The laughable oxymoron "islamic science", how could anyone possibly take it seriously?!

The  oxymoron "islamic science" is utter defamation of science, and is rooted in ignorance about the origin of islam! 

Klevius science tutorial for Seyyid Hossein Nasr and others

Seyyid Hossein Nasr (“professor” of Islamic Studies at Georgetown University) at MIT Islamic Students Association (sponsored by the Pakistan Study Group, the MIT Muslim Students Association and “other groups”): “Science has its own world-view. No science is created in a vacuum. Science arose under particular circumstances in the West with certain philosophical presumptions about the nature of reality. As soon as you say, m, f, v, and a, that is, the simple parameters of classical physics, you have chosen to look at reality from a certain point of view. There is no mass, there is no force out there like that chair or table. These are particularly abstract concepts which grew in the seventeenth century on the basis of a particular concept of space, matter and motion which Newton developed. The historians and philosophers of science in the last twenty [or] thirty years have shown beyond the scepter of doubt that modern science has its own world view. It is not at all value free; nor is it a purely objective science of reality irrespective of the subject you study. It is based upon the imposition of certain categories upon the study of nature, with a remarkable success in the study of certain things, and also a remarkable lack of success [in others], depending on what you are looking at.”

Klevius: Listen to this utter crap! “Science has its own world-view. No science is created in a vacuum”. Two cardinal flaws in just twelve words! Does this muslim fella also believe that "the Western interpretation" 2+2=4 has a corresponding Sharia compliant islamic version?! The choice to look at reality from a certain point of view isn't science, just like what you choose to do with your power tool isn't the power tool!

OK, science doesn’t have its own world-view, that’s for sure. If it had it wouldn't be science anymore. This is the very definition of science. Just as Negative Human Rights don’t have a world-view either, simply because they are supposed to protect you from “world-views”.

Science is pure logic* and shouldn’t be confused with the scientific process, i.e. including its non-scientific parts, such as choice of topic, background/pre-understanding etc., and the interpretation of results from the scientific part of the scientific process. Nor should flaws in the scientific process (such as e.g. errors, deliberate or accidental) be blamed on scientific logic. And yes, logic could be described as “a vacuum” just like Negative Human Rights is the eliminating of impositions. Logic that is dependent on a worldview is per definition not logic at all, and Human Rights that are dependent on an ideology/world-view (e.g. Sharia) aren’t (negative, i.e. the basic freedom rights) Human Rights at all.

As Klevius use to put it: Our most holy duty is to NOT fill the freedom Human Rights with anything! You shouldn’t have the positive Sharia “right” to, for example, be raped by your husband; instead you should have the negative right to choose not to have sex. Even a child understands that this latter right doesn't deny you from having sex, only protects you from imposed compulsion. The difference is, as you can see, is mind blowing if you have been raised within an islamic "world-view".

And this is the reason why the islamofascist muslim world organization/Umma, Saudi initiated and based islamofascist OIC with its fanatic Turkish Fuhrer/caliph Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu 1) has abandoned Human Rights and REPLACED THEM WITH SHARIA, and 2) criminalized scrutiny/criticism of islam (the worst racist/sexist hate crime ever against humanity) and calls any critical scrutiny "islamophobia" or "defamation of religion".

* as Klevius has explained in Demand for Resources (1992) pure logic is the pointing out of conceptualized deterministic chains (e.g. 2+2=4) in a universe that is deterministic yet chaotic in the sense that our existence-centrism excludes us from "a total, god-like overview" (see Origin of Universe").

Here's what Klevius wrote about "islamic science" a couple of years ago

Everyone who understands islam (e.g. by reading Klevius, or by digging history records with open eyes) knows there's no such thing as "islamic science". This is because of islam's inborn parasitic nature (the open historical "secret" of islam's original fuel: booty, sex and slavery) and due cultural and technological impotency. So when someone talks about "islamic civilization" you definitely know s/he lies! Sadly, most people don't check these lies and haven't all read Klevius as yet.

One example is the Medieval Indian/Persian Al Beruni whom the notorious islamic mass murderer and enslaver (one of the worst known to history - also called the plunderer of India), Mahmud of Ghazna, imprisoned and let stay alive as long as he submitted to islamic Mohammedanism.

But BBC, Wikipedia etc. happily present this islamic hostage as a "muslim scientist" (sic)!

The bloodthirsty Mohammed is the evil and only pope of islam - and needs to be pierced by Enlightenment so his ignorant followers may be released and his deliberate followers may be ashamed. However, a strategy based on naming evil good seems less appropriate for this task, doesn't it.

It's truly sad that the descendants of islam's victims through 1400 years continue defending their bully!?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Btw, some half of the most popular Google image hits on 'OIC sharia' are signed klevius! Why do so few bother to care about this the most important issue of our time?! Could it be because islam is censoring main stream media?

 . .

Are these really the best idols "black" American "civil righters" can find? And what about "black" racism? And what about a comparison with Frank Lee Morris!

Rodney King, O. J. Simpson, Trayvon Martin etc are all used as political tools for black racism and political etc greed.

See below what George Zimmerman recalls with his encounter with the 17 year old Trayvon Martin who in media is described as "an unarmed innocent black teenager racially profiled by Zimmerman".

 .









"Ms Lucy Black", one of the worst internet trolls ever, seems to have slipped(?!) from the attention of BBC, other media and the "civil rights movement" (read "the movement for political use of black racism and white stupidity").

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The escape from Alcatraz and an extremely unfair life: Frank Lee Morris, very intelligent, non-violent, nice and committed to learning and working, would have been the perfect symbol for "civil righters" -  if only he'd been "black".

Ludwig Wittgenstein was imprisoned in the world's best university (Cambridge) and Frank Lee Morris in the world's best prison (Alcatraz). Both managed to escape.

It's now 50 years since Frank Lee Morris made the most spectacular escape from the safest prison in USA (see the movie or do some reading). Who was he really? Klevius gives you the best answer based on available facts. And one thing seems certain, he wasn't a violent parasitic thug who excused his behavior with islam or similar racist ideologies.

Frank Lee Morris, who was tested/evaluated as having "superior intelligence" (his IQ scores would have been much higher if calibrated for his lack of education), in good physical shape and "excellent drafting and working skills", became an orphan at an early age and was thrown by the social state* between state paid foster homes and state paid institutions where he was abused as a slave and guinea pig.

He was convicted of his first crime (escape) at the age of 13 and the only robbery was when he was around 30 (not in his teen as stupid Wikipedia puts it) and, according to himself, wanted to quit the Americn curse and move via Mexico to the south. Except for escapes and this failed non-violent night burglary to a bank called "robbery", his most serious crime seems to have been travelling over a state border with a  minor teenage girlfriend.

As a teen he eventually escaped a psychiatric "treatment" institution based on flimsy psychoanalytic** ideas (they assessed him as having too low intelligence for to be successfully "treated" when, in fact, he begged for being able to develop his drafting skills and to work as a draftsman) and therefor got labelled a "delinquent" hence making it impossible for him to educate himself, dismissed from military service, and denied real work opportunities due to his state fabricated records. Instead he was chased around USA and imprisoned for some petty crimes but mainly for his repeated escapes.

* understand the extremely important concept of a "social state" by reading Angels of Antichrist (no dude, Klevius isn't even close to a Christian).


** Klevius' groundbreaking psychosocial Freud timeline will offer you the best possible kick start for beginning to understand the extreme stupidity of psychoanalysis (yes, Klevius has gone through not only Freud and his daughters works as well as those surrounding them, he has also gone through all the main Freud critics as well as how this early psychoanalysis is connected to that of today - just like the origin of islam Freud is excused and distanced from yet his most horrifying tenets are still around - and its very core the prevailing sex segregation  - and before you smile please consider your own ignorance and the fact that e.g. Ludvig Wittgenstein did include Otto Weininger among those thinkers who had impressed on him, but not Freud).

George Zimmerman about his encounter with Trayvon Martin in an area which he was supposed to keep an eye on as a neighborhood watch volunteer, and where a lot of burglaries etc crimes recently had occurred.

George Zimmerman, who by neighbors is described as nice and helpful, said it was a life-and-death struggle that began when the youth "jumped out from the bushes" after he had contacted the police".

As he spoke to the dispatcher, he said Martin circled his vehicle but he "lost visual of him." At the same time, he said the dispatcher asked him his location. He said he wasn't sure of the name of the street he was on and got out of the vehicle to look for a street sign or an address on a home.

The dispatcher asked him if he was following Martin and he replied that he was "trying to find out where he went." The dispatcher told him, "We don't need you to do that," noting an officer was en route.

Zimmerman was heading back to the vehicle when Martin jumped out, asking him, "What the f---'s your problem?"

He told Martin, "I don't have a problem," but the youth replied, "Now you have a problem," and attacked him. He said he fell backward after being punched in the nose, and "he was whaling on my head."

 In a written statement Zimmerman said Martin told him to "shut the f--- up" during the struggle.

"Each time I attempted to sit up, the suspect slammed my head into the sidewalk. My head felt like it was going to explode."

Martin punched him repeatedly in the face. "I started screaming for help. I couldn't see. I couldn't breathe.

He grabbed my head and started hitting it into the sidewalk," he said. "When he started doing that, I slid into the grass to try to get out from under him. ... I'm still yelling for help."

Martin "reached for my now exposed firearm" as the teen threatened his life and cursed at him.

Martin put his hand over Zimmerman's mouth and nose and told him, "You're going to die tonight."

"When I slid, my jacket and my shirt came up, and when he said, 'You're going to die tonight,' I felt his hand go down my side, and I thought he was going for my firearm, so I grabbed it immediately, and as he banged my head again, I just pulled out my firearm and shot him."

When he did, he said, Martin, who had been on top of him, fell away and said, "All right. You got it. You got it."

George Zimmerman, 28, is charged with second-degree murder in Martin's February 26 shooting death. Zimmerman has said he shot Martin in self-defense, but Martin's family and civil rights activists from across the country said that Zimmerman, who is white and Hispanic, racially profiled Martin. This race hunt has not only led to this but also to his wife being jailed as a consequence of the desperate situation the family was forced into, including the threats from black supremacist groups etc.

It may also be noted that Trayvon Martin used drugs and had been relegated from his school and that he also had had possession of jewellery that he couldn't explain from where it came.

No wonder a muslim born (apostate?!) "president" who came to power with islamofascist help from Saudi Arabia sides with a muslim thug, Najee Ali (former(?) gang member and recently released from jail after a four years bribery sentence) who (via his Project Islamic Hope) organized "a vigil in Leimert Park to celebrate Rodney King's life". Did we see CAIR and Saudi money also in the shadows of Trayvon Martin's death? We certainly saw the appalling racist black supremacist "panthers" around!

 .

Why is OIC denying muslims Human Rights? And why is OIC calling this question "islamophobia" and wants to criminalize it (just like apostasy)?!

.

Aren't muslims gathering in hate spittings and speeches around Kaba the most fanatic of idolators?!  

  .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OIC Caliph Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu with some of his good pals (who certainly not suffer from "islamophobia).

Prayers and handshakes against Human Rights

.

OIC/Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu defends one of the worst criminals of our time!

al-Bashir: "Genocide like the ICC claims is nonexistent. If [those figures] were accurate, there needs to be mass graves. Where are those graves?"

Klevius comment:Could they possible be scattered in the same way as Sudan's islamofascist semi-military and their terror actions?!






















 . .

Egypt: Muslim Brotherhood and OIC (and the Salafists) are against the true meaning of democracy

According to the islamofascist Cairo declaration of OIC (Islamic Organization of Cooperation) only islamic Sharia, not Human Rights (the basis of democracy) can be applied to the rule of law. Hence a Sharia supporting muslim "vote" is a non-vote and against the real Human Rights declaration which defend EVERY human beings individual freedom! . .

This evil* islamofascist** muslim OIC Fuhrer/Caliph*** (Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu) of ALL**** the world's muslims has wasted a lifetime at trying to find non-existing islamic science

*        If by 'evil' we mean someone who promotes racism and sexism contrary to the original Universal Human Rights Declaration
**      See definition of islamofascism
***    According to Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, born in Egypt but now a Turkish citizen, it was a great mistake to separate the Turkish state from islam. He wants instead to re-establish Ottoman rule and as the leader of OIC he sees himself as the new Ottoman Caliph in tight cooperation with the Saudi Sunni/Wahhabi Caliph.
**** OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) is a Saudi based organization covering 57 nations with majority or considerable muslim population, which is totally based on islamic Sharia (Cairo declaration) and which also covers muslims in non-OIC member states by referring to the muslim world Umma nation. OIC also campaigns forcefully for the criminalization of criticism/scrutiny against islam (criticism against islam, so called "defamation" or "islamophobia", is, together with apostasy the gravest of crimes according to all forms of islamic Sharia).

In Klevius' series The empty myth about islamic "science".

Islam's basic idea is that you can enslave people. That's why slavery isn't forbidden in islam. All the "golden ages" of islam have been based on profiting on slaves.

The basic, parasitic tenets of islam (i.e. the origin of islam) effectively excludes any possibility of producing science. Hence the wording 'islamic science' is an oxymoron just like e.g. 'Christian atheists' (although one might find that many atheists have been in churches etc and even registered as "Christians", that doesn't make a true atheist a Christian, does it).

The Ottoman islamofascist world was utterly anti-science and anti-technology 

The Ottoman writers guild denounced the printing press as "the Devil's Invention." Their objection caused a 53-year lag between its invention by Gutenberg in Europe in the 1440's and its introduction to the Ottoman society with the first Gutenberg press in Constantinople that was established by the Sephardic Jews, who had escaped from the Spanish Inquisition of 1492 (the inquisition was directed against the Jewish habit of trading in slaves). However, Muslims did not use the printing press in the Ottoman Empire until the 18th century. In 1726 (almost 300 years after Gutenberg invented the printing press), Ibrahim Muteferrika convinced the the clergy on the efficiency of the printing press, and later submitted a request to Sultan Ahmed III, who granted Muteferrika the permission to publish non-religious books despite opposition from some calligraphers and religious leaders. Muteferrika's press published its first book in 1729!).

The Ottoman "golden age" was entirely based on slavery

Galina Yermolenko: The large-scale Tatar-Turkish slave trade had been devastating these regions from the thirteenth century through most of the seventeenth century. In the fifteenth and sixteenth

centuries, the Ottoman slave trade escalated to an unprecedented degree.

Various sixteenth-century Polish chroniclers, such as Marcin Bielski, Joachim

Bielski, Maciej Stryjkowski, Marcin Broniowski, Bernard Wapowski, and

Joachim Jerlicz, wrote of the staggering statistics of these raids. Some of the

most devastating raids happened in 1498–1500, when Tatars ravaged Galicia,

taking 150,000 captives49; in 1509, when they plundered Lviv and burned

down Rohatyn50; and in 1516, when 30,000 Tatar raiders captured 60 thousand

Ukrainian people.51 During such raids, Tatars laid waste to villages and towns,

killing everyone who resisted them and taking captive not only men and

women, but also children and livestock.52 In the second half of the sixteenth

century, 150,000–200,000 Podolians were taken into captivity. The devastating

Tatar raids continued on a full-scale during the seventeenth century.53 Overall,

between the fifteenth century and the first half of the seventeenth century,

about 2.5 million Ukrainians were kidnapped and sold into slavery.54 The

Ukrainian population was so decimated during that time that the “country

did not recover from it for many generations.”

Sayeeda Warsi, rooted in Pakistan, deceives the Brits and acts as a traitor against those very Human Rights the British society is based on

 . .

If you support Universal Human Rights, then Sayeeda Warsi should be prosecuted as a traitor!

Islam is OIC and OIC is genocide and rapetivism and the exclusion of Human Rights. Do you support it?

Islamofascism is synonymous with islam 

A rough description of some core tenets of fascism with some extra references to islamofascism: 

A revolutionary, trans-class form of anti-liberal, and anti-conservative nationalism (ummaism/caliphatism) built on a complex range of theoretical and cultural influences, promising radical politics to rescue the umma from decadence. Fascism is a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with moral decline, humiliation, or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity, in which a mass-based party (“faith”) of committed nationalist (ummaists, incl. militants) working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties (other than for the purpose of empowering islamofascism) and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion (compare e.g. the “Arab spring”). A political aesthetic using romantic symbolism, mass mobilisation, a positive view of violence in defense of the state (umma), promotion of masculinity and youth and charismatic leadership.

 

Only the diffuse use of the diffuse term "faith" separates Sayeeda Warsi from being described as a conventional traitor!

Conservative Party chairwoman Sayeeda Warsi has issued a grovelling apology for embarrassing the Government. It evetually came after David Cameron bowed to pressure and asked Sir Alex Allan, the independent adviser on the Ministerial Code, to examine whether she broke the rules by taking business associate Abid Hussain (an eager supporter and previous member of Hizb ut-Tahrir, an islamist terror organization) on an official trip to Pakistan.


Although Warsi is now involved in three separate inquiries of misbehavior, the most important one is yet to be initiated, i.e. the fact that she is a direct threat to those basic Human Rights which have constituted the backbone of Britain for longer than Elizabeth has been the Queen. Those very rights that the recent celebration applauded are now threatened by islam/OIC. And no one seems to really care!?




 . .

Has UN become the main bastion of islamofascism?

Handshakes and prayers against Human Rights

In 2008, the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Luis Moreno Ocampo, accused al-Bashir of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in Darfur. The court issued an arrest warrant for al-Bashir in 2009 on counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity, but ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute him for genocide. However, in 2010 the Court ruled there was sufficient evidence for charges of genocide to be brought and issued a second warrant containing three separate counts. Sudan's genocidal war criminal Omar al-Bashir and

Muslim OIC Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu bowing towards Saudi islamofascism together with muslim massmurderer Omar al-Bashir.

The UN/OIC-US-UK islam net runs from the White House via NY to muslim massmurderers in an open effort to  eradicate Human Rights (because Human Rights are unacceptable for islam) while most muslims and non-muslims are more or less ignorant about what's going on.

Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu is an Egyptian born Turkish islamist and der Fuhrer of OIC, the Saudi initiated and based islamist organization representing all muslims in the world, that has abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia, and which tries to criminalize all scrutiny of islam's atrocities!

Are you for or against that OIC denies you Human Rights? 

If you're against then OIC Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu and his friends Turkish PM Erdogan and the Saudi "king" will declare you a dangerous "islamophobe" while your government officials are applauding!

OIC's Cairo declaration (Sharia) that now lies as the basis for muslims' "rights" in the UN!

Do note that the examples below are just a few! And do compare the islamofascist state in which interest these "rights" are produced, with Klevius' description of the "social state" in Angels of Antichrist (no dude, Klevius isn't a Christian). Angels of Antichrist is the world's most important paper from the last century, simply because it's the only one that truly addresses sex segregation in a global perspective (i.e. avoids feminist and socialist, as well as faithist traps).



ARTICLE 6:
(a) Woman is equal to man in human dignity, and has her own rights to enjoy as well as duties to perform, and has her own civil entity and financial independence, and the right to retain her name and lineage.

Klevius comment: These are barbaric medieval principles. Ok, keep in mind that Human Rights clearly states e.g. that 'everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of sex'. But in Sharia women are only equal 'in dignity' and because she is unequal to muslim men she has 'her own rights to enjoy as well as duties (e.g. sex slavery and the reproduction of as many new muslim men as possible) to perform'

 
ARTICLE 7:
(a) As of the moment of birth, every child has rights due from the parents, the society and the state to be accorded proper nursing, education and material, hygienic and moral care. Both the fetus and the mother must be safeguarded and accorded special care.
(b) Parents and those in such like capacity have the right to choose the type of education they desire for their children, provided they take into consideration the interest and future of the children in accordance with ethical values and the principles of the Shari'ah.
(c) Both parents are entitled to certain rights from their children, and relatives are entitled to rights from their kin, in accordance with the tenets of the shari'ah.

Klevius comment: 'Education and moral' as well as 'certain rights' means according to Sharia!

    

ARTICLE 9:
(a) The seeking of knowledge is an obligation and provision of education is the duty of the society and the State. The State shall ensure the availability of ways and means to acquire education and shall guarantee its diversity in the interest of the society so as to enable man to be acquainted with the religion of Islam and uncover the secrets of the Universe for the benefit of mankind.
(b) Every human being has a right to receive both religious and worldly education from the various institutions of teaching, education and guidance, including the family, the school, the university, the media, etc., and in such an integrated and balanced manner that would develop human personality, strengthen man's faith in Allah and promote man's respect to and defence of both rights and obligations.

Klevius comment: 'The State shall ensure the availability of ways and means to acquire education and shall guarantee its diversity in the interest of the society so as to enable man to be acquainted with the religion of Islam'!

Would you believe it! Still wondering why islam and islamofacism are the same?! And talking about "secrets of the Universe", first of all, get rid of the creationist 'the' and upper case in universe! Both imply a naive pre(mis)understanding (common among "monotheists") of universe as "one" (no dude, there aren't many either - if this confuses you do follow Klevius' Origin of Universe blog). The idea of universe as "created" and hence having some sort of "boundaries" is of course utterly ridiculous and truly limits once openness for scientific scrutiny, although it might be helpful for the 'strengthening of man's faith in "Allah"'.

ARTICLE 10:
Islam is the religion of true unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of pressure on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to force him to change his religion to another religion or to atheism.

Klevius comment: Well, that seals for good muslims' possibilities for scientific openness, doesn't it!

ARTICLE 11:

(a) Human beings are born free, and no one has the right to enslave, humiliate, oppress or exploit them, and there can be no subjugation but to Allah the Almighty.

(b) Colonialism of all types being one of the most evil forms of enslavement is totally prohibited. Peoples suffering from colonialism have the full right to freedom and self-determination. It is the duty of all States peoples to support the struggle of colonized peoples for the liquidation of all forms of and occupation, and all States and peoples have the right to preserve their independent identity and control over their wealth and natural resources.

Klevius comment: Islam clearly allows slavery so where's the catch? Oh, it's very simple, ony "true muslims" are human beings according to islam. The others are just given a possibility to submit under islam and if they choose not to they should blame themselves and re open for enslavement. Moreover, it was "colonialism", not islam, that tried to end islamic slavery, the most extensive the world has ever experienced! And the "right" 'to 'preserve their independent identity' should, of course, be read 'to preserve islam'!

ARTICLE 12:

Every man shall have the right, within the framework of the Shari'ah, to free movement and to select his place of residence whether within or outside his country and if persecuted, is entitled to seek asylum in another country. The country of refuge shall be obliged to provide protection to the asylum-seeker until his safety has been attained, unless asylum is motivated by committing an act regarded by the Shari'ah as a crime.

Klevius comment: Would you believe it! Persecution in islamic societies is almost always based on Sharia in one or another form!

 . .