UK's "special relation" with US has historically been abusing others. However, now it's UK's turn to be the useful idiot victim.

 

1971 Nixon made US "great again" by stealing the world dollar rather than making bankruptcy. And today US continuing $-embezzlement has reached roads end so Trump weaponizes every last ounce of US stolen $-hegemony incl. tariffs - usually followed by a threatening phone call. 

How ignorant (or worse) are BBC's presenters?! They seem to be in total darkness about US and China! Moreover, the increase in military attack spending is extremely shortsighted, hurt people in UK, and is doomed to fail at best or endanger peace and lives at worst. 

This extremely ignorant (or worse) BBC "reporter", Laura Bicker, was stupidly presented on Sinophobic BBC Radio 4 Today, as "how China tries to catch up with US". And for this purpose she strangely reported about Chinese kids playing with chess and AI.

Peter Klevius: China has long since passed* US. US can't even produce a single high quality chip by itself! There's actually not a single area where US can compete* with China - except in creating wars. This is the reason US behaves as it does - like a desperado while applauded by its useful idiot "allies"!

BBC sees no evil in US or Israel- but eagerly backs whatever baseless US anti-China propaganda.

When Assad made a deal with China that would have greatly increased the wealth of Syrians, US toppled him and placed Uighur jihads who had fought together with IS etc. islamist terrorists in charge. Everything possible to harm China and with no remorse for people in Syria.

* How could China with more than 100 million+ modern cities with superior infrastructure be second to US with seven low quality infrastructure similar size cities? And yes, I know that CCP likes to keep a low profile by using the "second largest economy" based on the completely useless nominal (i.e. Feds Mickey Mouse money) $-GDP, as well as making general development targets far in the future so not to worry competitors. Already today every branch of China's defense forces is more technologically advanced than anything in US attack forces. But US is so experienced with many endless wars, someone might argue. Yes, indeed, but China isn't Vietnam, Afghanistan, the Gaza strip, Lebanon etc!

And while US has a (criminal) $-motive to attack where it can instead of cooperation, China's tech leadership makes it not only renounce of such motive, but has all to win on peaceful trading etc. cooperation. 

Peter Klevius always thought Soviet and Maoist Communisms were bad. However, how is modern China's "Communism" bad other than as a derogatory lie made by desperate US? China beats US in people's support, technology and science, and is in most aspects a model country and much safer ! When you adjust for the effects of hegemonic US anti-China smear campaigns, as well as US hegemonic soft war and lawfare against China and Chinese people, as well as US hegemonic military provocations on China's borders and interests around the world, and add these together, only then you can get a fair picture of China's reactions - which have nothing with Communism to do, but would be natural for any country. And whereas in the West you are constantly spied on by not only US but also the country you legally reside in - and in both cases not benefiting you but the state(s) - in China its superior infrastructure makes living way easier and more predictable. 

And finally, whereas US has a clear motive to attack China on all fronts so to keep US stolen (1971-) dollar hegemony despite constant deficit and losing all tech and science races, for China the opposite is true. US has actually never been the source of leading tech and science. US has only imported it or having others doing the difficult jobs, such as e.g. Chinese (Taiwanese) semiconductor manufacturing with Dutch semiconductor printers - which US criminally hinders Dutch from exporting to mainland China. And historically, US couldn't even produce the atom bomb without a Chinese scientist - who then typically was dropped from the  Oppenheimer movie, despite being possibly the greatest scientist of her time (see next posting).

China is basically similar to your own country, except of course so much more developed. And all new technologies in China were first presented in the West as "CCP's surveillance" before they became equally used in the West, where US knows everything about you (and can weaponize its control), and your bank and credit institutes keep point record over your behavior. Moreover, the real difference is that in China you are so much safer against crimes than in the West.

 

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation". 

 

Peter Klevius started as an empty origo/singularity whose existencecentrism (mind) now is the sum of his experience with his surroundings and due synaptic adaptations, while also constituting part of the surroundings of others. A canvas which doesn't have a soul/self of its own but does reflect what it has experienced and adapted to. However, the false impression of having a "self", "free will" etc. rests on language, i.e. the use of the word 'I' which animals and humans without language lack. As a human with language you are in the same position as Peter Klevius, and together we all (incl. non-language humans) make up the total existencecentrism of humankind - and the key to a universal human with (negative) Human Rights without irrational exceptions and impositions. So when Peter Klevius talks/writes/acts, he does so against a background that includes the latest synapses combinations in his brain as well as what his other nerve signals bring to his thalamus from his body and other surroundings.

 

How US robs the world