Pages

Friday, September 26, 2025

"Peacemaker" Trump wants the war in Europe to escalate for more US arms trade, and approves NATO shooting down Russian aircraft violating NATO member airspace. Peter Klevius: Well knowing NATO can't do that at Stenskär (aka Vaindloo)*!

* This was where the Russian fighter jets passed which Estonia hyped about. Nato member states only include undisputed borders. Stenskär (Swedish meaning 'stony islet' aka Vaindloo) is a tiny disputed island in the Finnish bay. Peter Klevius thinks 'Vaindloo' is a form of the Swedish 'vindlä' meaning protected from the wind because it's only 300m wide but 800m long in North-South direction against storms in the Baltic Sea. 

Did Zelensky let repair and refuel Russian decoy drones and send them to Poland*? And why is Estonia complaining about NATO "air space incursion" over disputed** territory under internationally agreed*** Russian air control?


* The range of drones used in the 9 September 2025 attack on Ukrainian military targets did not exceed 700 km which made it impossible for them to have reached Polish territory, and Russia was willing to engage in professional discussions with the Polish MOD to understand what had taken place. But the Polish representative stated that Polish territorial integrity has been purposely violated by Russian drones on an unprecedented scale, and Poland knew that it was not a mistake. Peter Klevius comment: Indeed, this fits perfectly as a desperate Ukrainian false flag operation!

** The border treaty was signed in 2005, but Estonia added a mention of the Tartu Peace Treaty to the legal text of the already ratified treaty. Now, as expected, Russia withdrew its own signature.

*** The St. Petersburg FIR (Flight Information Region) is located around disputed (Estonia changed already signed and ratified border agreement hence making Russia withdrawing its own signature) Vaindloo Island, and air traffic services there are provided by Russia, not Estonia, under agreements ratified by the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization).


 


 



The territory of Estonia called Svenska Estlan (Swedish East land) belonged to Sweden for 150 years before it 1710 became Russian territory until the 1920s after German military heleped a fascist-aristocratic led minority to take over during the revolutionary chaos in Russia.

The first self-governance elections in Estonia took place March 16, 1917. Of the 198 delegates elected, 58 were Bolsheviks, 87 were Social Revolutionaries, 29 were Mensheviks, and 22 were non-partisan.

On 24 September 1939, with the fall of Poland to Nazi Germany and the USSR imminent and in light of the Orzeł incident, Moscow declared Estonia as hostile to the Soviet Union. 

Moscow therefore demanded that Estonia allows the USSR to establish military bases and station 25,000 troops on Estonian soil for the duration of the European war. The government of Estonia accepted and signed the corresponding agreement on 28 September 1939.

The pact:

    Estonia granted the USSR the right to maintain naval bases and airfields protected by Red Army troops on the strategic islands dominating Tallinn, the Gulf of Finland and the Gulf of Riga;
    The Soviet Union agreed to increase her annual trade turnover with Estonia and to give Estonia facilities in case the Baltic is closed to her goods for trading with the outside world via Soviet ports on the Black Sea and White Sea;
    The USSR and Estonia undertook to defend each other from "aggression arising on the part of any great European power";
    It was declared: the pact "should not affect" the "economic systems and state organizations" of the USSR and Estonia.

There is no consensus in Estonian society about the decisions that the leadership of the Republic of Estonia made at that time.

When Soviet troops marched into Estonia the guns of both nations gave mutual salutes, and bands played both the Estonian anthem and the Internationale, the anthem of the USSR, at the time.

Similar demands were forwarded to Finland, Latvia and Lithuania. Finland resisted, which initiated the Winter War. 

The war ended with the signing of the Moscow Peace Treaty in March 1940, in which Finland ceded 9% of its territory to the Soviet Union. This could have been avoided by a less hawkish Russophobic attitude, because the end deal was essentially the same as the one Russia asked for in the first place and very lucrative for Finland which not only got most of its war debt waived but also got the perfect trading partner because Finland was already a world leader in wood processing (e.g. Enso-Gutzeit) and other technologies which benefited from a stable supply of raw material etc. from Russia, and longterm trade stability.

The first population loss for Estonia was the repatriation of about 12,000–18,000 Baltic Germans to Germany.

In 1941 the Soviet Union was pressured to sign the Ribbentrop Pact due to its failed attempts to secure a collective security agreement* with Britain and France against Nazi Germany, leaving it vulnerable to German aggression. The pact provided a temporary measure of security by ensuring non-aggression between the two powers and allowed the Soviets to expand their influence in Eastern Europe.

* The main reason was that UK wanted Germany to attack and weaken Russia, so that it and Germany could be defeated when Germany also had lost its military edge.

 

Wednesday, September 10, 2025

US supported Israel, "defended" its war crimes on BBC, incl. bombing peace negotiators and staff in Qatar by stating 'We're a democracy'! Peter Klevius: Bombing democratically elected Hamas* whose military wing defends* Palestinians just like IDF but with more right!

* US military base in Doha knew about the missiles but didn't protect Qatar but only Israel. IDF and Mossad (CIA associated) are US proxy army and intelligence. Israel is a tiny country with a GDP less than Hong Kong, and would never alone been able to commit the atrocities it has. John Mearsheimer says that due to Israel's occupation and oppression of Palestinians, Hamas had the right to attack Israel. And it wasn't Hamas that committed the worst atrocities during the attack. So this extreme pointing against Hamas seems to fit Israel's genocide agenda because technically Hamas still represents all of the Palestinians in Gaza. After all, Israel's war against Palestinians has never stopped - just compare how Zelensky still "represents" Ukrainians although his presidency ended long ago. 

You're a fool (or worse - i.e. a fascist*) if you fall for the demonizing mis- and disinformation about Russia and especially China**, which ultimately rests on US fear of losing its 1971 stolen dollar hegemony.  

* Don't you think the Germans who backed the Nazis felt the same Russophobia/anti-Communism and thought that Germany had to increase its defense spending - and increase the territories it could control (compare NATO/EU today).

** When Xi tries to defuse North Korea this is instead in the West used to further demonize China. However, China is in every aspect (incl. crime rate) a better led country than US - the overwhelming opinion of Chinese people, and US tourists inChina. Moreover, even though Mao rightly is celebrated for his campaign against the mass-murderer and dictator Chiang Kai-shek (whom US helped occupy Taiwan) and the Japanese occupation, when Mao died, so did "Maoism". If you correct for China's necessary measures against US and its "allies" attacks, as well as for the fact that China leads in technology - which may lead to China haters using it as in the case of facial surveillance before this tech became commonplace also in the West.


When Israel killed at least 62 Palestinians on Sunday, BBC's mediafascists only "reported" that 'two high rise buildings were taken down', while making a big number of Russia's attack where 4 were killed - probably misdirected because of air defense. 

These graphs tell how US 1971  dollar theft affects US twin UK.
1995 Japan surpassed US as the world's largest economy - so US took help from EU to contain Japan's economy. Today it's China, which unlike Japan isn't occupied by US and is 12 times larger.


A key concept of the UN Charter is non-interference in the domestic affairs of other countries. So why did Ukraine's leadership welcome NATO, well knowing that would alter peace?



Why didn't Ukraine stop harassing terrorizing, and bombing Russians in Ukraine since 2014? Why didn't Zelensky stop the genocide* against Russians in 2019 when he was elected, and the war 2022 when Russia offered ceasefire and negotiations? And why positive to NATO** membership, well knowing Russia's red line*?

* Oppressing Russian language and culture in Ukraine while also attacking them with military bombardment and terrorizing them with Nazi Ukrainian militants, all seem to well top China's detention of IS Uyghur islamists who had raped and slaughtered equally many Chinese as Israelis, and China's effort to give sharia imprisoned women a chance to educate and work without bombing them, was declared "genocide" by the US dictatorship over the West. So the West condemns Palestinian islamism while applauding Uyghur islamism! 

** NATO membership means US nukes, but US would never have tolerated Russian nukes in Mexico or Cuba. And no matter what text is in the membership application, there's no guarantee about whether US will declare the unspecific "armed attack" as an excuse to place nukes secretly in Nato and DCA countries. After all, an "armed attack" can include "various forms" of military "aggression" and "cyber attacks" depending on the context. Moreover, no one can control when and where US nukes are located and transported within NATO - not even Rutte.

First Ukraine was declared nuke free, and Russia only rented Sevastopol. Then 2013 US planned to seize it and place its nukes there. Then 2014 Crimeans voted to belong to Russia. Then US toppled the president and supported an 8 year genocidal civil war against Russians, which 2022 led to Russia liberating* the eastern parts. 

And now Merz wants the war to continue indefinitely.





Read this if you still feel confused:


Ukraine’s NATO Membership Was Always Russia’s Red Line

by Kyle Anzalone | Apr 28, 2025

Since 2008, the North Atlantic Alliance has been promising to one day add Ukraine as a member of the bloc. However, Moscow protested Kiev accession to the alliance, arguing that it would present a major national security concern for Russia.

While the American president following Bush did little to make Ukraine a formal member of the bloc, each subsequent president ramped up U.S. support for Ukraine. President Joe Biden finally pushed Russian President Vladimir Putin to invade Ukraine when he began treating Kiev as a de facto member of the military alliance in 2021.

Putin made several diplomatic overtures in late 2021 and early 2022, seeking to get Washington to take NATO membership off the table for Kiev. However, the top officials in the Biden administration pretended not to understand that Ukraine joining the bloc was a major red line for Russia. This was the provocation that ultimately led Putin to order the invasion of Ukraine.

As Libertarian Institute Director Scott Horton explains in his book Provoked: How Washington Started the New Cold War with Russia and the Catastrophe in Ukraine, it was a long-established fact in Washington that Kiev becoming a treaty ally with the United States was going to lead to Russia lashing out at Ukraine. In fact, the best evidence comes from the CIA Director during Biden’s presidency, William Burns, who in 2008, was serving as an American diplomat in Russia.

The following is an excerpt from Provoked.