Klevius question to all of you wondering why evil medieval islam is given so much space today: Could it possibly have anything to do with your own outdated religious anti-Human Rights tendencies?!
Judaic/islamic evil protected by "divinity" while spreading bigotry, racism and sexism.
You can be evil even without a "god", however, at least you cannot hide your evilness behind "him"!
Klevius history lesson: Original Judaism was based on rapetivism for the purpose of conquering neighboring tribes by the help of numbers. That's why women were forced to squeeze out as many kids as possible in an institutionalized system of rapetivism (incl. unhealthy* male circumcision for avoiding masturbation etc). However, because Judaism was born out of true religion (see The Vagina Gate and the Atom of Kinship and Klevius Definition of Religion) Judaism later (after Christianity was born with its early asexual approach) came to be defined as transferred via the mother (for the purpose of discriminating between "true" Jews and Jews believing in Jesus etc). This, of course, constituted a bottleneck which was later radically changed in islam so that whoever female raped by a muslim could produce new muslims. Because Koran & Sharia says rape doesn't exist in islam (because women have sexually to submit under the man's demand) one may describe the islamic system as pure rapetivism
* The principal risks of circumcision are hemorrhage, infection, and surgical accident leading to mutilation, such as penile amputation. Death may occur from loss of blood or from systemic infection.
As discussed in Argument 1, circumcision causes emotional issues for many men.
As discussed in Argument 2, circumcision always causes loss of the ridged band and results in degraded sexual function and pleasure.
The rate of complications is understated by most writers in English, but Patel (1966) studied 100 circumcisions prospectively (the most accurate type of study), followed the infants after discharge, and recorded 35 cases of bleeding, 8 cases of infection (one severe), meatal ulcers in 31, meatal stenosis in 8, and acquired phimosis in 1.
Griffiths et al. (1985) prospectively studied 140 boys aged 1 through 15 who were admitted for circumcision. The authors reported 46 cases of vomiting, 19 cases of delayed urination, and four cases of readmission to hospital to treat complications. The mean time of healing was 10.4 days.
Williams & Kapila (1993) report an incredible variety of complications, up to and including death. The incidence of death from circumcision related complications is unknown, because no on maintains a record of deaths from circumcision, however Gellis says there are more deaths from complications of circumcision than cancer of the penis, while Baker estimates 229 deaths a year from circumcision. Coroner’s reports show several circumcision deaths at the hands of medical practitioners, and, tragically, two deaths after ritual circumcision are a matter of record.
Newborn boys who have been circumcised have an open wound. They are at twelve-times greater risk of infection with life-threatening antibiotic-resistant CA-MRSA than intact boys. This is a new and emerging risk recently recognized by the CDC.
Non-therapeutic infant and child circumcision should not be performed because the injury is certain and the risks are severe and demonstrated.
The foreskin has a multitude of natural functions which have nothing to do with racist/sexist religious "divinity".
In fact, no minor should be circumcised/mutilated in the name of a "god"!
No comments:
Post a Comment