The Koran is written on the basis of sex and booty jihad. Simple as that. This explains why muslim "empires" always "developed" into misery, especially when slavery, the Koran sanctioned Sharia finance of islam, was forbidden by the West. However, Klevius will also present you with a more complicated picture of the origin of islam (carefully avoiding tendentious and behind the curtain steered charlatan Wikipedia), yet the basic formula is always the same.
In the meantime, take a look at and contribute to the new blog on how BBC's misleading islam propaganda pushes innocent people in tragic relations with believers in islam!
These guys from UK really try to follow pure Koranic islam! However, the pattern is the same around the world!
Rapetivism, a cornerstone of islam
A provisional inquiry, "Shariah Law and American State Courts,"
evaluated 50 appellate court cases from 23 states that involved
conflicts between Sharia and American state law. There were examples of
American judges accepting "input" from Sharia in rendering judgments,
included an odious, widely publicized New Jersey ruling that
upheld Sharia-sanctioned marital rape. Appellate court intervention was
required to reverse this ruling in July 2010: Western legal norms
prevailed over Sharia -- with the presiding judge soberly concluding
that the Muslim husband's "conduct in engaging in nonconsensual sexual
intercourse was unquestionably knowing, regardless of his view that his
religion permitted him to act as he did." Completely ignored at the time
of these New Jersey proceedings was the fact that marital rape is not
recognized as criminal, but rather is sanctioned by a fatwa of the
Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America.
Many of these muslim pedophiles* victims are those very girls the social state has "taken care of". This is a topic Klevius has researched since the 1980's both theoretically and in praxis (as a solicitor). Take a look at Angels of Antichrist (perhaps the most important sociological paper from the last Century) and Pathological symbiosis!
* technically a true 'pedophile' is someone who is sexually interested in children who haven't reached puberty. However, now the term has been heavily conflated as including anyone below 18 (or sometimes 21) when there is a grooming/rapetivist relation.
Already have muslim "community leaders" threatened UK politicians for hinting these muslims are "Asians" (why are Mideastern muslims always veiled as "Asians" when they are just a tiny minority compared to the real Asians?! An deep insult against non-muslim Asians, isn't it!)
How islam sanctions enslavement of "infidel" girls/women (e.g. during jihad - remember that islam is immediately "under attack" as long as you don't submit under it):
“It is not lawful for you (to marry other) women after this, nor to change them for other wives even though their beauty attracts you, except those (captives or slaves) whom your right hand possesses. And Allah is Ever a Watcher over all things.” Surah 33:52
And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts from illegal sexual acts). Except with their wives and the (women slaves and captives) whom their right hand possess,--for (then) they are not to be blamed.” Surah 70:29-30
“Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess,--for then, they are free from blame;” Surah 23:6
“(1) Two categories of women have been excluded from the general command of guarding the private parts: (a) wives, (b) women who are legally in one’s possession, i.e. slave-girls. Thus the verse clearly lays down the law that one is allowed to have sexual relations with one’s slave-girl as with one’s wife, the basis being possession and not marriage. If marriage had been the condition, the slave-girl also would have been included among the wives, and there was no need to mention them separately…..” Meaning of the Qur’an Book 8, page 10, footnote 7.
“Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your hands possess. Thus has Allah ordained for you…..” Surah 4:24
Tafsir of Mawdudi, Book2, page 112, footnote 44:
“That is, ‘Those women, who became prisoners of war, while their husbands are left behind in the War Zone, are not unlawful because their marriage ties have been broken by the fact that they have come into the Islamic Zone. It is lawful to marry such women and make them wives, and it is also lawful for those, in whose possession they are, to have sexual relations with them.
No comments:
Post a Comment