Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Friday, April 22, 2011

Muslim apostate "president" Barry Barack Barakeh Mohammad Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) and his Saudi pal kill muslims while preparing for a worldwide islamic "ministerial exeption"

"Religion" (in the senseless Jewish "monotheism" meaning, such as Judaism, Christianity and islam) is the worst threat against Universal Human Rights (the main reason being the racist "chosen people" moral morass and the sexist oppression of women's rights that underpin them all). And islam is the worst of the worst simply because of its openly racist/sexist parasitic ideology which not only resembles and extrapolates on the original Jewish formula (which was built on a framework copied from Persian Zoroastrianism) but has made the most of its parasitic evilness throughout 1400 years of slavery looting and genocides, to an extent that, by far, renders islam the worst ideological crime ever committed against humanity. And for those who say that we weren't enlightened by Human Rights back then, pls just consider we are now, so stop being an ignorant hypocritical bigot - all at the same time!

Everyone agrees that these "religions" are in need of fixing if we want to defend any kind of functioning universal morality. However, the smallest possible moral denominator is the concept of Negative Human Rights (the basis for the 1948 Human Rights Declaration) which islam, via its strongest representation OIC, has dismissed and replaced with islamic sharia (see burning Cairo declaration above) because otherwise it should have meant the death for islam itself as we know it! But how many young "muslims" are really aware of this dirty play with their lives played by Mr X "president" and the Saudi Abdullah & Co?


The "ministerial exception" protects medieval theocracy

A "ministerial exception" is a judicial synonyme for Human Rights violations under the cover of religion,! In US it's now eventually on the Supreme Court table - a table that is surrounded by Six Catholics, three Jews and one Protestant Chrisian! Judaic "religions" in USA constitute the very poison that the founders were escaping from..

The by far worst US "president" ever. How long will it take for people to really realize it?!


While Saudi Arabia sends thousands of troops to assist Bahrain's Saudi supported dictator's crack down on his people by the help of bullets, torture and nerve gas, evil Obama doesn't move a finger!

Schoenman: "From the beginning of the uprising, the regime has targeted the medical personal, the hospitals, the medical centers, the ambulances, the surgeons, the physicians, the nurses; anyone associated with medical care because of the nature of the repression: the use of nerve gas, the use of chemicals, the brutality with which people have been tortured and the evidence that this represents to the bodies and the patients and the treatment and the medical documentation of what has occurred. For example, nine doctors have confirmed the use of nerve gas and the chemical properties appropriate to it and had been administering atropine to the victims."

Congressman James P. McGovern (in letter to Mohammad Obama): "Dear President Obama, I write to express my serious concern over the deteriorating human rights situation in Bahrain. The violent crackdown by Bahraini security forces on protesters and arbitrary arrest of political dissidents must not be tolerated. With King Hamad's declaration of a three-month state of emergency in Bahrain and the arrival of 2,000 Saudi and Emirati troops as part of the Gulf shield forces under the aegis of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), U.S. action is critical to prevent an escalation of bloodshed in Bahrain. Reports indicate that security forces have taken over Salmaniya Hospital in Manama as well as other health facilities, and are preventing injured protesters from receiving medical attention. Human rights activists assert that medics who have tried to help the wounded in the streets have been beaten. Gulf shield forces have also reportedly engaged in brutal attacks on Shiite villages."


Btw, talking about medieval religious darkness, did you know that most African leaders are creationists?! Makes one think about Richard Leakey's (possibly the most famous of anthropologists) recent statement that Christianity and islam are the main obstacles against a sound acceptance of science and human evolution.


















Negative human rights for a positive human future without racist/sexist islam















Monday, April 18, 2011

Do muslim born apostate "president" Barry Barakeh Hussein Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) and his supporters suffer from Kleviusophobia?

If by Klevius we mean the benign belief in universal equality (incl. women) then the answer must be yes because this Mr X "president" says he respects the worst crime ever against humanity and he supports OIC (Organization of the Islamic Council) which has as its main goal a world covering islamic sharia law which denies women and non-muslims equality.

The circular "islamophobia" argument

Think of it! If you've studied history, have some IQ and the ability to count, then you'll easily realize that islam is the worst crime ever against humanity. A parasitic Arabic Umma nation that for some 1400 years has used human lives as the main currency in its finance. An ideology which, since its origin, rests on the abuse of others, and which now wants to criminalize criticism of itself. Is it really possible to have a "phobia" against such an ideology?! Like naziphobia or fascistphobia?!

Btw, in Malaysia, thanks to OIC and islamic sharia, you can now, as a non-muslim, be arrested for quoting from a Koran book.




















Monday, April 11, 2011

Are "birther" and "islamophobia" the most anti-democratic of words? And why does US media love them so much?

It's islam that is the real "birther" religion when it commits social child abuse via its notorious apostasy ban. And it's hardly a "phobia" to question such a fascism in the light of Universal Human Rights (follow the link if you don't understand this enormous difference between islam and Human Rights - you'll be rewarded by the web's best analysis of 'freedom').  


According to islam this man is a traitor - either against islam or against US and Human Rights!

We really don't need a birth certificate to prove that this traitor "president" is born muslim as well as, later on, adopted muslim. Islamic sharia proves it all for us - and simultaneously disproves itself in a democracy! If his father was a muslim he is either a muslim or a previous muslim, i.e. an apostate. And in either case he's against not only the US Constitution but also, and more importantly, against the Universal Human Rights Declaration that 1948 stated that ALL humans are equal, including women and non-believers! He namely doesn't see himself as a victim of islam (like his very opposite when it comes to morality, integrity and character - Ayaan Hirsi Ali) but rather "respects" islam and its sharia!

One of the most obvious and direct consequences of islamic sharia (in whatever form) is that it legitimizes sex segregation. Let me explain. As it stands now, in the free "Western" world, Human Rights give women the right to lead their lives as they like without restrictions because of their sex. However, due to sex segregated upbringing in a society that is still trapped in (unnecessary) sex segregation restraints from the past, sex segregation is still common although not required by law. There are openings for women to be utilized - as they have been for the last century. But islamic sharia would put a legal hold on this positive development. Although sharia could be proposed in a myriad of alternative forms/interpretations, All of them would contain sexist sex segregation in one form or another.


Indisputable scientific facts about islam: 

1 There's no historical Mohammed to be found. No evidence whatsoever! That's why there's no "Mohammad's grave" either.

2 There's no Koran to be found before long after the non-existing Mohammed was allegedly dead. No evidence whatsoever!

3 There's no islam (other than the original parasitic looting, killing and raping one) to be found where it allegedly should have existed. No evidence whatsoever! The very idea of islam is parasitism which fact explains why devastation and backwardness has always been the result (when a thief/robber drives in a fancy car bought by stolen money we don't usually admirer his/her robber moral for it, do we). 

4 There are no "oldest mosques" whatsoever. And in the case of Saudi Arabia, "the homeland of islam", the Saud/Wahhabi families (Mr X "president" Obama's first call) who robbed the country from its people by the help of funds they had gathered by (ab)using African and other slaves to gain wealth from date plantations, every effort has been made to destroy/remove/hide the real nature (incl. total lack) of what is now called "islam's holy places. The demolition has focused on mosques, burial sites, homes and historical locations associated with the non-existing Muhammed and many of the alleged founding personalities of early islamic fairy tales. In Saudi Arabia, many of the demolitions have officially been part of the continued expansion of the Masjid Al-Haram at Mecca and the non-existing Mohammed's "mosque" in Medina.

5  Islam has enslaved, murdered, raped etc more people during 1400 years than any other ideology incl. communism/national socialism.The currency of islamic finance has always been the enslavement of "infidels" (which includes all women).

All you get is a bombastic stuck-up pile of fairy tale nonsense served to you via Wikipedia, other media, schools, universities, mosques etc by the help of propaganda money (i.e. Western oil/gas money) from the most evil of islamist dictatorships.


Monday, April 04, 2011

Klevius' islam lesson of the day: Why islamic mass murder in Ivory Coast but not in Egypt, Libya etc?

Ivory Coast (like most of Africa) has a "religious" problem: Islam and its main world representative OIC!   
Ivory Coast is, like Egypt etc, entangled in OIC's deadly sharia trap (see below).Islamic enslavement of Africa for more than a Millennium is the main source of Africa's mess. No matter how bad Gbagbo has been (I know nothing about it so I can't tell) islam and its representative Qattara and OIC (via UN's Human Rights Council, would you belive it that UN now calls islamic sharia "human rights"!) are worse. It's like islamic street jihad which always comes ON TOP OF other crimes!

Islam's world puppet (dangling from Saud & Co's oil/gas money created by Western non-islamic technology) muslim born apostate (?) Mr X "president" Barry Barakhe Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever). Christian Americans will probably do their utmost to get him re-elected while islam slaughters Christians (and others) and burn churches around the world.

The origin of islam: Islam is the most evil part (the sex and booty looting jihad that made "success" in the empty, lawless land leftover by Romans and Persians) of the original Judaic "religious" ideology which says that because you're "the chosen people" you have the right to slaughter, loot, rape etc the Canaanites, infidels Kafirs etc. You reader who are ignorant about Judaism and islam ought to keep in mind (look it up for yourself, dude, I'm not gonna give you any "references" so you better clean up your brain from distracting PC malware so you can start thinking for yourself) the overall framework of the "people of the book" cultural disease (sex segregation) that has haunted certain parts of the world for Millenniums.

In short again (how many years/times have I written this?!): Judaism rests on a sexist apartheid where  women were originally defined through marriage and their capabilities to produce sex and new copies of Jewish men. This storyline was temporarily interrupted by a protest movement made possible through Roman occupation. These sex protesters (who got inspiration from the much more sex liberal Roman society) were later called Christians although they had nothing to do with that form of Judaic Christianity that came to rule much of Europe after the "church fathers" took over, and later, as a consequence of the atrocities/attacks by Judaic islam (which was no islam at that time - just an other Judaic Christian movement gone extra bad) and which was finally broken by a new protest movement from within (Protestantism) which then paved the way for the industrial and post industrial world of today, which, in turn, as a biproduct produced the opposite to islamic sharia, i.e. Negative Human Rights (in UN's Universal 1948 Human Rights declaration which OIC violates via a Human Rights Council they have hijacked and from were they mislead people by calling islamist sharia "human rights", i.e. the most treacherous cheating of naive innocent and ignorant people in the voting boot you can imagine!.

What combines the "Judaic tradition" is sex segregation, and so far Klevius is the only proud "looner" to point this self evident fact out. Why? Simply because it's precisely the West's impotency to fully live up to girls'/women's equality with men as given them through the Universal Human Rights Declaration! Whereas Human Rights give you the right to choose how to lead your life (incl. to choose sex segregation), sex segregation is the only option in ALL forms of islamic sharia.

Ever thought about the Origin of Vikings? Well, you really should if you like to understand islamic sex slavery!


Keep in mind the following short but interesting and indisputable scientific facts: 

1 There's no historical Mohammed to be found. No evidence whatsoever! That's why there's no "Mohammad's grave" either.

2 There's no Koran to be found before long after the non-existing Mohammed was allegedly dead. No evidence whatsoever!

3 There's no islam (other than the original looting, killing and raping one) to be found where it allegedly should have existed. No evidence whatsoever! The very idea of islam is parasitism which fact explains why devastation and backwardness has always been the result (when a thief/robber drives in a fancy car bought by stolen money we don't usually admirer his/her robber moral for it, do we). 

4 There are no "oldest mosques" whatsoever. And in the case of Saudi Arabia, "the homeland of islam", the Saud/Wahhabi families (Mr X "president" Obama's first call) who robbed the country from its people by the help of funds they had gathered by (ab)using African and other slaves to gain wealth from date plantations, every effort has been made to destroy/remove/hide the real nature (incl. total lack) of what is now called "islam's holy places. The demolition has focused on mosques, burial sites, homes and historical locations associated with the non-existing Muhammed and many of the alleged founding personalities of early islamic fairy tales. In Saudi Arabia, many of the demolitions have officially been part of the continued expansion of the Masjid Al-Haram at Mecca and the non-existing Mohammed's "mosque" in Medina.

5  Islam has enslaved, murdered, raped etc more people during 1400 years than any other ideology incl. communism/national socialism. 

All you get is a bombastic stuck-up pile of fairy tale nonsense served to you via Wikipedia, other media, schools, universities, mosques etc by the help of propaganda money (i.e. Western oil money) from the most evil of islamist dictatorships.

This short overview might be too confusing for some (Georg Henrik von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge, used to criticize me for being too economical with words). However, I promise, here and now, to clarify it if you, dear professor, researcher or confused Hip Hopper etc just give me a comment below describing what puzzles you! This blog, btw, must be the least commented relative to how many readers it has! And yes, intelligence is the last of taboos. I've never really understood why intelligent and stupid "researchers" should be equalized or even the latter being hailed. Or is it because the dumb (or without moral integrity) "researchers" are the only ones probable to follow a biased ne of research. 

In today's world islam repeats its origin (not to do so wouldn't be islam) by abusing and parasiting on Human Rights freedom and democracy while simultaneously using the islamic dagger/sword which is usually kept hidden under the robe. Institutions like UN and IMF (the Ivory Coast massmurder inciter or accomplice muslim Alassane Ouattara used to work at IMF) are already heavily infiltrated by evil islamists.

A common islamic pattern: In many muslim countries Muslim Brotherhood etc. keeps the islamic order up whereas in places/countries where there are considerable amount of non-muslim infidels jihadist violence is used while afterwards, at the body count, "condemning" it.


From Andrew Harding’s report Was it a massacre?

On a dirt road in Duekoue, the body bags lie in haphazard groups, every hundred yards or so, waiting to be collected. I count 20 within a few blocks. A car stops beside us and a young man tells me "the minister" wants to talk to me, "immediately."  We drive into the town centre. The road is lined with what looks like looted, or perhaps rescued furniture. Konate Sidiki is the local representative of Mr Ouattara's government. He's clearly on a mission to limit the damage that the "massacre" allegations may be doing to the internationally backed winner of last November's election. "Our forces cannot be implicated in any massacre," he says. "I call on all human rights organisations to come to Duekoue. One week after the fight we discover 162 people have been killed. Not 800. Not 1,000. Since we have taken control of the town there is no conflict here. Our aim is to go to Abidjan and chase Gbagbo from power." Mr Sidiki is standing at the entrance of a church compound. Inside there are an estimated 40,000 civilians, who have lost their homes or simply fear for their lives. As Mr Sidiki approaches the crowd, an aide mimes for them to clap, and a few duly do so. We move away to try to talk to the families here, but the same aide follows us. When a man in the crowd starts to tell us that he fears for his life, and can't go home because he is "scared of the soldiers" - pointing to the men standing outside the gate - Mr Sidiki's aide intervenes, calling him a member of "Gbagbo's militia."

Klevius comment: Comments unnecessary if you just read it with what I said above in mind!