! The very same ideology you pretend to blink for the purpose of not severing the money flow from the naive infidels who feed and support you.
The "moderate" versions of communism* had to rename (e.g. social-democracy, national-socialism etc) so to hide it's evil roots. Yes, "socialism" looked attractive for many an intellectual in the 20th century as long as they hadn't seen it in full scale praxis (see eg the most important sociological paper from the last century, Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship, which describes state parasitism.
* Whereas revolutionary communism is pure evil, state communism and state socialism may not always appear equally evil. However, they don't work either (compare China's leaders who in the 1980s realized this simple fact).
A Swedish foot shot triggered by naive(l) islamophilia
Was it muslims playing with fireworks or an attack from rival muslims? What seems clear though is that the most unlikely scenario is prioritized by the Minister of Immigration, Swedish TV, Aftonbladet etc.
BBC 25 December 2014 updated at 18:48: Swedish mosque hit by arson in Eskilstuna, injuring five. Police are treating the incident as arson after reports that someone threw an object into the building.
Nothing whatsoever indicated any "anti-muslim"* forces behind the fire.
* Just like islamic violence serves the spread of islam (jihad) "anti-muslim" violence (so rare so it almost doesn't exist in any meaningful sense compared to islamic violence) also fulfills the same purpose.
Klevius: However, this is how Scandinavia's biggest news paper described it:
Sweden's Minister for Justice: An appalling evil deed
Sweden's Minister for Justice and Migration (!), Morgan Johansson: 'Hard to believe anything else than that this aggregated assault was directed against muslims as a group and islam as a religion.'
Klevius: A Swedish Minister for Justice acting like a teen troll who would have been immediately arrested had it been the other way round!
Swedish TV: The arson attack against the mosque in Eskilstuna shows, according to Islamiska förbundets leader Omar Mustafa, how hate against muslims has intensified.
Klevius: Reminds me of an old joke from the 1980s: A Finn tells a Swede that Finland has increased its asylum quota from Africa by 100%. The Swede: 'Gee, so now you have already two Africans over there.
Omar Mustafa, leader of the Islamiska Förbundet i Sverige(IFIS - a terrorist organization according to, for example, UAE): ”Man har gått från ord till handling.” (They have moved from words to action).
Klevius: Who are 'they'? Islamic State?!
The mosque belongs to the Dawah movement known for close connections to the Islamic State.
It also seems that the mosque has been attacked in the past by other muslims.
It's also reported that a boy living nearby told his father that Somalis played with fireworks ('smällare', i.e. crackers) inside the mosque.
The injured seem to have been a little Somali boy who injured his hand with some crackers and someone who broke his feet when jumping from a balcony.
All of this is of course just rumors but still interesting. Klevius would definitely suggest first eliminating a hypothetical scenario where playing with fireworks caused the fire (perhaps just before prayer time) and then a cover up effort for insurance made possible by the Swedish islamophilia dhimmis eagerly waiting for "mosque attacks".
Tuesday, December 09, 2014
Why did Google suddenly swap LA arson with terror warnings blamed on Bush?!
A muslim apostate "president" and Google's AI robots defending and protecting islamofascism
From being the main news the LA fire in no time completely disappeared from Google's front news page when it was suspected the fire was a terrorist act. And at the same time an alternative reason was pushed forward to heighten muslim terrorist alert.
Dear reader, you are cheated again in the very same way as you were cheated to elect muslim (apostate?!) born (muslim genitor Obama) and raised (muslim adopted dad Soetoro) mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever)!
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
If you call for islam you inevitably also call for evil islam (i.e. the original islam)
OIC, the islamofascist monster that hijacked UN which was supposed to be our bulwark against such totalitarian fascism
Why are muslims and Saudi islamofascists equally protected from criticism against their senseless Human Rights violations?
In fact, Human Rights are considered terrorism by the Saudi islamofascist dictator family - and by OIC.
Why are we afraid of veiled people? Klevius: Because they so often* turn out to be racist** muslims who hate us! But a more important question is what and who incite such islamofascist hatred?
* Compare the widespread muslim support for al-Qaeda, Islamic State, and numerous lesser muslim organizations and individuals.** You're a racist (not to mention you're sexist too) if you're a muslim adhering to any type of sharia because sharia is against the most basic of the Universal Human Rights (compare how OIC - all muslims world Ummah - had to violate Human Rights for the purpose of keeping Human Rights violating islamic sharia) and disparaging non-muslims which they call "infidels" etc. And in doing this, muslims open themselves up for criticism. But not even this can be tolerated by racist/sexist muslims who want to criminalize criticism against their own violations against Universal Human Rights!
Abu Dhabi's burqa hiding muslim woman murdered a non-muslim mother in the restroom while the victim's two young children waited outside. Abu Dhabi encourages islam and sharia - so why do people even go there?
Eager convert proselytizer Myriam Francois-Cerrah applauds islam while islam's guardian Saudi Arabia jails and lashes Raif Badawi fordaring to talk about Human Rights.
Without any objection heard there's a lot of racist and sexist smear
going on against "white males" as a group - however not much against
islamofascist Arab oil billionaires clad in sun/sand protecting Bedouin
head scarves (indoors)! Why?!
Right, they belong to that overly protected vulnerable and easily offended "minority" called muslims who are under attack from a very few peaceful (but apparently so dangerous and disgusting) Human Rights defenders (i.e. not sharia compliant) called "islamophobes".
Raif Badawi is such an "islamophobe" whose friends and family now have chosen to distance themselves from or even turning against him. In other words, they have, like so many others, helped the Saudi islamofascists instead of a Human Rights defender.
Badawi did nothing wrong according to Western standards other than start a forum that was aimed at "a new generation of Saudi young men and women, who want to express themselves in a way that they can counter the overwhelming majority of clerics and religious people."
Now he has to kneel on the ground and receive 50 lashes every week until he has received 1,000 lashes. Happy now Myriam Francois-Cerrah? Right, Klevius almost forgot that the very fact that Saudi Arabia is the guardian of islam makes it having nothing to do with islam in your perverted thinking?
.
No comments:
Post a Comment