See the fascinating truth: Why didn't fully modern humans evolve in Africa? And why weren't you told?!
The pic is a reconstruction made on a Homo floresiensis skull. H. floresiensis was an apelike creature who used same type of stone tools as Homo erectus although the former had less than half the brain size.
Islam heavily intervened in the discovery of Homo floresiensis via its Indonesian representative the so called "anthropologist"* Teuku Jacob who stole the remains and even damaged them!
* Teuku Jacob was the head of Indonesian "anthropology" & hence closely tied to "muslim interpretations", i.e. essentially a crypto-evolutionist, i.e. one who believes in evolution only when it doesn't involve humans. Whereas Klevius proposes a streightforward evolutionary explanation to the emergence of modern humans, islamists want to have it a "divine intevention" when the human "spirit" entered the brain. Compared to Klevius explanation, this naive (or deliberate) confusion misses the very point, namely that we are 100% mixed with the rest of nature, & that there's not the slightest hint of any "divine spirit" other than that an ape brain that was better structured than the Homo brain ("Homo" floresiensis is probably a wrong & misleading name), entered the Homo skulls via hybridization & as a consequence got much more space. If this is "divine" then whatever could be called "divine" hence making the wording pure non sense (see more on Philosophy in depth by Klevius)!
We don't consider apes humans, do we. We don't even call the apelike Homo floresiensis human. So why call those Homos who happened to walk on two legs & superficially resembling us humans?!
What is extremely confusing for many, & understandably so, is the fact that the dumb Homos were much bigger & humanlike than the pygmy sized hybrids which spread out of Africa (& East Asia?). See Klevius Out of Africa as pygmies and back as global mongoloids! A completely new understanding of the human evolution will open up in front of your eyes - supposing you open them!
Cro Magnon (Europe) skull 28,000 bp representing a typical Aurignacian. The Cro Magnon skull was in fact some 15-20% bigger than the average of today. This is because the adaptive pressure for the evolution of intelligence has long since stopped because there cannot be any real evolution among us anymore (only a variety of gene expressions) because we're simply too many & too mixed for evolutionary niches to survive long enough (not even the remotest tribes usually fulfil this criterion). In fact, as I wrote in Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor (1992), we may well already have slipped into a slight retardation. This would certainly explain the many stupid "anthropologists" etc out there, wouldn't it! The hallmark of modern humans, Aurignacian culture, never developed in Africa but only in Eurasia.
Aurignacian is the hallmark of the emergence of truly modern humans, i.e. people who are clearly distanced from the level of culture seen among e.g. Homo floresiensis, Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis & even so called "modern sapiens" etc more apelike creatures.
Unfortunately (but logically due to the climate situation back then) Aurignacian is centered in Europe & northern Asia hence making it politically incorrect.
Aurignacian culture is solely associated with skulls much more sophisticated (i.e. less archaic) than ALL other such cultures & started after 40,000 years ago so whatever is presented for you before that is not made by humans but by Homos or other apelike creatures. No, Klevius isn't racist against apes or Homos but just wants to distinguish between them & human creatures in accorance with YOUR view on what to be considered human!
There's rights now an exhibition at the David H. Koch Hall of Human Origins at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, which is such a charlatan example of misleading & confused "science" you can ever imaging.
(INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BY KLEVIUS)
HUMANS WERE CREATED IN STAGES
ReplyDeleteOnly 60 years ago, researchers confirmed that man does not come into existence all at once, but rather he passes through stages of development one after another. However, the Holy Quran already has this information.
Shaykh al-Zandaani said, we met an American professor, one of the greatest American scientists, whose name was Professor Marshall Johnson, and we told him that it says in the Quran that man is created in stages. When he heard this, he was sitting down, but he stood up and said, “Stages?” We said, “That was in the seventh century CE! This Book came and said, man was created in stages.” He said, “That is impossible, impossible.” We told him, “Why do you say that?” This Book says (interpretation of the meaning):
"He creates you in the wombs of your mothers, creation after creation in three veils of darkness" (The Quran, 39:6)
"What is the matter with you, that [you fear not Allah (His punishment), and] you hope not for reward (from Allah or you believe not in His Oneness).While He has created you in (different) stages" (The Quran, 71:14)
Then he sat back down on his chair and after a few moments he said, “There are only three possibilities. The first is that Muhammad had a huge microscope through which he managed to study these things and he knew things that the people did not know, and he said these things. The second is that this happened by accident, it was a coincidence. The third is that he was a Messenger from God.” We said, “With regard to the first idea, that he had a microscope and other equipment, you know that a microscope needs lenses, and lenses need glass and technical expertise and other equipment. Some of this information can only be discovered with an electron microscope which needs electricity, and electricity needs knowledge which should have been acquired by an earlier generation. It is not possible for this knowledge to have been acquired all at once in a single generation; the previous generation would have had to strive hard in developing science and transmitting it to the next generation, and so on. But for this to be the work of one man, with no one coming before him or after him, either in his own land or the neighbouring lands for the Romans, Persians and Arabs were ignorant and had no such equipment, for one man to have all these instruments and tools which he did not pass on to anyone else this is not possible.” He said, “That’s right, it would be very difficult.” We said, “And for it to have been an accident or coincidence, what would you think if we said that the Quran did not mention this fact only in one verse but in several verses, and that it did not refer to it in general terms but that it gave details of every stage, saying that in the first stage such and such happens, in the second stage such and such happens, in the third stage and so on. Could that be a coincidence?” When we explained to him all the details of those stages, he said, “It is wrong to say that this is an accident! This is well-founded knowledge.” We said, “Then how do you explain it?” He said, “There is no explanation except that this is revelation from above!”
Obtained from the website Islam-QA.com by Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
"HUMANS WERE CREATED IN STAGES", just like Koran/islam! Mohammed didn't even officially exist before Malik "invented" him when he compiled the first official version of Koran. It's a confused collection of Jewish, Zoroastrian etc thoughts spiced with the utmost parasitism & put together in an effort to make a "moral" for infidel slavery & rapetivism!
ReplyDeleteAll "religions" are based on "beliefs" & hence outside logic! However, islam is special in that it has excluded Allah alltogether & replaced it with Mohammed & his lunatic interpretors. Islam was & is the "faith" in the logics of theft & slavery. This is why there is no truly islamic science in history, only captured non-muslim scientists under the threat of apostasy ban! Everything progressive muslims have learnt from real civilizations.
And when should Koran/islam pay for its atrocities throughout 1400 yrs incl. the total destruction of the African continent?!
Who wrote the Quran,have a look!!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.jannah.org/articles/quranwrote.html
Here, have a look:
ReplyDeleteHugh Kennedy (professor of Arabic language and Arabic history): "Before Abd al-Malik (caliph 685-705) Mohammed (dead 632) is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever nor any form of religious pronouncement”.
Bite the bullet dude, and check the mirror!