Islam is islamofascism - no matter you like it or not! Klevius analysis of islam's schizophrenia

 Islam's denial of its own problem isn't cured by the number of its supporters - quite the opposite

A freudian slip from the guy who ordered the assassination of an American muslim citizen?!

Mr X "president" Barakeh Husain Mahumet Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever, who can tell who he really is when most of his records are kept out of reach and he himself has spent millions on hindering insight): "Awlaki's hateful ideology and targeting of innocent civilians has been rejected by the vast majority of muslims".

Klevius analysis: "the vast majority of muslims"!? That would mean that islamofascist terrorist Awlaki and his followers are also muslims, wouldn't it. But according to Turkish PM Erdogan there are no muslim terrorists or moderate muslims "because there's no such thing as moderate islam, only islam".

But this is like denying that a violent schizophrenic person suffers from schizophrenia by simply denying any connections between that violence and the illness that caused it.

Might we hence conclude that the whitewashing of islam is a tricky and dirty, not to say schizophrenic, business caused by the fact that evil islam during 1400 years of slavery, genocides and rapetivism has managed to colonize and contaminate large third world populations with it's slave parasitism. And that political and military power play demands a PC attitude that simply blinks islam's bottomless evilness. And that in the midst of it all sits Obama's first call, the Saudi dictatorship, the world's most intolerant state which also happens to be "the guardian of islam".


A tiny little exmple tip of islam's immense medieval iceberg of intolerance

Juan Pablo Pino, 24, a Catholic from Colombia, and a member of Saudi Arabia’s Al Nasr soccer club, was taken into custody in Riyadh on Friday by Saudi moral police after mall customers complained about him walking through a mall wearing a sleeveless shirt that revealed his religious tattoos, including one of Jesus.


Islamofascism is the very soul of true islam and may have inspired 20th Century fascism

We have all the info we need to conclude that islam historically is an evil and disgusting ideology for parasitic slavery, and that the only reason it has survived is that it now sponges on "Western" technology (oil) and welfare.

Definition of fascism according to Wikipedia:

What constitutes a definition of fascism and fascist governments is a highly disputed subject that has proved complicated and contentious. Historians, political scientists, and other scholars have engaged in long and furious debates concerning the exact nature of fascism and its core tenets.

Most scholars agree that a "fascist regime" is foremost an authoritarian form of government, although not all authoritarian regimes are fascist. Authoritarianism is thus a defining characteristic, but most scholars will say that more distinguishing traits are needed to make an authoritarian regime fascist.

Core tenets: Nationalism (Umma) · Authoritarianism (Koran/Muhammad interpreters) · Single party state (Caliphate) · Dictatorship (Caliph) · Social Darwinism (muslim men, infidels and women) · Social interventionism (Sharia) · Indoctrination · Propaganda · Anti-intellectualism (see e.g. islamic creationism) · Eugenics (only muslim men can transfer muslimhood) · Heroism (Jihadism) · Militarism (Jihad) · Economic interventionism (Sharia finance)

Most scholars prefer to use the word "fascism" in a more general sense, to refer to an ideology (or group of ideologies) that was influential in many countries at many different times. For this purpose, they have sought to identify a "fascist minimum" - that is, the minimum conditions that a certain political group must meet in order to be considered fascist. Several scholars have inspected the apocalyptic, millennial and millenarian aspects of fascism. According to most scholars of fascism, there are both left and right influences on fascism as a social movement

Benito Mussolini:

Liberalism, democracy, this does not mean that the XXth century must also be the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrines pass; nations remain. We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the 'right', a Fascist century. If the 19th century was the century of the individual (liberalism implies individualism) we are free to believe that this is the 'collective' century, and therefore the century of the State.

The Fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State—a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values—interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole life of a people.

Fascism is a religious conception in which man is seen in his immanent relationship with a superior law and with an objective Will that transcends the particular individual and raises him to conscious membership of a spiritual society. Whoever has seen in the religious politics of the Fascist regime nothing but mere opportunism has not understood that Fascism besides being a system of government is also, and above all, a system of thought.


Roger Griffin: Fascism argues for a "re-birth" of a conflated nation (Umma/OIC) and ethnic people (muslims). Fascism is best defined as a revolutionary form of nationalism (Ummaism), one that sets out to be a political, social and ethical revolution, welding the ‘people’ into a dynamic national community under new elites infused with heroic values. The core myth that inspires this project is that only a populist, trans-class movement of purifying, cathartic national rebirth (palingenesis) can stem the tide of decadence


Emilio Gentile sees fascism as the "sacralization of politics" through totalitarian methods (i.e. precisely as islam is used today)

[Fascism is] a genuinely revolutionary, trans-class form of anti-liberal, and anti conservative nationalism (Ummaism/OIC) to generate a populist mass movement through a liturgical style of politics and a programme of radical policies which promised to end the degeneration affecting the nation under liberalism, and to bring about a radical renewal of its social, political and cultural life as part of what was widely imagined to be the new era being inaugurated in Western civilization. The core mobilizing myth of fascism which conditions its ideology, propaganda, style of politics and actions is the vision of the nation's (Umma's) imminent rebirth (OIC) from decadence.

Finally, Griffin claims that the above definition can be condensed into one sentence:
“ Fascism is a political ideology whose mythic core (Koran/Mohammad) in its various permutations is a palingenetic form of populist ultra-nationalism (Ummaism).”

The word "palingenetic" refers to notions of rebirth (in the case of islaml rebirth of the Arabic slave Caliphate or Ottoman slavery "empire" - which quickly eroded away after slavery was forbidden by Western powers).

Emilio Gentile sees fascism as the "sacralization of politics" through totalitarian methods.

Robert O. Paxton, a professor emeritus at Columbia University, defines fascism in his book The Anatomy of Fascism as: A form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.

Umberto Eco

In a 1995 essay "Eternal Fascism",[21] the Italian writer and academic Umberto Eco attempts to list general properties of fascist ideology. He claims that it is not possible to organise these into a coherent system, but that "it is enough that one of them be present to allow fascism to coagulate around it". He uses the term "Ur-fascism" as a generic description of different historical forms of fascism.

The features of fascism he lists are as follows:

"The Cult of Tradition", combining cultural syncretism with a rejection of modernism (often disguised as a rejection of capitalism).
"The Cult of Action for Action's Sake", which dictates that action is of value in itself, and should be taken without intellectual reflection. This, says Eco, is connected with anti-intellectualism and irrationalism, and often manifests in attacks on modern culture and science.
"Disagreement Is Treason" - fascism devalues intellectual discourse and critical reasoning as barriers to action.
"Fear of Difference", which fascism seeks to exploit and exacerbate, often in the form of racism or an appeal against foreigners and immigrants.
"Appeal to a Frustrated Middle Class", fearing economic pressure from the demands and aspirations of lower social groups.
"Obsession with a Plot" and the hyping-up of an enemy threat. This often involves an appeal to xenophobia or the identification of an internal security threat. He cites Pat Robertson's book The New World Order as a prominent example of a plot obsession.
"Pacifism Is Trafficking with the Enemy" because "Life is Permanent Warfare" - there must always be an enemy to fight.
"Contempt for the Weak" - although a fascist society is elitist, everybody in the society is educated to become a hero.
"Selective Populism" - the People have a common will, which is not delegated but interpreted by a leader. This may involve doubt being cast upon a democratic institution, because "it no longer represents the Voice of the People".
"Newspeak" - fascism employs and promotes an impoverished vocabulary in order to limit critical reasoning.


Italian Fascism was (officially) neither atheist nor racist — provided the colonized folk agreed to Italianisation and swore fealty to Il Duce, (See: Racial classification).[43] Just as Italian Jews were allowed membership in the National Fascist Party, in metropolitan Italy,[45][46] in the Libyan colony, Muslims were Fascist Party members via the Muslim Association of the Lictor.[47] In a unity ceremony, a Libyan chief awarded Prime Minister Mussolini an ancient Yemeni Sword of Islam artefact.[48] East Africans were allowed to serve with Italians in the MVSN Colonial Militia

and so on an on...


Islamofascism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements from the turn of the 21st century on, and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

The term "Islamofascism" is included in the New Oxford American Dictionary, which defines it as "a controversial term equating some modern Islamic movements with the European fascist movements of the early twentieth century".

There are similarities between historical fascism and Islamofascism. Christopher Hitchens makes the following comparison:
“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Gonzalo Queipo de Llano so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.[3] ”
[edit] Criticism

The term, "Islamofascism" has been criticized by some scholars[11] and journalists. Historian Niall Ferguson[12] and international relations scholar Angelo Codevilla consider it historically inaccurate and simplistic.[13] Author Richard Alan Nelson criticized the term as being generally used as a pejorative or for propaganda[14][15] purposes. Tony Judt argued in a September 2006 article in the London Review of Books that use of the term was intended to reduce the War on Terror to "a familiar juxtaposition that eliminates exotic complexity and confusion", criticising authors who use the term Islamo-fascism and present themselves as experts despite not having previous expertise about Islam.

Cultural historian Richard Webster has argued that grouping many different political ideologies, terrorist and insurgent groups, governments, and religious sects into one single idea of "Islamofascism" may lead to an oversimplification of the phenomenon of terrorism. However, according to Klevius, this is precisely how the word islam is used. Although it's not an oversimplification but most often an undersimplification by those ignorant who haven't as yet got/digested a full enough picture of islam's extremely evil and disgusting history.











.
.