This creepy guy, who made his first call as a "president" to the Saudi dictator of the world's most intolerant, racist and sexist state, "respects" islam and Sharia. And in doing so he doesn't only spit on the Universal Human Rights Declaration and the US Constitution but also on islam's hundreds of Millions of victims throughout 1400 years.
.
Muslim born apostate (?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) has, so far, together with the Saudi terrorist family managed to murder more than 60,000 muslims in Syria. And he affords to do it by printing money. Because the dollar has functioned as an international currency it has, unlike most other national currencies, been more or less immune to inflation. This is one of two black holes in the the world economy. The other being Obama's belowed social(ist) state (see Angels of Antichrist - the world's most important sociological paper from the last century) which serves itself and its masters rather than the people (No stupid, Klevius isn't and has never been a Christian or any kind of "monotheist").
Klevius political tutorial: If the most disgusting part of the right is religion (which it now seems to share with a changing left) the most disgusting part of the left is its disrespect for the negative Human Rights (i.e. the part that protects the individual against the state). We need redistribution - but not to the state!
According to Syrian media as well as opposition, Obama's pal the Saudi spy chief "prince" Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al Saud has decided to bring the militants fighting the Syrian forces under the umbrella of al-Nusra Front (i.e. Al-Qaeda).
Keep this background in mind while reading the following:
Can a muslim really be this dumb and Human Rightsophobic?!
This muslim talks like many a muslim terrorist. Yet. he doesn't seem to realize it himself due to the same manipulation of language that has made it possible for islam to be 1) a "religion of peace" while muslim blood is wasted ln the hundreds of thousands just in the last decade to the beat of Allahu Akbar 2) a "faith" encompassing a huge variety of muslims 3) one true islam 4) excluded from certain muslims, especially those who follow the Koran "too closely" and therefore are called "extremist muslims" 5) excluded from certain other muslims, especially those who follow the Koran "too loosely" and therefore are called "secularist muslims" 6) the worst mass-murder/genocide/slavery/rapetivism ideology during the last 1400 yeats.
Or is it because as a muslim he can only chose between apostasy or Saudi money? And by choosing the latter you completely empty your moral and therefore need to compensate by barking nonsense accusations.
Haroon Moghul, a severe case of Human Rightsphobia
A "dumb untalented bigot" (his own words about Human Rights defenders) muslim, Haroon Moghul: All Muslims are on the hook for what some Muslims do, and must constantly distance themselves from other Muslims—as if the whole must bear responsibility for the acts and faults of individuals. How does that make any sense.
Klevius' intellectual aid to Haroon Moghul and other dumb untalented bigot muslims: Please, let me help you make sense of this. Let's start with one muslim individual named Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu. He eagerly wants to establish a muslim world caliphate based on Human Rights violating Sharia. He leads OIC, all muslims world organization representing 57 member states in UN, which, due to islam's evil history, demands the criminalization of criticism against islam or Sharia. OIC doesn't accept Human Rights, period. So what do you think, Haroon Moghul? Do you bear responsibility for the acts and faults of this individual muslim or do you oppose his world Umma based on Sharia and lacking the most important Human Rights? Do you share his Human Rightsphobia? Or could it be that Haroon Moghul doesn't understand islam, after all?
Haroon Moghul: Only a puny minority of Muslims acts in a violent manner, while the huge majority does not, though both are reading the same book.
Klevius: And I've never heard about the Koran murdering anyone without the help of a believing muslim. This "puny minority of muslims" has since 2000 managed to kill hundreds of thousands of fellow muslims (more than 60,000 just in Syria so far).
Haroon Moghul: Adaptability has been key to islam's endurance over the last 1400 years. It was one-and-a-half centuries before Muslim jurists began systematically to address the two interlinked questions that are central to any legal system: how to decide between two different arguments concerning a rule; and how to resolve cases that are not explicitly covered by clear rules in the first place. In the years since then, countless thousands of scholars have spent their lives struggling to interpret God’s law.
Klevius: This muslim really serves his stupidity on a plate! Is he really that dumb?! Obviously islam couldn't adapt to Human Rights but had to replace them with Sharia precisely because of the universal freedom (especially for women) granted by Human Rights! Moreover, whereas Human Rights constitute a freedom basis for national laws, Sharia always constitutes a confinement. The source of Sharia is a black hole called "god", thus leaving any interpretation/alteration to muslim humans anyway.
Haroon Moghul: For Islamophobes, Muslims don’t have agency.
Klevius: Few muslims were fully aware of the true meaning of the consequences of OIC's Human Rights violating Sharia declaration, especially when it was treacherously called islamic "human rights". In fact it seems it was introduced by high level (secretaries of states) extremists from "a puny minority of muslims" while now including most of the world's muslims.
Clearly Haroon Moghul seems to resolve these challenges posed by reality by dismissing them.
Robert Spencer: The real “Islamophobia industry” is the one for which Haroon Moghul works: the one that is dedicated to intimidating Americans into thinking that it’s “bigoted” to resist jihad and Islamic supremacism. This one has tens of millions more dollars, and a much more coordinated network, than do the foes of jihad and Islamic supremacism. Moghul's claim rests on a Center for American Progress report that conflates money received by "Islamophobic" organizations over a period of ten years to give the impression of a huge sum funding some coordinated machine -- when in fact the aggregate amount was less than the budget of the Center for American Progress for one single year, and was spread among seven quite disparate organizations. In reality, those resisting jihad and Islamic supremacism are few and ill-funded, facing a giant, fabulously wealthy media and propaganda machine of which Moghul is an exponent.
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment