A little soot on a London mosque is more important for BBC than Christians slaughtered by muslims

Klevius (an Atheist) asks: Why are muslims and their mosques extremely protected (by polis, media etc) against almost non-existing non-muslim attacks, while unprotected Christians are bombed and burned en masse in their churches by muslims?!


When someone (either muslims or unbelievably clumsy and incompetent* arsonists) sprayed some industrial foam on a window and a door of the Harlow mosque in London and then put fire on it nothing really happened physically to the building. However, the reaction from muslims, police and media was stunning in their hysterical blaming it on "anti-muslim racist EDL".

* Yet smart enough to know that their facial recognition was outside the limits of the CCTV. Were they perhaps so- called "anti-fascists" wanting to leave an impression of British anti-islamofascists acting as something (arsonists) they are not?

http://www.fahrenheit211.net/2013/08/26/heres-another-funny-mosque-fire-funny-as-in-suspicious/: This case looks like it has a lot in common with the Muswell Hill arson where a mosque that had grand ambitions, but little cash, caught fire causing the idiots of the local council to wet themselves and cough up taxpayers money for a replacement mosque.

Klevius: However, when muslims commit atrocities against non-muslims or "wrong-muslims" almost nothing happens - at least not before its overwhelming (compare 9/11 and down) and then usually followed by first an excuse and later followed by blaming it on the victim/s (compare 9/11 and down).

The most hypocritical and bigoted is BBC's reporting - or lacking thereof.

When muslims destroy a church and murder more than 80 people and leave more than 100 injured BBC is silent like a mosque mouse:

A news search on 'church pakistan' gives no BBC news at all - I went even three pages down, but nothing!

But BBC seems to love both of them! You know the phrase by now: "... but most muslims are ..." followed by something positive.

Klevius: But most muslims are completely ignorant about their "religion" and its awful and parasitic origin and history of looting, enslavement, rapetivism and genocides.


Benjamin Lazarus (presumably a Jew): For decades, the West has tolerated Saudi Arabia because of their oil supply. A blind eye has been turned as the country continually abused religious and political minorities, apostates, homosexuals, and women. Just this year, as the West called for a democratic and peaceful solution to the conflicts in Syria, Egypt, and the rest of the Middle East, Saudi Arabia increased the amount of arrests and trials of peaceful dissidents, and reacted with force to demonstrations by its citizens. Unsurprisingly, this was seemingly overlooked by the West.

The West has also largely ignored the fact that Saudi Arabia is the largest funder of Salfi jihadist militant groups, including al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and Lashkar-e-Taiba in South Asia. The horrors orchestrated by such groups against civilians, soldiers, and aid-workers are all well-documented.

The West has also made allowances for the fact that it is Saudi Arabia which has historically been the largest backer of the Palestinian militant Islamic group, Hamas; an organisation that has inflicted utter beggary and serfdom upon the Palestinians of Gaza, as well as committed acts of terror against Israel. Little fuss, moreover, was made in the West to the recent news that Saudi has ballistic rocket launchers facing the Jewish State.