Origin of islam, the worst crime ever against humanity

Muslim baroness* Sayeeda Warsi: "Non-majority muslims are idiots!"

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:33:00 +0000

* CaMORON made her a baroness because she didn't make it democratically! She has a dirty history (see e.g. abt her new muslim husband's ex-wife Massarat Bi - a typical example of islam's ultimate immoral sexism) & is an extreme bigot.

She had to rely on police escort after this!
How come that Koran, history, the guardians of islam, imams, active muslims etc. ALL share the same “extremist view” as Klevius, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders etc?! Not to mention UK bishop Nazir-Ali with Paki roots who resigned because he criticized islam & the Sharia supporting idiot archbishop Rowan Williams.

True muslims see Koran/islam exactly as Klevius does, only they propose it while he warns for it! So Klevius can well be classified as an islamophobe by true muslims & PC people. However, only PC people, not true muslims, can describe Klevius as an extremist.

PC people, on the other hand, try to float somewhere in between, some as political opportunists, others as stealthy & lying muslims who don’t dare to show islam in its entire evilness (i.e. what true muslims call goodness: infidel racism, rapetivism, apostasy ban etc).

BBC & other PC representatives, only see the “islam” & the “muslims” that fit their distorted extremist view on islam, not shared by ANY true muslim who knows abt islam.

Has there ever been such a bad “religion” that has got such a good press as islam?

Upper class PC muslims & the ignorant "muslim idiots"

Sayeeda Warsi, the Conservative peer and shadow minister for community cohesion (also look at what Klevius said 2007abt her islam lover accomplice CaMORON): "They (muslims believing in the Koran & Mohammed) are idiots who do not represent the majority of British Muslims".

Sayful Islam, spokesman for islam4UK: "We are against everything she stands for. She is not a practising muslim. Clearly by looking at her she does not represent Muslims."

Klevius comment: He might have alluded to her bare head or something similar. However this makes me think abt:

An example of islam's evilness embedded in the Koran

Official (PC) translation of Koran 33:59: "Tell your wives, your daughters, and the wives of the believers that they shall lengthen their garments. Thus, they will be recognized (as righteous women) and avoid being insulted"

A non PC translation: “...draw their Jilbabs around them to be recognized as believers and so that no harm will come to them.”

or

"Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons: that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested."

or (the latter part)

"this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble"

"that will be better, so that they may be recognised and not annoyed"

Klevius islam analysis: What should be considered isn't how? but why? Klevius answer: Because islam is an utterly racist & sexist "religion" which encourages insult, defamation, harrassment & molestation of "infidels". So how could the islamic jihadists know who's a muslim woman without a dress code that signalled it.

Cure your bottomless ignorance abt islam:

Origin of islam

Klevius is your best informed source for information on evil islam & its supporters

A good babbler but a confused “president” fights islam while calling it “a great religion”!?

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:41:00 +0000

UK muslim peers great Sudan's "president" who is arrested in his absence by the Hague for crimes against humanity in Darfur. Ahmed is the one who killed a person with his car while allegedly playing with his cell & got away with 12 month! Lord Ahmed is also the jihadist who threatened to let loose 10,000 muslim jihadist thugs if Geert Wilders was allowed to visit UK. Warsi is the muslim basoness fighting against some lesser muslims (i.e. those following Koran) because she want's to introduce fundamentalist islam (Sharia etc) in small parts instead of openly & at once. Btw, UK already has Sharia courts!

Varying extremists of "a great religion" with a common in killing people

Mr X “president”: "As we know, these men belonged to Al Qaeda – a group of extremists who have distorted and defiled Islam, one of the world's great religions, to justify the slaughter of innocents."

Klevius correction: Almost equally distorted as you (follow video link at the ende of the post)! Moreover, you also slaughter muslims & others while "justifying" it as a "Cristian" who knows what real (great?) islam is & who the real (great?) muslims are!

Islam/Koran is notorious for its abundance of infidel racism, murdering of infidels etc. However, its bigot supporters use to defend (cover) it by presenting the following evil stupidity in Koran in this fancy (PC) translation:

... whoever slays an innocent, unless it be for murder or for mischief in the land, it is as though he slew entire mankind; and whoever keeps it alive, it is as though he kept entire mankind alive; ... (5:32)

Problem being islam/Koran doesn't say so but:

‏5:32 من اجل ذلك كتبنا على بني اسرائيل انه من قتل نفسا بغير نفس او فسادفي الارض فكانما قتل الناس جميعا ومن احياها فكانما احيا الناس جميعا ولقد جاءتهم رسلنا بالبينات ثم ان كثيرا منهم بعد ذلك في الارض لمسرفون

i.e.: Min ajli thalika katabna AAala banee isra-eela annahu man qatala nafsan bighayri nafsin aw fasadin fee al-ardi fakaannama qatala alnnasa jameeAAan waman ahyaha fakaannama ahya alnnasa jameeAAan walaqad jaat-hum rusuluna bialbayyinati thumma inna katheeran minhum baAAda thalika fee al-ardi lamusrifoona

Remember, "radical islam" is synonymous with islam, while "islam" in PC jargong is synonymous with ignorance abt islam or deliberate cover up of this true islam.

Also remember that when islam/Koran speaks abt humans, persons, souls etc. infidels aren't included! This is the totalitarian nature of islam. Only after submission to it you count!

Cure your bottomless ignorance abt islam (although there are many islam critics out there NO ONE EXCEPT KLEVIUS HAS, SO FAR, TRULY & INFORMED, ADDRESSED THE MAIN ISSUE NAMELY SEX SEGREGATION in this context.

see video (from 2:30) abt Mr X "president's" truly frightening extremist islam connection

read Origin of islam

Islamo-ignorance: Only 57,5 % of Swiss infidels realize the danger of islam!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:05:00 +0000

If you, like Mahmud Muhammad Taha (excecuted by islamic Sudan), try to remove slavery, gender inequality, & jihad (& perhaps even "infidel" racism) from Koran (without being assassinated), you still face the ultimate problem with sex segregation as it is stipulated by the Koran & by the notorious Cairo (Sharia) declaration of islamic "human rights"created by 57 OIC countries (btw, the same block that wants to criminalize critical scrutiny of islam, the worst crime ever).

As the corner stone of the islamic "faith" hence is a legalized sex segregation it is also in stark opposition to the 1948 Human Rights Declaration & the European Convention, which both defend girls'/women's right not to have their freedom limited because of their sex. The OIC's Cairo (Sharia) declaration clearly states (via Sharia) that females are exempted from certain rights because of their sex related "duties" & "responsibilities" (btw, most of the Sharia law concerns restrictions put on girls/women).

While Millions of muslims throw stones on the infidel "Satan" (you, the Westerner - incl Westernized "muslims") on their "pilgrimage"* to the most intolerant nation in the world, Saudi Arabia, Klevius again offers a history lesson for those deeply misled & ignorant abt islam:

* The islamic hate mongering "pilgrimage" tradition was originally a slave trade journey to the Meccan slave market. Compare Africa's mualim "hero" Mansa Musa who, on a single pilgrimage, brought tens of thousands of African slaves to Mecca.

Minarets have had two main functions throughout history, neither of them which is the calling to "prayer" (islam is essentially abt jihad politics & submission, not abt a personal faith - personal faiths are seldom totalitarian, are they):

1) As a watch tower (this they got from the Romans). Koran doesn't stipulate neither minarets nor mosques, hence lacking any directives for such constructions. There's reason to believe that the first minaret ever was used in Basra (more than 30 yrs after the alleged death of Mohammed - no one knows anything for sure abt this Mohammed who isn't even officially referred to at this time) as a watch tower over Zanj plantation slaves imported from East Africa. In fact, Koran was compiled as a moral defense for a Sharia finance based on slavery parasitism.

2) As a tool for the warning, humiliation & intimidation of infidels, i.e. not a phobia but a very real threat (i.e. islam's most central tenets: infidel racism-Sharia sexism-apostasy ban). Because minarets were used to indicate the presence of islam they initially existed only in predominantly non-Muslim cities. There were no minarets at the alleged "mosque" of Mohammed in Medina nor at the original mosque in Mecca.

Muslims & islam supporters behaving exactly like nazis & nazi collaborators in 1938!

Stephen H. Norwood, professor of history at the University of Oklahoma, is author of "The Third Reich in the Ivory Tower: Complicity and Conflict on American Campuses":

Last week's last-minute cancellation at Princeton and Columbia Universities of a lecture by Arab feminist Nonie Darwish - an author who has strongly denounced Islamic intolerance and jihadism - brings to mind American universities' unwillingness to protect campus free speech rights for opponents of Nazism during the 1930s. Princeton's reason for shutting down the scheduled presentation by Darwish strikingly resembles those given by Queens College's president in April 1938 when he withdrew an invitation to anti-Nazi German Jewish exile Ernst Toller to speak on campus. The parallels between Darwish and Toller are powerful. Both were made pariahs in their homelands and came to the United States seeking freedom. Darwish, who grew up in Gaza and in Egypt, became a staunch critic of radical Islam. She wrote a book titled "Now They Call Me Infidel." Toller called his autobiography, published in the United States in 1934, "I Was a German." The Nazis burned his books and confiscated almost all of his property.
In both cases, these challenges to authority made the speakers too "controversial" to appear on some campuses here. In Darwish's case, after the Princeton invitation was issued and accepted, a campus Muslim student group protested - and the sponsoring student organizations then withdrew their invitation. This was met with the university administration's approval - or at least its silence. The university apparently would rather not have the headache of having to worry about bad headlines. Toller's case followed a similar pattern. In April 1938, after Germany's Jews had suffered years of savage street beatings, expulsion from the professions and university faculties, Toller was to speak at Queens College. The college's president, Paul Klapper, suddenly cancelled the renowned playwright's lecture, citing opposition from faculty members and students. Klapper claimed that Toller was an "ardent propagandist." Translation: His opposition to Nazism was too pronounced.

Klevius comment: Just like Geert Wilders, right!

Avoid desiformation & cure your bottomless & truly frightening ignorance abt islam! Read abt the perverse Origin of islam

Islam doesn't deserve Human Rights

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:32:00 +0000

Four days after purely islamic muslims mass murdered & decapitated some 60 "less pure muslims" & others in the Philippines (probably sponsored by Mr X "president's' first call, Saudi Abdullah & Co) the Swedish people haven't been told anything abt it from their main news papers Aftonbladet & Expressen!!!

This is the world's main terrorist & spreader of racist islamic hate/intolerance, the Saudi dictator (& Co) over the world's most intolerant muslim nation, who tries to cover it up (with the eager help of PC media & spineless politicians) in one way "inter-faith" talks (islam is always a dead end) & flashy spending of Western oil money, no matter if it's universities or blood money for killing other muslims (every Saudi soldier's family get USD 266,000 from "king" Abdullah when their son dies in Wahhabi jihad aginst Shia muslims in Yemen). This Saudi Arabia also wants to criminalize (via UN & OIC) criticism of the worst crime ever (it's a worrisome fact that few people seem to understand that islam's deeply immoral & extremely evil slave finance, mass murdering, genocides, imperialism, colonialism, sex slavery & Sharia confinement of females etc constitute the very soul of islam, from Mohammed to now*)! Moreover, this Saudi Arabia also initiated (via UN & OIC) the Cairo declaration which eliminates human rights for girls/women.

Islam is against the law in two ways: 1) It's got its own "law" Sharia, 2) It opposes all the main tenets that constitute a democracy based on Negative Human Rights(see Origin of islam). This is why a true muslim never can honestly participate in a democratic election or as a democratic representative of democracy! Islam doesn't count "infidels" as humans!

Yes' I know, most "muslims" aren't muslims. So why do they support true islam & true muslims?!

When true islam meets democracy

The muslim victims were in a convoy of vehicles Monday heading to register a candidate to challenge even more muslim islamic Ampatuan in next year's election for governor.

What's happening in the Philippines is an example of what happens when you give islam a finger! Since Arabic islam first started to enslave poor Philippinos (many centuries before any European was around) an evil parasitic islamic slave hierarchy developed. This together with islam's jihad pillar has to be acknowledge before assessing the situation in the Philippinos. The US was very wrong when it didn't completely stop islamic slavery there some 100 yrs ago but instead (wrongly) believed it was better to leave it as it was. They saw some uneducated poor slaves whom they thought would be "better off" where they were!

Amina Rasul, the director of the Philippines "Council for Islam and Democracy" (sic): "It will be difficult for authorities to enter Ampatuan territory, let alone arrest a member of the family. Most of the elected politicians are Ampatuans, the police are their people, it's very difficult to get in without having more violence if they do not cooperate".

Klevius comment: Really! I.e. an islamic state & part of the Saudi Caliph's (Mr X "president's" dearest friend) world Umma.

Amina Rasul, the director of the Philippines "Council for Islam and Democracy" (sic): "With such kind of an alliance between islamic politicians (she actually wrongly said "warlords") and the national elected government officials, it then becomes difficult to see how they could actually do democratic reforms, how they could actually do electoral reforms at the local level since they have a bond of gratitude to these local leaders (she now uses the term "local leaders" instead of "warlords" - presumably the next step would be "local politicians").

Klevius comment: She's right, "it then becomes difficult to see how they could actually do democratic reforms" if democracy involves islam! Isn't it simply the other way round, i.e. that islam abuses democracy for reforming democracy to suit islam, i.e. anti-democracy!

Every finger given to islam inevitably leads to its main body. This simple rule explains what should have been totally unexplainable just a decade ago, namely that a European country such as UK now has Islamic Sharia courts! You "muslims" who are on the run from islam, don't go to Britain if you want to avoid Sharia!

The only cure against islam is to get rid of it. Start by facing every muslim you meet with these essential questions abt "infidels", sexist legal segregation etc etc etc etc etc etc!!!!!!

Peter Wagner: "Basically, when Mohamed or Allah have said something contradictory, and there are lots of those, the last command takes precedence over the earlier command and renders the earlier command null and void. Since the books of the Koran are not in chronological order one needs to know which command came last. Much of the "kill the infidel" stuff is the more recent commands.

"Part of the problem with "peaceful Muslims" is that none will repudiate the "kill the infidels" commands of their god and prophet because to do so would make one worse than an infidel with another command by Allah to put the apostate to death. In fact, "Radical Islamists" are nothing more than true believers doing exactly what Mohammed and Allah are telling them to do. The "peaceful Muslims" are actually the unbelievers and the Jihadists are the true believers. Check the 'murtadd'; it also explains why "peaceful Muslims" won't condemn the Jihad at Fort Hood. If you want personal proof, when talking to a Muslim, ask them to condemn and repudiate the grossly hateful and kill-the-infidel stuff in the Koran. You will get some interesting answers."

Whereas true Christians "turn the other cheek, love their enemies, do unto others..." etc. True Muslims kill the infidels. Both are just doing what their god and prophet told them to do.

* yes, all forms of monotheisms(sic) are evil & part of an immoral sex segregation(early Christianity may be seen as an anti-sexual exception, before it was overpowerd by patriarchal sexism). However, as explained in Origin of islam, islam is the latest & most advanced/evil form of this evilness (what made it successful was Mohammed's sex & booty attraction on teenage boys!). Islam took the worst parts of old Judaism & fine tuned it via laws that STILL IN 2009 makes it impossible for a true muslim woman to love a non-muslim whereas a muslim man can fuck whomever & the child can be claimed a muslim (compare Mr X "president"). I never cease to get surprised when I meet decent people who still don't know this simple fact! They seem to daydream that islam can't be that bad, can it? YES' IT CAN!!!

Mr X "president's" beloved Saudi-islamic hate mongerer strikes again: some 60 murdered in islamic terror on the Philippines while PC media is silent!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:42:00 +0000

An islamic mass murder on the Philippines & most main news media don't even mention it, & those few who do don't inform you that it was islamic muslim terrorists sponsored by Saudi Arabia who did it! How long will you take this deliberate misinformation?!

This is the world's main terrorist & spreader of racist islamic hate/intolerance, the Saudi dictator (& Co) over the world's most intolerant muslim nation, who tries to cover it up (with the eager help of PC media & spineless politicians) in one way "inter-faith" talks (islam is always a dead end) & flashy spending of Western oil money. No matter if it's universities or blood money for killing other muslims (every Saudi soldier's family get USD 266,000 from "king" Abdullah when their son dies in Wahhabi jihad).

This is what media should have written if they really wanted to inform those ignorant/misled abt islam (they certainly possessed the info but didn't want you to know!):
Some 50 people ambushed, murdered, decapitated & thrown into mass graves by islamic murderers resting on what is written in the Koran, & sponsored & agitated by that very same Saudi Arabia that is the "guardian of islam" & which is now busy killing Shia muslims in Yemen! Also, this Saudi Arabia wants to criminalize (via UN & OIC) criticism of the worst crime ever. Moreover, this Saudi Arabia also initiated (via UN & OIC) the Cairo declaration which eliminates human rights for women.

Islamic Abu Sayyaf (in Arabic 'bearer of the muslim sword') in the Philippines has become noted for its ambushes of government forces, kidnappings, piracy, & the beheading of captives. The U.S. Department of Treasury in 2007 named three of their Saudi supporters: Abdul Rahim Al-Talhi, Muhammad Abdallah Salih Sughayr and Fahd Muhammad Abd Al-Aziz Al-Khashiban. According to Levey, no one identified by the US or UN as a terrorist financier has been prosecuted by the Saudi authorities.

Klevius history lesson: First of all, start by curing your bottomless ignorance abt islam (e.g. Origin of islam). Islam was in its beginning as well as now a parasitic slavery ideology capable of producing nothing except suffering & more muslims in a system of institutionalized rapetivism (Sharia).
Whatever islamic historical stone you turn around you always gonna see decay masked in a slave or oil finance.

SE Asia was islamized in exactly the same way as was Africa, namely via slave rading/trading. An Arabic network of slave rading/trading was established by the help of local chiefs while selling/using the poor in slavery. In the process the wealthy ones became even more wealyhy & powerful while they adopted islam. Also due to inter-marriage & islam's inborn dead end Sharia structure (which means every pregnancy led to more muslims or muslim slaves while none the other way round according to islamic law). Whereas both Christian & islamic praxis may have widely varied in different times & settings, islam only has an unaltered moral basis that stands firm on a moral resting on infidel racism/Sharia rapetivism/apostasy ban! Against this background it's equally pathetique & tragical that, on the one hand, these young muslim terrorists deeply aware of islam's teachings, think they're (like Pol Pot's etc willing young murderers) murdering for a good heavenly cause, &, on the other hand, those youngsters who are misinformed to believe islam is "a religion of peace" & "egalitarianism" (your only real key out of this dilemma is by understanding Negative Human Rights. And when it comes to "egalitarianism" you may remember that life is per definition not egalitarian, only death is egalitarian. This is also the main shortcoming of monotheist "godisms" (see Klevius definition of religion) However, a global system based on the elimination of taxation of work, & instead progressive taxation on luxury or "bad" consumption, combined with positive human rights such as basic education, health care etc).

It's because of islam's parasitism you can't buy any decent product made in Saudi Arabia!

What many a young jihadist doesn't seem to understand is islam's inherent evilness in the form of its infidel racism & sexist treatment of women as sex slaves. Or maybe they are...

However, they do behave like Pol Pot, don't they. And why should they be more educated than the Western morons who supported Khmer Rouge?

Btw, there was no "golden age" of islam in Spain, only a disgusting islamic slave finance. Also, there was no good (like BBC use to present it) islamic Ottoman rule. On the contrary the Ottomanian slave "empire" inevitably deteriorated until the abolishment of slavery & Western force together with Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's secularization paved the way for the Turkish progress that is now again on the verge of slipping into even more islamic barbary. Let's see if the new EU president remembers what he said abt islamic Turkey as not a possible part of Europe.

Klevius Law School for the babbling Mr X “president” & his Attorney General

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:43:00 +0000

Read Origin of islam to understand what's going on!

THE REAL MASTERMIND OF 9/11 & HIS PUPPET MR X "PRESIDENT"
You can see Mr X "president's" close islamic advisors at his ears. In the middle you have CAiR (Council of American islamic Relations, founded by bin Laden's close friend & ally) rewarding Hasan (founder of the "moderate" "inter-faith" islamic Bridget TV, supposed to deliver a better - i.e. false - picture of islam in the US) who then, in a purely Koranic/islamic style, decapitated his divorcing wife after having stabbed her some nine times.

Klevius Law School, extracted from Demand for Resources (1992:43-44): The only strictly scientific discipline, jurisprudence (narrowly defined), is characterized by an absolute truth, i.e. the intention of the legislator expressed (& blurred) in text form. A reality (or a game, if you like) that’s construed by the participants/players themselves. A possible violation is spotted by ticking off on a list of crimes (the law) in a test bench we call the judicial process. This is an experiment in which a ”case” is evaluated against the text in the law, which also regulates the judicial process itself. However, if it’s difficult or impossible to evaluate an alleged crime, this may be due to incomplete data or clumsiness in the process. Moreover, it’s also possible that complete/good enough evaluation cannot be reached due to special characteristics of a particular case. If this is the case then the defendant is acquitted (no matter how clear it is he did the deed) & may even be entitled to compensation for a “false allegation” (& maybe even a green card). A failed prosecution only needs to be judicially “false”, not false in the realm outside the judicial process. A court can never disprove an accusation , only fail to judicially prove it. An "appropriate decorum" wouldn't change this basic fact, but rather contribute to a picture of the US Justitia shooting herself in the foot.

A peculiar first consequence of the above is that the defendant has an absolute right to a fair trial, which includes the right to be treated as not guilty (although suspect) until the verdict. Intervening in this right of the suspect/defendant by someone involved in the judicial process may constitute a violation of the said process.

Mr X “president’s” babbling abt the 9/11 case may well constitute a tampering with the jurisdiction of the courts for the purpose of influencing a decision, thus violating judicial independence. A civilian trial for the 9/11 terrorists may harm the US (& world) security, place government officials and civilians at risk, and provide an islamic propaganda platform not unlike 9/11 itself. Remember how the islamic murdering of some 3000 people became used as a “liberation” flag for islam supporters!

Attorney General Eric Holder isn’t directly elected by the American people but indirectly by the illegitimate Mr X “president”, whose schizopheric decision to hold military tribunals for other detainees at the Guantanamo Bay prison, including Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri (who planned the 2000 USS Cole bombing) while exempting the Islamic terrorists of 9/11, reflects the urge to de-militarize (& hence to make political) the war on islamic terror. Btw, what's the difference of bombing Cole or Pentagon?

Some examples of Mr X "president" & his Attorney General's babbling

Attorney General Eric Holder: "The defendants could have been tried in either military or civilian court, because the 9/11 attacks were both an act of war and a violation of our federal criminal law. But at the end of the day, it was clear to me that the venue in which we are most likely to obtain justice for the American people is in federal court."

"Failure is not an option (Klevius comment: Well, it is! It's the very foundation of Western justice just as falsification is the basis for Western science). These are cases that have to be won. I don't expect that we will have a contrary result."

According to Mr X "president" himself those offended by the legal privileges given to Mohammed by virtue of getting a civilian trial rather than a military tribunal won't find it "offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him".

He then partly realized his own stupidity & quickly added that he did not mean to prejudging the outcome of the trial. "I'm not going to be in that courtroom. That's the job of the prosecutors, the judge and the jury."

Klevius comment: The main difference between military & civil cases is that the former threaten the nation (even if it's just a trifling matter of discipline) whereas the latter only try to "order" a society's relations with its individuals. A failure to do so doesn't necessarily threaten the society which can adapt (man made legislation) because it's not equally limited to a specified purpose.

BBC & other overpaid "executives'" IQ deficiency, islam's racist/sexist Caliph (& his puppet), the Angels of Antichrist & Klevius' islamophobic harem

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:39:00 +0000

Klevius intellectual wives: Oriana Fellaci (a true journalist - her photo ought to be in front of every BBC & other media "executive"), Wafa Sultan, Nonie Darwish, Hirsi Ali. Klevius intellectual concubines are so many so their pics won't possibly fit here. Klevius main rival: Mr X "president's" first call, islamofascist Don Abdullah Juan (see Klevius love letter to Edit Södergran to get it), the "guardian of islam". He & his pals have blood on their fingers, not only from Darfur, Iraq, Afganistan etc, but also from millions of victims for islamic street jihadism all over the world, fueled by Koranic infidel racism.

Gal Luft: The murdering of 13 U.S. soldiers in Fort Hood by Nidal Malik Hasan is one in a string of events involving muslim soldiers and veterans. According to General Norman Schwarzkopf’s aide, Rick Francona, Saudi officers appeared to have been directed by their senior military or religious leadership (i.e. Abdullah & Co, i.e. Mr X "president's" first call - Klevius comment) to spot and assess potential converts to islam among American military members. Once targeted, Saudi military officers, incl. an imam, would attempt to meet the American outside of the work area. These approaches included generous gifts & literature abt islam. Americans who decided to convert to Islam were rewarded by an all expenses paid trips to Mecca, & payments as high as $30,000. The commander of Saudi forces in the Gulf, Prince Khaled bin Sultan, bragged in his memoir that more than 2,000 American troops converted to islam through this campaign. “These muslim troops are now the messengers of islam in the U.S. forces” said Dr. Abu Ameena Bilal Phillips, a Jamaican-born convert to islam, who worked under the auspices of the U.S. Air Force while converting U.S. troops to Islam. After the war, Phillips moved to the United States to “set up Islamic chapters in the U.S. Defense Department.”

Note: ‘Evil’ is here conceptualized as something that a majority of people would normally consider evil (if released from a confusing/blurring & anti human rights ‘faith’ propaganda).

Islam’s evil original formula: An evil racist "infidel" moral that opens up for slave rading/trading/trafficking & the subjugation of girls/women under the sex terror (rapetivism) of Sharia in the dead end of apostasy ban.

The overpaid (usually paid by taxpayer's - 50 of BBC's executives earn more than the PM!) "executives" behind political correctness (PC)

"White" children, forcibly shipped to Australia, whose children now are the target for often brutal PC racism (tooling islam), is just but one example revealing the dangerous, unethical & deeply immoral racist segregation of people based on their skin nuances. The whole PC movement (which, as a byproduct, unfortunately bolsters evil islam) rests on the false allegation/self guilt (you name it) that white people have statistically been more technologically/economically successful (because industrial technology happened to start in Europe) & that this has something to do with colonialism (this view is not only rudely unfair against less fortunate "white" - and "black" - individuals/people but also excepts all wealthy "black" Europeans. In fact, there’s really nothing to prove that European colonialism, on the whole, didn’t benefit those people, sometimes even hugely, compared to islam’s purely parasitic imperialism/colonialism based on slavery in its three main modes: sex slavery/household slavery, plantation slavery, & "soldier"/jihadist slavery. It was islam's blood-sucking that delayed Africa's & other's progress.

In this context it’s also important to note the extreme intellectual desperation/fraud hiding in efforts to prove islamic slavery more "benign" than others. Slavery has always “leaked” between the classes just like in the society as a whole. Only in the case of islam it's popular to pick the cherries. When the overwhelming amount of islam's historical & contemporary atrocities becomes non-escapable the only refuge is to make evil good, isn't it!

Those "white" overpaid "executives" (in media & politics) are today's ruling class, i.e. belong to that very same strata they use to spit on historically (often incl. the "bourgeoisie"). And precisely because their hypocrisy is so obvious they desperately have to defend themselves by pretending not to be racist although they are almost as racist & sexist as those islamists they support. In this process they even boost their own racism & simultaneously commit a double sin against those in a weaker position in society!

Angels of Antichrist, Homo Filius Nullius & sex segregation

In possibly the most important sociological paper in the 20th century, it is argued that the socialist individualisation/collectivisation (the social state) of humans has resulted in a dehumanization that is best visible in the state's (often horrible) praxis with children. The "BBC executives & Co" mafia belongs to this unfortunate outcome of Enlightenment. These are also the guys who now (again) betray us with a fascism that is more deceptive than ever.

Klevius comment: When I was a young boy I used to read Holocaust documentaries mainly because I couldn't for my life understand how Germans, who looked & behaved exactly like people around me, could have committed such atrocities. What really scared me was that no one gave me the slightest clue to having solved the problem of the popularity of fascism. It was only after 9/11 & the emerging PC movement I really started understanding how the social mechanisms behind fascism work & what motivates them.

Of course, nothing will change before the true adaptation of Negative Human Rights as they were initially intended. Such a move would legally wipe out fascism & islam in one strike! And of course, we'd face new problems. However, what counts is what we're facing now.

And no, there's no risk for more persecution of muslims than there's for muslim persecution of non-muslims. Quite the contrary. Propaganda news exaggerate whatever happens to "vulnerable muslim minorities" while covering up muslim atrocities, racism, sexism etc against the invisible group of non-muslims, although we're talking abt a one Billion plus islamic majority Umma/O.I.C., & although the real minorities are the non-muslim & muslim individuals who suffer under this fascist elephant in the porcelain shop.

The older part of tendentious & hugely overpaid (are they even doing anything or are they contra productive?) the notorious "BBC executives" belong to the generation that sexually exploited vulnerable girls under the false mantra of "sexual liberation for women". Remember, that back then the position of girl's was even more vulnerable than today. They were just released from their homes while still carrying the old sexual moral heavily on their shoulders. And when they heard/saw the boy bands playing on Cavern they screemed out their sex segregation while the boys were rewarded by sex (some 50 bands or so used to play in one night).

This "sexual liberation" had happened before, in the Victorian/Edwardian era. However, when we look at what happened in Japan a century ago we'll find that the slogan was quite the opposite namely "freedom from sex" (no, Klevius isn't proposing any certain attitude abt sex, only to get rid of rapetivism, i.e. institutionalized or individual sexual pressure & due sex segregation, self rape, rape etc)!

One may summarize the overpaid smuggish "executive" Beatles generation (& many of their kids) as going from free sex to the hermetically closed islamic burqa (Sharia) & its unfree content which is excluded from whatever sex or love except for the duty to satisfy her husband whenever he feels for it!

The medieval islamic conquerers brought no women with them, only their swords.
Today the same is repeated. Most are young muslim men who are supposed to take non-muslim wives, whereas muslim immigrant women (except for Ayaan Hirsi Ali & Co) are tied with/to islam via Sharia & aren't allowed to fall in love with non-muslims.

Yes, most islamic slavery through 1400 yrs have been "peaceful", i.e. just kidnapping or cheaply buying slaves from criminal locals.

When women & children of Mali suffer even starvation on top of everything else because of islam (i.e. no food but a huge over production of kids while the muslim men are loitering around thanks to UK welfare) it's almost parodical when BBC, the knight of islam, cries abt it, isn't it.

Islam is always one way - the dead end!

Cure your ignorance:

Origin of islam
The islamic origin of Vikings

Nothing to do with Arabic islam?!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:51:00 +0000

Islam's Arabic Saudi Caliph (to whom Mr X "president" so deeply bowed & to whom he made his first telephone call as "president") is busy bombing tens of Yemeni villages in his hunt for Shia muslims.

To understand the pics see Origin of islam
Also consider The Jewish/islamic Origin of the Vikings

A modern Arab woman on Arab men - a wormhole to the islamic myth abt pre-islamic Arabia

Hajar Benlahmar (slightly edited by Klevius): If i have to choose between marrying an Arab and non Arab, I'd pick the non Arab even though I’m an Arab, for one simple reason, I can't bear the mentality of Arabic men, which is dogmatic, racist, sexist - just name it (Klevius: Islam?). An Arabic man cant accept a woman as partner in life, he wants her to be under his control (Klevius: Sharia?) following his wills and denying her existence. Most Arabic men are not looking for a wife to share life with, but they are looking for a domestic servant.

Klevius comment: "A domestic servant" whose services include sex & the reproduction of dogmatic, racist, sexist boys & submissive girls.

You've heard it many times. The evil pre-islamic society was improved by Mohammed & islam. However, the opposite holds true. Because of a scandalous ignorance abt pre-islamic Arabia, sanctioned by islam (includes ibn-Khaldun & others), islamic vulgo caricatures of the pre-islamic Arabs are taken as facts by stupid "islamologs" & others even today.

The non-islamic world is at war with islam

Islam has, from scratch, been an attacking jihadist "faith", & if you are under attack & defend yourself it's called war, isn't it! Most of islam's basic tenets are opposite those of U.S. & the free democratic world. In fact, there's an enourmous & desperate effort to "reformulate"/"reinterpret" islam/Koran while simultaneously belittling the products of Enlightenment (which, btw, was caused by an attacking islam). Islam started & built its tenets as a parasitic slave finance combined with sex slavery & rapetivism confined in Sharia & apostasy ban & sealed with monotheism. That's why sex jihadism made it initially so successful, that's why O.I.C. (Organization of Islamic Countries) have their own "human rights" (Cairo declaration, which denies girls/women freedom under the cover of "responsibilities & "dignity" etc) & now wants to (via UN) criminalize criticism of islam.

The elusive good "Western islam" vs true evil Mohammedan islam

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:06:00 +0000

Islam isn't a "faith" but a totalitarian regime. That's why islam has to stop hiding behind "freedom of religion"!

Rick Santorum: Three muslim students at Harvard University, one man and two women, who wore Western-style clothes and spoke English with little or no accent, disputed my description of Islam as it's practiced in the Middle East, maintaining that al-Qaeda's version of islam in no way reflects the islam that is practiced around the world. So I asked: Should apostates - muslims who convert to another religion - be subject to execution?

One of the women quickly said no. She insisted that she was free to leave islam if she wanted to, and that she knew other people who had done so without a problem - in the United States.

I said: What if they lived in a muslim-majority country?

Silence. Eventually, the young man blurted out, "That's different because in Muslim countries, islam and the government are one, and converting from islam is the equivalent of treason against the government, punishable by death." The two women agreed.

Klevius comment: This is why muslims can't participate in democracy without abandoning islam! This is also why muslim born (without committing open apostasy as yet - in islam you can pretend to be a Christian for the sake of islam) Mr X "president" is unconstitutional, as are all truly muslim politicians.

Again, if you don't understand the mechanism behind islam's initial success 1400 yrs ago, you end up in exactly these situations. Without knowing exactly these persons the statistical scenario is that the women represented ignorance while the man represented the evilness of Mohammed/islam.

When women share this evilness it's usually due to family, marriage etc. Of course you know that in islam women are forced to sexually satisfy muslim men while forbidden from having relations with non-muslim men. However, muslim men can have sex with both muslim & non-muslim women, four wives & an unlimited amount of concubines. Moreover, the kids are always his & muslim from birth, & it's the women's duty to foster them to obeying muslims who despise non-muslims (what Klevius call muslim racism) under the threat of Sharia/apostasy ban.

Btw, why is it that so many ask if apostasy is punishable by death? The question ought to be: Is apostasy punishable (legally or socially)? I guess this is one of a variety of islamic tactics to keep as much as possible of evil original islam alive. Islam is built on sex & threats. Sex for men & threats for women & other infidels!

To really understand the perversity of not only islam but also our own submission to its evilness, read how Jewish slave trade evolved into islamic totalitarianism in Origin of Vikings.

Radical islam IS islam. Why? Simply because there are no "other" islams on the shelf!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:52:00 +0000

What’s the difference between a “dispassionate scholar in search of historical truth” & an intellectual warrior in “a conflict that is being waged for the highest stakes”?! There’s no difference dude (haven’t you read your Wittgenstein or Klevius)!
Remember, islam isn’t a faith but a totalitarian parasitic & occupying ideology using politics, violence & rapetivism (syn. islamofascism)! Islam's terror formula is an evil jihad* "moral" based on infidel racism/slavery/rapetivism/apostasy ban.
* remember that totalitarian ideologies are, per definition, always "threatened" & hence need to fight the "unbelievers"!

The self proclaimed islam/Koran interpretor, the fanatic & heavily disturbed islamic lunatic muslim (he was a muslim, right?) named Nidal Malik Hasan, was at least on the right track when he stated that "Obama & the US army are fighting muslims".
But according to New York Times (& other media morons), they are not fighting muslims but non-muslims, i.e. those who have "misinterpreted" the Koran.
However, according to Klevius, the US army isn't fighting muslims nor non-muslims but islam.

Wondering over Klevius lack of capitals in islam & muslim? Well, I don't use it in communism & communist, or murder & murderer either (yes I used to do it & haven't bothered to change everywhere)!

DOROTHY RABINOWITZ on political islam correctness etc: What is hard to ignore, now, is the growing derangement on all matters involving terrorism and Muslim sensitivities. Its chief symptoms: a palpitating fear of discomfiting facts and a willingness to discard those facts and embrace the richest possible variety of ludicrous theories as to the motives behind an act of Islamic terrorism. All this we have seen before but never in such naked form. The days following the Fort Hood rampage have told us more than we want to know, perhaps, about the depth and reach of this epidemic.

One of the first outbreaks of these fevers, the night of the shootings, featured television's star psychologist, Dr. Phil, who was outraged when fellow panelist and former JAG officer Tom Kenniff observed that he had been listening to a lot of psychobabble and evasions about Maj. Hasan's motives.

A shocked Dr. Phil, appalled that the guest had publicly mentioned Maj. Hasan's Islamic identity, went on to present what was, in essence, the case for Maj. Hasan as victim. Victim of deployment, of the Army, of the stresses of a new kind of terrible war unlike any other we have known. Unlike, can he have meant, the kind endured by those lucky Americans who fought and died at Iwo Jima, say, or the Ardennes?

Officials determined that "the communications were benign and contained no threat".

Malik Nidal Hasan came under scrutiny by officials beginning last year for communicating with Anwar al-Awlaki, who had been a scholar at a mosque Hasan attended when he lived in Virginia. The Virginia mosque where al-Awlaki taught had also been visited by 9/11 hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour.

Officials briefed on the case said that an individual overseas was being monitored when authorities recognized that Hasan had contacted the scholar. The FBI notified two of the bureau's Joint Terrorism Task Force offices, which pursued the leads on Hasan. "We don't have any indication that he was directed, we don't have any indication that there were co-conspirators but, once again, this is fairly early on in what may be a complex and long-term investigation,"

Klevius comment: You did have indication that "he was directed"! He was clearly directed by Koran/islam fueled by Mr X "president's" beloved Saudi Abdullah & Co.

There's no way islam can accept Negative Human Rights (the fundament on which the US Constitution & the free world stands). This is why you can't be a true muslim in USA! Either you skip islam or you skip being an American! Says Klevius who is a true American!

Cure your ignorance abt islam:

Origin of islam

The Jewish/islamic origin of the Vikings

Klevius is (so far) your only in-depth guide on sex-segregation as the key to understanding medieval rapetivism in the 21th century (see e.g. Klevius definition of feminism!

Three mass murderers, but two are missing from the most wanted list

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:22:00 +0000

"President" Omar Hassan al-Bashir (Sudan) is behind the Darfur genocide, & a good friend of the Saudi Caliph "king" Abdullah, the culprit behind the OIC efforts to criminalize scrutiny & criticism against islam, & the main thug behind the funding of global islamic jihad, who has a muslim born Indonesian "Christ-believing"** puppet called Mr X or Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever), who is responsible for a continuing mass murder of muslims & others in Afganistan & Pakistan, mainly through drone terror, & who is busy transforming USA into an islamic Sharia land in accordance with the wish of his close ally CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations).

** Mr X "president" says he believes in a "redemptive resurrection" which is a code word for a muslim view on Jesus!

The key to Mohammed's & islam's initial (& by conventional historians unexplained) success is extremely simple (see Origin of islam) & clearly written in the Koran: A racist infidel moral paving the way for a parasitic social system of slavery & rapetivism confined in Sharia law (all reproduction goes to islam & nothing to the opposite direction) & sealed by apostasy ban! Due to islam's totalitarian nature & due internal inconsistencies everything goes, e.g. real muslims vs not so real muslims etc (btw, if we were all muslims most of the men would be without wives & children).

BTW, Mr X "president's" belowed Sunni Saudi Abdullah is right now, together with Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorists, busy fighting a heavy war against fellow Yemeni shia muslim liberators (yes, you got it right)!

Saudi "king" Abdullah's close friend arrested in his absence by the International Criminal Court, but welcomed by Turkey!

Omar Hassan al-Bashir, president of Sudan, against whom the International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued an arrest warrant, has been invited to a meeting of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in Istanbul. Last year, al-Bashir visited Turkey twice and "despite national and international protests the Turkish government seems to have no intention at all of changing its policy on allowing a person into the country that is under strong suspicion of being responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity".

The Darfur genocide by Sudan's National Islamic Front regime IS led by “president” Omar Hassan al-Bashir & physically performed by his extremely violent Arab/islamic para-military terrorists.

The Darfur genocide started virtually unnoticed in February 2003, under the shadow of the war in Iraq, murdering some 350,000-400,000 & with an unknown number of rape victims etc & Millions of refugees. The victims are non-Arab Furs, Massaleits, Zaghawas, Tunjurs, Birgids, Dajos etc. The pathetic notion that the victims "are also muslims" doesn't at all recognize the deep history of Arab/islamic slave racism in Africa & the cultural genocide that this "muslimhood" reflects!

Mr X "president" has repeatedly & frenetically babbled abt his "respect" for islam. Klevius question to you: Do you respect islam?

Fort Hood investigators: No terror plot. Klevius: Did they check in the Koran?

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:16:00 +0000

Klevius comment: How exactly, does Nidal Malik Hasan differ from Osama bin Laden?!

According to "muslim sensitive" US officials, this bloodthirsty Arabic islamic jihad inspired muslim terrorist mass murderer monster "acted out under a welter of emotional, ideological and religious pressures"! Klevius comment: What should I say? Poor man?! No, I'd rather say poor victims who happened to encounter this otherwise perfectly normal* but islam distorted "psychiatrist"!

* i.e. not suffering from a biological nerve dysfunction! Islam, like other brainwashing sects, is not biologoical! Nor is islam's main pillar sex segregation/rapetivism!

Btw, as those who have studied on KLEVUX already know, psychology/psychiatry (except for the understanding of psychic drugs) are hoax "sciences", mainly funded by tax payers!

Check out:
Klevius Psychosocial timeline
Origin of islam

And Mr X "president" (see previous postings to understand the X & the quotation marks - no, Klevius isn't even close to a racist, just read his writings against race & sex segregation, will you, stupid!) talks & covers up in the trails of his beloved Saudi mad men.

BTW, GOOGLE OR SOMEONE HAS APPARENTLY STARTED FILTERING/BLOCKING MY PAGES LATELY. I'M FLATTERED! AS A READER OF KLEVUX YOU SHOULD ALSO FEEL FLATTERED AS STILL BELONGING TO A FREE WORLD BASED ON NEGATIVE HUMAN RIGHTS!

US islamic terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan & muslim born Mr X "president" both respect islam & its racist/ sexist Koranic jihad message!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:18:00 +0000

THE MOTIVE: ISLAM! Not "radical islam" or "islamism" or "extremist islam" etc. but just the very same islam that in PC propaganda covers everything from fashion & sufism to Saudi islam!

islamic terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan was "educated" (brainwashed) in a Saudi Wahhabi mosque funded by Saudi Abdullah & Co (the very man Mr X "president" first made a call to after becoming "president" & to whom he deeply bowed at a G20 meeting)!

What a coincidence! Although, according to PC media/politicians, it's islamophobia that is the real culprit, & islam has nothing to do with a muslim man (who prays at the mosque every day) who, while shouting Allahu Akbar, mass murders US troops at Forth Hood/Texas on their way to fight muslims in islamic land, everything seems to fit at least equally well, perhaps even more, to what is written in the islamic Koran!?

To understand the home grown US (non'radical according to an imam at the US mosque he visited every day, & where he was enrolled on an islamic list for getting women) muslim jihadist terrorist mass-murderer Nidal Malik Hasan, who deliberately shot more than 40 people, you need to understand the Origin of islam!

Nidal Malik Hasan swore an oath to the US army but didn't want to obey when his ccommander in chief ordered him to the front in Afganistan killing islamic jihadists!

And why should he? His commander in chief (who isn't even a commander in chief legally - see postings below) says he respects islam, & Koran islam gives Nidal the full right to disobey everyone else except Islam anyway!

UPDATE: IS IT NIDAL MALIK HASSAN WHO IS THE REAL HERO IN FORT HOOD?! The islamic mass murderer's family & PC media now inform us that it wasn't islam's or the mass murderer's fault. It was the 40 plus victims' fault (just like 9/11) because someone had called poor Hassan a "camel jockey".
Oh my god, calling a muslim names! That might be even harder than what Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin, Mohammed & other creepy mass murderers had to suffer. However, isn't the army the place no one can get through without being insulted?!

The main suspect is islam, i.e. the very same islam that has caused years of monstruous islamic jihad terror in Iraq & Afganistan in the aftermath of the one week liberation of Iraq.

Islam is a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder caused by Mohammed!

Without Naziphobia we shouldn't have had any World War 2, should we!

How long will it take for peolpe (muslims & non-muslims) to really understand the inevitable truth that you can't be a true muslim in a free democracy. Or, in other words, islam is no longer islam in any meaningful sense if you can.

Also read Klevius explosive Origin of Vikings!

Politically correct Swedish PM Reinfeldt: "Only barbarism is genuinely Swedish. All further development has come from abroad"

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:35:00 +0000

Klevius comment: If he means the Vikings the poor man is way too ignorant. They actually got their specific barbarism abroad from islam!

Young Swedes seems equally confused as Mr Reinfeldt.

According to Novus Opinion 70% of Swedes think islamic al-Qaida did the 9/11 whereas 7% didn't. However, among under 30 yr old adult Swedes only 58% thought islamic al-Qaida did it & 15% thought they didn't. Moreover, to the question whether they thought Bush & his government were involved in the attacks 8% of the Swedes in the survey said yes while 64% said no. But again, when checking for those Swedish adults under the age of 30, only half of them dismissed the conspiracy theories whereas 18% were convinced that Bush & Co somehow did it! Moreover, an additional 31% thought maybe or were unsure!

Muslim born US Mr X “president” wants to protect the worst crime ever from criticism & “negative stereotyping”!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:20:00 +0000

Selling out freedom & the US Constitution
Mr X "president" (Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro - or whatever) is a born muslim & later an adopted muslim who has hidden all records of his past & who says he respects islam, the worst crime ever against humanity! His dearest friend is "the guardian of islam", the extremely* intolerant & totalitarian "king" Abdullah, for whom he deeply bows, & who has for long been top rated on the lists of the world’s most intolerant dictators! The guys from CAIR on the pic reward the muslim CEO of the “moderate” American muslim Bridges TV, who, btw, stabbed his divorcing wife 9 times before he decapitated her in a truly islamic manner.
Btw, have you noticed (what Karzai & others have experienced) that most of Mr X's islam politics can be predicted in terms of Shia (Iran) & Sunni (Saudi/Arabic).

The worst crime ever against humanity is now to be protected from scrutinity, criticism or any negative "stereotyping" by the help of Mr X "president" & his islamist pals in 57 islamic countries!

Although there’s no doubt whatsoever that islam is the ideology that throughout 1400 yrs of slavery/genocides has caused the most human suffering (Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Rwanda etc. aren’t even close), those who desperately (or out of pure ignorance) try to whitewash islam now use the last resort to avoid confronting the unbearable truth. On Oct 1, 2009, Mr X “president” & Co together with OIC (Saudi led organization of 56 islamic countries), introduced an anti-free speech draft resolution, titled "Freedom of Opinion and Expression" to the UN's Human Rights Council. It includes condemnation of "negative stereotyping of islam".

The proposed resolution attempts to construe this protection of a totalitarian racist/sexist “faith” fascism we use to call islam, as an international human rights law and obligation. I.e. in direct opposition to the Negative Human Rights that constituted the backbone ot the UN 1948 Declaration on Human Rights which was construed to hinder such totalitarian fascism from ever showing up again!

Already now everyone defending Negative Human Rights & critical of islam (the worst crime known to historians) is met with avoidance, intimidation etc hence constituting a new paria caste in the politically correct islamic landscape. When we eventually came to a point where we got rid of the evil religion-state connection by swapping it for secular human rights, every effort is made by our politicians to pave the way for an even worse & anti-humanfollow-up.

Why do you call yourself a muslim?!

Being a muslim makes you undemocratic if you by that mean you adhere to islam & its infidel racism & Sharia sexism. Islam wants to replace freedom & to confine you if you are a girl/woman in its monosexism. You can't leave your evil "faith" & you can't really, as a woman, even love someone who doesn't share this evil "faith", if you want to be considered a muslim! So either you ought to leave islam (i.e. committing apostasy, its worst crime & its deepest evilness) or you leave your right to participate in the democratic process. Third option being that you cheat as sanctioned by Koran (or are you in fact, that dumb & ignorant so you didn't get it as yet?!)!

Also remember that to say islam is egalitarian is a double lie. Infidels (& lousy muslims) are always excluded. Moreover, islam is from scratch construed for the slave's submission to his/her master, i.e. someone above you. Allah is completely eliminated in islam & replaced by the Koran which is not only full of evil sayings but also considered the last unaltered word of Allah, i.e cannot be changed. So which particular islamic evilness will hit you depends on the reader!

But one thing is extremely clear. If you want to commit evil deeds you'll find it in the Koran & you will be protected by human rights & political blindness.

It's indeed a shame if we have to wait for muslims to protect them & us from the evil of original islam, inn't it?!

Acknowledgement.

Klevius is the only** one (so far) who dares to offer an intelligent & informed analysis of islam based on its main pillar sex segregation. Moreover, to make Klevius IQ really open for scrutinity there are hundreds of challenging texts on the web signed klevius. So even if you think you lack the brain muscles (or knowledge) as Klevius has, you have all the time in the world to check him out, don't you!

** Yes, there are eminent islam critics out there, such as e.g. Ayaan Hirsi Ali & others, but they either lack the truly male perspective or what it's like growing up as a free outcast in a free society while cursed with extremely high IQ & level of knowledge. Yet still never ceasing to strive for being "extremely normal"... (see Klevius Definition of religion). You may also benefit from Angels of Antichrist (no, Klevius is NOT a monogodist). Moral in a changing world cannot be stapled in a book but has to be continuously scrutinized outside religion & inside a global logic that ultimately rests on Negative HUman Rights. So when the feeble minded (or extremely treacherous) archbishop Rowan Williams sponsors Sharia in England he does it while muslim nations & individuals try to get rid of it out of pure fear for it!

DEFEND MULTI-CULTURALISM AGAINST ISLAMIC MONO-CULTURALISM!

Although there’s no doubt whatsoever that islam is the ideology that throughout1400 yrs of slavery/genocides has caused the most human suffering & genocides (Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Rwanda etc. aren’t even close), those who desperately (or out of pure ignorance) try to whitewash islam now use the last resort to avoid confronting the truth. On Oct 1, 2009, Mr X “president” & Co together with OIC (Saudi led organization of 56 islamic countries), introduced an anti-free speech draft resolution, titled "Freedom of Opinion and Expression" to the UN's Human Rights Council.

It includes condemnation of "negative stereotyping of religions and racial groups". It further attempts to construe this as an international human rights law and obligation
The proposed resolution attempts to construe this protection of a totalitarian racist/sexist “faith” fascism as an international human rights law and obligation.
Already now everyone defending negative human rights & critical of islam (the worst crime known to historians) is met with avoidance, hence constituting a new paria caste in the politically correct.

There’s no “egalitarian spirit of Islam”. On the contrary the whole original idea of islam is the very opposite, i.e. infidel racism & sexist rapetivism limitations of women’s freedom.

Btw, being a muslim makes you undemocratic. Islam wants to replace freedom & to confine you in institutionalized sex segregation if you are a girl/woman. You can't leave your evil "faith" & you can't even love someone who doesn't share this evil "faith"! So either you ought to leave islam (i.e. committing apostasy (its worst crime & its deepest evilness) or you leave your right to participate in the democratic process. Third option being that you cheat as sanctioned by Koran (or are you in fact, that dumb & ignorant so you didn't get it as yet?!)!

Evil Saudi Caliph: "Islam no longer rules all aspects of life"!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:55:00 +0000

It's not Al Qaeda that's the worst problem, it's islam & its Saudi Caliph, the guardian of islam's "holiest" (i.e. what used to be islamic slave markets) places, & Mr X "president's" first call & the only one he deeply bows for (he later tried to cover it up by also bowing deeply for the Japanese emperor)!
And prove me wrong, but this is the worst of terrorists with his (& his pals) fingers deeply involved in the Taliban movement as well as radical islamist elements in Pakistan, Philippines & abt everywhere where there's a Saudi funded/supported school, mosque , university etc! The evil islamist hate mongerer & hypocrite Saudi "king" Abdullah (& Co) who, on the one hand admits that "islam cannot compete with science/technology", but on the other hand, wants to benefit from islam's inborn evilness. As a criminologist I understand that unreported & in police reports unconnected islamic hate crimes (boosted by Koran verses etc deliberately distributed by Saudi oil Billionaires) may be hard to see as an entity but when you do the numbers get huge, not the least because these crimes are also largely blinked, hence paving the way for further intimidation/submission. And now the old evil chap wants to wash (with Western oil money) his reputation as one of the world's most intolerant dictators (in the most intolerant of nations, with no freedom for other faiths or faithlessness), guilty of an unknown (but apparantly enormous) number of murder/rape/robbery/assault etc victims due to islamic street jihad agitated for from madrassas, mosques, schools, universities etc that he has sponsored/sanctioned. Not to forget the Millions in Darfur etc whose blood is on his & his good pal's (Sudan's "president" Bashir, who is wanted for arrest by the Haague) hands.

When you know the real forces (i.e. islam's ideological soul) behind the Origin of islam you have only two choices left:

1 Puke & commit apostasy, or
2 Continue as nothing has happened, i.e. being a bigot/hypocrite muslim. Or maybe you're an extremist who really likes true original islam?!

The third alternative, i.e. reforming islam, is hypothetical & impossible, precisely because the very backbone of the original islam (i.e. Koran's infidel racism+slavery+rapetivism+apostasy ban jihad) of course, contradicts everything a normal* & decent world citizen would agree on today.

Saudi "king" Abdullah has long since given up any dream of reconciling islam with the inevitable power of Western civilization based on technology & negative human rights (after having read it you hopefully understand why "responsibilities" aren't & cannot be connected to Negative Human Rights, only to democratic laws which don't violate NHR)! Abdullah understands that he has eventually to submit to "Western" civilization, although he wants to squeeze out as much as possible of his evil medieval Leviathan. Runs in the family.

However, although Abdullah's KAUST (the new Saudi university paid by Western tech money the "House of Sand, um, Saud" has stolen from others) is presented by "king" Abdullah as a "scientific center that embraces all peoples" & that it's "the first line of defense against extremism", it still preserves extremely outdated sex segregation. So for example, aren't women allowed to swim in the same pool as men**, etc etc. So no matter how "radical" (from an islamic point of view) KAUST will still stick to sexist customs we in the West haven't seen for >100 yrs!

According to "king" Abdullah "faith and science cannot compete except in unhealthy souls". I agree, letting a totalitarian monogod into your soul will inevitably make it filthy - see Klevius definition of religion). This means that he has given up islam's validity in one of the most essential parts of modern life.

And always remember that Klevius blogs/sites are the only ones***, so far, addressing the very root cause, i.e. sex segregation! A burqa or veil is almost always remote controlled by a Mohammed copy! Except, of course, when it's not just feeble minded fashion.

Read Islam doesn't deserve Human Rights

* As has been repeatedly stated on this & other KLEVUX/Klevius blogs/sites, Klevius is an extremely normal world citizen. Why/how? Because instead of resting his morality via a "god" he takes it from his fellow world citizens. As everyone (except many monogod people) already knows, building one's moral on a private "god" (i.e. a moral black hole) or on a totalitarian "god", both reduces the responsibilities of the individual (see Klevius Definition of religion)!

** As you know, in islam it's believed that (muslim) men cannot see a woman without risking getting mad!

*** Yes, it's a heavy burden, but I have to admit it's a lot of fun as well. Why? Because it has grown so big, yet is still so simple. When Wollstonecraft in the 1790s wrote abt sex segregation most women had no access to her writings or possibility to really evaluate their segregated position. However, while sex segregation has become utterly visible in modernity, its defense has grown at an equal rate starting with Victorian time psychoanalysis etc (see e.g. Rapetivism from Freud to bin Laden) & feminism/chauvinism (to understand this you may read From Klevius without love), & of course, the ultimate sex segregation, islam. This defense has now become such a big bubble that nothing could be easier than picking its monstrous contradictions. If you just want/dare to do it!

CONgrats to islam's Saudi caliph & his puppet, to the Nobel prize! Real dynamite against the free world!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:07:00 +0000

Islam, the worst crime ever against humanity, again got the peace prize! What would islam do without Alfred Nobel's dynamite?

Mr X "president's" (Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro - or whatever) dearest friends are "the guardians of islam" in the extremely intolerant & totalitarian fascist "house of Saud". "King" Abdullah for whom he so deeply bows has been for long top rated on the lists of the worlds most notorious dictators! Btw way, Mr X is a born muslim & later an adopted muslim who has hidden all records of his past! Btw, being a muslim makes you undemocratic. Islam wants to replace freedom & islam wants to confine you if you are a girl/woman. You can't leave your evil "faith" & you can't even love someone who doesn't share this evil "faith"! So either you ought to leave islam (i.e. committing apostasy, its worst crime & its deepest evilness) or you leave your right to participate in the democratic process. Third option being that you cheat as sanctioned by Koran (or are youä in fact, that dumb & ignorant so you dion't get it as yet?!)!

Wondering abt the Obama pic? Ok, can you tell who is a "moderate muslim" eager to broadcast a positive picture of islam's peacefulness, & who stabbed his divorcing wife at least 9 times & then chopped her head off while she was still alive? OK, I agree, they all look capable of it. Correct answer is the guy to the left who's rewarded by top islamofascists from islam's muslim terror organization CAIR (The Council on American Islamic Relations). Btw, Mr X's first call as "president" was to the islamofascist Saudi leader whose legal adviser is the violent Nation of Islam & Black Panthers guy at his right ear (same guy who arranged & paid for his Harvard studies) while Ingrid Mattson at his left ear is a wahhabist islamofascist leader of American muslims, who wants to make islam & Sharia the new constitution of USA!

Winston Churchill (Europe's World War 2 hero) also won a Nobel prize, although in literature (he was rightly nominated for the peace Nobel prize as well, but never got it although he defeated Hitler & the Germans). Here's an excerpt from Churchill's pencil, The River War - An Historical Account of the Reconquest of the Soudan (written in the late 19th Century):

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men."

The Nobel peace prize committee also supported Yasser Arafat while he deliberatley ended the Middleast peace process by - yes, violence, shortly after the award! Mr X "presoident" is abt to double his war in Afganistan (or admit total surrender to the islamofascist Taliban terrorists) & has already escallated the use of deadly drone attacks against civilians in Pakistan & Afganistan. He has increased the violence in Afganistan by sending more troops to an extent that it soon approaches the numbers of the initial Iraq war! He is mongering hatred against Iran & preparing for violence against the country which is inhabited by mainly Shiite muslims, i.e. what his master, Saudi "king" Abdullah (& Co) consider apostates & arch enemies.

This was the most disastrous decision so far by the Nobel committee. Mr X has done nothing for the free world (rather the opposite), just talked!

Excuse me, but who mentioned nukes? The only reason Mr X talks abt nuke stop now is to connect it to Iran's "possible" future threat of weapons of massdestruction (which no one knows anything abt today - just like in Saddam Hussein's Iraq - so to satisfy his Sunni islamic Saudi master(s) against the only threat (Shia Iran) to their total islamic dominance in Mideast.

Klevius concluding comment: This extremely dangerous islamophilia may end up in an escallated civil war within the islamic Umma itself (yes, I know, the Umma has NEVER been peaceful). A war at the doorstep of the Nobel society & other islamophils who paved the way for it. Last major clash between Sunni & Shia "peaceful islam" was local (Iran-Iraq war 1980-88) but managed to produce more than half a Million dead & a couple of Millions victimized!

Islamic sexist/racist infidel totalitarianism is from its very beginning fueled by the opposite to peace, i.e. jihad. The only peace known to islam is the infidel slave's submission under it (& of course, muslim girls/women)! Read abt its true origin & its Sharia slave finance on Origin of islam

The founding of Israel was perfect - for muslims!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:52:00 +0000

Klevius brief history lesson - always there to serve your hunger for truth stripteased from political correctness & unnecessary ornaments:

Why don't say it as it is?!

Judaism started with rapetivism/circumcision & spread via the old Vagina gate. The Jewish variant was turbocharged compared to conventional tribal procreation.

Early Christianity was a reaction against rapetivism, although it later became a sexist state religion. The real boost for patriarchal Christianity wasn't the Romans but the attacks from islam which caused strengthened Catholicism. This, of course, was later protested & caused the industrial revolution that created our modern world (no stupid, it wasn't the European's fair complexion!).

Islam hence was the ultimate rapetivism because contrary to Judaism it spread via men. This is why there are now less than 10 Million Jews but almost as many muslims as there are Chinese!

The founding of Israel, in the midst of the morally, technologically & economically deprived islamic Mideast, meant that Westernized (i.e. civilized, if we by this mean democracy & human rights) Jews were able to create an enlightened oasis of wonder in the dark islamic desert.

This is why ortodox Jews & muslims have so much in common!

And this is why muslim Arabs benefitted not only from jobs created by Israel but also by the welfare they have received from the Western civilization.

Islam was from scratch technologically & culturally impotent & parasitic & still is - while sponging on the Vagina & Western oil!

Islam's ultimate suicide bomb, created by Mohammed & distributed by the Saud/Wahhab slave/oil mafia & their puppet "apostate"!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:40:00 +0000

The "apostate" & the apostates, & the ultimate islamic suicide bomb

Whereas Rifqa Bary & Ayaan Hirsi Ali (both on the escape from islam in the "free" USA) are true apostates from the evil racist/sexist islamic "faith" politics, we don't really know abt Mr X "president" Barry Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever). Born to a muslim father means he is certainly a muslim according to Koran/islam. Trying to stretch this fact will quickly shred the very soul of islam, i.e. that in islam everything should be done to make it esay to become a muslim (by birth or rape) & extremely hard to get out. And if that's not enough Mr X is later adopted by another muslim father. What we do know is that he says he "respects" a totalitarian racist/sexist ideology that in every meaningful bit contradicts the freedom ideal put down in the US constitution, & that he embraces the murderous hate mongering Saudi Caliph "king" Abdullah & Co. His least fault is probably that his birt status doesn't comply with the US Constitution (he isn't "natura born" & that he for that reason has used Millions of dollars to hide ALL his records (except for a, in this context, meaningless computer extract!

So this ambassador for evil racist & sexist islam, & Saudi puppet "president" blinks all islam's atrocities & all the hundreds of Millions of islam's victims, including Rifqa Bary & the ambassadress for freedom from islamic persecution, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, while the hypocrites & the ignorant applaud him.

The first years of islam were at least equally evil as the 1400 that followed & which history the islamic countries (O.I.C) desperately wants to forbid digging in

The origin of islam(also compare Klevius revealing Viking history)

Thomas Jefferson & John Adams in a 1786 report to the Continental Congress asked the representative of Tripolitania, Sidi Haji Rahmand Adja, why the Barbary states (Morocco, Algerian, Tunisia & Libya) attacked “Infidel ships, seized the cargos & sailors & enslaving those who could not be ransomed. The answer was “…that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

Steven Groeneveld: One has to be a bit weak in the head to start with to buy into any religion.

Klevius comment: Or willing to sell one's soul to Satan as did Faust(us), an old European theme brilliantly exposed by Marlowe, poetically castrated by Goethe & transferred to a modern techno ghost between green but naive femininity & rational but presumptuous masculinity in Klevius short movie Pandora's Box.

The 1400 yrs long burning fuse in the bomb in Mohammed's head is about to finish!

"Pathological symbiosis" between state & "faith": Sweden puts the definite stop for homeschooling & instead offers psycho school & islam curriculum!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:17:00 +0000

According to Klevius research the failure of modern school system is caused by:

1 psycholization (although psychology is an impossible science our kids have become its most popular guinea pigs & the school its main laboratory - and we pay for it!)
2 statelization (while attachment to parents are crushed poor peer relations are thriving & the curriculum is filled with non sense at best & state/faith propaganda at worst).
3 sexualization (many schools, in fact, function as brothels where the boys are supplied with sex while the girls think it's a necessary deal to get through the sex apartheid barrier). Comes handy for islamic jihadist schooled boys!

Recommended essential Klevius reading before you continue:

Where the Law Ends the Tyranny Begins 1993 (only available in Swedish)
Children & the Arbitrariness of Authorities 1994 (only available in Swedish)
Daughters of the Social State 1994 (only available in Swedish)
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state 1996. The most important sociology paper written in the last century? What do YOU think, dude? Think!
"Pathological Symbiosis" in LVU - Relevance, and Sex Segregated Emergence 2004. Apart from being possibly the only good scientific work on the origin of the concept also an astonishing example of how democracy is sidestepped by state bureaucracy.
From Freud to bin Laden 2004
Klevius Psychosocial Freud Timeline 2004
What is Sex Segregation & feminism, really? 2004

Islamic globalization - Saudi Abdullah & Co behind the spread of racist/sexist islamic hate mongering around the globe!

Klevius Sweden report: Background to the proposal that will definitely stop free homeschooling in Sweden.

When racist muslim school aged youth attack cemetary staff, visitors & graves,it reflects not "homeschooled" racism but madrassa & imam schooled "infidel" racism rooted in the evil Origin of islam.

Sweden has made a pact with Satan, um, Saudi finanzed islam (the worst crime ever against humanity) which means that islam is now expanding in the Swedish curriculum while homeschooling is forbidden. Already now non-muslim Swedish students have to "learn" abt islam via hypocritical imam lies sponsored by Saudi Arabia, starve during Ramadan, be raped & bullied as "infidels" via child/youth jihadists etc. This happens while Saudi Arabia (together with 56 other islamist countries), the most intolerant country in the world, works hard via UN to criminalize the truth abt islam. continues.

History

In 1723 Swedish parents were stipulated to teach their kids reading. In 1842 school attendance became obligatory although it was still possible to homeschool if the authorities (the church) checked it up. In 1924 Sweden got its first social (welfare) state law accessing all children. One of its consequences was that Astrid Lindgren (world famous author of Pippi Longstocking etc children's books) as a pregnant 18 year old single mother had to escape to Denmark for not loosing her child ( see e.g. Klevius' Angels of Antichrist, possibly the most important sociological paper from the last century - judge for yourself. However, due to its lack of Mideastern monotheist ideology, its criticism of sex segregation, its criticism of much psykology/psychiatry & its criticism of feminism, few can survive its reading without suffering dimming brain rage).

Few modern schools are capable of educating children without the assistance of homeschoolers

The school system of today already rests on partial homeschooling. Behind almost every successful student there is a supporting home where the crucial teaching and support occur.

Myths & facts abt homeschooling

Homeschooling is often accused for the loss of social interaction with peers. However, peer interaction may well be more of a problem than an asset’ simply because peers are in general equally immature. Peer-oriented children are also often more difficult to parent and teach. and often fail to integrate into society. At least while they are young. It's a troublesome fact that most criminality in Sweden is performed by children/youth. Moreover, when occasionally some of them are caught by the police (after often costly chases) nothing can be done because of their age. This catch 22 is pure child neglect from the side of the social state.

Modern school evolved from a need to basic reading/writing to an institution where to keep the kids while the parents worked. Soon it became obvious that the state could use this splendid opportunity for brainwashing the kids. It\s important to distinguish between a healthy and human attachment to the surrounding society, and the indoctrination of religious or political views.

The center for peer orientation is now the school and the street, while the teachers are hiding.

Pathological symbiosis vs attachment

The most common argument against homeschooling is, in fact, its most convincing defense. Homeschooled children are usually (on a US scale up to 83% compared to 23%) more mature, more socially adept, and better prepared for higher education.
No wonder homeschooled students are allegedly favored applicants of many universities. Homeschooling may hence be seen as the balancing cure to the lack of healthy parental attachment, and as a protection against unhealthy peer attachment.
However, as shown by Peter Klevius in his thesis “Pathological Symbiosis” the Swedish “social state” has managed to keep its dirty foster child trafficking outside the scope of the European Human Riughts Convention by hiding under the legal term “margin of appreciation” (see Klevius’ Angels of Antichrist 1996 & Pathological Symbiosis 2004).

Although the Swedish state now (again*) wants to use the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child as an excuse for completely denying the rights of homeschoolers, the text in the Swedish child abduction, um, protection act LVU (Act Containing Special Regulations Concerning the Care of Young Persons) – now including[5] the term “pathological symbiosis” – stays in an obvious opposition to the view expressed in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (see Klevius Pathological Symbiosis).

* As I described in Angels of Antichrist (1996) the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child was a creation of mostly socialist Swedish women who had set up the "Save the Children" organization a few years before the world's first general child protection law in 1924.

“Pathological Symbiosis” is, as already the name implies, an oxymoron. A “pathological symbiosis” is per definition parasitic, i.e. the very opposite to symbiosis. In the thesis “Pathological Symbiosis” Klevius has, as possibly the first ever, carefully traced not only the dim roots of this peculiar term but also its murky adaptation and implementation as a handy tool for robbing children. In fact, “pathological symbiosis” is a smear campaign against parental attachment, and in Sweden frequently used as a last resort for kidnapping children from parents (usually a mother) who the (usually female) welfare officer happenms to dislike (or if she has a standing order for such a child / remember that most child abductions in Sweden used to be targeting nice and unproblematic kids, i.e. what is termed on subjective grounds (see e.g. Hessle’s 1997 comparison Japan-Sweden).
Research on homeschooling reveals a number of strengths.

The cultivation and preservation of the child-parent attachment leads to considerably less delingquncy and youth criminality (Sweden has among the worst child criminality paired with perhaps the worst & most costly public school compared to e.g. their neighbour Finland which used to be in the educational top with Japan which, in turn, use to have the lowest child/youth criminality & one of the cheapest school systems). By the stealthy introduction of murky child “protection” criterions such as, for example, ”pathological symbiosis” the social state effectively contradicts the best interest of the child, by eroding parent-child attachment, not only among those targeted by the social authorities but also in general because of the widespread attitude that follows and makes parents even more reluctant to take responsibility for their kids.

A healthy attachment to the surrounding society

Parental attachment has since long been known as the most significant protector against criminality and destructive behavior.

It may also be noted that it’s pure and unfounded Utopian naivity to assume that a fictitious “soul” of the nation or society can be dictated via the schools. Life is inevitably moving and that’s the whole meaning of living . That’s why the world’s most popular toy is round (sorry American “football” and rugby fans). Attachment is the primary mechanism of cultural transmission. This is why segregation is so dangerous, no matter if it is Islamic ghettos or street gangs.
It’s a well known fact that almost all homeschooled chidren are openminded and kind towards other. To an extent that representatives for the totalitarian social state machinery actually proposes this as a weakness because the homeschooled children have to face the unhealthy children the school system has created.

Individuation- a psychological/psychiatric confusion

As shown/discussed by Klevius (1981, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1999, 2004 etc) the so called individuation process has in child psychiatry been made upside down. The baby human ought to be seen as what it is, namely an extremely egoistic individual who then, hopefully, gets rid of its state of individuation by learning to attach with others. The baby suckling the mother is a symbiotic relation between two individuals who have extremely little in common.
Unsupervised attachments to peers undermines the development of empathy. This may be beneficial from a cold business perspective but less so from a human point of view. The womb for human warmth is to be found at home, and it doesn’t have to be even female. Only an individual who is fully attached with society can perform a truly democratic opinion based on the idea of Negative Human Rights.

The Swedish proposal to definitely ban homeschooling

As noted in Angels of Antichrist 1996 the Swedish compulsory school attendancy (instead of compulsory education) already hinders most homeschooling efforts, and effectively gathers the Swedish kids into a trap for almost random abduction.

According to the proposal the possibility to fullfil compulsory school attendancy in some other way remains. This is clearly not true because "religious and philosophical reasons" are now no longer accepted. This is, however, well in line with the ECHR decision Konrad & others vs Germany, which many, including the homeschool organization ROHUS seem to have missed completely. This despite information given to their "judicial expert" by Klevius both in writing and orally!?

Apart from this it's also proposed that instead of the previous writing "special reasons" ("sarskilda skal") it should now be "extraordinarely reasons" ("synnerliga skal"). Moreover, this possibility should, according to the proposal, be used "very restrictivly".

Konrad & others vs Germany

"The Court observes in this respect that there appears to be no
consensus among the Contracting States with regard to compulsory
attendance of primary schools. While some countries permit home
education, other States provide for compulsory attendance of its State or
private schools.. In the present case, the Court notes that the German authorities and courts have carefully reasoned their decisions and mainly stressed the fact
that not only the acquisition of knowledge, but also the integration into and
first experience with society are important goals in primary school
education. The German courts found that those objectives cannot be equally
met by home education even if it allowed children to acquire the same
standard of knowledge as provided for by primary school education..
The Court considers this presumption as not being erroneous and as falling
within the Contracting States' margin of appreciation which they enjoy in
setting up and interpreting rules for their education systems."

Klevius comment: It is within this "margin of appreciation" racist, sexist, totalitarian, anti-democratic, anti human rights islam will thrive together with social state fascism (compare the Swedish LVU child "protection" act), while Negative Human Rights of the individual are squeezed away!

Klevius vs Obama in Lorna Saltzman’s islamophobe test

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:46:00 +0000

Dear reader, check out for yourself if you think these proposed answers from Obama are in accordance with what he himself has said/acted! If not, pls let me know & I'll change them.

What's the difference between Peter Klevius & Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) according to Lorna Saltzman’s islamophobe test?

1 Do you favor equal rights and treatment of women and men?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, because I respect islam.

2 Do you oppose stoning of women accused of adultery?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

3 Do you favor mandatory education of girls everywhere?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

4 Do you oppose slavery and child prostitution?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

5 Do you support complete freedom of expression and the press?
No, because I hate stupid people who criticize islam

6 Do you support the right of an individual to worship in her chosen religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): A tricky one. I was born to a muslim father & adopted by another muslim, & I haven’t committed open apostasy as yet neither have I admitted being technically a muslim in accordance with that very same islam I do respect.

7 Do you oppose government- and mosque-supported anti-Semitic publications, radio, TV and textbooks?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

8 Do you oppose the wearing of burqas in public places, schools and courts?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No

9 Do you oppose segregation of the sexes in public places and houses of worship?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, because I respect islam.

10 Do you oppose the death penalty for non-Muslims and Muslims who convert to another religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

11 Do you oppose “honor” killings?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

12 Do you oppose female genital mutilation?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I love Indonesia.

13 Do you oppose forced sexual relations?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

14 Do you oppose discrimination against homosexuals?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Just a little.

15 Do you support the right to criticize religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam & hate islamophobes.

16 Do you oppose polygamy?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam.

17 Do you oppose child marriage, forced or otherwise?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

18 Do you oppose the quranic mandate to kill non-Muslims and apostates?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): This is a misinterpretation of the holy Koran. In classical Arabic (i.e. when the Arabs, as the last people on the peninsula, learned to write) it simply means that you should kill unclean dogs & pigs!

19 Do you oppose the addition of sharia courts to your country’s legal system?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam & Ingrid Matson.

20 Do you disagree with the quran which asserts the superiority of Islam to all other religions?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Not at all! Islam IS all religions!

In conclusion Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) scored well in line with his islamic roots, although not at all in line with the U.S. Constitution!

Peter Klevius, on the other hand, miserably failed this test as a 100% islamophobe.

Evil islamic slave trade/raids to India spread much like the plague

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:23:00 +0000

Klevius IQ turbocharged history lesson on the origin of India's islamization

As you hopefully already know (by reading Klevius non-religious, non-biased & unsponsored analysis, e.g. Origin of islam, instead of relying on the extremely distorted picture served to you by supporters/representatives/naive collaborators of the worst crime ever against humanity!) the original ideology of islam is based on slavery/rapetivism/Sharia confinement/apostasy ban. The attraction of islam lays in sex segregation, i.e. Koran's sanctioning of (infidel)racism (meaning you can "morally" justify your immoral deeds), (rapetivism)sexism (up to four wives for the maximum reproduction of new muslims + as many infidel sex slaves you like or can "possess with your right hand").

Simply put, islam is built on male sex hunger (HSA*) & Koran/Sharia hinders girls/women from escaping it. Western Human Rights gives female human beings a free choice, & this is why islamic countries have come up with their Cairo declaration on "islamic human rights", now boosted by UN which was initially created for hindering precisely such kind of fascism! And Mr X US "president" (a born muslim who hasn't dared to either confirm he is a muslim or confirm his apostasy, hence being the true opposite to the US constitution of freedom) "respects" this evil "faith" & bows its evil hate mongering representatives. Remember, evilness doesn't become less evil just because so many support it. And also remember, islam can never be democratically elected precisely because islam is AGAINST democracy! And saying you are a racist when criticizing a half black man for his lies is just another angle of evil political correctness in the wake of Western oil money. Everything evil in islam is "translated" to something "positive" no matter if it's slavery, sex slave polygamy or infidel racism.

* HSA (male biased heterosexual attraction) heavily confuses women because it's often hard to distinguish from cultural sex segregation. As a consequence many women feel obliged to perform more heterosex than they would as truly free (emancipated) beings. They are trapped like those poor slaves who were gathered in Great Zimbabwe before they were transported to the muslim/Arabic Zwahili coast mosques (from A Roots Guide 2006)!

With the above in mind you may now consider how inherently parasitic islam came to utilize old trade routes for a purely parasitic Sharia finance based onj slave trade/raids. You may have been brainwashed to think that "because slavery was common all over the place Koranic/islamic slavery wasn't an issue to bother abt. But, in fact, the opposite is true. Koran sanctions slavery, slavery in the muslim world (the slave world) never stopped before it was forced to stop by Western Enlightenment & the idea of Negative Human Rights, islamic sex segregation is absolute & sees women/girls as sex slaves confined within Sharia & apostasy ban with no right of their own to choose a non/muslim man or even to have normal contact with "infidel" men (down to such trivial things as handshaking etc). Muslim females are seen as belonging to a non/human species according to Koran/islam.

When early muslim Arab slave traders sat in their dows & let the wind transport them to Kerala, Ceylon etc. they initiated a grim parasitic alliance with powerful locals who then made slave business by catching & selling out their own (poor) people, or buying African slaves from the Swahili area etc. As a consequence of these practices the powerful Indians often converted to islam out of greed whereas the poor did it out of fear. As a result you got different castes of muslims while still having access to an endless amount of potential "infidel" slaves on the Indian sub continent (just like in Africa & elsewhere where islamic Sharia slave finance had spread). Because of the share size of India's population, islamic slave trading/rading there would be more than enough to render islam the title of the worst crime ever against humanity.

Quite the opposite to what you might have been taught the "Arabs" who created evil islam were extremely "primitive" compared to the surrounding civilizations. As Mohammed is alleged to have said: "The most unprofitable thing that eats up the wealth of a believer is building". This statement by the alleged founder of islam is in 100% agreement with Klevius analysis of islam as a purely parasitic ideology! So the PC agitation of "Arabs" as contributers to development is a double mistake. A thief with a jewellers collection ought not to be called a jeweller!

Unfortunately the eager finger pointing (boosted by an inferiority complex which was also caused by islam!) against West, true history research has been almost stalled in most universities & replaced with islam.

The first rajputs were such muslim slave masters who combined it with violent military style slave raiding! It's striking how well the big & longlasting (until the Brits) Indian development crunch fits with the chronology of islam's enslavement of India. Just as in the case of Africa as Klevius has pointed out in the still unpublished A Roots Guide & partly on Klevius web pages/blogs.

In fact, many awful customs can be traced to islam, directly or indirectly, even the worst variants of the caste system!

BTW & speaking abt how evil islam abuses its opposite, i.e. Negative Human Rights, for its thugs & their jihadist deeds! During Ramadan islamic police in islamic countries use to arrest even more non/muslims than usually, whereas in Western democracies the Western police is asked not to arrest almost any muslim thugs during Ramadan, although they rarely do at other times either!

Muslim* Mr X "president"* (Barry, Barack, Hussein, Dunham, Obama, Soetoro, or whatever) - an accomplice to islamic terror!

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:13:00 +0000

Shrine of Democracy or shrine of islam?

*Born muslim & later adopted muslim
**No one knows for sure his background
***His "presidency" is to spit in the face of the U.S. constitution. He is a born muslim who hasn't sworn himself free from his muslimhood. By not having done that he avoids violating the worst crime known to islam, i.e. apostasy (i.e. leaving islam) but simultaneously he violates the U.S. constitution because islam is its very opposite, namely AGAINST, not for, freedom! A TRUE muslim can never participate in a Democratic election because islam (the worst crime ever against humanity) sees itself as superior to everything else! A true muslim vote/representation is therefore a vote/representation AGAINST democracy.

This is the man who leads the pack that has used the original islam for offending, assaulting, murdering & raping around the globe. This is also the same man Mr X "president" bows so deeply for, and the very same racist/sexist ideology he "respects"!

Wahhabism, Salafism, Qutbism etc, are all anchored in the origin of islam, which is simply medievcal Sharia finance based on slavery, rapetivism & apostasy ban.

Abd al-Wahhab: "If a person believes that a non-Muslim might go to heaven, he has become an apostate; if someone believes that it is all right to befriend or support or assist or ally oneself with infidels, he has become an apostate."

Klevius comment: We see it all the time. Islam never befriends or supports or assists or allies itself without gaining from it on the behalf of someone else! This is the inevitable destiny for a parasitic ideology. This is also why islam has NEVER made ANY scintific or technological progress. Everything that is positively ascribed to islam sooner or later turns out to be traceable to civilized people who were colonized by islam. Just check history!

Daily Times editorial 29 Aug 2009: Karachi city is actually the most dangerous city in Pakistan as far as possible violent reaction to textbooks is concerned. The madrassas (mostly Saudi funded - Klevius comment) in the city — officially 1,000; unofficially 3,000 — have the capacity to attack and kill.

Humans are weak, that’s why islamic racism (i.e. infidel racism)/sexism (i.e. rapetivism) is so appealing.

It's bottomless stupidity/ignorance not to realize that islam IS its own beginning! Moreover, by neglecting (not to say respecting) the true nature of islam one contributes to islamic terror worldwide.

In memory of known & forgotten victims of islam

Islam is the world's fastest vanishing "faith" thanks to muslim islamophobia

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:44:00 +0000

The spectra of factual "religious" islamic fascism & totalitarianism is indeed wide although the origin/base is extremely narrow.

Most westernized muslims fear the true teachings in the Koran. They therefore try to distance themselves from the original true islam.

By defining the recognition of the by far worst* single** ideological crime throughout history as a "phobia" one simultaneously defines a majority of muslims as islamophobes, simply because of their "moderation" i.e. their distancing themselves from these basic & original Koranic tenets.

* Counted in suffering & deaths. Although the early illiterate jihadists (incl. Muhammed) weren't able to leave any reliable records abt their crimes, the surrounding civilizations did record their atrocities to some extent. Later on there is even more evidence for a movement (islam from 'silm', meaning compromise, or avoidance of conflict, i.e. what you usually do at gun point) that first violently & later culturally (& violently) sponged on others, mainly through slavery (incl sex slavery), i.e. the origin of islamic Sharia finance. The estimates of the costs of islam's slavery through 1400 yrs vary considerably but even the lowest ones are more than enough for legitimizing the award title above.

** "Islamic diversity" is, of course, also an oxymoron. Rape victims, victims of conventional slavery (due to the amount of slaves islam IS 'conventional' slavery) & those in racist dhimmitude under islamic Sharia, may express a variety of"diverse" reactions to their submission under islamic totalitarian fascism. However, islam's basic tenets are simplistic racist infidel despise (now in the form of calling them "islamophobes") & sexist rapetivism (treating females as a different & segregated species in line with sex slavery for the purpose of sexually satisfying muslim males & culturally satifying islam's need of more muslims).

What’s the difference between Phillip Garrido & Mohammed/islam (the "faith" of kidnapping, slavery & rapetivism)?

noreply@blogger.com (klevux) — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:45:00 +0000

If Phillip Garrido had been black (like the muslim Washington snipers Malvo & Muhammed), the chances are huge that he had been a muslim jihadist terrorist with even more tragedies behind him!

Both in the case of islam as well as in the Garrido case it's all abt girls/women who bond to their kidnappers & rapists, the so called Stockholm Syndrome!

Ed Smart: "I don't agree on the Stockholm Syndrome because I think that in many cases, these children do try to escape, and after numerous attempts they feel it's hopeless, and so they try to survive. And that's not necessarily bonding with these monsters. It is a matter of survival."

Klevius comment: That's Sharia! Islam is grounded on slavery, rapetivism & apostasy ban (see Origin of islam). The victims of islam have been harmed mentally (e.g. infidel racism) as well as physically (e.g. genital mutilation). They have no self-esteem because they feel guilt and shame - or hide it behind exaggerated "pride". They are emotionally dependent, frightened. They have not lived a normal life in a free Western sense.

Phillip Garrido, the pedophile who kidnapped & sex abused an 11 yr girl Jaycee Dugard & fostered two kids with her, has a church business called God's Desire, based out of his home in Antioch.: "The Creator has given me the ability to speak in the tongue of angels in order to provide a wake-up call that will in time include the salvation of the entire world," "What's kept me busy the last several years is I've completely turned my life around," Garrido told KCRA 3. "And you're going to find the most powerful story coming from the witness, the victim -- you wait. If you take this a step at a time, you're going to fall over backwards and in the end, you're going to find the most powerful heart-warming story."

Klevius comment: And he was abt to do it, just like Mohammed, but the police took him. Unlike Mohammed, Phillip Garrido didn't resort to enough (collective) violence! Btw, Phillip Garrido reportedly used to be a tall & good looking guy who married a Jehova's Witness during his prison sentence in the 1980s.

Reportedly "calls for the death sentence from outraged citizens are already being voiced for this tragic and violent crime against Jaycee". Well, Mohammed died some 1400 yrs ago but half a billion of his victims are still alive. But who should talk for them? Ayaan HIrsi Ali & her likes, of course.

Keith Ablow (a psychiatrist): “To maintain one’s desperation and grief and rage for many years, would be too damaging to the human mind – so the human mind tells itself a story about safety and contentment to safeguard itself – that’s the essence of Stockholm syndrome.

Klevius comment: When Arabic muslim slave traders & jihadists kidnapped or bought 100 of Millions of slaves, for feeding the islamic Sharia system of finance, the victims (those who didn't die) clearly developed a Stockholm syndrome in the form of "islamic cukltural heritage".

Stepfather, Carl Probyn: "Jaycee has strong feelings with this guy," "She really feels it's almost like a marriage."