Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Klevius New Year wish: Get rid of dangerous racist/sexist Mideast monotheisms once & for all! Get global & anti-sexist!
Ever thought abt why there are over a billion muslims but less than 10 million jews?
Institutionalized Mideast rapetivism, i.e. the curse of monotheism, started (Mazdaism - like Christianity - isn't monotheist) with Jewish circumcision (for the purpose of boosting population growth & keeping them together & separate from others) & ended as Judeo-islam, the worst crime ever against humanity. Israel-Palestine isn´t abt Judaism vs islam but Judeo-islam vs Western freedom (read Negative Human rights). The islamofascists problem with Israel isn´t that it´s Jewish but that it´s Western! The real jews in Israel don´t differ that much from real muslims! Yes, Israel is a secular Western colony in the monotheist Mideast darkness, & equally disturbing as were the Western colonies in Africa who fought the Arabic/islamic slavetrade/rapetivism/genocides that had terrorized the continent for more than thousand years - & still does.
The rose that has blossomed in Mideast isn't Jewish but the "Western" civilization based on individual freedom and human rights! And the fighting is caused by islamic jihadism!
And yes, it's an open question whether Europe would have ever been in the early lead of the industrial revolution without the pressure from Judeo-islam (i.e. islamofascism) that created rigid Catholicism, which, in turn, created the protest movement that opende up for technology/industrialization. And it's equally hypothetical whether Europe would ever have been so evil as it sometimes became without that very same pressure!
When the Germans mass murdered some six million Jews (most of who were no real but ethnic Jews) it was the culmination of a racism that Judeo-islamic slave finance had triggered in Medieval time. Moreover, just like today, the German leadership applauded & supported real Judeo-islam, i.e. islamofascism!
You racist/sexist islamofascist (or supporter)! What if the industrial revolution had started in Africa?! "Western" doesn't mean European but technological development (btw Japan is far ahead of Europe!) & enlightenment moron! Read this & try to cure your ignorance!
Origin of islam
(intellectual copyright Klevius/KLEVUX)
Thursday, December 04, 2008
WARNING! Born antifascist, UN is now, 60 years later, the main defender of (islamo)fascism - by the help of spineless idiots!
Saudi Arabia, the homeland of islam, the worst crime ever against humanity, & the most intolerant, hate mongering sexist & racist nation in the world (btw, 15 of the 19 Wahhabi Arabs of the 9/11 attacks were Saudis following Saudi-born Osama bin Laden) has now taken over the institution that was created precisely as a protection against such nations & movements!
In November 24, 2008, U.N. passed a draft resolution against "defamation of islam", initiated by Saudi Arabia + 56 other islamofascist member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC).
The propaanda background was the 2005 Danish cartoon "controversy" which started almost half a year after the images of Muhammad were first published, but just before the UNHCR was about to consider the OIC's resolution on "Combating Defamation of islam". According to the National Secular Society in its Memorandum to the UK Parliament "the Danish cartoon crisis was manufactured…to exploit sensitivities around racial discrimination and to promote (or even exaggerate) the notion of 'Islamophobia' in order to restrict possibilities for open discussion or criticism of Islam….[M]easures calling for legislation banning 'defamation of religion' …. aim to remove religion, especially Islam, from public scrutiny and public debate".
A meeting, closed to the press, with Ban Ki-moon to which General Assembly President "Father" Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann invited member states, secretly discussed islamofascist Abdullah's initiatives. Ban Ki-moon's envoy Terje Roed Larsen, keen on Saudi funding, seems to have been Saudi Abdullah's eager errand boy in this deeply embarrassing & evil matter.
When Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann was asked about the "defamation of islam" resolution first he said he'd never heard abt it. However, when asked what he thought abt a resolution that violated freedom of expression, he said "Defamation of religion should be banned".
The OIC bloc of Islamic nations also demands us to stop using the word ‘islam’ in reports on islamic terrorism!
Klevius comment: extreme reality-avoidance
Indite islam! Fascism is a crime in most of the free, non-islamic world!
And make the story abt Ayaan Hirsi Ali compulsory teaching at school. And if you haven’t time enough, remove islam propaganda from the curricullum!
When will the world wake up? Too late again?!