Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are Atheists (i.e. not "believing" in a "god"*). That fact paves the way for Human Rights equality. Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women) Human Rights equality.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

If you call for islam you inevitably also call for evil islam (i.e. the original islam)


OIC, the islamofascist  monster that hijacked UN which was supposed to be our bulwark against such totalitarian fascism


Why are muslims and Saudi islamofascists equally protected from criticism against their senseless Human Rights violations?


In fact, Human Rights are considered terrorism by the Saudi islamofascist dictator family - and by OIC.


Why are we afraid of veiled people? Klevius: Because they so often* turn out to be racist** muslims who hate us! But a more important question is what and who incite such islamofascist hatred?

* Compare the widespread muslim support for al-Qaeda, Islamic State, and numerous lesser muslim organizations and individuals.

** You're a racist (not to mention you're sexist too) if you're a muslim adhering to any type of sharia because sharia is against the most basic of the Universal Human Rights (compare how  OIC - all muslims world Ummah - had to violate Human Rights for the purpose of keeping Human Rights violating islamic sharia)  and disparaging non-muslims which they call "infidels" etc. And in doing this, muslims open themselves up for criticism. But not even this can be tolerated by racist/sexist muslims who want to criminalize criticism against their own violations against Universal Human Rights!



Abu Dhabi's burqa hiding muslim woman murdered a non-muslim mother in the restroom while the victim's two young children waited outside. Abu Dhabi encourages islam and sharia - so why do people even go there?




Eager convert proselytizer  Myriam Francois-Cerrah applauds islam while islam's guardian Saudi Arabia jails and lashes Raif Badawi fordaring to talk about Human Rights.


Without any objection heard there's a lot of racist and sexist smear going on against "white males" as a group - however not much against islamofascist Arab oil billionaires clad in sun/sand protecting Bedouin head scarves (indoors)! Why?!




Right, they belong to that overly protected vulnerable and easily offended "minority" called muslims who are under attack from a very few peaceful (but apparently so dangerous and disgusting) Human Rights defenders (i.e. not sharia compliant) called "islamophobes".

Raif Badawi is such an "islamophobe" whose friends and family now have chosen to distance themselves from or even turning against him. In other words, they have, like so many others, helped the Saudi islamofascists instead of a Human Rights defender.


Badawi did nothing wrong according to Western standards other than start a forum that was aimed at "a new generation of Saudi young men and women, who want to express themselves in a way that they can counter the overwhelming majority of clerics and religious people."

Now he has to kneel on the ground and receive 50 lashes every week until he has received 1,000 lashes. Happy now Myriam Francois-Cerrah? Right, Klevius almost forgot that the very fact that Saudi Arabia is the guardian of islam makes it having nothing to do with islam in your perverted thinking?


Klevius wrote

August 18, 2013

When Saudi blogger gets 600 lashes and 7 yrs in a Saudi prison, BBC only reports he was freed (from death sentence)

 

A screen dump on a Google news search today on 'BBC Raif Gadawi' gives this shameful result:





A general search gives this:





And this kind of utterly disgusting, not to say purely criminal, behavior from BBC just continues while it simultaneously uses all its resources to silence, misrepresent, or falsify facts about islam, Sharia and OIC while using every opportunity to air the views of islamofascists and their supporters.
 
 

Saudi islamofascism, a Saudi "islamophobe" and BBC's silence



How islamofascism works


When should "islamophobes" be designated authors of conscience, persecuted for not only peacefully exercising their right to freedom of expression but more importantly, for defending Universal Human Rights.


On July 30, 2013 Saudi media reported that Raif Badawi had been sentenced to seven years in prison and 600 lashes for founding an Internet forum that "violates Islamic values and propagates liberal thought". The court also ordered the website closed.

On 17 June 2012, he was arrested on a charge of insulting Islam through electronic channels, and in December of that year was also cited for apostasy, a conviction which carries an automatic death sentence. Badawi's website also hosted material criticizing "senior religious figures" and Badawi had suggested that Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University had become "a den for terrorists."

The family of Badawi's wife subsequently filed a court action to forcibly divorce the couple on grounds of Badawi's alleged apostasy.

On May 7, 2014 Badawi was re-sentenced to 1000 lashes and ten years in prison. He also received a fine of 1 million riyal (equal to about $267,000).

Badawi's lawyer Waleed Abulkhair has been jailed after setting up Monitor of Human Rights in Saudi Arabia, a human rights organization. He is being charged for "setting up an unlicensed organization” and for “breaking allegiance with the ruler”. His requests to license the organization were denied.

Badawi has stated that he was a Muslim but "everyone has a choice to believe or not believe.

According to Human Rights Watch in its review of Saudi Arabia's membership in the United Nations Human Rights Council, "Over the last year Saudi authorities have harassed, investigated, prosecuted, and jailed prominent peaceful dissidents and human rights activists on vague charges based solely on their peaceful practice of basic rights, particularly the right to free expression, including Mohammed al-Qahtani, Abdullah al-Hamid, Mohammed al-Bajadi, Abd al-Kareem al-Khodr, Omar al-Saeed, and Raif Badawi."



Ask yourself: Why hasn't BBC and their Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Mishail Husain, properly informed you about this and OIS's sharia declaration?


These jihadists, Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo, may represent three main channels for spreading islamofascism: The reproductive, the cultural, and the militant.

However, the by far most important islamofascist power is Saudi based OIC and its sharia declaration through UN, steered by the Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani. Even with Islamic State taking over Saudi Arabia it would become easier to handle because as it is now the Saudi islamofascist billionaires can freely travel etc in the West, while with Islamic State such would not be tolerated anymore.

The counting is still out but the Saudi dictator family has probably still caused much more suffering and murdering with its islamic hate mongering than has Islamic State so far.



First time Klevius read OIC's sharia declaration he thought it was a joke or some poorly done pre-college homework. Judge for yourself!

Acknowledgement: Klevius has simplified and clarified the text. However, make no mistake. The text hasn't lost anything of its original meaning.

This is OIC's disgusting and pompous  Human Rights violating sharia declaration (the so called "islamic human rights") that an islamist, or islamist supporting voting bloc managed to pass through UN. However, don't panic. It's not legal because the UN is supposed to be a democratic institution and as such can not logically uphold decisions against democracy and Universal Human Rights. In other words, what has happened in UN is a disastrous deception that has nothing to do with UN's original aim. It should therefore be seen as nullified through its own manifesto of which some articles are presented below.


Allah made the Islamic Ummah as the best community which should guide all humanity that is confused because of different and conflicting beliefs and ideologies.

Klevius explanation: Childish but dangerous totalitarian fanatism. The utterly naive expression can be understood only as a product of a pathetic balancing between language borrowed from the real Human Rights declaration from 1948 and then mixed up with islamic nonsense cherry picked to fit the Saudi dictator family plus, to a lesser and varying degree, their supporters.

Mankind is still, and shall remain, in dire need of islam.

Klevius explanation: Wishful fanatic thinking that islam should rule the world.

Sharia is an integral part of the Islamic religion and no one shall have the right to abolish it either in whole or in part or to violate or ignore it in as much as it is binding divine commands, which are contained in the Koran and which were sent through Muhammad. Safeguarding sharia is an act of worship whereas the neglect or violation thereof is an abominable sin.

Klevius explanation: A definition of a muslim.

All men are equal - in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and responsibilities.

Klevius explanation: All muslim men of the right sect are equal - but not women and non-muslims. Every country can have its own sectarian version of sharia (e.g. wahhabi sharia in Saudi Arabia). 'Dignity', 'obligations' and 'responsibilities' are code words for sex slave apartheid and the inferior status of women in islam.

All human beings are Allah's subjects, and the most loved by Him are those who are most beneficial to His subjects, and no one has superiority over another except on the basis of piety and good deeds.

Klevius explanation: 'Those who are most beneficial' moeans those wh best serve the Saudi dictator family.

It is prohibited to take away life except for a sharia prescribed reason.

Klevius explanation: In Saudi jurisdiction the support of Universal Human Rights is equated with terrorism - and due sentences.

Bodily harm is prohibited to breach without a Sharia-prescribed reason.

Klevius explanation: Wife and slave beating etc.

Parents and those in such like capacity have the right to choose the type of education - provided they take into consideration the principles of sharia.

Klevius explanation: Main aim being to make the kids muslim and see to it that they stay that way (apostasy ban etc).

Both parents are entitled to different rights from their children, and relatives are entitled to rights from their kin - in accordance with sharia.

Klevius explanation: Meaning the muslim man has the right to the kids.

Every man shall have the right - within the framework of the sharia - to free movement and to select his place of residence whether within or outside his country and if persecuted, is entitled to seek asylum in another country. The country of refuge shall be obliged to provide protection to the asylum-seeker until his safety has been attained - unless asylum is motivated by committing an act regarded by the sharia as a crime.

Klevius explanation: Only muslims have this right. And an apostate muslim isn't persecuted according to sharia because s/he is simply the worst of criminals.

Everyone shall have the right to enjoy the fruits of his scientific, literary, artistic or technical labour of which he is the author; and he shall have the right to the protection of his moral and material interests stemming therefrom - provided it is not contrary to the principles of the sharia.

Klevius explanation: Means that this right only applies to muslims and non-muslims who submit to Human Rights violating sharia.

There shall be no crime or punishment - except as provided for in the sharia.

Klevius explanation: Everything that is against sharia is a crime and could render punishment.

Everyone shall have the right to express his opinion freely - in accordance with the principles of the sharia.

Klevius explanation: You think this must be a joke? No, it's pure old fashion fanatic totalitarianism.

Information may not be exploited or misused in such a way as may violate sanctities and the dignity of Muhammad, undermine sharia or disintegrate, corrupt, harm or weaken islam.

Klevius explanation: They got at least that right. An empty parasitic slave ideology that lacks any other foundation logic than the mysterious Allah (whose intentions/will even the muslims admit they have no clue about) is in extreme need of protection from scrutiny. Extremely laughable was it not for all the people who have suffered and died because of this hateful ideology.

It is not permitted to excite nationalistic or doctrinal hatred.

Klevius explanation: You're not allowed to criticize the Saudi dictator family or wahhabi islamofascism.

Everyone shall have the right to participate, directly or indirectly in the administration of his country's public affairs. He shall also have the right to assume public office - as long as he complies with sharia.

Klevius explanation: 'Everyone' means a muslim who complies with the muslim dictator family. Remember, we are dealing with islam and its guardian in the first place. This is also the aim of the islamofascist so called "diversity training" that is sprayed all over our Western institutions etc. Sadly, it is aggressive islamofascism, not timid Human Rights voices that is let through.

All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic sharia.

Klevius explanation: What else?! This simply means the complete elimination of any possibility for an individual to take cover under the Human Rights declaration form 1948.

The Islamic sharia is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration.

Klevius explanation: So why even bother to write this declaration when it gives full freedom for every member state to tailor their own sharia? The answer is of course UN. By having "islamic human rights" sanctioned via UN, OIC's member states in general but Saudi Arabia in particular, can avoid UN criticism against Human Rights violations.


Klevius concluding advice: When you're done laughing - start thinking! Honestly, isn't this the worst offense ever against what it means to be a human being! And as such, well in line with its origin - the worst ideological crime ever against humanity.


Muslims could have the freedom to look, behave and believe freely under the 1948 Human Rights declaration. But that's not enough for muslims - they want sharia, i.e, violation of Human Rights! 


.

Sunday, December 28, 2014

How many more Syrians are Saudi supporting Obama and Cameron prepared to let suffer and die rather than talking with Assad?

 

Saudi Arabia is the main cause of blood baths in Mideast - and the one state that takes the least responsibility for it


Saudi Arabia takes zero refugees from the disaster it created in Syria.


Amnesty International: 7 ways Saudi Arabia is silencing people online


1. Gagging anyone with an independent opinion

“Overall, the situation in Saudi Arabia is very bad, particularly from the point of view of people with independent opinions who go against the grain. Recently, there have been investigations, arrests and short-term detentions of journalists, athletes, poets, bloggers, activists and tweeters.”

2. Blaming everything on terrorism

“The authorities are fragile. They seek to gag and stifle dissent using various means, including the shameful Terrorism Law that has become a sword waved in the faces of people with opinions. Courts issue prison sentences of 10 years or more as a result of a single tweet. Atheists and people who contact human rights organizations are attacked as ‘terrorists’.”

3. Personal attacks on bloggers

“I have been harassed in many ways. The authorities approached the internet providers hosting my personal website and asked them to block it and delete all the content. They also dispatched security officers to tell me to stop what I was doing in my own and my family’s best interests. I was later officially banned from blogging and threatened with arrest if I continued. I succumbed and stopped in order to protect my family.”

4. Bans, false accusations and being fired from your job

“There are many cases of bloggers being restricted or banned. Some of them – whom I know – are still being investigated about blogs they wrote in 2008, even though they aren’t involved in blogging anymore. Saudi bloggers can also be fired from their jobs and prevented from making a living. Many face false allegations that they are ‘atheists’or ‘demented’. Restrictions are imposed on almost every aspect of the blogger’s life.”

5. Far-reaching online surveillance and censorship

“Censorship is at its maximum, especially after passing the Terrorism Law. A poet was arrested as a result of a single tweet which indirectly criticized King Abdullah using symbolic language. With millions of web users in Saudi Arabia, this means the authorities are keeping an eye on everything that’s being written. We have also received reports through international newspapers that Saudi Arabia uses surveillance to hack and monitor activists’ accounts.”

6. Deploying an electronic army

“The authorities have powerful cyber armies which give a false impression of the situation in Saudi Arabia to deceive people overseas. They launch websites, YouTube channels and blogs to target activists and opponents, and depict them as atheists, infidels and agents who promote disobedience of the Ruler. By contrast, these websites, channels and blogs often praise the state and its efforts. I have personally been the victim of such state orchestrated campaigns that harmed my reputation.”

7. Brutal punishments

“Raif Badawi’s case further demonstrates the brutality of a state that still rules through punishments from the Middle Ages, like flogging, hefty fines and exaggerated prison terms. The Saudi government needs to know that it doesn’t own the world and that it can’t silence the world’s voice with its money.”

The kingdom has also launched a powerful cyber army to create “a false impression of the situation in Saudi Arabia to deceive people overseas” and target Saudi activists and opponents, depicting them as “atheists, infidels and agents who promote disobedience of the ruler,” the blogger said.

Earlier this year, Saudi authorities sentenced Raif Badawi to 10 years in jail and one thousand lashes for only setting up a website.

Reporters Without Borders has named Saudi Arabia, which is ruled by a hereditary royal system, as one of the “enemies of the Internet” for its censorship and surveillance.

In July, then UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, censured Saudi Arabia for harassing human rights activists under a failed judicial system.

Activists say there are over 30,000 political prisoners in Saudi Arabia.

Saudi authorities have also defied calls by international rights groups to end what has been described as violations of women’s rights in the monarchy.


Islam is the worst ideological crime history knows about and Saudi Arabia is the most intolerant Human Rights abuser - yet both are desperately protected by Western leaders


Jürgen Todenhöfer (German expert on the situation in Iraq and Syria): They (muslim terrorists) are extremely brutal. Not just head-cutting. I'm talking about the strategy of religious cleansing. That's their official philosophy. They are talking about 500 million people who have to die.

The West doesn’t want democracy in Syria. The biggest resistance to
democratic reforms in Syria comes currently out of Obama's and Cameron's policy. Obama once said: "Strong presidents talk to their enemies." Why doesn't he just do it? The fact that Assad is not a Democrat cannot be an obstacle. America's favorite friends in the Arab world, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Co. are not either.

The West 'has no concept' of how dangerous the group (i.e. original islam - Klevius correction) is and says they want to 'kill all non-believers and enslave their children'.

The West has underestimated the risk posed by Islamic State 'dramatically'. IS is 'much smarter and more dangerous than our leaders believe'.

'The city of Mosul [in Iraq], with a population of three million, for example, is controlled by IS with about 5,000 fighters. To crush them with bombs means reducing all of Mosul to rubble and killing tens of thousands of civilians.'

Todenhöfer said that he constantly heard the view that ISIS want to 'conquer the world'.

This is the largest religious cleansing strategy that has ever been planned in human history.

Klevius: I beg to differ. It's only a tiny top of the iceberg of the largest religious cleansing strategy that has ever been planned in human history.

In Syria, however, the protesters were met with fierce opposition from within their own population. To date Bashar Al-Assad has at least as many followers as the opposition, whether we like this or not. Almost the entire alawite, christian and other minorities have rallied behind him. They make up about 28 percent of the population. Also parts of the Sunni middle class do support him; the West has completely misjudged the situation.

The legitimacy of the Syrian protesters was lost, when in early May 2011 Qatar and Saudi Arabia began to supply the Syrian uprising with money and weapons

In line with international law, money and arms supplied for the support of uprisings in other countries remains a violation of international law and an unlawful encroachment on the sovereignty of states. Barack Obama or Angela Merkel would share this view, if Syria were to provide American or German insurgents with weapons.

The Sunni states of Saudi Arabia and Qatar pursue in Syria - tacitly supported and controlled by their big brother, the USA - other goals than the sympathetic Syrian protesters of the first days. In the downfall of the Alawite Assad they see an opportunity to weaken their nemesis, which is shiite Iran, and who is Syria's ally. Therefore they support in Syria specific Sunni extremists who regard Shiites and Alawites as heretics.

In late 2011 this remote-controlled war of faith and by proxy attracted like a magnet the Salafist-Wahhabi terrorist organization Al-Qaeda, which calls its Syrian branch Jabhat-Al-Nusra. Because of their member's great personal courage and fighting strength, it has become the most powerful and most potent rebel group in Syria. As is the general case of the global support for Al-Qaeda's terrorism it does receive its support and direction specifically from within Saudi Arabia. Its Saudi backers believe that this strategy will not only weaken Iran, but will also help in spreading the radical Salafist-Wahhabi faith, to which - and much to their chagrin - only two percent of the world's Muslim population adhere.

The number of muslim jihadists in Syria is more than 100,000, and counting.

The claim of the United States that they could ensure through inspections at the Turkish border that only "moderate" insurgents receive Saudi or Qatari weapons is almost killingly funny. Jabhat-Al- Nusra, being the strongest rebel-group inside Syria, has no difficulty to get to the weapons it needs.

The type of government most of the extremists aim for, is not going to be any better than the current system, it will be worse.

The majority of the terrorist insurgents, i.e. at least 60,000 are pious muslims. At least 5,000 are foreign "jihadists" from Tunisia, Libya, Jordan, Iraq and Europe. The "Free Syrian Army", have, at most, 20,000 fighters. Every day they do loose supporters to the pious terrorist muslims who pay and fight better.


Klevius: Doesn't take a lot to be smarter than Obama, does it. Without his skin color he could never have been "elected president". However, what is problematic with Jürgen Todenhöfer's analysis is his naive Western illusion of there being somewhere "a good islam" behind all that Allahu Akbar blood shed despite the fact that his own reporting 100% fits historical facts about the origin of islam as well as fits all the "puzzling" gaps.

Western taqiya islam has nothing at all to do with islam and its evil origin. Your local imam is either full of wishful thinking or taqiya.

And in the bottom you always have the inescapable - and deeply troubling - fact that the Saudi dictator family not only steers all the world's muslims via UN but also gets 100% support from leaders such as Obama and Cameron.


Iyad Madani, the Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based OIC, the worst Human Rights violator.




















.

Saturday, December 27, 2014

Naive Swedes "love-bomb" terrorist labeled mosque


Islam means sharia and sharia is ALWAYS and in whatever form, against the most basic of Human Rights



Muslim "freedom fighters" to "moderate" imam: "What is your problem with the Islamic State? You are on the wrong path!"

"Moderate" imam: "The Islamic State. It is like an invisible arm, coming to poison the wells where our children drink. We are losing something precious. We are losing our young people."

Klevius: It's not the Islamic State - it's the ideology of islam! The very same ideology you pretend to blink for the purpose of not severing the money flow from the naive infidels who feed and support you.

The "moderate" versions of communism* had to rename (e.g. social-democracy, national-socialism etc) so to hide it's evil roots. Yes, "socialism" looked attractive for many an intellectual in the 20th century as long as they hadn't seen it in full scale praxis (see eg the most important sociological paper from the last century, Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship, which describes state parasitism.

* Whereas revolutionary communism is pure evil, state communism and state socialism may not always appear equally evil. However, they don't work either (compare China's leaders who in the 1980s realized this simple fact).





A Swedish foot shot triggered by naive(l) islamophilia


Was it muslims playing with fireworks or an attack from rival muslims? What seems clear though is that the most unlikely scenario is prioritized by the Minister of Immigration, Swedish TV, Aftonbladet etc. 

BBC 25 December 2014 updated at 18:48: Swedish mosque hit by arson in Eskilstuna, injuring five. Police are treating the incident as arson after reports that someone threw an object into the building.

Nothing whatsoever indicated any "anti-muslim"* forces behind the fire.

* Just like islamic violence serves the spread of islam (jihad) "anti-muslim" violence (so rare so it almost doesn't exist in any meaningful sense compared to islamic violence) also fulfills the same purpose.

Klevius: However, this is how Scandinavia's biggest news paper described it:



Sweden's Minister for Justice: An appalling evil deed 


Sweden's Minister for Justice and Migration (!), Morgan Johansson: 'Hard to believe anything else than that this aggregated assault was directed against muslims as a group and islam as a religion.'

Klevius: A Swedish Minister for Justice acting like a teen troll who would have been immediately arrested had it been the other way round!


Swedish TV: The arson attack against the mosque in Eskilstuna shows, according to Islamiska förbundets leader Omar Mustafa, how hate against muslims has intensified.

Klevius: Reminds me of an old joke from the 1980s: A Finn tells a Swede that Finland has increased its asylum quota from Africa by 100%. The Swede: 'Gee, so now you have already two Africans over there.



Omar Mustafa, leader of the Islamiska Förbundet i Sverige(IFIS - a terrorist organization according to, for example, UAE): ”Man har gått från ord till handling.” (They have moved from words to action).

Klevius: Who are 'they'? Islamic State?!

The mosque belongs to the Dawah movement known for close connections to the Islamic State.

It also seems that the mosque has been attacked in the past by other muslims.

It's also reported that a boy living nearby told his father that Somalis played with fireworks ('smällare', i.e. crackers)  inside the mosque.

The injured seem to have been a little Somali boy who injured his hand with some crackers and someone who broke his feet when jumping from a balcony.

All of this is of course just rumors but still interesting. Klevius would definitely suggest first eliminating a hypothetical scenario where playing with fireworks caused the fire (perhaps just before prayer time) and then a cover up effort for insurance made possible by the Swedish islamophilia dhimmis eagerly waiting for "mosque attacks".






.

Friday, December 26, 2014

Different results from the same PC schizophrenia caused by muslim "sensitivities" (sharia)


Brits are proud of their flag while Swedes are ashamed of theirs. So where will it end? With a green Saudi muslim scimitar flag in both countries?!




 UK


A Labour MP, Emily Thornberry, who lives in a £3million home in Islington, North London and is a close ally of Ed Miliband and the party's shadow attorney general, has been forced to apologize after being accused of holding working class voters in "contempt" for tweeting a pic of a terraced family home draped in England flags ("image from #Rochester").

She quickly issued an apology after Ed Miliband intervened and made it "very clear" that he believes people should be able to fly the England flag with pride.


SWEDEN


Söndrumsskolan (school) in Halmstad, southern Sweden, forbids the use of the Swedish flag after some students on a masquerade painted their face with it.
According to the principal Hans Åkerlund, the use of the flag is 'incitement to racial hatred' and 'risks offending other individuals'.  The school board also forbade the students from carrying anything signing the Swedish flag for school photography which ought to be 'free from national symbols'.

Klevius: So what about wahhabi inspired clothing, burqas, veils etc?! Isn't every muslim a member of the islamic OIC state called Ummah?

















.

Thursday, December 25, 2014

2014 - the year when muslim hatred against Human Rights peaked


Telling ‘the truth in love’


Klevius approach to mankind is and has always been love. And there can not be a better tool for universal love than the Universal Human Rights declaration. However, such love of the equality principle has now by evil forces been named "hate" while criticism against islamic hatred is called "islamophobia".

Muslim haters reject Human Rights - but do all muslims hate Human Rights?


Klevius answer: If you by 'muslims' mean sharia supporting muslims the answer is definitely yes. However, if you include as "muslims" those who reject sharia in all Human Rights violating forms, then Klevius and the majority of muslim top clerics as well as Saudi based and Saudi steered muslim world organization OIC don't see them as real muslims. According to Saudi Arabia and OIC some of the most basic of Human Rights are seen as grave criminal offenses against "islamic human rights" (sharia).
 


Supreme Court of Canada: 'speech may only be deemed hateful when assessed to be so objectively from the perspective of a reasonable person, with full consideration of the circumstances'

Klevius: Which makes sharia support a form of hate speech!

Under Human Rights a woman may choose to lead a sharia style life if she so wishes. However, under sharia women may no.

The "islamophobia" campaigners continue protecting the worst ever ideological crime on the planet! Why?!

Facebook: Our mission has always been to make the world more open and connected. We seek to provide a platform where people can share and surface content, messages and ideas freely, while still respecting the rights of others.

Klevius: This (i.e. Human Rights) is the foundation on which everything Klevius writes firmly stands on. In other words, the only muslims who could possibly be offended are those who support or commit Human Rights violations.

Facebook: While there is no universally accepted definition of hate speech, as a platform we define the term to mean direct and serious attacks on any protected category of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability or disease.

Klevius: So "infidels", i.e. non religious people are not protected. But muslim terrorists and Human Rights violators are!? Or is it just some muslims (who? sharia rejecting "muslims"?!).





The Islamic State constitutes a perfect time machine for those who want to understand the origin of islam


Islam, an ideology originating in and based on parasitism (e.g. slavery) and terror (jihad), is a monstrous hate crime throughout 1,400 years. Its victims can be counted in hundreds of millions (possibly as many as there are muslims today). Its Sharia is ALWAYS against Human Rights. Yet criticism of islam is called "islamophobia"!






'Telling the truth  with love', however, doesn't necessitate you to love the open or silent haters


Islamic State says it is prepared to murder as many non-muslims as it takes - no matter how many hundreds of millions. And the number of their supporters among silent muslims is high and counting.


The difference between hateful muslims and Klevius is that Klevius doesn't ask for retaliation - just the right to exist on an equal level with everyone else on the planet.



 So when muslim born (apostate?!)* Mr X** "president"*** Hussain**** Obama Soetoro (or whatever)***** wants to criminalize criticism of islamic hate speech, he has made himself sharia compliant and therefore against Human Rights.

* Born to a muslim father who hadn't committed apostasy (the worst crime in islam) made him a muslim. Moreover, he was also raised as a muslim because his adoptive father Soetoro was a muslim.
** All his records are labeled secret.
*** His mother was too young as the only US parent for to fulfill the constitutional criterion. He listened for some 20 years to one of the worst black supremacist racists' preachings. He used the race card in the election and he has violated the spirit of the US Constitution ever since.
**** more in line with his muslim heritage
***** sarcasm








.

Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Racial profiling of blacks and muslims - and the lack of intervention against black and muslim hate crimes


Klevius' dictionary entry of today: 


"Diversity training", meaning

1 support for islam and Saudi islamofascism
2 support for racial segregation* and agitation

* Do note that the first sentence on Klevius' first web appearance (re. Human Rights) goes like this: 'Peter Klevius' definition of The HOLY (negative) HUMAN RIGHTS vs. RACE & SEX SEGREGATION (i e rapetivism).'

NYPD officers turning their back against NY mayor Blasio who together with muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Hussein Obama Soetoro (or whatever) has been agitating in support of black racism. NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos (top left) were murdered by a black thug (with a long criminal record) while sitting in their patrol car.


Whereas every muslim is tied to Human Rights violating islam via its sharia, a black police has no such a tie to black criminals. However, because blacks in certain areas are hugely over represented in crime stats (hence also proportionally in general stats), it would be quite strange if equally many whites were pulled over, arrested etc. in such areas.

So when you see a muslim you can be sure he supports Human Rights violating sharia, otherwise he wouldn't be a true muslim according to all the world's muslims world organization Saudi based and Saudi led OIC which constitutes the biggest voting bloc in UN and which calls sharia "islamic human rights" for the sole purpose of duping you and now also making it possible to sell weapons to Human Rights violating Saudi Arabia despite the new UN initiative which forbids weapon sales to Human Rights violating nations. So the trick is simple. Saudi Arabia doesn't violate "islamic human rights", i.e. sharia, because Human Rights violating sharia has been incorporated within UN behind your back by the help of some of the worst Human Rights offenders, i.e. OIC the biggest voting bloc in UN. Moreover, the Saudi islamofascists also managed to exclude those muslim OIC member states it disliked by arranging for Syria to be suspended from OIC and Russia (an ally of Syria and Iran) to be included in the UN ban against weapon export.

Can you now see the bottomless hypocrisy and bigotry in your political leaders when they brag about not selling weapons to Human Rights violators while simultaneously forcing your kids, police etc with more islam propaganda "diversity training"?


Iyad Madani, the Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based OIC, the world's foremost Human Rights violator.

So why hasn't BBC's Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain told you about this?




Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain (BBC's sharia presenter) and Michael Adebolajo all have islam and its Human Rights violating sharia in common



.

Sunday, December 21, 2014

Good Yule (Swedish 'God Jul') today and a happy New Year tomorrow

Good* non-religious** Yule*** - and hopefully a future freed from Human Rights violating islam
*   isn't it funny that the words 'god' and 'good' both originated in an extremely old Finnic-Uralic 'pagan word for home - long before any monotheist religion was even thought about!
 
** i.e. without a totalitarian "one-god-only" made in their own image

*** Icelandic hjól "wheel, tyre" Old English word hweol from Old Nordic today represented in Swedish by 'hjul'. 

From pagan (now called Atheism where 'theis' stands for Mideastern "monotheisms") to theisms and back (see Klevius 1992:9)


Yule or Yuletide ("Yule time") is a pagan religious festival observed by the historical Germanic peoples, later being absorbed into and equated with the Christian festival of Christmas. The earliest references to Yule are by way of indigenous Germanic month names Ærra Jéola (Before Yule) or Jiuli and Æftera Jéola (After Yule). Scholars have connected the celebration to the Wild Hunt, the god Odin and the pagan Anglo-Saxon Modranicht.

Terms with an etymological equivalent to Yule are used in the Nordic countries for Christmas with its religious rites, but also for the holidays of this season. Yule is also used to a lesser extent in English-speaking countries to refer to Christmas. Customs such as the Yule log, Yule goat, Yule boar, Yule singing, and others stem from Yule. A number of Neopagans have introduced their own rites.

Yule is the modern English representation of the Old English words ġéol or ġéohol and ġéola or ġéoli, with the former indicating the 12-day festival of "Yule" (later: "Christmastide") and the latter indicating the month of "Yule", whereby ǽrra ġéola referred to the period before the Yule festival (December) and æftera ġéola referred to the period after Yule (January). Both words are thought to be derived from Common Germanic *jeχʷla-, and are cognate with Gothic (fruma) jiuleis and Old Norse (Icelandic and Faroese) jól (Danish and Swedish jul and Norwegian jul or jol) as well as ýlir, Estonian jõul(ud) and Finnish joulu. The etymological pedigree of the word, however, remains uncertain, though numerous speculative attempts have been made to find Indo-European cognates outside the Germanic group, too. The simple reason to those linguistic failures  is that Uralo-Siberian (later called Uralic) preceeded and gave birth to Indo-European.

Then came the Romans with their triple god and, much later, the muslims with their triple god the unreachable Allah and his arch angel Gabriel who in turn dictated his "holy messenger" who then died and is "interpreted" by whatever wimps of other human beings in a variety of traditions which all have only one thing really in common, namely that they all are against the most basic of Human Rights..


Klevius wrote

Wednesday, December 25, 2013



Do the muslim test by asking them if they are against Human Rights. If they are not they are no real muslims, according to OIC and every possible form of Sharia!

In other words, a true muslim is then per definition always a supremacist racist and sexist individual through the tie to islam and Sharia. And there is no real  islam without Sharia! Got it dude? And stop cheating yourself and others with that "moderate islam" crap, will you!



Sayeeda Warsi is Cameron's "minister of faith islam" and UK's representative in OIC, the islamofascist Sharia organization which in the UN has abandoned Human Rights and now wants Britain to implement Sharia compliance and making London a Sharia capital. And making national laws criminalizing anything critical of islam or muslims! All to satisfy islamofascists Arabs etc.


The Abu Qatada noise was deliberately used to make Brits hostile to Human Rights (which don't allow torture) so to pave the way for islamofascist Sharia money to London.



Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain (BBC's sharia presenter) and Michael Adebolajo all have islam and its Human Rights violating sharia in common.


Iyad Madani, the Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based OIC, the worst Human Rights violator.

Should islam dominate the world? No, I don't think so - quite the opposite!






Cure your ignorance about Human Rights - especially the so called Negative Human Rights, i. e. the most basic of rights!


Klevius wrote

Saturday, April 07, 2012


Doggerlandians - the proto-Finnish/Uralic speaking true natives of Doggerland and Britain

Update: Due to the sad fact that, reportedly, some of Klevius' readers are complaining over sores on their feet while tramping on diamonds, the following guidelines may or may not deliver relief:

By 'Uralic' it's here, of course, meant the branch of the linguistic tree that at its stem in time goes deeper than any language family based on agriculture (and most possibly the deepest of modern humans), and geographically comprises an area (north and mid-Eurasia) that is bigger than any other. The technical term 'proto-Uralic' doesn't mean that the lineage abruptly started there but deepens into what might be called Altaic/Eurasiatic.

Although the modern Finnish vocabulary may be one which contains among the highest amount of loan-words, it also contains a remarkable old kernel (some 200-300 words) that is not only immensely old but also often reflects more exactly reconstructed "original" words in a way its sister languages do not. This may be due to, among other factors, its westernmost location (see Kvenland - the origin of the Goths).





From Ural to the Baltic Sea and Britain
(to really grasp the significance of this ancient water route please take a look at the islamic Origin of Vikings and Russia)

Klevius intellectual bias warning: There has been a severe "mongoloid complex" (social, not genetic) going on for long in the debate about the original Europeans, not the least among the Samis and the Finns (see what Klevius wrote about the mongoloid complex almost a decade ago). The Finns were introduced to "civilization" via Klevius ethnic people, the Finland-Swedish "colonizers", who, after Sweden's loss of Finland in the 1808-09 war, said "We aren't Swedes anymore, and we don't wanna be Russians, so let's be Finns". So they learned Finnish, many of them translated their Swedish names into Finnish ones, and one of them gathered the ancient Finnish epic Kalevala, all in an effort to strengthen the Finnish ethnicity.

Klevius brief intellectual aid to the background of the topic: Finnish and Sami researchers are possibly the least reliable (together with Afro-centrists) when it comes to the "Urheima" of the Europeans. So you will have a hard time finding info if you don't read Klevius. But keep two basic facts in mind: Proto-Uralic was here before the farmers - proto-Indo-European (PIE) was not, simply because it was tied to farming/pastoralism. And ultimately, no matter if we call it proto-Altaic or something else, what seems certain is that modern humans and their language developed in the very midst of the mongoloid hunting-gathering area (where the 40,000 BP Denisova bracelet below was found), not among farmers.

Don't you think the producers of this bracelet were able to talk?! 























After the last ice age Doggerland still connected Uralic speaking Sweden (and the Baltic Sea) with Britain a couple of thousands of years before the arrival of farming. The oldest complete skeleton of a Brit (the Cheddar man in Gough's Cave, outside Baath near Bristol) is from this time.


Background

Ago Künnap: From the Ukrainian refuge the people spread over the area that eventually extended from the so-called North Sea Land on the site of the present-day British Isles as far as the Urals. It should be regarded as probable that the Uralic lingua franca was functioning in the area also before the Last Glacial Maximum, consequently before the people gathered in the refuges. It continued functioning in the Ukrainian refuge and, in addition to this, also in the ice-free area, creating a foundation by making languages into the present-day Uralic languages. As a result of people’s spreading out from the larger refuges the whole northward Europe was shared by the Basque and Uralic type of languages.

Klevius: Today's Basques/Iberians have almost nothing to do with Europe's original hunter-gatherers. Samis do. Geneticists have long since proved that ice-age humans entered Europe from Siberia (haplogroup M173 aka R), not Mideast. Linguists have proved that they spoke a language related to Uralic. Many linguists have for long connected East and West-Eurasia in the proto-Altaic language complex at the very spot where geneticists see the splitting point that gave the birth to the truly modern humans and real Aurignacian culture. Common sense does the rest by considering the map, geography, food sources and the mix of cold-adapted northern-most Neanderthals and Denisovans.

The mongoloid features of Sami people may be explained as follows (also consider evolution map below): The first Europeans were a mix of Mongoloid and Cro-Magnon traits due to the blend of Denisova and northern Neanderthal traits with southern Homos. However, while spreading southward, what we now call the Caucasoid traits (Klevius "bastard belt") increased while the Mongoloid traits got stronger in the north due to pressure from the east.

Cheddar man certainly didn't speak Indoeuropean


Cheddar man was found near Bristol in England. His Finnish/Sami type of DNA closely matches contemporary Brits near the location where the skeleton was found. And the amber found beside him came from the Baltic Sea.

Cheddar man stature is estimated to 166 cm and he has a relatively high (compared to modern Sami but not to modern Finns) crural index and tibial length/trunk height indices but a total morphological pattern considered cold-adapted. This mix is in line with Klevius Out of Africa as pygmies and back as global mongoloids theory, which states that human like Homos what we used to think of as our predecessors were, in fact, big brained but dumb non-humans, and that the smart ones were small ape-like creatures (Floresiensis, Red Deer Cave people, Denisovans etc) who in Euraisa mixed with Neanderthals and later on with the southern Homos from whom we didn't get our intelligence but only part of our physical appearance (in fact, we started loosing intelligence and are now on a much lower level than some 30,000 years ago - just compare the stunning performance of Aurignacian art below). So for example, what has "puzzled" fossilized academics the most about the tiny ape-like Floresiensis with a brain size barely exceeding that of a Chimp, is how to explain its tools, use of fire etc.

Compared to many presumptuous and subjective PC academics Klevius' theory has a much better fit to existing evidence out there.


Doggerland and a harpoon found in it. Altough  the historical Goths emerge some 7,000 years later it's worth mentioning that Gotland in the Baltic Sea was already populated more than 9,500 years ago. Moreover, although no one knows the true origin of the name Gotland and Goth confusing efforts have been made to connect the origin of the name to different and less likely later forms such as e.g. 'gut' and 'jut'. Due to an enormous general ignorance there thrives a bias that could be described as a majority complex which blurs topics of evolution and linguistics etc. by covering them under the "Out of Africa" or the  "Indo-European" or the "monotheist" blanket. This type of prejudice is easily seen when you, for example, tell an English speaker that the word 'boy' comes from the Finnish/Uralic 'poika'. In fact, if we really start digging we will soon realize that most of the really old Indo-European words can be traced to the original Uralic speaking inhabitants of Europe. Btw, on Gotland 'peika' mens a girl and became maid ('piga') in Swedish. Just like the English word for child that transformed into 'girl'.







Genetic relation

Cheddar man has been genetically tested as belonging to haplogroup U5a which happens to be most common today in northern Finland and Scandinavia among Sami people and, to a lesser extent, among Finns. Haplogroup U5 is spread all over Europe but is by far best presented among Finnish speaking populations in the north. That U5 is also found in North-Africa is in line with the mixing theory below. U5a is a latecomer and hence fits a pattern of increasing blend of genes along the Atlantic coastline. U5b is also toprated among Samis as is V.


Linguistic relation

At this time all hunter-gatherers in mid/northern (and possibly sourhern)  Europe talked an Uralic language. Uralic languages preceeded Indo-European and Finno-Ugric languages and, according to linguistics, is today best survived in the Finnish* language. It is important here to realize that proto-Sami people populated all of the fringes of glacial and post-glacial Europe and that Basque language most probably was Sami related although heavily distorted by incoming linguistically non-related farmers, whereas the northern Sami became influenced by related Finnish speakers, hence explaining why today's Sami sounds so Finnish and Basque doesn't sound Finnish at all although it has many features in common with Uralic/Finnish languages.


* As Klevius has pointed out for decades, in Finnish (as in most other languages) there is no sex segregation. A person is 'hän' regardless of sex, not the stupid he/she apartheid Europe has inherited from sexist Mideastern "monotheisms".


To PC-people and others with a racist agenda blurring the facts: Non-African art from 40,000 - 25,000 years ago - i.e. long before anything like this emerged in Mideast or Africa! And one thing is for certain, they weren't neolithic farmers!

This extremely complicated to manufacture stone bracelet was made by the non-human Denisovan (or whatever we should call the hybrid that paved the way for modern humans - the process may have taken a long time at and around Altai) in Siberia 40,000 years ago by utilizing a drilling technology, comparable to modern machines, according to the researchers who found it.




.
.






In Dolní Věstonice, Central-Europe, an extremely well sculptured portrait is dated to 29,000 years ago, i.e. even earlier than the Brassempouy "Venus" portrait below, which was found in Mid-France.



















Brassempouy "Venus" approx 26,000 BP
















and with some make up by Klevius





















































From the left: Red Deer Cave, Sami, Cro-Magnon



First and third from the left are Red Deer Cave people 14,300-11,500 years ago. Second and fourth the so called Venus from Brassempuoy in France 25-26,000 years ago. The last pic is a reconstruction of a 1.9 Million year old Homo rudolfiensis skull. They all had flat broad cheeks, no chin and rounded forehead.



Klevius notes: The Hofmeyr skull represents the "roaming Homo", and despite no advanced tool etc culture, is large in relation to that of modern African males, with prominent supraorbital structures and a robust face. Morphometric analysis places Hofmeyr within the range of recent humans and close to those associated with Upper Paleolithic industries in Eurasia.
The fact that Northern Neanderthals, with whom the Denisovans interbred, differ genetically from southern Neanderthals fits Klevius theory that there was a double mixing going on: One that created the modern humans in the north and an other on the way down.



From Altai to Gotland, Sami, God, Vikings, Shakespeare and Tolkien
Klevius etymology and history remarks relating to the Britain-Scandinavia connection: The ancient Persian (which is extremely young compared to Uralic) word for god 'khoda' connects to the even more ancient Finnish 'koti' and Finno-Ugric 'kota' (=home/house/seed vessel - see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate), Saami 'goahti'. German Gott (god) and Swedish gott (good) as well as Gotland (pronounced Gottland), the island in the Baltic sea that constituted a (the?) main Viking hub in their slave trade with Jews and muslims.

Gotland in particular is famous as the probable ancestral home of the Goths: "a Gothic population had crossed the Baltic Sea before the 2nd century AD, reaching Scythia at the coast of the Black Sea in modern Ukraine where Goths left their archaeological traces in the Chernyakhov culture. In the 5th and 6th centuries, they became divided as the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths, and established powerful successor-states of the Roman Empire in the Iberian peninsula and Italy. Crimean Gothic communities appear to have survived intact in Crimea until the late 18th century.

The father of Shakespeare's prototype for Hamlet was a Goth from the Gothenburg area in Sweden (were Klevius father also happened to be born). These Goths came originally from Gotland via those very same waterways that were shaped already some 9,000 years ago, hence connecting the Baltic Sea with Doggerland/North Sea.

Gotland was also the home port and treasure island for the Vikings because it naturally connected West and East via Staraja Ladoga southeast of Finland on the river way down to the south. Gotland has revealed the biggest hoards of Viking age old Arab/islamic silver coins in Northern Europe.

Immediately north of Staraja Ladoga is the homeland of the Finnish national epic Kalevala which Tolkien based his writing on.

The world's oldest fishing net is found in southeastern Finland and is some thousand years older than Cheddar man the "oldest Brit".

Bromme culture existed in what is today's Sweden already 11,700–11,000 bp.

As a curiosity it might be noted that film director Ingmar Bergman lived most of his life on Gotland where some of his most powerful movies were filmed.

In conclusion one might well argue that the Baltic Sea has been a main hub since the birth of modern humans. 








.
.







.