Cameron’s islamofascist right hand, Sayeeda Warsi: “You can have people with the wrong interpretation in all strains of islam” (sic). Klevius: So that’s why so many muslims have been tortured and murdered in the “Arab spring”?!

Is she UK's most dangerous, racist and sexist under cover islamofascist?

She certainly gets uncritical support from BBC's islamofascist propagnda machinery (rooted in BBC's commercial Mideast section - out of reach for critical scrutiny).




Sayeeda Warsi in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, at islamofascist* OIC's headquarter in the world's most intolerant islamofascist nation. 

* OIC, the worlds main muslim organization, forbids criticism of islam and demands its member states and other muslim groups to abandon the Universal Human Rights Declaration against fascism and to adopt their Human Rights violating Sharia (the so called Cairo declaration). If you need more details on how OIC's Sharia violates Human Rights please make a comment and Klevius will enlighten you with fatty details!


In BBC's never ending series of misleading lies and propaganda about islam, Sayeeda Warsi was given one more piedestal from which to prove her complete ignorance about the origin of islam. She "presented" slave master Razia Sultana ("ruled" from 1236 a couple of years in Delhi) as her idol. Problem being that the muslims in Delhi/India used to be some of the worst human beings ever on the planet!

K. S. Lal: From the day India became a target of Muslim invaders its people began to be enslaved in droves to be sold in foreign lands or employed in various capacities on menial and not-so-menial jobs within the country. To understand this phenomenon it is necessary to go into the origins and development of the Islamic system of slavery.  For, wherever the Muslims went, mostly as conquerors but also as traders, there developed a system of slavery peculiar to the clime, terrain and populace of the place. For example, simultaneously with Muhammad bin Qasim’s invasion of Sindh in early 8th century, the expansion of Arab Islam had gone apace as far as Egypt, North Africa and the Iberian Peninsula in the West, as well as in Syria, Asia Minor, Palestine, Iraq, Iran, Khurasan, Sistan and Transoxiana. In all these countries Muslim slave system grew and developed in its own way. There was constant contact between India and most of these countries in the medieval times. For example, as early as during the reigns of the slave sultans Iltutmish and Balban (1210-86), there arrived at their courts in Delhi a large number of princes with their followers from Iraq, Khurasan and Mawar-un-Nahr because of the Mongol upheaval.¹ Many localities in Delhi and its environs were settled by these elites and their slaves, soldiers and scholars. In Balban’s royal procession 500 Sistani, Ghauri and Samarqandi slave-troops with drawn swords used to march by his side pointing to the fact that a large number of foreign slaves from these lands had come to India in 13th-14th centuries.² When the Mughals launched their conquest of India, there was the establishment of the Ottoman Empire in Turkey which at its height included present-day Albania, Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, Romania and several other contiguous countries. Then there was the Safavid empire in Iran. The Ottoman Empire traded with Europe and imported “there indispensable stock of slaves. (Slav, as the word indicates), supplied by merchants, sometimes Jewish, from Verdun, Venice or elsewhere in Italy. Other slaves were brought from black Africa, eastern Europe and Turkish Central Asia.”³ The

Footnotes:

¹ Minhaj, 598-99; Farishtah, I, 73, 75.

² Barani, 57-58.

³ Cambridge History of Islam, II, 524. The word slave, observes Ram Swarup, “is derived from Stavs, the Slavonic peoples of Central Europe. When they were captured and made bondsmen, they gave birth to die word ‘slave’”, The word as Revelation: Names of Gods, 23; also J.H. Kremers, The Legacy of Islam, 101.

Sayeeda Warsi, you know, she who shouts pious muslims "idiots" on the Mr X "president" pic below (right down corner), says “You can have people with the wrong interpretation in all strains of islam” (sic). 

Klevius comment: Really?! So how do we know who's hit the bull's eye with their particular "interpretation"? Doesn't that statement reveal a racist von oben attitude bordering either to insanity or megalomania. However, much more important than Sayeeda Warsi's strangea nd bigoted hypocritical views is the question about OIC's stamping on Human Rights and the British Conservative's eagerness to applaud it. A philosophical enlightenment for Sayeeda Warsi's and others understanding of Human Rights is to be find for free here.

And as she lives in UK she might be interested in the islamofascist history of the Vikings.

Islamic schizophrenia - is this the real "orientalism"?

.
.