*A phobia is (according to the politically correct but usually scientifically incorrect Wikipedia) the "excessive, unreasonable desire to avoid the feared subject". That would certainly exclude Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Klevius etc. from the category of "islamophobes", wouldn't it!
The heroine (Ayaan Hirsi Ali - the enlightened) & the coward Chicago gangsta (Mr X "president"** - the endarkened)
Can you tell who is a "moderate muslim" eager to broadcast a positive picture of islam's peacefulness, & who stabbed his divorcing wife at least 9 times & then chopped her head off while she was still alive? OK, I agree, they all look capable of it. Correct answer is the guy to the left who's rewarded by top islamofascists from islam's muslim terror organization CAIR (The Council on American Islamic Relations - these guys are also busy accusing FBI for offending muslims because FBI has monitored a California mosque that hosts islamic terrorists planning blow up jobs in California). Btw, the British lord Ahmed (who threatened Britain with 10000 street jihadists if Wilders was allowed entrance to Britain) to the right has also accused of murder/manslaughter (this dangerous islamofascist who Catholic Blair rewarded with a lord title, got away with only 3 months in jail because the biased British court "thought" he had just stopped his 20 minute constant SMS session while driving, just seconds before he killed a person!? Btw, Mr X "president's" first call was to the islamofascist Saudi leader whose legal adviser is the Nation of Islam guy at his right ear (same guy who arranged & paid for his Harvard studies) while Ingrid Mattson at his left ear is a wahhabist islamofascist leader of American muslims who wants to make islam & Sharia the new constitution of USA!
Islam is a lunatic medieval millstone around Africa's (& the rest of the world's) neck! Islam's infidel racist supremacist ideology has murdered, enslaved & raped hundreds of millions through 1400 yrs! Why do so many pretend not to see & why are islamologists so feeble minded?!
Simply because the bright ones have long since abandoned Islamic illogic, i.e. the stupid (or simply egoistic) idea abt a “god” who is completely (& safely) out of reach yet still somehow manages to justify the “believers” beliefs! This is then embedded in an ideology that is empowered with the usual common moral stuff for the purpose of even more justification. However, what is missing is the very root, the origin of islam, i.e. the original evil formula (infidel racism-slavery-sexist rapetivism- apostasy ban) that made its murderous looting campaign into civilized land successful in the first place. There\s absolutely no alternative explanation to islam’s initial bloody “success”. Today’s “extremist” Islamic jihadism is just a repetition of Mohammed’s original one, & the senseless denying of this dirty historical fact is nothing moré or less than pathetic "faith" laundering.
We are now again heading towards a new dark middle age because of islam. Back then it was islam’s Sharia finance based on slavery parasitism that made it possible, today it’s oil. And Satan & Co sit in Riyadh & fund not only jihadist hate mongering supremacist racism against “infidels” but also “political correctness” triggered by Saudi etc oil money & influence.
Amil Imani: “Our academia leftists even engage in willful misinformation and deception when it suits them. Terms such as “Political Islam,” or “Radical Islam,” for instance, are contributions of our leftist intellengtsia. These terms do not even exist in the native parlance of Islam itself, simply because they are redundant. Even a cursory study of Islam and its charter—the Quran—will clearly reveal that it is a radical political movement. It is the socialist leftists and paid-for-media and politicians who sanitize Islam and misguide the populace by saying that the “real Islam” constitutes the main body of the religion; and, that this main body is non-political and moderate”
Klevius comment: In my Demand for Resources – on the right to be poor (1991) I criticized the academic etc use of references for non-scientific political (or religious) purpose via computerized streamlined non-scientific social “research” packages under the protecting umbrella of peer review. In other words, those the least to trust when it comes to islam’s true nature are the islamologists (regardless if muslims or not).
However, as everyone knows but only Klevius draws the conclusion of, islam is sex segregation in its purest form.
Even feeble minded islamists understand that either their ideology ultimately dies in the swirl of modernity or they have to kill everything else. This is why they are so desperate. It would be fun to look upon their struggle
had it not been for the victims of islam still counting.
Klevius advice to feeble minded islamologists: Either switch career or wait until you drown in the melt water from the medieval iceberg you are sitting on! Globalization is unstoppable as is technology (see e.g. Shinto meets islam).
The ugliness of islam – from its cradle to its grave
Islam is the worst crime ever - & those who support it (except if out of ignorance) are murderers/criminals. The contradiction between the heavily biased & distorted picture of a “good” islam presented in schools etc.
The beauty of islamophobia
Islamophobia rests on the inevitable logic of Negative Human Rights (i.e. not a "local Western point of view"). The inescapable conclusion being the very opposite to the evil medieval Islamic Cairo declaration from 1990) which uphelds totalitarian sex segregation under the cover of women's "responsibilities" (i.e. to submit to rapetivism).
Also cure your ignorance abt what religion is!
The Christian double muslim Mr X
**He (the double muslim - according to islam & no matter what he thinks himself! - Mr X) hides (or lacks) his real (long form) birth certificate & has spent huge amount of money & effort to cover up the fact that he isn't a natural born US citizen. Moreover he has for years deliberately & cunningly abused a hole in the justice system that doesn't demand him to present this paper (a change of the law is under work but will it include a sitting "president"?! Even bin Laden could have become "president" of the US by applying this method! And what's the difference, really?! May be bin Laden should have killed fewer civilian muslims than Obama's cruel slaughtering by a hugely escalating war campaign + stealthy & bloody drone attacks.
No comments:
Post a Comment