Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Sunday, September 27, 2009

"Pathological symbiosis" between state & "faith": Sweden puts the definite stop for homeschooling & instead offers psycho school & islam curriculum!

According to Klevius research the failure of modern school system is caused by:

1 psycholization (although psychology is an impossible science our kids have become its most popular guinea pigs & the school its main laboratory - and we pay for it!)
2 statelization (while attachment to parents are crushed poor peer relations are thriving & the curriculum is filled with non sense at best & state/faith propaganda at worst).
3 sexualization (many schools, in fact, function as brothels where the boys are supplied with sex while the girls think it's a necessary deal to get through the sex apartheid barrier). Comes handy for islamic jihadist schooled boys!

Recommended essential Klevius reading before you continue:

Where the Law Ends the Tyranny Begins 1993 (only available in Swedish)
Children & the Arbitrariness of Authorities 1994 (only available in Swedish)
Daughters of the Social State 1994 (only available in Swedish)
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state 1996. The most important sociology paper written in the last century? What do YOU think, dude? Think!
"Pathological Symbiosis" in LVU - Relevance, and Sex Segregated Emergence 2004. Apart from being possibly the only good scientific work on the origin of the concept also an astonishing example of how democracy is sidestepped by state bureaucracy.
From Freud to bin Laden 2004
Klevius Psychosocial Freud Timeline 2004
What is Sex Segregation & feminism, really? 2004

Islamic globalization - Saudi Abdullah & Co behind the spread of racist/sexist islamic hate mongering around the globe!

Klevius Sweden report: Background to the proposal that will definitely stop free homeschooling in Sweden.

When racist muslim school aged youth attack cemetary staff, visitors & graves,it reflects not "homeschooled" racism but madrassa & imam schooled "infidel" racism rooted in the evil Origin of islam.

Sweden has made a pact with Satan, um, Saudi finanzed islam (the worst crime ever against humanity) which means that islam is now expanding in the Swedish curriculum while homeschooling is forbidden. Already now non-muslim Swedish students have to "learn" abt islam via hypocritical imam lies sponsored by Saudi Arabia, starve during Ramadan, be raped & bullied as "infidels" via child/youth jihadists etc. This happens while Saudi Arabia (together with 56 other islamist countries), the most intolerant country in the world, works hard via UN to criminalize the truth abt islam. continues.

History

In 1723 Swedish parents were stipulated to teach their kids reading. In 1842 school attendance became obligatory although it was still possible to homeschool if the authorities (the church) checked it up. In 1924 Sweden got its first social (welfare) state law accessing all children. One of its consequences was that Astrid Lindgren (world famous author of Pippi Longstocking etc children's books) as a pregnant 18 year old single mother had to escape to Denmark for not loosing her child ( see e.g. Klevius' Angels of Antichrist, possibly the most important sociological paper from the last century - judge for yourself. However, due to its lack of Mideastern monotheist ideology, its criticism of sex segregation, its criticism of much psykology/psychiatry & its criticism of feminism, few can survive its reading without suffering dimming brain rage).


Few modern schools are capable of educating children without the assistance of homeschoolers

The school system of today already rests on partial homeschooling. Behind almost every successful student there is a supporting home where the crucial teaching and support occur.

Myths & facts abt homeschooling

Homeschooling is often accused for the loss of social interaction with peers. However, peer interaction may well be more of a problem than an asset’ simply because peers are in general equally immature. Peer-oriented children are also often more difficult to parent and teach. and often fail to integrate into society. At least while they are young. It's a troublesome fact that most criminality in Sweden is performed by children/youth. Moreover, when occasionally some of them are caught by the police (after often costly chases) nothing can be done because of their age. This catch 22 is pure child neglect from the side of the social state.

Modern school evolved from a need to basic reading/writing to an institution where to keep the kids while the parents worked. Soon it became obvious that the state could use this splendid opportunity for brainwashing the kids. It\s important to distinguish between a healthy and human attachment to the surrounding society, and the indoctrination of religious or political views.

The center for peer orientation is now the school and the street, while the teachers are hiding.


Pathological symbiosis vs attachment

The most common argument against homeschooling is, in fact, its most convincing defense. Homeschooled children are usually (on a US scale up to 83% compared to 23%) more mature, more socially adept, and better prepared for higher education.
No wonder homeschooled students are allegedly favored applicants of many universities. Homeschooling may hence be seen as the balancing cure to the lack of healthy parental attachment, and as a protection against unhealthy peer attachment.
However, as shown by Peter Klevius in his thesis “Pathological Symbiosis” the Swedish “social state” has managed to keep its dirty foster child trafficking outside the scope of the European Human Riughts Convention by hiding under the legal term “margin of appreciation” (see Klevius’ Angels of Antichrist 1996 & Pathological Symbiosis 2004).

Although the Swedish state now (again*) wants to use the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child as an excuse for completely denying the rights of homeschoolers, the text in the Swedish child abduction, um, protection act LVU (Act Containing Special Regulations Concerning the Care of Young Persons) – now including[5] the term “pathological symbiosis” – stays in an obvious opposition to the view expressed in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (see Klevius Pathological Symbiosis).

* As I described in Angels of Antichrist (1996) the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child was a creation of mostly socialist Swedish women who had set up the "Save the Children" organization a few years before the world's first general child protection law in 1924.

“Pathological Symbiosis” is, as already the name implies, an oxymoron. A “pathological symbiosis” is per definition parasitic, i.e. the very opposite to symbiosis. In the thesis “Pathological Symbiosis” Klevius has, as possibly the first ever, carefully traced not only the dim roots of this peculiar term but also its murky adaptation and implementation as a handy tool for robbing children. In fact, “pathological symbiosis” is a smear campaign against parental attachment, and in Sweden frequently used as a last resort for kidnapping children from parents (usually a mother) who the (usually female) welfare officer happenms to dislike (or if she has a standing order for such a child / remember that most child abductions in Sweden used to be targeting nice and unproblematic kids, i.e. what is termed on subjective grounds (see e.g. Hessle’s 1997 comparison Japan-Sweden).
Research on homeschooling reveals a number of strengths.

The cultivation and preservation of the child-parent attachment leads to considerably less delingquncy and youth criminality (Sweden has among the worst child criminality paired with perhaps the worst & most costly public school compared to e.g. their neighbour Finland which used to be in the educational top with Japan which, in turn, use to have the lowest child/youth criminality & one of the cheapest school systems). By the stealthy introduction of murky child “protection” criterions such as, for example, ”pathological symbiosis” the social state effectively contradicts the best interest of the child, by eroding parent-child attachment, not only among those targeted by the social authorities but also in general because of the widespread attitude that follows and makes parents even more reluctant to take responsibility for their kids.


A healthy attachment to the surrounding society

Parental attachment has since long been known as the most significant protector against criminality and destructive behavior.

It may also be noted that it’s pure and unfounded Utopian naivity to assume that a fictitious “soul” of the nation or society can be dictated via the schools. Life is inevitably moving and that’s the whole meaning of living . That’s why the world’s most popular toy is round (sorry American “football” and rugby fans). Attachment is the primary mechanism of cultural transmission. This is why segregation is so dangerous, no matter if it is Islamic ghettos or street gangs.
It’s a well known fact that almost all homeschooled chidren are openminded and kind towards other. To an extent that representatives for the totalitarian social state machinery actually proposes this as a weakness because the homeschooled children have to face the unhealthy children the school system has created.


Individuation- a psychological/psychiatric confusion

As shown/discussed by Klevius (1981, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1999, 2004 etc) the so called individuation process has in child psychiatry been made upside down. The baby human ought to be seen as what it is, namely an extremely egoistic individual who then, hopefully, gets rid of its state of individuation by learning to attach with others. The baby suckling the mother is a symbiotic relation between two individuals who have extremely little in common.
Unsupervised attachments to peers undermines the development of empathy. This may be beneficial from a cold business perspective but less so from a human point of view. The womb for human warmth is to be found at home, and it doesn’t have to be even female. Only an individual who is fully attached with society can perform a truly democratic opinion based on the idea of Negative Human Rights.


The Swedish proposal to definitely ban homeschooling


As noted in Angels of Antichrist 1996 the Swedish compulsory school attendancy (instead of compulsory education) already hinders most homeschooling efforts, and effectively gathers the Swedish kids into a trap for almost random abduction.

According to the proposal the possibility to fullfil compulsory school attendancy in some other way remains. This is clearly not true because "religious and philosophical reasons" are now no longer accepted. This is, however, well in line with the ECHR decision Konrad & others vs Germany, which many, including the homeschool organization ROHUS seem to have missed completely. This despite information given to their "judicial expert" by Klevius both in writing and orally!?

Apart from this it's also proposed that instead of the previous writing "special reasons" ("sarskilda skal") it should now be "extraordinarely reasons" ("synnerliga skal"). Moreover, this possibility should, according to the proposal, be used "very restrictivly".


Konrad & others vs Germany

"The Court observes in this respect that there appears to be no
consensus among the Contracting States with regard to compulsory
attendance of primary schools. While some countries permit home
education, other States provide for compulsory attendance of its State or
private schools.. In the present case, the Court notes that the German authorities and courts have carefully reasoned their decisions and mainly stressed the fact
that not only the acquisition of knowledge, but also the integration into and
first experience with society are important goals in primary school
education. The German courts found that those objectives cannot be equally
met by home education even if it allowed children to acquire the same
standard of knowledge as provided for by primary school education..
The Court considers this presumption as not being erroneous and as falling
within the Contracting States' margin of appreciation which they enjoy in
setting up and interpreting rules for their education systems."

Klevius comment: It is within this "margin of appreciation" racist, sexist, totalitarian, anti-democratic, anti human rights islam will thrive together with social state fascism (compare the Swedish LVU child "protection" act), while Negative Human Rights of the individual are squeezed away!

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Klevius vs Obama in Lorna Saltzman’s islamophobe test

Dear reader, check out for yourself if you think these proposed answers from Obama are in accordance with what he himself has said/acted! If not, pls let me know & I'll change them.

What's the difference between Peter Klevius & Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) according to Lorna Saltzman’s islamophobe test?

1 Do you favor equal rights and treatment of women and men?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, because I respect islam.

2 Do you oppose stoning of women accused of adultery?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

3 Do you favor mandatory education of girls everywhere?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

4 Do you oppose slavery and child prostitution?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

5 Do you support complete freedom of expression and the press?
No, because I hate stupid people who criticize islam

6 Do you support the right of an individual to worship in her chosen religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): A tricky one. I was born to a muslim father & adopted by another muslim, & I haven’t committed open apostasy as yet neither have I admitted being technically a muslim in accordance with that very same islam I do respect.

7 Do you oppose government- and mosque-supported anti-Semitic publications, radio, TV and textbooks?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

8 Do you oppose the wearing of burqas in public places, schools and courts?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No

9 Do you oppose segregation of the sexes in public places and houses of worship?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, because I respect islam.

10 Do you oppose the death penalty for non-Muslims and Muslims who convert to another religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

11 Do you oppose “honor” killings?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

12 Do you oppose female genital mutilation?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I love Indonesia.

13 Do you oppose forced sexual relations?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

14 Do you oppose discrimination against homosexuals?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Just a little.

15 Do you support the right to criticize religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam & hate islamophobes.

16 Do you oppose polygamy?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam.

17 Do you oppose child marriage, forced or otherwise?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

18 Do you oppose the quranic mandate to kill non-Muslims and apostates?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): This is a misinterpretation of the holy Koran. In classical Arabic (i.e. when the Arabs, as the last people on the peninsula, learned to write) it simply means that you should kill unclean dogs & pigs!

19 Do you oppose the addition of sharia courts to your country’s legal system?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam & Ingrid Matson.

20 Do you disagree with the quran which asserts the superiority of Islam to all other religions?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Not at all! Islam IS all religions!

In conclusion Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) scored well in line with his islamic roots, although not at all in line with the U.S. Constitution!

Peter Klevius, on the other hand, miserably failed this test as a 100% islamophobe.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Evil islamic slave trade/raids to India spread much like the plague

Klevius IQ turbocharged history lesson on the origin of India's islamization

As you hopefully already know (by reading Klevius non-religious, non-biased & unsponsored analysis, e.g. Origin of islam, instead of relying on the extremely distorted picture served to you by supporters/representatives/naive collaborators of the worst crime ever against humanity!) the original ideology of islam is based on slavery/rapetivism/Sharia confinement/apostasy ban. The attraction of islam lays in sex segregation, i.e. Koran's sanctioning of (infidel)racism (meaning you can "morally" justify your immoral deeds), (rapetivism)sexism (up to four wives for the maximum reproduction of new muslims + as many infidel sex slaves you like or can "possess with your right hand").

Simply put, islam is built on male sex hunger (HSA*) & Koran/Sharia hinders girls/women from escaping it. Western Human Rights gives female human beings a free choice, & this is why islamic countries have come up with their Cairo declaration on "islamic human rights", now boosted by UN which was initially created for hindering precisely such kind of fascism! And Mr X US "president" (a born muslim who hasn't dared to either confirm he is a muslim or confirm his apostasy, hence being the true opposite to the US constitution of freedom) "respects" this evil "faith" & bows its evil hate mongering representatives. Remember, evilness doesn't become less evil just because so many support it. And also remember, islam can never be democratically elected precisely because islam is AGAINST democracy! And saying you are a racist when criticizing a half black man for his lies is just another angle of evil political correctness in the wake of Western oil money. Everything evil in islam is "translated" to something "positive" no matter if it's slavery, sex slave polygamy or infidel racism.

* HSA (male biased heterosexual attraction) heavily confuses women because it's often hard to distinguish from cultural sex segregation. As a consequence many women feel obliged to perform more heterosex than they would as truly free (emancipated) beings. They are trapped like those poor slaves who were gathered in Great Zimbabwe before they were transported to the muslim/Arabic Zwahili coast mosques (from A Roots Guide 2006)!

With the above in mind you may now consider how inherently parasitic islam came to utilize old trade routes for a purely parasitic Sharia finance based onj slave trade/raids. You may have been brainwashed to think that "because slavery was common all over the place Koranic/islamic slavery wasn't an issue to bother abt. But, in fact, the opposite is true. Koran sanctions slavery, slavery in the muslim world (the slave world) never stopped before it was forced to stop by Western Enlightenment & the idea of Negative Human Rights, islamic sex segregation is absolute & sees women/girls as sex slaves confined within Sharia & apostasy ban with no right of their own to choose a non/muslim man or even to have normal contact with "infidel" men (down to such trivial things as handshaking etc). Muslim females are seen as belonging to a non/human species according to Koran/islam.

When early muslim Arab slave traders sat in their dows & let the wind transport them to Kerala, Ceylon etc. they initiated a grim parasitic alliance with powerful locals who then made slave business by catching & selling out their own (poor) people, or buying African slaves from the Swahili area etc. As a consequence of these practices the powerful Indians often converted to islam out of greed whereas the poor did it out of fear. As a result you got different castes of muslims while still having access to an endless amount of potential "infidel" slaves on the Indian sub continent (just like in Africa & elsewhere where islamic Sharia slave finance had spread). Because of the share size of India's population, islamic slave trading/rading there would be more than enough to render islam the title of the worst crime ever against humanity.

Quite the opposite to what you might have been taught the "Arabs" who created evil islam were extremely "primitive" compared to the surrounding civilizations. As Mohammed is alleged to have said: "The most unprofitable thing that eats up the wealth of a believer is building". This statement by the alleged founder of islam is in 100% agreement with Klevius analysis of islam as a purely parasitic ideology! So the PC agitation of "Arabs" as contributers to development is a double mistake. A thief with a jewellers collection ought not to be called a jeweller!

Unfortunately the eager finger pointing (boosted by an inferiority complex which was also caused by islam!) against West, true history research has been almost stalled in most universities & replaced with islam.

The rajputs were such muslim slave masters who combined it with violent military style slave raiding! It's striking how well the big & longlasting (until the Brits) Indian development crunch fits with the chronology of islam's enslavement of India. Just as in the case of Africa as Klevius has pointed out in the still unpublished A Roots Guide & partly on Klevius web pages/blogs.

In fact, many awful customs can be traced to islam, directly or indirectly, even the worst variants of the caste system!

BTW & speaking abt how evil islam abuses its opposite, i.e. Negative Human Rights, for its thugs & their jihadist deeds! During Ramadan islamic police in islamic countries use to arrest even more non/muslims than usually, whereas in Western democracies the Western police is asked not to arrest almost any muslim thugs during Ramadan, although they rarely do at other times either!

Friday, September 11, 2009

Muslim* Mr X** "president"*** (Barry, Barack, Hussein, Dunham, Obama, Soetoro, or whatever) - an accomplice to islamic terror!

Shrine of Democracy or shrine of islam?

*Born muslim & later adopted muslim
**No one knows for sure his background
***His "presidency" is to spit in the face of the U.S. constitution. He is a born muslim who hasn't sworn himself free from his muslimhood. By not having done that he avoids violating the worst crime known to islam, i.e. apostasy (i.e. leaving islam) but simultaneously he violates the U.S. constitution because islam is its very opposite, namely AGAINST, not for, freedom! A TRUE muslim can never participate in a Democratic election because islam (the worst crime ever against humanity) sees itself as superior to everything else! A true muslim vote/representation is therefore a vote/representation AGAINST democracy.


This is the man who leads the pack that has used the original islam for offending, assaulting, murdering & raping around the globe. This is also the same man Mr X "president" bows so deeply for, and the very same racist/sexist ideology he "respects"!

Wahhabism, Salafism, Qutbism etc, are all anchored in the origin of islam, which is simply medievcal Sharia finance based on slavery, rapetivism & apostasy ban.

Abd al-Wahhab: "If a person believes that a non-Muslim might go to heaven, he has become an apostate; if someone believes that it is all right to befriend or support or assist or ally oneself with infidels, he has become an apostate."

Klevius comment: We see it all the time. Islam never befriends or supports or assists or allies itself without gaining from it on the behalf of someone else! This is the inevitable destiny for a parasitic ideology. This is also why islam has NEVER made ANY scintific or technological progress. Everything that is positively ascribed to islam sooner or later turns out to be traceable to civilized people who were colonized by islam. Just check history!

Daily Times editorial 29 Aug 2009: Karachi city is actually the most dangerous city in Pakistan as far as possible violent reaction to textbooks is concerned. The madrassas (mostly Saudi funded - Klevius comment) in the city — officially 1,000; unofficially 3,000 — have the capacity to attack and kill.

Humans are weak, that’s why islamic racism (i.e. infidel racism)/sexism (i.e. rapetivism) is so appealing.

It's bottomless stupidity/ignorance not to realize that islam IS its own beginning! Moreover, by neglecting (not to say respecting) the true nature of islam one contributes to islamic terror worldwide.

In memory of known & forgotten victims of islam

Thursday, September 03, 2009

Islam is the world's fastest vanishing "faith" thanks to muslim islamophobia

The spectra of factual "religious" islamic fascism & totalitarianism is indeed wide although the origin/base is extremely narrow.

Most westernized muslims fear the true teachings in the Koran. They therefore try to distance themselves from the original true islam.

By defining the recognition of the by far worst* single** ideological crime throughout history as a "phobia" one simultaneously defines a majority of muslims as islamophobes, simply because of their "moderation" i.e. their distancing themselves from these basic & original Koranic tenets.

* Counted in suffering & deaths. Although the early illiterate jihadists (incl. Muhammed) weren't able to leave any reliable records abt their crimes, the surrounding civilizations did record their atrocities to some extent. Later on there is even more evidence for a movement (islam from 'silm', meaning compromise, or avoidance of conflict, i.e. what you usually do at gun point) that first violently & later culturally (& violently) sponged on others, mainly through slavery (incl sex slavery), i.e. the origin of islamic Sharia finance. The estimates of the costs of islam's slavery through 1400 yrs vary considerably but even the lowest ones are more than enough for legitimizing the award title above.

** "Islamic diversity" is, of course, also an oxymoron. Rape victims, victims of conventional slavery (due to the amount of slaves islam IS 'conventional' slavery) & those in racist dhimmitude under islamic Sharia, may express a variety of"diverse" reactions to their submission under islamic totalitarian fascism. However, islam's basic tenets are simplistic racist infidel despise (now in the form of calling them "islamophobes") & sexist rapetivism (treating females as a different & segregated species in line with sex slavery for the purpose of sexually satisfying muslim males & culturally satifying islam's need of more muslims).