"In Allah's name", who is the stupidest muslim islamophobe?

Bigotry, hypocrisy, words are not enough to describe this nakedness and confusion of muslim immoral!

An islam and Sharia fearing UK muslim, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, warns for - islamophobia!

Is she the stupidest muslim in the UK? Hard to tell because the competition is tough. However, Douglas Murray takes it one step further and includes all women in Britain, which could possibly also be considered an offense against British women. Why didn't he write 'muslim woman'?!

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown seems not to have realized that the most important muslim world organization, Saudi based OIC, rests entirely upon Sharia. In fact to such an extent that the world's muslims (especially women) have to sacrifice the most basic of Human Rights. This is what happened in the UN when OIC stepped aside Human Rights and replaced them with the so called Cairo declaration which clearly states that Sharia rules over basic Human Rights. UK's representative at OIC is Sharia supporting Sayeeda Warsi.

Strangely, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown differs sharply from an other UK islamofascist, Sayeeda Warsi, who supports both OIC and Sharia at the highest level! This dispite the fact that both women share what they say constitutes their most challenging problem namely islamophobia.

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown (according to herself. "a part-Pakistani leftie liberal, feminist muslim". She also has the nerve to call herself "anti-racist" although she supports the most racist ideology ever): How did Islam become so intolerant? In Allah’s name, what is wrong with us Muslims? And why do we find it so hard to ask that question of ourselves? What will it take to break the heavily curtained window of denial?

Klevius answer: What is wrong with you muslims is that you don't know (or pretend not to know) islam! But just a brief parallell reading of islam's tenets and its history reveals the most disgusting and horrifying racist and sexist logic.

Michael Wharton has accused Yasmin Alibhai-Brown of an excessive pursuit of political correctness: "At 3.6 degrees on the Alibhai-Brown scale, it sets off a shrill scream that will not stop until you’ve pulled yourself together with a well-chosen anti-racist slogan." Stephen Pollard accused her of racism while calling her opinions "utterly vile" in The Spectator. On Five's The Wright Stuff discussion programme, about an employment issue relating to white men, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown said: "Take his advice. Don't apply. It would be great if you lot just went away; white, middle class men. We'd just walk in wouldn't we." Commentator Douglas Murray accused her of disregarding the lives of British soldiers killed in action: "The vindication of her own opinion is of more importance to her than the lives of British and American troops and Iraqi civilians." On 5 May 2011 Yasmin was on the panel of BBC's Question Time show and was criticised (but not by BBC of course) for her opinion on how Osama Bin Laden should have been given a respectful burial.


Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: I have met smart muslim graduates at some of our top universities who offer perfectly honed theses to justify the actions of men like the Birmingham three. In sum, they give three key reasons: Palestinian rights denied by Israel, Islamophobia, and Western interference in Muslim countries. I sympathise with this position and have written with deep conviction on all those thorny issues.

Klevius comment: Apart from the obvious nonsense in the previous statement, is she really capable of evaluating the "smartness" of muslim graduates? And it's a fact that most UK "top universities" now have departments where you study medieval superstition and dogmas which can't be criticized because such criticism would, according to Sharia, constitute the worst of crimes namely "islamophobia". The "smartness" of such studies may be questioned before OIC has managed to criminalize both Klevius and Yasmin Alibhai-Brown.

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: Fifty-three more died in an explosion in Syria where more than 70 000 have been killed in two years. Islamic rebels in Mali, Nigeria and elsewhere carry on their nefarious, destabilising activities. Eighty-nine Shias were killed in Pakistan, whose first leader, Muhammad Jinnah, was a Shia, as am I. They want to obliterate us there, in Afghanistan, Kashmir, Bahrain, and Iraq too, where bombs go off routinely to kill these worshippers. Other minority Muslim groups are also targeted and often murdered. Internal and external intolerance is now Islam’s brand.

Polymath Ziauddin Sardar has met “countless Muslim scholars, thinkers, writers and activists” who are impatient for change and reform. That can’t happen while there is an aversion to criticism and self-criticism. Thoughtful and honest Muslims stay silent because they fear ostracism or inciting more racism against Muslims – both real perils. But silence now is cowardly, and collusion with the corrupters of our faith. True believers have a duty to speak out against that corruption.

Klevius:But hello! True muslim believers obey OIC and Sharia, according to which it's a crime not to support Sharia! So what about you?

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown (2008): What Rowan Williams wishes upon us (Sharia) is an abomination and I write here (Independent) as a modern Muslim woman. He lectures the nation on the benefits of sharia law – made by bearded men, for men – and wants the alternative legal system to be accommodated within our democracy in the spirit of inclusion and cohesion. Pray tell me sir, how do separate and impenetrable courts and schools and extreme female segregation promote commonalities and deep bonds between citizens of these small isles? What he did on Thursday was to convince other Britons, white, black and brown, that Muslims want not equality but exceptionalism and their own domains. Enlightened British Muslims quail. Friends like this churchman do us more harm than our many enemies. He passes round what he believes to be the benign libation of tolerance. It is laced with arsenic. He would not want his own girls and women, I am sure, to "choose" to be governed by these laws he breezily endorses. And he is naive to the point of folly if he imagines it is possible to pick and choose the bits that are relatively nice to the girls or ones that seem to dictate honourable financial transactions. Look around the Islamic world where sharia rules and, in every single country, these ordinances reduce our human value to less than half that is accorded a male; homosexuals are imprisoned or killed, children have no free voice or autonomy, authoritarianism rules and infantilises populations. What's more, different Muslim nations claim to have their own allegedly god-given sharia.

Saudi Wahabi Islam is taking over and we see Saudi sharia taking hold. It is growing in influence here, too. Ten years ago, the only fully shrouded Muslim women around were from the Arab fiefdoms, the many wives of sheikhs often drawn by cartoonists to convey the absurdity and inhumanity of such cloaks. Now all of Europe has these girls and women rendering themselves invisible in public spaces. It is their elected sharia, so they claim without credibility.

Klevius diagnosis: An indisputable case of grave muslim islamophobia.

.
 .

 .