Peter Klevius question to Åsa Linderborg: So which of the Judaic branches do you think would have been first in line trying to murder Albert Einstein as of today?
Åsa Linderborg concludes her hateful rant in Aftonbladet* yesterday about the Swedish artist whom muslims tried to murder in Denmark, in a satified tone:
'Lars Vilks now starts looking scared for real.'
* Åsa Linderborg, is a hard core communist and defender of islamofascism who is cultural editor in chief on Scandinavia's biggest news paper Aftonbladet. Among other hateful commentaries she used to compare the African heroine Ayaan Hirsi Ali, together with "Western leaders", with mass murderers.
Is this Saudi islamofascist her best intellectual pal?
Klevius wrote in 2012 after she made herself a big letter "heroine" on Aftonbladet by stating that she had got "threatening" emails from some usual morons:
A Swedish fascist with a mouth the size of the biggest news paper in Scandinavia
Åsa Linderborg, you're not a heroine like Ayaan Hirsi Ali. You're a hateful fascist! I really hope no one will be so stupid so to do any harm to you because that would (apart from that I don't want you to get hurt in any sense) cover up your perverted anti-Human Rights views (communists like islamists have always been against basic individual Human Rights) you share with Mideast islamist dictators and other fascists.
How media power changes evil to "good"
After using Scandinavia's biggest news paper's most powerful headline resources for weeks for the sole purpose of smearing Sweden's only political party that dares to criticize islam(ofascism), Åsa Linderborg has now managed to gather a few hate mails from some poor and confused Swedes, and now uses these stupid insults and most probably empty "threats" (if one can call them threats when at the same time talking about Ayaan Hirsi Ali and the real threats from Koran reading islamofascists who have already murdered her friend and thousands of others).Klevius islam tutorial for ignorant (or deliberately hypocritical) Åsa Linderborg
What's not in islam
There was no Mohammed. Hugh Kennedy (professor of Arabic
language and Arabic history): "Before Abd al-Malik (caliph
685-705) Mohammed (dead 632) is never mentioned on any official
document whatsoever..."
So the stories about him were made up
by Bukhari in the 9th Century, i.e. some 200
years later!
There was no written Koran before Malik,
i,e, some 70 years after alleged Mohammed's alleged death
What actually is islam
Islam is a political and militant ideology based on racism and sexism
(rapetivism) and parasitism (slaves were the main Sharia currency before
oil).
Although slavery wasn't uncommon at all at the time of the origin of islam, no other sytem was so deliberately framed on slavery as islam. It was islam's very basic idea, i.e. to sponge on male slaves, mainly for work, military or as objects for sale whereas female slaves were taken mainly for sex and the reproduction of as many new muslims as possible.
Slavery isn't only allowed in the Koran but everything surrounding slavery is there as well if you just read it as it is. And if that's not enough for you then just check which ideology historically has had most slaves.No other is even close.
When slavery was forbidden islam imploded in misery (compare e.g. the Ottoman slave "empire") until West gave them money for oil West dug up for them. Islam's "success" doesn't lie in any "personal god spirit" but in its capability to collectively make use of some of the most evil human characteristics and transform them to suit power hungry greedy robbers, dictators, politicians, media people etc, while offering male muslims a free outlet for their racism and sexism while muslim women are "rewarded" by the same racism plus Sharia "protection" against this very same sexism from others than their husbands (marital rape is not only allowed but enforced - a muslim woman can't say no to sex). Moreover, apostasy ban (i.e. that muslims have a hard time leaving islam) functions as a dead end spiced with reproduction of new muslims under the sword of Sharia.
Although slavery wasn't uncommon at all at the time of the origin of islam, no other sytem was so deliberately framed on slavery as islam. It was islam's very basic idea, i.e. to sponge on male slaves, mainly for work, military or as objects for sale whereas female slaves were taken mainly for sex and the reproduction of as many new muslims as possible.
Slavery isn't only allowed in the Koran but everything surrounding slavery is there as well if you just read it as it is. And if that's not enough for you then just check which ideology historically has had most slaves.No other is even close.
When slavery was forbidden islam imploded in misery (compare e.g. the Ottoman slave "empire") until West gave them money for oil West dug up for them. Islam's "success" doesn't lie in any "personal god spirit" but in its capability to collectively make use of some of the most evil human characteristics and transform them to suit power hungry greedy robbers, dictators, politicians, media people etc, while offering male muslims a free outlet for their racism and sexism while muslim women are "rewarded" by the same racism plus Sharia "protection" against this very same sexism from others than their husbands (marital rape is not only allowed but enforced - a muslim woman can't say no to sex). Moreover, apostasy ban (i.e. that muslims have a hard time leaving islam) functions as a dead end spiced with reproduction of new muslims under the sword of Sharia.
And as you can see this formula is as far you can get from Human Rights,
which fact explains why Saudi (the world's most intolerant and hate
mongering country) initiated and based OIC and its islamofascist
Egyptian born Turkish Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu backed by a bunch of
scumbag dictators etc, has managed to make islamic violations of Human
Rights OKed in the UN:
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment